Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury
Collaboration among investigators, centers, countries, and disciplines is essential to advancing the care for traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is thus important that we "speak the same language." Great variability, however, exists in data collection and coding of variables in TBI studies,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurotrauma 2011-02, Vol.28 (2), p.177-187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 187 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | Journal of neurotrauma |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Maas, Andrew I R Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L Menon, David Adelson, P David Balkin, Tom Bullock, Ross Engel, Doortje C Gordon, Wayne Langlois-Orman, Jean Lew, Henry L Robertson, Claudia Temkin, Nancy Valadka, Alex Verfaellie, Mieke Wainwright, Mark Wright, David W Schwab, Karen |
description | Collaboration among investigators, centers, countries, and disciplines is essential to advancing the care for traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is thus important that we "speak the same language." Great variability, however, exists in data collection and coding of variables in TBI studies, confounding comparisons between and analysis across different studies. Randomized controlled trials can never address the many uncertainties concerning treatment approaches in TBI. Pooling data from different clinical studies and high-quality observational studies combined with comparative effectiveness research may provide excellent alternatives in a cost-efficient way. Standardization of data collection and coding is essential to this end. Common data elements (CDEs) are presented for demographics and clinical variables applicable across the broad spectrum of TBI. Most recommendations represent a consensus derived from clinical practice. Some recommendations concern novel approaches, for example assessment of the intensity of therapy in severely injured patients. Up to three levels of detail for coding data elements were developed: basic, intermediate, and advanced, with the greatest level of detail attained in the advanced version. More detailed codings can be collapsed into the basic version. Templates were produced to summarize coding formats, explanation of choices, and recommendations for procedures. Endorsement of the recommendations has been obtained from many authoritative organizations. The development of CDEs for TBI should be viewed as a continuing process; as more experience is gained, refinement and amendments will be required. This proposed process of standardization will facilitate comparative effectiveness research and encourage high-quality meta-analysis of individual patient data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/neu.2010.1617 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3037806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A249685093</galeid><sourcerecordid>A249685093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-32e35c88f41875537186c10f65e1632ebd5f042f121b3880ddd01cbaf5ca6cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtLxDAUhYMoOj6WbqXgwlXH3GTymI0g4gsEF7oPaR5jpE00bQX99aaMioJkEXLPdw8nHIQOAc8By-VpdOOc4OnFQWygGTAm6iVekE00K7qoBTDYQbt9_4wxUE7ENtohAJxwwDMkHgYdrc42fIS4qqwedGVS2zozhBSrEKsh67HTQzBVk3WYRs9jft9HW163vTv4uvfQ49Xl48VNfXd_fXtxflebBaNDTYmjzEjpFyAFY1SA5Aaw58wBL2JjmS9ZPRBoqJTYWovBNNozo7kxdA-drW1fxqZz1rhY4rTqJYdO53eVdFB_lRie1Cq9KYqpkJgXg5Mvg5xeR9cPqgu9cW2ro0tjryQDwQgmpJDHa3KlW6dC9KkYmolW52Sx5JLhJS3U_B-qHOu6YFJ0PpT5n4V6vWBy6vvs_E94wGpqUJUG1dSgmhos_NHvH__Q35XRT9vPlis</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851752022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Maas, Andrew I R ; Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L ; Menon, David ; Adelson, P David ; Balkin, Tom ; Bullock, Ross ; Engel, Doortje C ; Gordon, Wayne ; Langlois-Orman, Jean ; Lew, Henry L ; Robertson, Claudia ; Temkin, Nancy ; Valadka, Alex ; Verfaellie, Mieke ; Wainwright, Mark ; Wright, David W ; Schwab, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Maas, Andrew I R ; Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L ; Menon, David ; Adelson, P David ; Balkin, Tom ; Bullock, Ross ; Engel, Doortje C ; Gordon, Wayne ; Langlois-Orman, Jean ; Lew, Henry L ; Robertson, Claudia ; Temkin, Nancy ; Valadka, Alex ; Verfaellie, Mieke ; Wainwright, Mark ; Wright, David W ; Schwab, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Collaboration among investigators, centers, countries, and disciplines is essential to advancing the care for traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is thus important that we "speak the same language." Great variability, however, exists in data collection and coding of variables in TBI studies, confounding comparisons between and analysis across different studies. Randomized controlled trials can never address the many uncertainties concerning treatment approaches in TBI. Pooling data from different clinical studies and high-quality observational studies combined with comparative effectiveness research may provide excellent alternatives in a cost-efficient way. Standardization of data collection and coding is essential to this end. Common data elements (CDEs) are presented for demographics and clinical variables applicable across the broad spectrum of TBI. Most recommendations represent a consensus derived from clinical practice. Some recommendations concern novel approaches, for example assessment of the intensity of therapy in severely injured patients. Up to three levels of detail for coding data elements were developed: basic, intermediate, and advanced, with the