Characterization of particulate matter emission from open burning of rice straw
Emission from field burning of crop residue, a common practice in many parts of the world today, has potential effects on air quality, atmosphere and climate. This study provides a comprehensive size and compositional characterization of particulate matter (PM) emission from rice straw (RS) burning...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric environment (1994) 2011, Vol.45 (2), p.493-502 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 502 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 493 |
| container_title | Atmospheric environment (1994) |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi Ly, Bich Thuy Tipayarom, Danutawat Manandhar, Bhai Raja Prapat, Pongkiatkul Simpson, Christopher D. Sally Liu, L.-J. |
| description | Emission from field burning of crop residue, a common practice in many parts of the world today, has potential effects on air quality, atmosphere and climate. This study provides a comprehensive size and compositional characterization of particulate matter (PM) emission from rice straw (RS) burning using both
in situ experiments (11 spread field burning) and laboratory hood experiments (3 pile and 6 spread burning) that were conducted during 2003-2006 in Thailand. The carbon balance and emission ratio method was used to determine PM emission factors (EF) in the field experiments. The obtained EF varied from field to hood experiments reflecting multiple factors affecting combustion and emission. In the hood experiments, EF were found to be depending on the burning types (spread or pile), moisture content and the combustion efficiency. In addition, in the field experiments, burning rate and EF were also influenced by weather conditions, i.e. wind. Hood pile burning produced significantly higher EF (20
±
8
g
kg
−1 RS) than hood spread burning (4.7
±
2.2
g
kg
−1 RS). The majority of PM emitted from the field burning was PM
2.5 with EF of 5.1
±
0.7
g
m
−2 or 8.3
±
2.7
g
kg
−1 RS burned. The coarse PM fraction (PM
10–2.5) was mainly generated by fire attention activities and was relatively small, hence the resulting EF of PM
10 (9.4
±
3.5
g
kg
−1 RS) was not significantly higher than PM
2.5. PM size distribution was measured across 8 size ranges (from 9.0
μm). The largest fractions of PM, EC and OC were associated with PM
1.1. The most significant components in PM
2.5 and PM
10 include OC, water soluble ions and levoglucosan. Relative abundance of some methoxyphenols (e.g., acetylsyringone), PAHs (e.g., fluoranthene and pyrene), organochlorine pesticides and PCBs may also serve as additional signatures for the PM emission. Presence of these toxic compounds in PM of burning smoke increases the potential toxic effects of the emission. For illustration, an estimation of the annual RS field burning in Thailand was made using the obtained
in situ field burning EF and preliminary burning activity data. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3018782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231010007880</els_id><sourcerecordid>853485635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-4e25d5a7ce579584ef64e5f14f296252a44af02954d16a6d934230c40a1c35793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwF0ouCC5Z_O3kgkCr8iFV6gF6tqbOeOtVYi92sgh-fR3ttsAFTrY8z_vOjN-qOqdkRQlVb7crmMaYMexXjJRH0q0I44-qU9pq3rBWiMflziVrGKfkpHqW85YQwnWnn1YnjDLBSSdPq6v1LSSwEyb_CyYfQx1dvYM0eTsPMGE9wlSKNY4-56XsUhzruMNQ38wp-LBZBMlbrPOU4Mfz6omDIeOL43lWXX-8-Lb-3Fxeffqy_nDZWCXV1AhkspegLUrdyVagUwKlo8KxTjHJQAhwhHVS9FSB6jsuGCdWEKCWFwk_q94dfHfzzYi9xVC6D2aX_Ajpp4ngzd-V4G_NJu4NJ-WHWlYMXh8NUvw-Y55M2dDiMEDAOGfTSi5aqbgs5Jt_klRpRjRhqi2oOqA2xZwTuoeBKDFLbmZr7nMzS26GdKbkVoTnf67zILsPqgCvjgBkC4NLEKzPvzmumRR6MXp54BxEA5tUmOuvpZMs4QvdqoV4fyCwxLP3mEy2HoPF3ie0k-mj_9-0dwRPw9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1672070268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of particulate matter emission from open burning of rice straw</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi ; Ly, Bich Thuy ; Tipayarom, Danutawat ; Manandhar, Bhai Raja ; Prapat, Pongkiatkul ; Simpson, Christopher D. ; Sally Liu, L.-J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi ; Ly, Bich Thuy ; Tipayarom, Danutawat ; Manandhar, Bhai Raja ; Prapat, Pongkiatkul ; Simpson, Christopher D. ; Sally Liu, L.-J.</creatorcontrib><description>Emission from field burning of crop residue, a common practice in many parts of the world today, has potential effects on air quality, atmosphere and climate. This study provides a comprehensive size and compositional characterization of particulate matter (PM) emission from rice straw (RS) burning using both
