Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth
This study evaluated the 10-year clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement placed in posterior permanent teeth by means of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant wome...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2011-04, Vol.15 (2), p.265-271 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 271 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 265 |
| container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Zanata, Regia Luzia Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra Lauris, José Roberto Pereira Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima |
| description | This study evaluated the 10-year clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement placed in posterior permanent teeth by means of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant women (mean decayed teeth = 9.8 ± 5.5). Examinations were performed at 1-, 2-, and 10-year intervals according to ART criteria. In the last evaluation, the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were also used. After 10 years, 129 restorations (47.1%) were evaluated and achieved a cumulative survival rate of 49.0% (SE 7.2%). The 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations assessed using the ART criteria were 65.2% (SE 7.3%) and 30.6% (SE 9.9%), respectively. This difference was significant (jackknife SE of difference;
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3055991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>904471413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ee3f44f0cdcfb57cfba0d66b86b2edbcf83557528fafd7496cdca563f97b5f703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LJDEQhoPssjO6-wO8SOPFU9xK56v7IoziFwiCjOeQ7k60h57OmHQP-u8tHXXdBdlLJVBPvak3LyG7DA4ZgP6dsBSCApQUuC7o4xaZMsEV5Vqzb6_3nKqyYBOyndICgAml-Q8yyfEGQsOUHM9dT5-cjVka47pd2y4LPpvdzLPo0hCiHdrQp6zts5WLS9u7fshWIQ0utiFmg3PD_U_y3dsuuV9v5w65PTudn1zQq-vzy5PZFa2lUgN1jnshPNRN7SupsVholKoKVeWuqWpfcCm1zAtvfaNFqRC0UnFf6kp6DXyHHG10V2O1dE2Nq0TbmVVslzY-mWBb83enb-_NXVgbDlKWJUOBgzeBGB5GtGeWbapd16GtMCZTghCaCcb_SxZSMw6aF0ju_0Muwhh7_AeElEJLMkeIbaA6hpSi8x9LMzAvSZpNkgaTNC9Jmkec2fvs9mPiPToE8g2QsNXfufjn5a9VnwEAJKtq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>856635552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zanata, Regia Luzia ; Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari ; Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra ; Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ; Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima</creator><creatorcontrib>Zanata, Regia Luzia ; Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari ; Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra ; Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ; Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the 10-year clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement placed in posterior permanent teeth by means of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant women (mean decayed teeth = 9.8 ± 5.5). Examinations were performed at 1-, 2-, and 10-year intervals according to ART criteria. In the last evaluation, the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were also used. After 10 years, 129 restorations (47.1%) were evaluated and achieved a cumulative survival rate of 49.0% (SE 7.2%). The 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations assessed using the ART criteria were 65.2% (SE 7.3%) and 30.6% (SE 9.9%), respectively. This difference was significant (jackknife SE of difference;
p
< 0.05). Using the USPHS criteria, the 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations were 86.5% and 57.6%, respectively. The primary causes of failure were total loss (9.3%) and marginal defects (5.4%). The survival rates observed, especially for the single-surface restorations, confirm the potential of the ART approach for restoring and saving posterior permanent teeth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20140470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Actuarial Analysis ; Bicuspid ; Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ; Dental Cavity Preparation - classification ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dentistry ; Dentition, Permanent ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; Humans ; Lost to Follow-Up ; Medicine ; Mobile Health Units ; Molar ; Observer Variation ; Original ; Original Article ; Pregnancy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2011-04, Vol.15 (2), p.265-271</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ee3f44f0cdcfb57cfba0d66b86b2edbcf83557528fafd7496cdca563f97b5f703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ee3f44f0cdcfb57cfba0d66b86b2edbcf83557528fafd7496cdca563f97b5f703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20140470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zanata, Regia Luzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima</creatorcontrib><title>Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the 10-year clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement placed in posterior permanent teeth by means of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant women (mean decayed teeth = 9.8 ± 5.5). Examinations were performed at 1-, 2-, and 10-year intervals according to ART criteria. In the last evaluation, the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were also used. After 10 years, 129 restorations (47.1%) were evaluated and achieved a cumulative survival rate of 49.0% (SE 7.2%). The 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations assessed using the ART criteria were 65.2% (SE 7.3%) and 30.6% (SE 9.9%), respectively. This difference was significant (jackknife SE of difference;
