Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis-DNA in synovial fluid: evaluation of the sensitivity of different DNA extraction methods and amplification systems
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are used in research for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. tr.) in synovial fluid (SF). However there is no standardized system for diagnostic use in clinical practice, therefore this study aimed at determining the molecular biolog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arthritis research & therapy 2009-01, Vol.11 (6), p.R175-R175, Article R175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | R175 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | R175 |
container_title | Arthritis research & therapy |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Freise, Julia Bernau, Iris Meier, Sabine Zeidler, Henning Kuipers, Jens G |
description | Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are used in research for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. tr.) in synovial fluid (SF). However there is no standardized system for diagnostic use in clinical practice, therefore this study aimed at determining the molecular biology method best suited to detect C. tr. from SF.
SF samples were spiked with C. tr. elementary bodies (EB) and human peripheral blood monocytes (PBMo) persistently infected with C. tr. in vitro to evaluate the sensitivity of different molecular biology methods and assays. Five different DNA-extraction methods were tested: 1) Alkaline lysis, 2) QIAex II Gel Extraction Kit+ CTAB, 3) Chelex-extraction, 4) QIAmp Tissue Kit and 5) QIAmp DNA Stool Kit. All DNA extracts were subjected to 5 different DNA amplification systems to detect C. tr.- DNA in the spiked SF samples: two C. tr. -omp1-- directed PCR, one C. tr.-plasmid-PCR, one C. tr. -16s RNA directed PCR, and one commercially available LCR (LCX), Abbott laboratories).
In SF samples spiked with C. tr.-EB and with C. tr.-PBMo, alkaline lysis, detecting 1 C. tr.-EB/ml SF, 0,1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml SF and QIAmp gel extraction kit+ CTAB detecting 0,1 C. tr. -EB/ml SF, 1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml, respectively, allowed most sensitive detection of the organism in combination with the C. tr.- omp1-(152 bp) PCR. Sensitivity decreased in all methods after storage of the DNA of C. tr.- dilution series at -20 degrees C for 4 months by at least one log phase.
The sensitivity to detect C. tr.- DNA from SF is highly dependent on the DNA extraction method and the detection system applied. Alkaline lysis as well as the QIAmp Gel extraction kit + CTAB in combination with C. tr.- omp1 - (152 bp) PCR evolved as the most sensitive methods to identify C. tr. in serial dilutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/ar2864 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3003517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A213934898</galeid><sourcerecordid>A213934898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a0f0c973c9f1343ed71f4007c0785c05b73f0a5c9cc7389a700561ebdf5bf7893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks2OFCEUhStG44yjPoIhLnRVIxRUQ7kw6fT4l0x0o2tCU5cpJhS0QHWsB_F9pax2_AkLyOU7J_fenKp6SvAlIWLzSsVGbNi96pwwLuoN3TT3794tO6sepXSLcdN0DXtYnZGuo7gV7Lz6cQUZdLbBo2DQbnBqnHurUI5KD2FU2ab66tMWWY_S7MPRKoeMm2z_GsFRuUn9luYBUAKfbLZHm-el1FtjIILPaHGA74vnL3yEPIQ-IeV7pMaDs8bq1SjNKcOYHlcPjHIJnpzui-rru7dfdh_q68_vP-6217VmlORaYYN1x6nuDKGMQs-JYRhzjbloNW73nBqsWt1pzanoFMe43RDY96bdGy46elG9WX0P036EXpdeo3LyEO2o4iyDsvLfH28HeROOkmJMW8KLwcuTQQzfJkhZjjZpcE55CFOSnJbtMyxoIZ__R96GKfoynWwIZ6LjvC3Q5QrdKAfSehOWnZXTw2h18GBsqW8bQjtaJKIIXqwCHUNKEcxd7wTLJRhyDUYBn_096R_slAT6E0Zrtio</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217489775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis-DNA in synovial fluid: evaluation of the sensitivity of different DNA extraction methods and amplification systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Freise, Julia ; Bernau, Iris ; Meier, Sabine ; Zeidler, Henning ; Kuipers, Jens G</creator><creatorcontrib>Freise, Julia ; Bernau, Iris ; Meier, Sabine ; Zeidler, Henning ; Kuipers, Jens G</creatorcontrib><description>Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are used in research for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. tr.) in synovial fluid (SF). However there is no standardized system for diagnostic use in clinical practice, therefore this study aimed at determining the molecular biology method best suited to detect C. tr. from SF.
SF samples were spiked with C. tr. elementary bodies (EB) and human peripheral blood monocytes (PBMo) persistently infected with C. tr. in vitro to evaluate the sensitivity of different molecular biology methods and assays. Five different DNA-extraction methods were tested: 1) Alkaline lysis, 2) QIAex II Gel Extraction Kit+ CTAB, 3) Chelex-extraction, 4) QIAmp Tissue Kit and 5) QIAmp DNA Stool Kit. All DNA extracts were subjected to 5 different DNA amplification systems to detect C. tr.- DNA in the spiked SF samples: two C. tr. -omp1-- directed PCR, one C. tr.-plasmid-PCR, one C. tr. -16s RNA directed PCR, and one commercially available LCR (LCX), Abbott laboratories).
