Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: contributions of syntax and transcription to translation

Children in grades one to four completed two sentence construction tasks: (a) Write one complete sentence about a topic prompt (sentence integrity, Study 1); and (b) Integrate two sentences into one complete sentence without changing meaning (sentence combining, Study 2). Most, but not all, children...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reading & writing 2011-02, Vol.24 (2), p.151-182
Hauptverfasser: Berninger, Virginia W., Nagy, William, Beers, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Reading & writing
container_volume 24
creator Berninger, Virginia W.
Nagy, William
Beers, Scott
description Children in grades one to four completed two sentence construction tasks: (a) Write one complete sentence about a topic prompt (sentence integrity, Study 1); and (b) Integrate two sentences into one complete sentence without changing meaning (sentence combining, Study 2). Most, but not all, children in first through fourth grade could write just one sentence. The sentence integrity task was not correlated with sentence combining until fourth grade, when in multiple regression, sentence integrity explained unique variance in sentence combining, along with spelling. Word-level skills (morphology in first and spelling in second through fourth grade) consistently explained unique variance in sentence combining. Thus, many beginning writers have syntactic knowledge of what constitutes a complete sentence, but not until fourth grade do both syntax and transcription contribute uniquely to flexible translation of ideas into the syntax of a written sentence. In Study 3, eleven syntactic categories were identified in single- and multi- sentence composing from second to fifth grade. Complex clauses (independent plus subordinate) occurred more often on single-sentence composing, but single independent clauses occurred more often on multi-sentence composing. For multi-sentence text, more single, independent clauses were produced by pen than keyboard in grades 3 to 7. The most frequent category of complex clauses in multi-sentence texts varied with genre (relative for essays and subordinate for narratives). Thus, in addition to syntax-level sentence construction and word-level transcription, amount of translation (number of sentences), mode of transcription, and genre for multiple sentence text also influence translation of ideas into written language of child writers. Results of these studies employing descriptive linguistic analyses are discussed in reference to cognitive theory of writing development.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3048336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ914702</ericid><sourcerecordid>1826166727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-ed299f658134764454d23cbb6ade81580cdd07b4baca9f556d79118accba21463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6AIJI4UY3pblfXAjSjDcG3Og6pFKpngzVSZukdHrna_gEvpdPYl1mWmdAVyHn_85_TsIPwEMEnyMIxYuMEKKshgjWCnNc72-BFWKC1FBBdhusoMK4pkKII3Av53MIIZaU3AVHGBFJJGcr8HN95vu2-pZ8cSn_-v6jsjHkkgZbfAyVCW2V3LVS7Krsw6Z3VXahuGBdnrGb0Hboi6-vmKq4i5JfTlRJvhkmKs9e-1DMxexQkgnZJr-bLUpcCr2ZrvfBnc702T24PI_B5zcnn9bv6tOPb9-vX5_WlmFcatdipTrOJCJUcEoZbTGxTcNN6yRiEtq2haKhjbFGdYzxViiEpLG2MRhRTo7Bq8V3NzRb19px_WR6vUt-a9JeR-P1dSX4M72JXzWBVBIyGTy9NEjxy-By0Vufret7E1wcslYQQ0UUZiP57L8kkpgjzgUWI_rkBnoehxTGj9BSYMQVhniE0ALZFHNOrjtsjaCe8qKXvOgxL3rKi96PPY__fu6h4yogI_BoAVzy9iCffFCIinkmXuQ8SmHj0p_F_j30NzhS3B0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872169202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: contributions of syntax and transcription to translation</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Berninger, Virginia W. ; Nagy, William ; Beers, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Berninger, Virginia W. ; Nagy, William ; Beers, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Children in grades one to four completed two sentence construction tasks: (a) Write one complete sentence about a topic prompt (sentence integrity, Study 1); and (b) Integrate two sentences into one complete sentence without changing meaning (sentence combining, Study 2). Most, but not all, children in first through fourth grade could write just one sentence. The sentence integrity task was not correlated with sentence combining until fourth grade, when in multiple regression, sentence integrity explained unique variance in sentence combining, along with spelling. Word-level skills (morphology in first and spelling in second through fourth grade) consistently explained unique variance in sentence combining. Thus, many beginning writers have syntactic knowledge of what constitutes a complete sentence, but not until fourth grade do both syntax and transcription contribute uniquely to flexible translation of ideas into the syntax of a written sentence. In Study 3, eleven syntactic categories were identified in single- and multi- sentence composing from second to fifth grade. Complex clauses (independent plus subordinate) occurred more often on single-sentence composing, but single independent clauses occurred more often on multi-sentence composing. For multi-sentence text, more single, independent clauses were produced by pen than keyboard in grades 3 to 7. The most frequent category of complex clauses in multi-sentence texts varied with genre (relative for essays and subordinate for narratives). Thus, in addition to syntax-level sentence construction and word-level transcription, amount of translation (number of sentences), mode of transcription, and genre for multiple sentence text also influence translation of ideas into written language of child writers. Results of these studies employing