greatest level of detail attained in the advanced version. More detailed codings can be collapsed into the basic version. Templates were produced to summarize coding formats, explanation of choices, and recommendations for procedures. Endorsement of the recommendations has been obtained from many authoritative organizations. The development of CDEs for TBI should be viewed as a continuing process; as more experience is gained, refinement and amendments will be required. This proposed process of standardization will facilitate comparative effectiveness research and encourage high-quality meta-analysis of individual patient data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-7151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1617</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21162610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Brain ; Brain Injuries - classification ; Brain Injuries - diagnosis ; Brain Injuries - therapy ; Clinical Coding - methods ; Clinical Coding - standards ; Clinical Protocols - standards ; Data Collection - methods ; Data Collection - standards ; Data entry ; Demography - methods ; Demography - standards ; Humans ; Injuries ; Original ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Severity of Illness Index</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurotrauma, 2011-02, Vol.28 (2), p.177-187</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-32e35c88f41875537186c10f65e1632ebd5f042f121b3880ddd01cbaf5ca6cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-32e35c88f41875537186c10f65e1632ebd5f042f121b3880ddd01cbaf5ca6cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maas, Andrew I R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelson, P David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balkin, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullock, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Doortje C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois-Orman, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Henry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temkin, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valadka, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verfaellie, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainwright, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury</title><title>Journal of neurotrauma</title><addtitle>J Neurotrauma</addtitle><description>Collaboration among investigators, centers, countries, and disciplines is essential to advancing the care for traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is thus important that we "speak the same language." Great variability, however, exists in data collection and coding of variables in TBI studies, confounding comparisons between and analysis across different studies. Randomized controlled trials can never address the many uncertainties concerning treatment approaches in TBI. Pooling data from different clinical studies and high-quality observational studies combined with comparative effectiveness research may provide excellent alternatives in a cost-efficient way. Standardization of data collection and coding is essential to this end. Common data elements (CDEs) are presented for demographics and clinical variables applicable across the broad spectrum of TBI. Most recommendations represent a consensus derived from clinical practice. Some recommendations concern novel approaches, for example assessment of the intensity of therapy in severely injured patients. Up to three levels of detail for coding data elements were developed: basic, intermediate, and advanced, with the greatest level of detail attained in the advanced version. More detailed codings can be collapsed into the basic version. Templates were produced to summarize coding formats, explanation of choices, and recommendations for procedures. Endorsement of the recommendations has been obtained from many authoritative organizations. The development of CDEs for TBI should be viewed as a continuing process; as more experience is gained, refinement and amendments will be required. This proposed process of standardization will facilitate comparative effectiveness research and encourage high-quality meta-analysis of individual patient data.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Clinical Coding - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Coding - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols - standards</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Data Collection - standards</subject><subject>Data entry</subject><subject>Demography - methods</subject><subject>Demography - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><issn>0897-7151</issn><issn>1557-9042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUtLxDAUhYMoOj6WbqXgwlXH3GTymI0g4gsEF7oPaR5jpE00bQX99aaMioJkEXLPdw8nHIQOAc8By-VpdOOc4OnFQWygGTAm6iVekE00K7qoBTDYQbt9_4wxUE7ENtohAJxwwDMkHgYdrc42fIS4qqwedGVS2zozhBSrEKsh67HTQzBVk3WYRs9jft9HW163vTv4uvfQ49Xl48VNfXd_fXtxflebBaNDTYmjzEjpFyAFY1SA5Aaw58wBL2JjmS9ZPRBoqJTYWovBNNozo7kxdA-drW1fxqZz1rhY4rTqJYdO53eVdFB_lRie1Cq9KYqpkJgXg5Mvg5xeR9cPqgu9cW2ro0tjryQDwQgmpJDHa3KlW6dC9KkYmolW52Sx5JLhJS3U_B-qHOu6YFJ0PpT5n4V6vWBy6vvs_E94wGpqUJUG1dSgmhos_NHvH__Q35XRT9vPlis</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>Maas, Andrew I R</creator><creator>Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L</creator><creator>Menon, David</creator><creator>Adelson, P David</creator><creator>Balkin, Tom</creator><creator>Bullock, Ross</creator><creator>Engel, Doortje C</creator><creator>Gordon, Wayne</creator><creator>Langlois-Orman, Jean</creator><creator>Lew, Henry