In SF samples spiked with C. tr.-EB and with C. tr.-PBMo, alkaline lysis, detecting 1 C. tr.-EB/ml SF, 0,1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml SF and QIAmp gel extraction kit+ CTAB detecting 0,1 C. tr. -EB/ml SF, 1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml, respectively, allowed most sensitive detection of the organism in combination with the C. tr.- omp1-(152 bp) PCR. Sensitivity decreased in all methods after storage of the DNA of C. tr.- dilution series at -20 degrees C for 4 months by at least one log phase.
The sensitivity to detect C. tr.- DNA from SF is highly dependent on the DNA extraction method and the detection system applied. Alkaline lysis as well as the QIAmp Gel extraction kit + CTAB in combination with C. tr.- omp1 - (152 bp) PCR evolved as the most sensitive methods to identify C. tr. in serial dilutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-6354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-6354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/ar2864</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19930584</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthritis, Infectious - diagnosis ; Care and treatment ; Chlamydia infections ; Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis ; Chlamydia trachomatis ; Diagnosis ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic screening ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Ligase Chain Reaction - methods ; Ligase Chain Reaction - standards ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Synovial fluid ; Synovial Fluid - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Arthritis research & therapy, 2009-01, Vol.11 (6), p.R175-R175, Article R175</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts 2009</rights><rights>Copyright ©2009 Freise et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009 Freise et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a0f0c973c9f1343ed71f4007c0785c05b73f0a5c9cc7389a700561ebdf5bf7893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a0f0c973c9f1343ed71f4007c0785c05b73f0a5c9cc7389a700561ebdf5bf7893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003517/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003517/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freise, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernau, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeidler, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuipers, Jens G</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis-DNA in synovial fluid: evaluation of the sensitivity of different DNA extraction methods and amplification systems</title><title>Arthritis research & therapy</title><addtitle>Arthritis Res Ther</addtitle><description>Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are used in research for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. tr.) in synovial fluid (SF). However there is no standardized system for diagnostic use in clinical practice, therefore this study aimed at determining the molecular biology method best suited to detect C. tr. from SF.
SF samples were spiked with C. tr. elementary bodies (EB) and human peripheral blood monocytes (PBMo) persistently infected with C. tr. in vitro to evaluate the sensitivity of different molecular biology methods and assays. Five different DNA-extraction methods were tested: 1) Alkaline lysis, 2) QIAex II Gel Extraction Kit+ CTAB, 3) Chelex-extraction, 4) QIAmp Tissue Kit and 5) QIAmp DNA Stool Kit. All DNA extracts were subjected to 5 different DNA amplification systems to detect C. tr.- DNA in the spiked SF samples: two C. tr. -omp1-- directed PCR, one C. tr.-plasmid-PCR, one C. tr. -16s RNA directed PCR, and one commercially available LCR (LCX), Abbott laboratories).
In SF samples spiked with C. tr.-EB and with C. tr.-PBMo, alkaline lysis, detecting 1 C. tr.-EB/ml SF, 0,1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml SF and QIAmp gel extraction kit+ CTAB detecting 0,1 C. tr. -EB/ml SF, 1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml, respectively, allowed most sensitive detection of the organism in combination with the C. tr.- omp1-(152 bp) PCR. Sensitivity decreased in all methods after storage of the DNA of C. tr.- dilution series at -20 degrees C for 4 months by at least one log phase.
