Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Choosing the most suitable treatment for scoliosis relies heavily on accurate and reproducible Cobb angle measurement from successive radiographs. The objective is to reduce variability of Cobb angle measurement by reducing user intervention and bias. Custom software to increase automation of the Co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of digital imaging 2008-06, Vol.21 (2), p.208-218 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 218 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 208 |
container_title | Journal of digital imaging |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Allen, Shannon Parent, Eric Khorasani, Maziyar Hill, Douglas L. Lou, Edmond Raso, James V. |
description | Choosing the most suitable treatment for scoliosis relies heavily on accurate and reproducible Cobb angle measurement from successive radiographs. The objective is to reduce variability of Cobb angle measurement by reducing user intervention and bias. Custom software to increase automation of the Cobb angle measurement from posteroanterior radiographs was developed using active shape models. Validity and reliability of the automated system against a manual and semiautomated measurement method was conducted by two examiners each performing measurements on three occasions from a test set (
N
= 22). A training set (
N
= 47) of radiographs representative of curves seen in a scoliosis clinic was used to train the software to recognize vertebrae from T4 to L4. Images with a maximum Cobb angle between 20° and 50°, excluding surgical cases, were selected for training and test sets. Automated Cobb angles were calculated using best-fit slopes of the detected vertebrae endplates. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) showed high intraexaminer (ICC > 0.90, SEM 2°–3°) and interexaminer (ICC > 0.82, SEM 2°–4°), but poor intermethod reliability (ICC = 0.30, SEM 8°–9°). The automated method underestimated large curves. The reliability improved (ICC = 0.70, SEM 4°–5°) with exclusion of the four largest curves (>40°) in the test set. The automated method was reliable for moderate-sized curves, and did detect vertebrae in larger curves with a modified training set of larger curves. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3043859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70778109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-39ef83605ab9b874d77b6581a5daa88ff42b54ddd62d08d9f5613ae888ec9d0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxomxsdvqH-DFEA_exgIzA4-LyWZTa5M2GqvGG2EGZoeGHVZga3r0Py-T3Vg18cTjvR8f78uH0EtK3lJCxFmihAmoSllJwnglnqAF5RQqwcT3p2hBQIqKAshjdJLSLSFUtKJ5ho6pqBvCGCzQr2_aO-PyPdaTwZ-td7pzfr6HAS_77O4svhn11uLrYKxPeAgR59Hi85TdRmcXpplcha7Dy2ntLXYT_lT6dsoJ_3R5xEsTvE19aeBL48JW59H1-KYP3oXk0nN0NGif7IvDeYq-vj__svpQXX28uFwtr6q-4SJXtbQD1Jy0upMdiMYI0fEWqG6N1gDD0LCubYwxnBkCRg4tp7W2AGB7aUhfn6J3e93trttYM-8TtVfbWGzEexW0U39PJjeqdbhTNWlqaGUReHMQiOHHzqasNq7Y8l5PNuySEkQIoGQGX_8D3oZdnIo5xSgHyWlLC0T3UB9DStEOvzehRM3pqn26ai7ndJUob179aeHxxSHOArA9kMpoWtv4-PP_VR8ACzCybQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216896151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Allen, Shannon ; Parent, Eric ; Khorasani, Maziyar ; Hill, Douglas L. ; Lou, Edmond ; Raso, James V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Shannon ; Parent, Eric ; Khorasani, Maziyar ; Hill, Douglas L. ; Lou, Edmond ; Raso, James V.</creatorcontrib><description>Choosing the most suitable treatment for scoliosis relies heavily on accurate and reproducible Cobb angle measurement from successive radiographs. The objective is to reduce variability of Cobb angle measurement by reducing user intervention and bias. Custom software to increase automation of the Cobb angle measurement from posteroanterior radiographs was developed using active shape models. Validity and reliability of the automated system against a manual and semiautomated measurement method was conducted by two examiners each performing measurements on three occasions from a test set (
N
= 22). A training set (
N
= 47) of radiographs representative of curves seen in a scoliosis clinic was used to train the software to recognize vertebrae from T4 to L4. Images with a maximum Cobb angle between 20° and 50°, excluding surgical cases, were selected for training and test sets. Automated Cobb angles were calculated using best-fit slopes of the detected vertebrae endplates. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) showed high intraexaminer (ICC > 0.90, SEM 2°–3°) and interexaminer (ICC > 0.82, SEM 2°–4°), but poor intermethod reliability (ICC = 0.30, SEM 8°–9°). The automated method underestimated large curves. The reliability improved (ICC = 0.70, SEM 4°–5°) with exclusion of the four largest curves (>40°) in the test set. The automated method was reliable for moderate-sized curves, and did detect vertebrae in larger curves with a modified training set of larger curves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-1889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-727X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17340228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Humans ; Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Models, Anatomic ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging ; Software</subject><ispartof>Journal of digital imaging, 2008-06, Vol.21 (2), p.208-218</ispartof><rights>Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2007</rights><rights>Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-39ef83605ab9b874d77b6581a5daa88ff42b54ddd62d08d9f5613ae888ec9d0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-39ef83605ab9b874d77b6581a5daa88ff42b54ddd62d08d9f5613ae888ec9d0c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043859/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043859/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17340228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parent, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorasani, Maziyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Edmond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raso, James V.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</title><title>Journal of digital imaging</title><addtitle>J Digit Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>J Digit Imaging</addtitle><description>Choosing the most suitable treatment for scoliosis relies heavily on accurate and reproducible Cobb angle measurement from successive radiographs. The objective is to reduce variability of Cobb angle measurement by reducing user intervention and bias. Custom software to increase automation of the Cobb angle measurement from posteroanterior radiographs was developed using active shape models. Validity and reliability of the automated system against a manual and semiautomated measurement method was conducted by two examiners each performing measurements on three occasions from a test set (
