Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation

Passing current through mastoid electrodes (conventionally termed galvanic vestibular stimulation; GVS) evokes a balance response containing a short‐ and a medium‐latency response. The origins of these two responses are debated. Here we test the hypotheses that they originate from net signals evoked...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of physiology 2010-11, Vol.588 (22), p.4441-4451
Hauptverfasser: Mian, Omar S., Dakin, Christopher J., Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien, Fitzpatrick, Richard C., Day, Brian L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4451
container_issue 22
container_start_page 4441
container_title The Journal of physiology
container_volume 588
creator Mian, Omar S.
Dakin, Christopher J.
Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien
Fitzpatrick, Richard C.
Day, Brian L.
description Passing current through mastoid electrodes (conventionally termed galvanic vestibular stimulation; GVS) evokes a balance response containing a short‐ and a medium‐latency response. The origins of these two responses are debated. Here we test the hypotheses that they originate from net signals evoked by stimulation of otolith and semi‐circular canal afferents, respectively. Based on anatomy and function, we predicted the directions of the stimulus‐evoked net head rotation vector from the canals and the linear acceleration net vector from the otoliths. We tested these predictions in healthy adults by obtaining responses with the head in strategic postures to alter the relevance of the signals to the balance system. Cross‐covariance between a stochastic waveform of stimulating current and motor output was used to assess the balance responses. Consistent with the canal hypothesis, with the head pitched down the medium‐latency EMG response was abolished while the short‐latency EMG response was maintained. The results, however, did not support the otolith hypothesis. The direction of the linear acceleration signal from the otoliths was predicted to change substantially when using monaural stimuli compared to binaural stimuli. In contrast, short‐latency response direction measured from ground‐reaction forces was not altered. It was always directed along the inter‐aural axis irrespective of whether the stimulus was applied binaurally or monaurally, whether the head was turned in yaw through 90 deg, whether the head was pitched down through 90 deg, or combinations of these manipulations. We conclude that a net canal signal evoked by GVS contributes to the medium‐latency response whilst a net otolith signal does not make a significant contribution to either the short‐ or medium‐latency responses. The vestibular organs of the inner ear comprise semicircular canals and otoliths, which transduce angular and linear accelerations of the head respectively. This information is transmitted to the brain via the vestibular nerve. Small currents to electrodes placed behind the human ear stimulate this pathway, potentially enabling the role of semicircular canals and otoliths to be studied in the control of human balance. In this study, we made theoretical predictions of semicircular canal‐evoked and otolith‐evoked balance responses arising from the electrical stimulus. The properties of the measured balance responses agreed with those predicted by semi‐circular canal inputs bu
doi_str_mv 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.195222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3008850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>799792831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5516-716f84da5894eb838eebfbd600aaf212a050ab2e2b4419ffba2a958606dc8a543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9rFDEYh4Modq1-A5GAB09T83cmuQhStCoLeqgHTyHJvONmm5msyczKfvtm2baoJ08JyfP-eH88CL2k5IJSyt9ud5tDCSleMHJ80pIx9gitqGh103WaP0YrQhhreCfpGXpWypYQyonWT9EZI0pKwbsV-rG2_ganAac5xTBvcJj2Ke5hhGmud-xstJMHnKHs0lSgYNinG-ixO-DRljmFHkMEP-fgbcRlDuMS7RzS9Bw9GWws8OLuPEffP364vvzUrL9efb58v268lLRtOtoOSvRWKi3AKa4A3OD6lhBrB0aZJZJYx4A5IageBmeZ1VK1pO29srXEOXp3yt0tboTe18WzjWaXw2jzwSQbzN8_U9iYn2lvOCFKSVID3twF5PRrgTKbMRQPsRaHtBTTad1ppjit5Ot_yG1a8lTbGSqF5KzlnaqUOFE-p1IyDA-7UGKO6sy9OnNUZ07q6tirP3s8DN27qoA-Ab9DhMN_hZrrL98EIy2_BRZkq7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545326378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IngentaConnect Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mian, Omar S. ; Dakin, Christopher J. ; Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien ; Fitzpatrick, Richard C. ; Day, Brian L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mian, Omar S. ; Dakin, Christopher J. ; Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien ; Fitzpatrick, Richard C. ; Day, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><description>Passing current through mastoid electrodes (conventionally termed galvanic vestibular stimulation; GVS) evokes a balance response containing a short‐ and a medium‐latency response. The origins of these two responses are debated. Here we test the hypotheses that they originate from net signals evoked by stimulation of otolith and semi‐circular canal afferents, respectively. Based on anatomy and function, we predicted the directions of the stimulus‐evoked net head rotation vector from the canals and the linear acceleration net vector from the otoliths. We tested these predictions in healthy adults by obtaining responses with the head in strategic postures to alter the relevance of the signals to the balance system. Cross‐covariance between a stochastic waveform of stimulating current and motor output was used to assess the balance responses. Consistent with the canal hypothesis, with the head pitched down the medium‐latency EMG response was abolished while the short‐latency EMG response was maintained. The results, however, did not support the otolith hypothesis. The direction of the linear acceleration signal from the otoliths was predicted to change substantially when using monaural stimuli compared to binaural stimuli. In contrast, short‐latency response direction