in situ experiments (11 spread field burning) and laboratory hood experiments (3 pile and 6 spread burning) that were conducted during 2003-2006 in Thailand. The carbon balance and emission ratio method was used to determine PM emission factors (EF) in the field experiments. The obtained EF varied from field to hood experiments reflecting multiple factors affecting combustion and emission. In the hood experiments, EF were found to be depending on the burning types (spread or pile), moisture content and the combustion efficiency. In addition, in the field experiments, burning rate and EF were also influenced by weather conditions, i.e. wind. Hood pile burning produced significantly higher EF (20
±
8
g
kg
−1 RS) than hood spread burning (4.7
±
2.2
g
kg
−1 RS). The majority of PM emitted from the field burning was PM
2.5 with EF of 5.1
±
0.7
g
m
−2 or 8.3
±
2.7
g
kg
−1 RS burned. The coarse PM fraction (PM
10–2.5) was mainly generated by fire attention activities and was relatively small, hence the resulting EF of PM
10 (9.4
±
3.5
g
kg
−1 RS) was not significantly higher than PM
2.5. PM size distribution was measured across 8 size ranges (from <0.4
μm to >9.0
μm). The largest fractions of PM, EC and OC were associated with PM
1.1. The most significant components in PM
2.5 and PM
10 include OC, water soluble ions and levoglucosan. Relative abundance of some methoxyphenols (e.g., acetylsyringone), PAHs (e.g., fluoranthene and pyrene), organochlorine pesticides and PCBs may also serve as additional signatures for the PM emission. Presence of these toxic compounds in PM of burning smoke increases the potential toxic effects of the emission. For illustration, an estimation of the annual RS field burning in Thailand was made using the obtained
in situ field burning EF and preliminary burning activity data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21243095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>air quality ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; burning ; carbon ; climate ; combustion ; emissions factor ; Exact sciences and technology ; field experimentation ; ions ; laboratory experimentation ; Levoglucosan ; Methoxyphenols ; organochlorine pesticides ; Oryza sativa ; particulate emissions ; particulates ; Pile burning ; PM composition ; Pollution ; rice straw ; Rice straw field burning ; Semi-VOC ; smoke ; Thailand ; toxicity ; water content ; weather</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2011, Vol.45 (2), p.493-502</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-4e25d5a7ce579584ef64e5f14f296252a44af02954d16a6d934230c40a1c35793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-4e25d5a7ce579584ef64e5f14f296252a44af02954d16a6d934230c40a1c35793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231010007880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23725473$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21243095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Bich Thuy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipayarom, Danutawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manandhar, Bhai Raja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prapat, Pongkiatkul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sally Liu, L.-J.</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of particulate matter emission from open burning of rice straw</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><addtitle>Atmos Environ (1994)</addtitle><description>Emission from field burning of crop residue, a common practice in many parts of the world today, has potential effects on air quality, atmosphere and climate. This study provides a comprehensive size and compositional characterization of particulate matter (PM) emission from rice straw (RS) burning using both
in situ experiments (11 spread field burning) and laboratory hood experiments (3 pile and 6 spread burning) that were conducted during 2003-2006 in Thailand. The carbon balance and emission ratio method was used to determine PM emission factors (EF) in the field experiments. The obtained EF varied from field to hood experiments reflecting multiple factors affecting combustion and emission. In the hood experiments, EF were found to be depending on the burning types (spread or pile), moisture content and the combustion efficiency. In addition, in the field experiments, burning rate and EF were also influenced by weather conditions, i.e. wind. Hood pile burning produced significantly higher EF (20
