Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues
Research shows that participants shoot armed Blacks more frequently and quickly than armed Whites, but make don't-shoot responses more frequently and quickly for unarmed Whites than unarmed Blacks. We argue that this bias reflects the perception of threat — specifically, threat associated with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental social psychology 2011, Vol.47 (1), p.184-189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 189 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 184 |
container_title | Journal of experimental social psychology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Correll, Joshua Wittenbrink, Bernd Park, Bernadette Judd, Charles M. Goyle, Arina |
description | Research shows that participants shoot armed Blacks more frequently and quickly than armed Whites, but make don't-shoot responses more frequently and quickly for unarmed Whites than unarmed Blacks. We argue that this bias reflects the perception of threat — specifically, threat associated with Black males. Other danger cues (not just race) may create a similar predisposition to shoot, and if these cues promote shooting when the target is White, they should attenuate racial bias. We embedded targets in threatening and safe backgrounds. Racial bias was evident in safe contexts but disappeared when context signaled danger, and this reduction was largely due to an increased tendency to shoot White targets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3041961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022103110002040</els_id><sourcerecordid>2230884931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-5f6edf9d8f0b13b93908b7c48b3d998bcc26db806caec54a31b29e562c3a3d843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhD7BAERKimwzXj2RshJBQWx5SERtYW45zM-MoYw-2U-Df42GG8lh0Zen6O8fH9xDymMKSAm1fjMsR027JoAxALoGu7pAFBdXWINrmLlkAMFZT4PSEPEhpBAAFjN4nJ4xyIaCRC3JxYfwaY5hThT7M683L6mPoMZrs_LqKxjozVZ0zqfrm8qaywWf8nucyzJuIJld2xvSQ3BvMlPDR8TwlX95efj5_X199evfh_M1VbRshct0MLfaD6uUAHeWd4gpkt7JCdrxXSnbWsrbvJLTWYFEYTjumsGmZ5Yb3UvBT8vrgu5u7LfYWfY5m0rvotib-0ME4_e-Ndxu9Dteag6CqpcXg-dEghq8leNZblyxOk_FYVqBlQ1dCrH49dXYrSSVvCsiAF_Tpf-gY5ujLIrRkrGmUaFWB2AGyMaQUcbhJTUHv29Sj3rep921qkLq0WURP_v7vjeR3fQV4dgRMsmYaovHWpT8cXzVc8bZwrw4clnauHUadrENvsXcRbdZ9cLfl-AmuFL4F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>822559469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Correll, Joshua ; Wittenbrink, Bernd ; Park, Bernadette ; Judd, Charles M. ; Goyle, Arina</creator><creatorcontrib>Correll, Joshua ; Wittenbrink, Bernd ; Park, Bernadette ; Judd, Charles M. ; Goyle, Arina</creatorcontrib><description>Research shows that participants shoot armed Blacks more frequently and quickly than armed Whites, but make don't-shoot responses more frequently and quickly for unarmed Whites than unarmed Blacks. We argue that this bias reflects the perception of threat — specifically, threat associated with Black males. Other danger cues (not just race) may create a similar predisposition to shoot, and if these cues promote shooting when the target is White, they should attenuate racial bias. We embedded targets in threatening and safe backgrounds. Racial bias was evident in safe contexts but disappeared when context signaled danger, and this reduction was largely due to an increased tendency to shoot White targets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21344058</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JESPAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Black people ; Context ; Experimental psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Perception of others ; Perceptions ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Race ; Racial attitudes ; Racial bias ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology ; Threat ; Threat perception ; Threats ; White people</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental social psychology, 2011, Vol.47 (1), p.184-189</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Jan 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-5f6edf9d8f0b13b93908b7c48b3d998bcc26db806caec54a31b29e562c3a3d843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-5f6edf9d8f0b13b93908b7c48b3d998bcc26db806caec54a31b29e562c3a3d843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,4009,27903,27904,27905,45975</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23753936$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21344058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Correll, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittenbrink, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyle, Arina</creatorcontrib><title>Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues</title><title>Journal of experimental social psychology</title><addtitle>J Exp Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Research shows that participants shoot armed Blacks more frequently and quickly than armed Whites, but make don't-shoot responses more frequently and quickly for unarmed Whites than unarmed Blacks. We argue that this bias reflects the perception of threat — specifically, threat associated with Black males. Other danger cues (not just race) may create a similar predisposition to shoot, and if these cues promote shooting when the target is White, they should attenuate racial bias. We embedded targets in threatening and safe backgrounds. Racial bias was evident in safe contexts but disappeared when context signaled danger, and this reduction was largely due to an increased tendency to shoot White targets.