measured from ground‐reaction forces was not altered. It was always directed along the inter‐aural axis irrespective of whether the stimulus was applied binaurally or monaurally, whether the head was turned in yaw through 90 deg, whether the head was pitched down through 90 deg, or combinations of these manipulations. We conclude that a net canal signal evoked by GVS contributes to the medium‐latency response whilst a net otolith signal does not make a significant contribution to either the short‐ or medium‐latency responses. The vestibular organs of the inner ear comprise semicircular canals and otoliths, which transduce angular and linear accelerations of the head respectively. This information is transmitted to the brain via the vestibular nerve. Small currents to electrodes placed behind the human ear stimulate this pathway, potentially enabling the role of semicircular canals and otoliths to be studied in the control of human balance. In this study, we made theoretical predictions of semicircular canal‐evoked and otolith‐evoked balance responses arising from the electrical stimulus. The properties of the measured balance responses agreed with those predicted by semi‐circular canal inputs but not with those predicted by otolith inputs. This implies the electrical stimulus is useful for studying the role of semi‐circular canals, but not otoliths, in human balance control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.195222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20855437</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHYA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electromyography - methods ; Head Movements - physiology ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Mastoid - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Neuroscience ; Orientation - physiology ; Otolithic Membrane - physiology ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Posture - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of physiology, 2010-11, Vol.588 (22), p.4441-4451</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 The Physiological Society</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2010 The Physiological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5516-716f84da5894eb838eebfbd600aaf212a050ab2e2b4419ffba2a958606dc8a543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5516-716f84da5894eb838eebfbd600aaf212a050ab2e2b4419ffba2a958606dc8a543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3008850/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3008850/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20855437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mian, Omar S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakin, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation</title><title>The Journal of physiology</title><addtitle>J Physiol</addtitle><description>Passing current through mastoid electrodes (conventionally termed galvanic vestibular stimulation; GVS) evokes a balance response containing a short‐ and a medium‐latency response. The origins of these two responses are debated. Here we test the hypotheses that they originate from net signals evoked by stimulation of otolith and semi‐circular canal afferents, respectively. Based on anatomy and function, we predicted the directions of the stimulus‐evoked net head rotation vector from the canals and the linear acceleration net vector from the otoliths. We tested these predictions in healthy adults by obtaining responses with the head in strategic postures to alter the relevance of the signals to the balance system. Cross‐covariance between a stochastic waveform of stimulating current and motor output was used to assess the balance responses. Consistent with the canal hypothesis, with the head pitched down the medium‐latency EMG response was abolished while the short‐latency EMG response was maintained. The results, however, did not support the otolith hypothesis. The direction of the linear acceleration signal from the otoliths was predicted to change substantially when using monaural stimuli compared to binaural stimuli. In contrast, short‐latency response direction measured from ground‐reaction forces was not altered. It was always directed along the inter‐aural axis irrespective of whether the stimulus was applied binaurally or monaurally, whether the head was turned in yaw through 90 deg, whether the head was pitched down through 90 deg, or combinations of these manipulations. We conclude that a net canal signal evoked by GVS contributes to the medium‐latency response whilst a net otolith signal does not make a significant contribution to either the short‐ or medium‐latency responses. The vestibular organs of the inner ear comprise semicircular canals and otoliths, which transduce angular and linear accelerations of the head respectively. This information is transmitted to the brain via the vestibular nerve. Small currents to electrodes placed behind the human ear stimulate this pathway, potentially enabling the role of semicircular canals and otoliths to be studied in the control of human balance. In this study, we made theoretical predictions of semicircular canal‐evoked and otolith‐evoked balance responses arising from the electrical stimulus. The properties of the measured balance responses agreed with those predicted by semi‐circular canal inputs but not with those predicted by otolith inputs. This implies the electrical stimulus is useful for studying the role of semi‐circular canals, but not otoliths, in human balance control.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Head Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Mastoid - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Orientation - physiology</subject><subject>Otolithic Membrane - physiology</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3751</issn><issn>1469-7793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9rFDEYh4Modq1-A5GAB09T83cmuQhStCoLeqgHTyHJvONmm5msyczKfvtm2baoJ08JyfP-eH88CL2k5IJSyt9ud5tDCSleMHJ80pIx9gitqGh103WaP0YrQhhreCfpGXpWypYQyonWT9EZI0pKwbsV-rG2_ganAac5xTBvcJj2Ke5hhGmud-xstJMHnKHs0lSgYNinG-ixO-DRljmFHkMEP-fgbcRlDuMS7RzS9Bw9GWws8OLuPEffP364vvzUrL9efb58v268lLRtOtoOSvRWKi3AKa4A3OD6lhBrB0aZJZJYx4A5IageBmeZ1VK1pO29srXEOXp3yt0tboTe18WzjWaXw2jzwSQbzN8_U9iYn2lvOCFKSVID3twF5PRrgTKbMRQPsRaHtBTTad1ppjit5Ot_yG1a8lTbGSqF5KzlnaqUOFE-p1IyDA-7UGKO6sy9OnNUZ07q6tirP3s8DN27qoA-Ab9DhMN_hZrrL98EIy2_BRZkq7Q</recordid><startdate>20101115</startdate><enddate>20101115</enddate><creator>Mian, Omar S.