±
8
g
kg
−1 RS) than hood spread burning (4.7
±
2.2
g
kg
−1 RS). The majority of PM emitted from the field burning was PM
2.5 with EF of 5.1
±
0.7
g
m
−2 or 8.3
±
2.7
g
kg
−1 RS burned. The coarse PM fraction (PM
10–2.5) was mainly generated by fire attention activities and was relatively small, hence the resulting EF of PM
10 (9.4
±
3.5
g
kg
−1 RS) was not significantly higher than PM
2.5. PM size distribution was measured across 8 size ranges (from <0.4
μm to >9.0
μm). The largest fractions of PM, EC and OC were associated with PM
1.1. The most significant components in PM
2.5 and PM
10 include OC, water soluble ions and levoglucosan. Relative abundance of some methoxyphenols (e.g., acetylsyringone), PAHs (e.g., fluoranthene and pyrene), organochlorine pesticides and PCBs may also serve as additional signatures for the PM emission. Presence of these toxic compounds in PM of burning smoke increases the potential toxic effects of the emission. For illustration, an estimation of the annual RS field burning in Thailand was made using the obtained
in situ field burning EF and preliminary burning activity data.</description><subject>air quality</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>burning</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>combustion</subject><subject>emissions factor</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>ions</subject><subject>laboratory experimentation</subject><subject>Levoglucosan</subject><subject>Methoxyphenols</subject><subject>organochlorine pesticides</subject><subject>Oryza sativa</subject><subject>particulate emissions</subject><subject>particulates</subject><subject>Pile burning</subject><subject>PM composition</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>rice straw</subject><subject>Rice straw field burning</subject><subject>Semi-VOC</subject><subject>smoke</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>toxicity</subject><subject>water content</subject><subject>weather</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwF0ouCC5Z_O3kgkCr8iFV6gF6tqbOeOtVYi92sgh-fR3ttsAFTrY8z_vOjN-qOqdkRQlVb7crmMaYMexXjJRH0q0I44-qU9pq3rBWiMflziVrGKfkpHqW85YQwnWnn1YnjDLBSSdPq6v1LSSwEyb_CyYfQx1dvYM0eTsPMGE9wlSKNY4-56XsUhzruMNQ38wp-LBZBMlbrPOU4Mfz6omDIeOL43lWXX-8-Lb-3Fxeffqy_nDZWCXV1AhkspegLUrdyVagUwKlo8KxTjHJQAhwhHVS9FSB6jsuGCdWEKCWFwk_q94dfHfzzYi9xVC6D2aX_Ajpp4ngzd-V4G_NJu4NJ-WHWlYMXh8NUvw-Y55M2dDiMEDAOGfTSi5aqbgs5Jt_klRpRjRhqi2oOqA2xZwTuoeBKDFLbmZr7nMzS26GdKbkVoTnf67zILsPqgCvjgBkC4NLEKzPvzmumRR6MXp54BxEA5tUmOuvpZMs4QvdqoV4fyCwxLP3mEy2HoPF3ie0k-mj_9-0dwRPw9w</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi</creator><creator>Ly, Bich Thuy</creator><creator>Tipayarom, Danutawat</creator><creator>Manandhar, Bhai Raja</creator><creator>Prapat, Pongkiatkul</creator><creator>Simpson, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Sally Liu, L.-J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Characterization of particulate matter emission from open burning of rice straw</title><author>Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi ; Ly, Bich Thuy ; Tipayarom, Danutawat ; Manandhar, Bhai Raja ; Prapat, Pongkiatkul ; Simpson, Christopher D. ; Sally Liu, L.-J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c656t-4e25d5a7ce579584ef64e5f14f296252a44af02954d16a6d934230c40a1c35793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>air quality</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>burning</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>combustion</topic><topic>emissions factor</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>ions</topic><topic>laboratory experimentation</topic><topic>Levoglucosan</topic><topic>Methoxyphenols</topic><topic>organochlorine pesticides</topic><topic>Oryza sativa</topic><topic>particulate emissions</topic><topic>particulates</topic><topic>Pile burning</topic><topic>PM composition</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>rice straw</topic><topic>Rice straw field burning</topic><topic>Semi-VOC</topic><topic>smoke</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>toxicity</topic><topic>water content</topic><topic>weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Bich Thuy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipayarom, Danutawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manandhar, Bhai Raja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prapat, Pongkiatkul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sally Liu, L.