p
< 0.05). Using the USPHS criteria, the 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations were 86.5% and 57.6%, respectively. The primary causes of failure were total loss (9.3%) and marginal defects (5.4%). The survival rates observed, especially for the single-surface restorations, confirm the potential of the ART approach for restoring and saving posterior permanent teeth.</description><subject>Actuarial Analysis</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment</subject><subject>Dental Cavity Preparation - classification</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentition, Permanent</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lost to Follow-Up</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mobile Health Units</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LJDEQhoPssjO6-wO8SOPFU9xK56v7IoziFwiCjOeQ7k60h57OmHQP-u8tHXXdBdlLJVBPvak3LyG7DA4ZgP6dsBSCApQUuC7o4xaZMsEV5Vqzb6_3nKqyYBOyndICgAml-Q8yyfEGQsOUHM9dT5-cjVka47pd2y4LPpvdzLPo0hCiHdrQp6zts5WLS9u7fshWIQ0utiFmg3PD_U_y3dsuuV9v5w65PTudn1zQq-vzy5PZFa2lUgN1jnshPNRN7SupsVholKoKVeWuqWpfcCm1zAtvfaNFqRC0UnFf6kp6DXyHHG10V2O1dE2Nq0TbmVVslzY-mWBb83enb-_NXVgbDlKWJUOBgzeBGB5GtGeWbapd16GtMCZTghCaCcb_SxZSMw6aF0ju_0Muwhh7_AeElEJLMkeIbaA6hpSi8x9LMzAvSZpNkgaTNC9Jmkec2fvs9mPiPToE8g2QsNXfufjn5a9VnwEAJKtq</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Zanata, Regia Luzia</creator><creator>Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari</creator><creator>Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra</creator><creator>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</creator><creator>Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth</title><author>Zanata, Regia Luzia ; Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari ; Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra ; Lauris, José Roberto Pereira ; Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-ee3f44f0cdcfb57cfba0d66b86b2edbcf83557528fafd7496cdca563f97b5f703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Actuarial Analysis</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment</topic><topic>Dental Cavity Preparation - classification</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentition, Permanent</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lost to Follow-Up</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mobile Health Units</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zanata, Regia Luzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zanata, Regia Luzia</au><au>Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari</au><au>Freitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra</au><au>Lauris, José Roberto Pereira</au><au>Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>265-271</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the 10-year clinical performance of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement placed in posterior permanent teeth by means of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. One operator placed 167 single- and 107 multiple-surface restorations in 43 high-risk caries pregnant women (mean decayed teeth = 9.8 ± 5.5). Examinations were performed at 1-, 2-, and 10-year intervals according to ART criteria. In the last evaluation, the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were also used. After 10 years, 129 restorations (47.1%) were evaluated and achieved a cumulative survival rate of 49.0% (SE 7.2%). The 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations assessed using the ART criteria were 65.2% (SE 7.3%) and 30.6% (SE 9.9%), respectively. This difference was significant (jackknife SE of difference;
p
< 0.05). Using the USPHS criteria, the 10-year survival of single- and multiple-surface ART restorations were 86.5% and 57.6%, respectively. The primary causes of failure were total loss (9.3%) and marginal defects (5.4%). The survival rates observed, especially for the single-surface restorations, confirm the potential of the ART approach for restoring and saving posterior permanent teeth.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20140470</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1432-6981 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2011-04, Vol.15 (2), p.265-271 |
| issn | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3055991 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Actuarial Analysis Bicuspid Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Dental Cavity Preparation - classification Dental Restoration Failure Dentistry Dentition, Permanent Female Follow-Up Studies Glass Ionomer Cements Humans Lost to Follow-Up Medicine Mobile Health Units Molar Observer Variation Original Original Article Pregnancy Young Adult |
| title | Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ten-year%20survival%20of%20ART%20restorations%20in%20permanent%20posterior%20teeth&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Zanata,%20Regia%20Luzia&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=265-271&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-009-0378-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E904471413%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=856635552&rft_id=info:pmid/20140470&rfr_iscdi=true |