descriptive linguistic analyses are discussed in reference to cognitive theory of writing development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21383865</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REWRE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Child development ; Clauses ; Cognitive development ; Cognitive Processes ; Construction (Process) ; Descriptive Linguistics ; Education ; Elementary Education ; Elementary school students ; Epistemology ; Genre ; Grade 1 ; Grade 2 ; Grade 3 ; Grade 4 ; Grade 5 ; Handwriting ; Integrity ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Intermediate Grades ; Language Acquisition ; Language and Literature ; Language proficiency ; Linguistics ; Literacy ; Literary Genres ; Morphology ; Neurology ; Oral Language ; Psycholinguistics ; Sentence Structure ; Sentences ; Social Sciences ; Spelling ; Syntactic structures ; Syntax ; Task Analysis ; Theoretical linguistics ; Transcription ; Transformational Generative Grammar ; Translation ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Processes ; Written Language ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Reading &amp; writing, 2011-02, Vol.24 (2), p.151-182</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-ed299f658134764454d23cbb6ade81580cdd07b4baca9f556d79118accba21463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-ed299f658134764454d23cbb6ade81580cdd07b4baca9f556d79118accba21463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ914702$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21383865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berninger, Virginia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: contributions of syntax and transcription to translation</title><title>Reading &amp; writing</title><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><description>Children in grades one to four completed two sentence construction tasks: (a) Write one complete sentence about a topic prompt (sentence integrity, Study 1); and (b) Integrate two sentences into one complete sentence without changing meaning (sentence combining, Study 2). Most, but not all, children in first through fourth grade could write just one sentence. The sentence integrity task was not correlated with sentence combining until fourth grade, when in multiple regression, sentence integrity explained unique variance in sentence combining, along with spelling. Word-level skills (morphology in first and spelling in second through fourth grade) consistently explained unique variance in sentence combining. Thus, many beginning writers have syntactic knowledge of what constitutes a complete sentence, but not until fourth grade do both syntax and transcription contribute uniquely to flexible translation of ideas into the syntax of a written sentence. In Study 3, eleven syntactic categories were identified in single- and multi- sentence composing from second to fifth grade. Complex clauses (independent plus subordinate) occurred more often on single-sentence composing, but single independent clauses occurred more often on multi-sentence composing. For multi-sentence text, more single, independent clauses were produced by pen than keyboard in grades 3 to 7. The most frequent category of complex clauses in multi-sentence texts varied with genre (relative for essays and subordinate for narratives). Thus, in addition to syntax-level sentence construction and word-level transcription, amount of translation (number of sentences), mode of transcription, and genre for multiple sentence text also influence translation of ideas into written language of child writers. Results of these studies employing descriptive linguistic analyses are discussed in reference to cognitive theory of writing development.</description><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Clauses</subject><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Construction (Process)</subject><subject>Descriptive Linguistics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elementary Education</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Grade 2</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Handwriting</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Intermediate Grades</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language and Literature</subject><subject>Language proficiency</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literary Genres</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Sentence Structure</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Spelling</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Theoretical linguistics</subject><subject>Transcription</subject><subject>Transformational Generative Grammar</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Processes</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0922-4777</issn><issn>1573-0905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6AIJI4UY3pblfXAjSjDcG3Og6pFKpngzVSZukdHrna_gEvpdPYl1mWmdAVyHn_85_TsIPwEMEnyMIxYuMEKKshgjWCnNc72-BFWKC1FBBdhusoMK4pkKII3Av53MIIZaU3AVHGBFJJGcr8HN95vu2-pZ8cSn_-v6jsjHkkgZbfAyVCW2V3LVS7Krsw6Z3VXahuGBdnrGb0Hboi6-vmKq4i5JfTlRJvhkmKs9e-1DMxexQkgnZJr-bLUpcCr2ZrvfBnc702T24PI_B5zcnn9bv6tOPb9-vX5_WlmFcatdipTrOJCJUcEoZbTGxTcNN6yRiEtq2haKhjbFGdYzxViiEpLG2MRhRTo7Bq8V3NzRb19px_WR6vUt-a9JeR-P1dSX4M72JXzWBVBIyGTy9NEjxy-By0Vufret7E1wcslYQQ0UUZiP57L8kkpgjzgUWI_rkBnoehxTGj9BSYMQVhniE0ALZFHNOrjtsjaCe8qKXvOgxL3rKi96PPY__fu6h4yogI_BoAVzy9iCffFCIinkmXuQ8SmHj0p_F_j30NzhS3B0</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Berninger, Virginia W.