-J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim Oanh, Nguyen Thi</au><au>Ly, Bich Thuy</au><au>Tipayarom, Danutawat</au><au>Manandhar, Bhai Raja</au><au>Prapat, Pongkiatkul</au><au>Simpson, Christopher D.</au><au>Sally Liu, L.-J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of particulate matter emission from open burning of rice straw</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><addtitle>Atmos Environ (1994)</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>502</epage><pages>493-502</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Emission from field burning of crop residue, a common practice in many parts of the world today, has potential effects on air quality, atmosphere and climate. This study provides a comprehensive size and compositional characterization of particulate matter (PM) emission from rice straw (RS) burning using both
in situ experiments (11 spread field burning) and laboratory hood experiments (3 pile and 6 spread burning) that were conducted during 2003-2006 in Thailand. The carbon balance and emission ratio method was used to determine PM emission factors (EF) in the field experiments. The obtained EF varied from field to hood experiments reflecting multiple factors affecting combustion and emission. In the hood experiments, EF were found to be depending on the burning types (spread or pile), moisture content and the combustion efficiency. In addition, in the field experiments, burning rate and EF were also influenced by weather conditions, i.e. wind. Hood pile burning produced significantly higher EF (20
±
8
g
kg
−1 RS) than hood spread burning (4.7
±
2.2
g
kg
−1 RS). The majority of PM emitted from the field burning was PM
2.5 with EF of 5.1
±
0.7
g
m
−2 or 8.3
±
2.7
g
kg
−1 RS burned. The coarse PM fraction (PM
10–2.5) was mainly generated by fire attention activities and was relatively small, hence the resulting EF of PM
10 (9.4
±
3.5
g
kg
−1 RS) was not significantly higher than PM
2.5. PM size distribution was measured across 8 size ranges (from <0.4
μm to >9.0
μm). The largest fractions of PM, EC and OC were associated with PM
1.1. The most significant components in PM
2.5 and PM
10 include OC, water soluble ions and levoglucosan. Relative abundance of some methoxyphenols (e.g., acetylsyringone), PAHs (e.g., fluoranthene and pyrene), organochlorine pesticides and PCBs may also serve as additional signatures for the PM emission. Presence of these toxic compounds in PM of burning smoke increases the potential toxic effects of the emission. For illustration, an estimation of the annual RS field burning in Thailand was made using the obtained
in situ field burning EF and preliminary burning activity data.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21243095</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1352-2310 |
| ispartof | Atmospheric environment (1994), 2011, Vol.45 (2), p.493-502 |
| issn | 1352-2310 1873-2844 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3018782 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | air quality Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution burning carbon climate combustion emissions factor Exact sciences and technology field experimentation ions laboratory experimentation Levoglucosan Methoxyphenols organochlorine pesticides Oryza sativa particulate emissions particulates Pile burning PM composition Pollution rice straw Rice straw field burning Semi-VOC smoke Thailand toxicity water content weather |
| title | Characterization of particulate matter emission from open burning of rice straw |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T13%3A54%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20particulate%20matter%20emission%20from%20open%20burning%20of%20rice%20straw&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Kim%20Oanh,%20Nguyen%20Thi&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=502&rft.pages=493-502&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E853485635%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1672070268&rft_id=info:pmid/21243095&rft_els_id=S1352231010007880&rfr_iscdi=true |