L</creator><creator>Robertson, Claudia</creator><creator>Temkin, Nancy</creator><creator>Valadka, Alex</creator><creator>Verfaellie, Mieke</creator><creator>Wainwright, Mark</creator><creator>Wright, David W</creator><creator>Schwab, Karen</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury</title><author>Maas, Andrew I R ; Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L ; Menon, David ; Adelson, P David ; Balkin, Tom ; Bullock, Ross ; Engel, Doortje C ; Gordon, Wayne ; Langlois-Orman, Jean ; Lew, Henry L ; Robertson, Claudia ; Temkin, Nancy ; Valadka, Alex ; Verfaellie, Mieke ; Wainwright, Mark ; Wright, David W ; Schwab, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-32e35c88f41875537186c10f65e1632ebd5f042f121b3880ddd01cbaf5ca6cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Clinical Coding - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Coding - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols - standards</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Data Collection - standards</topic><topic>Data entry</topic><topic>Demography - methods</topic><topic>Demography - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maas, Andrew I R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelson, P David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balkin, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullock, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Doortje C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Wayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langlois-Orman, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Henry L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temkin, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valadka, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verfaellie, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainwright, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maas, Andrew I R</au><au>Harrison-Felix, Cynthia L</au><au>Menon, David</au><au>Adelson, P David</au><au>Balkin, Tom</au><au>Bullock, Ross</au><au>Engel, Doortje C</au><au>Gordon, Wayne</au><au>Langlois-Orman, Jean</au><au>Lew, Henry L</au><au>Robertson, Claudia</au><au>Temkin, Nancy</au><au>Valadka, Alex</au><au>Verfaellie, Mieke</au><au>Wainwright, Mark</au><au>Wright, David W</au><au>Schwab, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurotrauma</addtitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>177-187</pages><issn>0897-7151</issn><eissn>1557-9042</eissn><abstract>Collaboration among investigators, centers, countries, and disciplines is essential to advancing the care for traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is thus important that we "speak the same language." Great variability, however, exists in data collection and coding of variables in TBI studies, confounding comparisons between and analysis across different studies. Randomized controlled trials can never address the many uncertainties concerning treatment approaches in TBI. Pooling data from different clinical studies and high-quality observational studies combined with comparative effectiveness research may provide excellent alternatives in a cost-efficient way. Standardization of data collection and coding is essential to this end. Common data elements (CDEs) are presented for demographics and clinical variables applicable across the broad spectrum of TBI. Most recommendations represent a consensus derived from clinical practice. Some recommendations concern novel approaches, for example assessment of the intensity of therapy in severely injured patients. Up to three levels of detail for coding data elements were developed: basic, intermediate, and advanced, with the greatest level of detail attained in the advanced version. More detailed codings can be collapsed into the basic version. Templates were produced to summarize coding formats, explanation of choices, and recommendations for procedures. Endorsement of the recommendations has been obtained from many authoritative organizations. The development of CDEs for TBI should be viewed as a continuing process; as more experience is gained, refinement and amendments will be required. This proposed process of standardization will facilitate comparative effectiveness research and encourage high-quality meta-analysis of individual patient data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>21162610</pmid><doi>10.1089/neu.2010.1617</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-7151 |
ispartof | Journal of neurotrauma, 2011-02, Vol.28 (2), p.177-187 |
issn | 0897-7151 1557-9042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3037806 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis Brain Brain Injuries - classification Brain Injuries - diagnosis Brain Injuries - therapy Clinical Coding - methods Clinical Coding - standards Clinical Protocols - standards Data Collection - methods Data Collection - standards Data entry Demography - methods Demography - standards Humans Injuries Original Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods Severity of Illness Index |
title | Standardizing data collection in traumatic brain injury |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A55%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardizing%20data%20collection%20in%20traumatic%20brain%20injury&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurotrauma&rft.au=Maas,%20Andrew%20I%20R&rft.date=2011-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=177-187&rft.issn=0897-7151&rft.eissn=1557-9042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/neu.2010.1617&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA249685093%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851752022&rft_id=info:pmid/21162610&rft_galeid=A249685093&rfr_iscdi=true |