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Perception of others</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial attitudes</subject><subject>Racial bias</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>Threat perception</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>0022-1031</issn><issn>1096-0465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhD7BAERKimwzXj2RshJBQWx5SERtYW45zM-MoYw-2U-Df42GG8lh0Zen6O8fH9xDymMKSAm1fjMsR027JoAxALoGu7pAFBdXWINrmLlkAMFZT4PSEPEhpBAAFjN4nJ4xyIaCRC3JxYfwaY5hThT7M683L6mPoMZrs_LqKxjozVZ0zqfrm8qaywWf8nucyzJuIJld2xvSQ3BvMlPDR8TwlX95efj5_X199evfh_M1VbRshct0MLfaD6uUAHeWd4gpkt7JCdrxXSnbWsrbvJLTWYFEYTjumsGmZ5Yb3UvBT8vrgu5u7LfYWfY5m0rvotib-0ME4_e-Ndxu9Dteag6CqpcXg-dEghq8leNZblyxOk_FYVqBlQ1dCrH49dXYrSSVvCsiAF_Tpf-gY5ujLIrRkrGmUaFWB2AGyMaQUcbhJTUHv29Sj3rep921qkLq0WURP_v7vjeR3fQV4dgRMsmYaovHWpT8cXzVc8bZwrw4clnauHUadrENvsXcRbdZ9cLfl-AmuFL4F</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Correll, Joshua</creator><creator>Wittenbrink, Bernd</creator><creator>Park, Bernadette</creator><creator>Judd, Charles M.</creator><creator>Goyle, Arina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues</title><author>Correll, Joshua ; Wittenbrink, Bernd ; Park, Bernadette ; Judd, Charles M. ; Goyle, Arina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-5f6edf9d8f0b13b93908b7c48b3d998bcc26db806caec54a31b29e562c3a3d843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Perception of others</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial attitudes</topic><topic>Racial bias</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>Threat perception</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Correll, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittenbrink, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Judd, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyle, Arina</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Correll, Joshua</au><au>Wittenbrink, Bernd</au><au>Park, Bernadette</au><au>Judd, Charles M.</au><au>Goyle, Arina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>184-189</pages><issn>0022-1031</issn><eissn>1096-0465</eissn><coden>JESPAQ</coden><abstract>Research shows that participants shoot armed Blacks more frequently and quickly than armed Whites, but make don't-shoot responses more frequently and quickly for unarmed Whites than unarmed Blacks. We argue that this bias reflects the perception of threat — specifically, threat associated with Black males. Other danger cues (not just race) may create a similar predisposition to shoot, and if these cues promote shooting when the target is White, they should attenuate racial bias. We embedded targets in threatening and safe backgrounds. Racial bias was evident in safe contexts but disappeared when context signaled danger, and this reduction was largely due to an increased tendency to shoot White targets.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21344058</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1031 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental social psychology, 2011, Vol.47 (1), p.184-189 |
issn | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3041961 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Attitudes Bias Biological and medical sciences Black people Context Experimental psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Perception of others Perceptions Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Race Racial attitudes Racial bias Social attribution, perception and cognition Social psychology Threat Threat perception Threats White people |
title | Dangerous enough: Moderating racial bias with contextual threat cues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dangerous%20enough:%20Moderating%20racial%20bias%20with%20contextual%20threat%20cues&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Correll,%20Joshua&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=184-189&rft.issn=0022-1031&rft.eissn=1096-0465&rft.coden=JESPAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2230884931%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=822559469&rft_id=info:pmid/21344058&rft_els_id=S0022103110002040&rfr_iscdi=true |