The sensitivity to detect C. tr.- DNA from SF is highly dependent on the DNA extraction method and the detection system applied. Alkaline lysis as well as the QIAmp Gel extraction kit + CTAB in combination with C. tr.- omp1 - (152 bp) PCR evolved as the most sensitive methods to identify C. tr. in serial dilutions.</description><subject>Arthritis, Infectious - diagnosis</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chlamydia infections</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Ligase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Synovial fluid</subject><subject>Synovial Fluid - microbiology</subject><issn>1478-6354</issn><issn>1478-6362</issn><issn>1478-6354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks2OFCEUhStG44yjPoIhLnRVIxRUQ7kw6fT4l0x0o2tCU5cpJhS0QHWsB_F9pax2_AkLyOU7J_fenKp6SvAlIWLzSsVGbNi96pwwLuoN3TT3794tO6sepXSLcdN0DXtYnZGuo7gV7Lz6cQUZdLbBo2DQbnBqnHurUI5KD2FU2ab66tMWWY_S7MPRKoeMm2z_GsFRuUn9luYBUAKfbLZHm-el1FtjIILPaHGA74vnL3yEPIQ-IeV7pMaDs8bq1SjNKcOYHlcPjHIJnpzui-rru7dfdh_q68_vP-6217VmlORaYYN1x6nuDKGMQs-JYRhzjbloNW73nBqsWt1pzanoFMe43RDY96bdGy46elG9WX0P036EXpdeo3LyEO2o4iyDsvLfH28HeROOkmJMW8KLwcuTQQzfJkhZjjZpcE55CFOSnJbtMyxoIZ__R96GKfoynWwIZ6LjvC3Q5QrdKAfSehOWnZXTw2h18GBsqW8bQjtaJKIIXqwCHUNKEcxd7wTLJRhyDUYBn_096R_slAT6E0Zrtio</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Freise, Julia</creator><creator>Bernau, Iris</creator><creator>Meier, Sabine</creator><creator>Zeidler, Henning</creator><creator>Kuipers, Jens G</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE Abstracts</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis-DNA in synovial fluid: evaluation of the sensitivity of different DNA extraction methods and amplification systems</title><author>Freise, Julia ; Bernau, Iris ; Meier, Sabine ; Zeidler, Henning ; Kuipers, Jens G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a0f0c973c9f1343ed71f4007c0785c05b73f0a5c9cc7389a700561ebdf5bf7893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Arthritis, Infectious - diagnosis</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chlamydia infections</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Ligase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Synovial fluid</topic><topic>Synovial Fluid - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freise, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernau, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeidler, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuipers, Jens G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Arthritis research & therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freise, Julia</au><au>Bernau, Iris</au><au>Meier, Sabine</au><au>Zeidler, Henning</au><au>Kuipers, Jens G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis-DNA in synovial fluid: evaluation of the sensitivity of different DNA extraction methods and amplification systems</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis research & therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Res Ther</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>R175</spage><epage>R175</epage><pages>R175-R175</pages><artnum>R175</artnum><issn>1478-6354</issn><eissn>1478-6362</eissn><eissn>1478-6354</eissn><abstract>Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) are used in research for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. tr.) in synovial fluid (SF). However there is no standardized system for diagnostic use in clinical practice, therefore this study aimed at determining the molecular biology method best suited to detect C. tr. from SF.
SF samples were spiked with C. tr. elementary bodies (EB) and human peripheral blood monocytes (PBMo) persistently infected with C. tr. in vitro to evaluate the sensitivity of different molecular biology methods and assays. Five different DNA-extraction methods were tested: 1) Alkaline lysis, 2) QIAex II Gel Extraction Kit+ CTAB, 3) Chelex-extraction, 4) QIAmp Tissue Kit and 5) QIAmp DNA Stool Kit. All DNA extracts were subjected to 5 different DNA amplification systems to detect C. tr.- DNA in the spiked SF samples: two C. tr. -omp1-- directed PCR, one C. tr.-plasmid-PCR, one C. tr. -16s RNA directed PCR, and one commercially available LCR (LCX), Abbott laboratories).
In SF samples spiked with C. tr.-EB and with C. tr.-PBMo, alkaline lysis, detecting 1 C. tr.-EB/ml SF, 0,1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml SF and QIAmp gel extraction kit+ CTAB detecting 0,1 C. tr. -EB/ml SF, 1 C. tr.-PBMo/ml, respectively, allowed most sensitive detection of the organism in combination with the C. tr.- omp1-(152 bp) PCR. Sensitivity decreased in all methods after storage of the DNA of C. tr.- dilution series at -20 degrees C for 4 months by at least one log phase.
The sensitivity to detect C. tr.- DNA from SF is highly dependent on the DNA extraction method and the detection system applied. Alkaline lysis as well as the QIAmp Gel extraction kit + CTAB in combination with C. tr.- omp1 - (152 bp) PCR evolved as the most sensitive methods to identify C. tr. in serial dilutions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>19930584</pmid><doi>10.1186/ar2864</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-6354 |
ispartof | Arthritis research & therapy, 2009-01, Vol.11 (6), p.R175-R175, Article R175 |
issn | 1478-6354 1478-6362 1478-6354 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3003517 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Arthritis, Infectious - diagnosis Care and treatment Chlamydia infections Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis Chlamydia trachomatis Diagnosis DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification Genetic aspects Genetic screening Health aspects Humans Ligase Chain Reaction - methods Ligase Chain Reaction - standards Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards Sensitivity and Specificity Synovial fluid Synovial Fluid - microbiology |
title | Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis-DNA in synovial fluid: evaluation of the sensitivity of different DNA extraction methods and amplification systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20Chlamydia%20trachomatis-DNA%20in%20synovial%20fluid:%20evaluation%20of%20the%20sensitivity%20of%20different%20DNA%20extraction%20methods%20and%20amplification%20systems&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20research%20&%20therapy&rft.au=Freise,%20Julia&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=R175&rft.epage=R175&rft.pages=R175-R175&rft.artnum=R175&rft.issn=1478-6354&rft.eissn=1478-6362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/ar2864&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA213934898%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217489775&rft_id=info:pmid/19930584&rft_galeid=A213934898&rfr_iscdi=true |