</creator><creator>Dakin, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien</creator><creator>Fitzpatrick, Richard C.</creator><creator>Day, Brian L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101115</creationdate><title>Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation</title><author>Mian, Omar S. ; Dakin, Christopher J. ; Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien ; Fitzpatrick, Richard C. ; Day, Brian L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5516-716f84da5894eb838eebfbd600aaf212a050ab2e2b4419ffba2a958606dc8a543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Head Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Mastoid - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Orientation - physiology</topic><topic>Otolithic Membrane - physiology</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mian, Omar S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakin, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Day, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mian, Omar S.</au><au>Dakin, Christopher J.</au><au>Blouin, Jean‐Sébastien</au><au>Fitzpatrick, Richard C.</au><au>Day, Brian L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of physiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Physiol</addtitle><date>2010-11-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>588</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>4441</spage><epage>4451</epage><pages>4441-4451</pages><issn>0022-3751</issn><eissn>1469-7793</eissn><coden>JPHYA7</coden><abstract>Passing current through mastoid electrodes (conventionally termed galvanic vestibular stimulation; GVS) evokes a balance response containing a short‐ and a medium‐latency response. The origins of these two responses are debated. Here we test the hypotheses that they originate from net signals evoked by stimulation of otolith and semi‐circular canal afferents, respectively. Based on anatomy and function, we predicted the directions of the stimulus‐evoked net head rotation vector from the canals and the linear acceleration net vector from the otoliths. We tested these predictions in healthy adults by obtaining responses with the head in strategic postures to alter the relevance of the signals to the balance system. Cross‐covariance between a stochastic waveform of stimulating current and motor output was used to assess the balance responses. Consistent with the canal hypothesis, with the head pitched down the medium‐latency EMG response was abolished while the short‐latency EMG response was maintained. The results, however, did not support the otolith hypothesis. The direction of the linear acceleration signal from the otoliths was predicted to change substantially when using monaural stimuli compared to binaural stimuli. In contrast, short‐latency response direction measured from ground‐reaction forces was not altered. It was always directed along the inter‐aural axis irrespective of whether the stimulus was applied binaurally or monaurally, whether the head was turned in yaw through 90 deg, whether the head was pitched down through 90 deg, or combinations of these manipulations. We conclude that a net canal signal evoked by GVS contributes to the medium‐latency response whilst a net otolith signal does not make a significant contribution to either the short‐ or medium‐latency responses. The vestibular organs of the inner ear comprise semicircular canals and otoliths, which transduce angular and linear accelerations of the head respectively. This information is transmitted to the brain via the vestibular nerve. Small currents to electrodes placed behind the human ear stimulate this pathway, potentially enabling the role of semicircular canals and otoliths to be studied in the control of human balance. In this study, we made theoretical predictions of semicircular canal‐evoked and otolith‐evoked balance responses arising from the electrical stimulus. The properties of the measured balance responses agreed with those predicted by semi‐circular canal inputs but not with those predicted by otolith inputs. This implies the electrical stimulus is useful for studying the role of semi‐circular canals, but not otoliths, in human balance control.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20855437</pmid><doi>10.1113/jphysiol.2010.195222</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3751
ispartof The Journal of physiology, 2010-11, Vol.588 (22), p.4441-4451
issn 0022-3751
1469-7793
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3008850
source MEDLINE; IngentaConnect Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electromyography - methods
Head Movements - physiology
Humans
Hypotheses
Mastoid - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Neuroscience
Orientation - physiology
Otolithic Membrane - physiology
Postural Balance - physiology
Posture - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Young Adult
title Lack of otolith involvement in balance responses evoked by mastoid electrical stimulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A42%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20otolith%20involvement%20in%20balance%20responses%20evoked%20by%20mastoid%20electrical%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20physiology&rft.au=Mian,%20Omar%20S.&rft.date=2010-11-15&rft.volume=588&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=4441&rft.epage=4451&rft.pages=4441-4451&rft.issn=0022-3751&rft.eissn=1469-7793&rft.coden=JPHYA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.195222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E799792831%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545326378&rft_id=info:pmid/20855437&rfr_iscdi=true