Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes
When planning a randomized clinical trial, careful consideration must be given to how participants are selected for various arms of a study. Selection and accidental bias may occur when participants are not assigned to study groups with equal probability. A simple random allocation scheme is a proce...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2011-01, Vol.8 (1), p.15-20 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Efird, Jimmy |
description | When planning a randomized clinical trial, careful consideration must be given to how participants are selected for various arms of a study. Selection and accidental bias may occur when participants are not assigned to study groups with equal probability. A simple random allocation scheme is a process by which each participant has equal likelihood of being assigned to treatment versus referent groups. However, by chance an unequal number of individuals may be assigned to each arm of the study and thus decrease the power to detect statistically significant differences between groups. Block randomization is a commonly used technique in clinical trial design to reduce bias and achieve balance in the allocation of participants to treatment arms, especially when the sample size is small. This method increases the probability that each arm will contain an equal number of individuals by sequencing participant assignments by block. Yet still, the allocation process may be predictable, for example, when the investigator is not blind and the block size is fixed. This paper provides an overview of blocked randomization and illustrates how to avoid selection bias by using random block sizes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph8010015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3037057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>851747065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-bbf86cf512548c77d7371863ec128117da9dba355c124370f6c2acd304b8f0033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9PwyAYhonRuDk9ejWNF0_VjwKFXUx08VeyxIueCaXUMbsyodVsf70sm8vmCfh4ePKSF6FzDNeEDOHGTo2fTwRgAMwOUB_nOaQ0B3y4s--hkxCmAETQfHiMehkmOD7BfSTua6c_TZl41ZRuZpeqta5Jfmw72YzqRRJMbXQboWIFJ8EuTThFR5WqgznbrAP0_vjwNnpOx69PL6O7caopJm1aFJXIdcVwxqjQnJeccCxyYjTOBMa8VMOyUISxeKaEQ5XrTOmSAC1EFQOTAbpde-ddMTOlNk3rVS3n3s6UX0inrNy_aexEfrhvSSDqGI-Cq43Au6_OhFbObNCmrlVjXBekYJhTDjmL5OU_cuo638TfRYgCIxRWunQNae9C8KbaRsEgV43IvUYif7Gbf0v_VUB-AQ77h7k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>854053407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Efird, Jimmy</creator><creatorcontrib>Efird, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><description>When planning a randomized clinical trial, careful consideration must be given to how participants are selected for various arms of a study. Selection and accidental bias may occur when participants are not assigned to study groups with equal probability. A simple random allocation scheme is a process by which each participant has equal likelihood of being assigned to treatment versus referent groups. However, by chance an unequal number of individuals may be assigned to each arm of the study and thus decrease the power to detect statistically significant differences between groups. Block randomization is a commonly used technique in clinical trial design to reduce bias and achieve balance in the allocation of participants to treatment arms, especially when the sample size is small. This method increases the probability that each arm will contain an equal number of individuals by sequencing participant assignments by block. Yet still, the allocation process may be predictable, for example, when the investigator is not blind and the block size is fixed. This paper provides an overview of blocked randomization and illustrates how to avoid selection bias by using random block sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8010015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21318011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bias ; Clinical trials ; Humans ; Random Allocation ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods ; Sample Size ; Selection Bias</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2011-01, Vol.8 (1), p.15-20</ispartof><rights>Copyright Molecular Diversity Preservation International Jan 2011</rights><rights>2011 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-bbf86cf512548c77d7371863ec128117da9dba355c124370f6c2acd304b8f0033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-bbf86cf512548c77d7371863ec128117da9dba355c124370f6c2acd304b8f0033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4890-5111</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037057/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3037057/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21318011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Efird, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><title>Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>When planning a randomized clinical trial, careful consideration must be given to how participants are selected for various arms of a study. Selection and accidental bias may occur when participants are not assigned to study groups with equal probability. A simple random allocation scheme is a process by which each participant has equal likelihood of being assigned to treatment versus referent groups. However, by chance an unequal number of individuals may be assigned to each arm of the study and thus decrease the power to detect statistically significant differences between groups. Block randomization is a commonly used technique in clinical trial design to reduce bias and achieve balance in the allocation of participants to treatment arms, especially when the sample size is small. This method increases the probability that each arm will contain an equal number of individuals by sequencing participant assignments by block. Yet still, the allocation process may be predictable, for example, when the investigator is not blind and the block size is fixed. This paper provides an overview of blocked randomization and illustrates how to avoid selection bias by using random block sizes.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9PwyAYhonRuDk9ejWNF0_VjwKFXUx08VeyxIueCaXUMbsyodVsf70sm8vmCfh4ePKSF6FzDNeEDOHGTo2fTwRgAMwOUB_nOaQ0B3y4s--hkxCmAETQfHiMehkmOD7BfSTua6c_TZl41ZRuZpeqta5Jfmw72YzqRRJMbXQboWIFJ8EuTThFR5WqgznbrAP0_vjwNnpOx69PL6O7caopJm1aFJXIdcVwxqjQnJeccCxyYjTOBMa8VMOyUISxeKaEQ5XrTOmSAC1EFQOTAbpde-ddMTOlNk3rVS3n3s6UX0inrNy_aexEfrhvSSDqGI-Cq43Au6_OhFbObNCmrlVjXBekYJhTDjmL5OU_cuo638TfRYgCIxRWunQNae9C8KbaRsEgV43IvUYif7Gbf0v_VUB-AQ77h7k</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Efird, Jimmy</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-5111</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes</title><author>Efird, Jimmy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-bbf86cf512548c77d7371863ec128117da9dba355c124370f6c2acd304b8f0033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Efird, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Efird, Jimmy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>15-20</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>When planning a randomized clinical trial, careful consideration must be given to how participants are selected for various arms of a study. Selection and accidental bias may occur when participants are not assigned to study groups with equal probability. A simple random allocation scheme is a process by which each participant has equal likelihood of being assigned to treatment versus referent groups. However, by chance an unequal number of individuals may be assigned to each arm of the study and thus decrease the power to detect statistically significant differences between groups. Block randomization is a commonly used technique in clinical trial design to reduce bias and achieve balance in the allocation of participants to treatment arms, especially when the sample size is small. This method increases the probability that each arm will contain an equal number of individuals by sequencing participant assignments by block. Yet still, the allocation process may be predictable, for example, when the investigator is not blind and the block size is fixed. This paper provides an overview of blocked randomization and illustrates how to avoid selection bias by using random block sizes.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>21318011</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph8010015</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-5111</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2011-01, Vol.8 (1), p.15-20 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3037057 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Bias Clinical trials Humans Random Allocation Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods Sample Size Selection Bias |
title | Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A40%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blocked%20randomization%20with%20randomly%20selected%20block%20sizes&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Efird,%20Jimmy&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=15-20&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph8010015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E851747065%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=854053407&rft_id=info:pmid/21318011&rfr_iscdi=true |