N
= 22). A training set (
N
= 47) of radiographs representative of curves seen in a scoliosis clinic was used to train the software to recognize vertebrae from T4 to L4. Images with a maximum Cobb angle between 20° and 50°, excluding surgical cases, were selected for training and test sets. Automated Cobb angles were calculated using best-fit slopes of the detected vertebrae endplates. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) showed high intraexaminer (ICC > 0.90, SEM 2°–3°) and interexaminer (ICC > 0.82, SEM 2°–4°), but poor intermethod reliability (ICC = 0.30, SEM 8°–9°). The automated method underestimated large curves. The reliability improved (ICC = 0.70, SEM 4°–5°) with exclusion of the four largest curves (>40°) in the test set. The automated method was reliable for moderate-sized curves, and did detect vertebrae in larger curves with a modified training set of larger curves.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0897-1889</issn><issn>1618-727X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFvFCEUxomxsdvqH-DFEA_exgIzA4-LyWZTa5M2GqvGG2EGZoeGHVZga3r0Py-T3Vg18cTjvR8f78uH0EtK3lJCxFmihAmoSllJwnglnqAF5RQqwcT3p2hBQIqKAshjdJLSLSFUtKJ5ho6pqBvCGCzQr2_aO-PyPdaTwZ-td7pzfr6HAS_77O4svhn11uLrYKxPeAgR59Hi85TdRmcXpplcha7Dy2ntLXYT_lT6dsoJ_3R5xEsTvE19aeBL48JW59H1-KYP3oXk0nN0NGif7IvDeYq-vj__svpQXX28uFwtr6q-4SJXtbQD1Jy0upMdiMYI0fEWqG6N1gDD0LCubYwxnBkCRg4tp7W2AGB7aUhfn6J3e93trttYM-8TtVfbWGzEexW0U39PJjeqdbhTNWlqaGUReHMQiOHHzqasNq7Y8l5PNuySEkQIoGQGX_8D3oZdnIo5xSgHyWlLC0T3UB9DStEOvzehRM3pqn26ai7ndJUob179aeHxxSHOArA9kMpoWtv4-PP_VR8ACzCybQ</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Allen, Shannon</creator><creator>Parent, Eric</creator><creator>Khorasani, Maziyar</creator><creator>Hill, Douglas L.</creator><creator>Lou, Edmond</creator><creator>Raso, James V.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</title><author>Allen, Shannon ; Parent, Eric ; Khorasani, Maziyar ; Hill, Douglas L. ; Lou, Edmond ; Raso, James V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-39ef83605ab9b874d77b6581a5daa88ff42b54ddd62d08d9f5613ae888ec9d0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parent, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorasani, Maziyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Edmond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raso, James V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of digital imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Shannon</au><au>Parent, Eric</au><au>Khorasani, Maziyar</au><au>Hill, Douglas L.</au><au>Lou, Edmond</au><au>Raso, James V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of digital imaging</jtitle><stitle>J Digit Imaging</stitle><addtitle>J Digit Imaging</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>208-218</pages><issn>0897-1889</issn><eissn>1618-727X</eissn><abstract>Choosing the most suitable treatment for scoliosis relies heavily on accurate and reproducible Cobb angle measurement from successive radiographs. The objective is to reduce variability of Cobb angle measurement by reducing user intervention and bias. Custom software to increase automation of the Cobb angle measurement from posteroanterior radiographs was developed using active shape models. Validity and reliability of the automated system against a manual and semiautomated measurement method was conducted by two examiners each performing measurements on three occasions from a test set (
N
= 22). A training set (
N
= 47) of radiographs representative of curves seen in a scoliosis clinic was used to train the software to recognize vertebrae from T4 to L4. Images with a maximum Cobb angle between 20° and 50°, excluding surgical cases, were selected for training and test sets. Automated Cobb angles were calculated using best-fit slopes of the detected vertebrae endplates. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) showed high intraexaminer (ICC > 0.90, SEM 2°–3°) and interexaminer (ICC > 0.82, SEM 2°–4°), but poor intermethod reliability (ICC = 0.30, SEM 8°–9°). The automated method underestimated large curves. The reliability improved (ICC = 0.70, SEM 4°–5°) with exclusion of the four largest curves (>40°) in the test set. The automated method was reliable for moderate-sized curves, and did detect vertebrae in larger curves with a modified training set of larger curves.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>17340228</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-1889 |
ispartof | Journal of digital imaging, 2008-06, Vol.21 (2), p.208-218 |
issn | 0897-1889 1618-727X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3043859 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Humans Imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Models, Anatomic Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiology Reproducibility of Results Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging Software |
title | Validity and Reliability of Active Shape Models for the Estimation of Cobb Angle in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20Reliability%20of%20Active%20Shape%20Models%20for%20the%20Estimation%20of%20Cobb%20Angle%20in%20Patients%20with%20Adolescent%20Idiopathic%20Scoliosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20digital%20imaging&rft.au=Allen,%20Shannon&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=208-218&rft.issn=0897-1889&rft.eissn=1618-727X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10278-007-9026-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70778109%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216896151&rft_id=info:pmid/17340228&rfr_iscdi=true |