</creator><creator>Nagy, William</creator><creator>Beers, Scott</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: contributions of syntax and transcription to translation</title><author>Berninger, Virginia W. ; Nagy, William ; Beers, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-ed299f658134764454d23cbb6ade81580cdd07b4baca9f556d79118accba21463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Clauses</topic><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Construction (Process)</topic><topic>Descriptive Linguistics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elementary Education</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Grade 2</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Handwriting</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Intermediate Grades</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language and Literature</topic><topic>Language proficiency</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literary Genres</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Sentence Structure</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Spelling</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Theoretical linguistics</topic><topic>Transcription</topic><topic>Transformational Generative Grammar</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Processes</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berninger, Virginia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagy, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beers, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Reading &amp; writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berninger, Virginia W.</au><au>Nagy, William</au><au>Beers, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ914702</ericid><atitle>Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: contributions of syntax and transcription to translation</atitle><jtitle>Reading &amp; writing</jtitle><stitle>Read Writ</stitle><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>151-182</pages><issn>0922-4777</issn><eissn>1573-0905</eissn><coden>REWRE8</coden><abstract>Children in grades one to four completed two sentence construction tasks: (a) Write one complete sentence about a topic prompt (sentence integrity, Study 1); and (b) Integrate two sentences into one complete sentence without changing meaning (sentence combining, Study 2). Most, but not all, children in first through fourth grade could write just one sentence. The sentence integrity task was not correlated with sentence combining until fourth grade, when in multiple regression, sentence integrity explained unique variance in sentence combining, along with spelling. Word-level skills (morphology in first and spelling in second through fourth grade) consistently explained unique variance in sentence combining. Thus, many beginning writers have syntactic knowledge of what constitutes a complete sentence, but not until fourth grade do both syntax and transcription contribute uniquely to flexible translation of ideas into the syntax of a written sentence. In Study 3, eleven syntactic categories were identified in single- and multi- sentence composing from second to fifth grade. Complex clauses (independent plus subordinate) occurred more often on single-sentence composing, but single independent clauses occurred more often on multi-sentence composing. For multi-sentence text, more single, independent clauses were produced by pen than keyboard in grades 3 to 7. The most frequent category of complex clauses in multi-sentence texts varied with genre (relative for essays and subordinate for narratives). Thus, in addition to syntax-level sentence construction and word-level transcription, amount of translation (number of sentences), mode of transcription, and genre for multiple sentence text also influence translation of ideas into written language of child writers. Results of these studies employing descriptive linguistic analyses are discussed in reference to cognitive theory of writing development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>21383865</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0922-4777
ispartof Reading & writing, 2011-02, Vol.24 (2), p.151-182
issn 0922-4777
1573-0905
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3048336
source Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Child development
Clauses
Cognitive development
Cognitive Processes
Construction (Process)
Descriptive Linguistics
Education
Elementary Education
Elementary school students
Epistemology
Genre
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Handwriting
Integrity
Interdisciplinary Approach
Intermediate Grades
Language Acquisition
Language and Literature
Language proficiency
Linguistics
Literacy
Literary Genres
Morphology
Neurology
Oral Language
Psycholinguistics
Sentence Structure
Sentences
Social Sciences
Spelling
Syntactic structures
Syntax
Task Analysis
Theoretical linguistics
Transcription
Transformational Generative Grammar
Translation
Writing (Composition)
Writing Instruction
Writing Processes
Written Language
Young Children
title Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: contributions of syntax and transcription to translation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A20%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Child%20writers%E2%80%99%20construction%20and%20reconstruction%20of%20single%20sentences%20and%20construction%20of%20multi-sentence%20texts:%20contributions%20of%20syntax%20and%20transcription%20to%20translation&rft.jtitle=Reading%20&%20writing&rft.au=Berninger,%20Virginia%20W.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=151-182&rft.issn=0922-4777&rft.eissn=1573-0905&rft.coden=REWRE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11145-010-9262-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826166727%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872169202&rft_id=info:pmid/21383865&rft_ericid=EJ914702&rfr_iscdi=true