Bioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol, Measures, Sample, and Comparative Context
Objectives: Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) is a national study of health and aging among individuals aged 25 to 74 at baseline (1995-1996). Longitudinal survey assessments (2004-2005), were followed by biological assessments on a subsample (aged 35-85).To facilitate public use, we describe the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aging and health 2010-12, Vol.22 (8), p.1059-1080 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1080 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1059 |
| container_title | Journal of aging and health |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Dienberg Love, Gayle Seeman, Teresa E. Weinstein, Maxine Ryff, Carol D. |
| description | Objectives: Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) is a national study of health and aging among individuals aged 25 to 74 at baseline (1995-1996). Longitudinal survey assessments (2004-2005), were followed by biological assessments on a subsample (aged 35-85).To facilitate public use, we describe the protocol, measures, and sample. Method: Respondents traveled to clinics for a 2-day data-collection protocol that included fasting blood specimens, 12-hr urine specimen, medical history, physical exam, bone densitometry, and a laboratory challenge (heart rate variability, blood pressure, respiration, salivary cortisol). Results: Response rates for the biological protocol (N = 1,255) were 39.3% or 43.1% (adjusting for those who could not be located or contacted). Reasons for nonparticipation were travel, family obligations, and being too busy. Respondents were comparable to the recruitment pool on most demographic characteristics and health assessments. Discussion: Strengths of the protocol vis-à-vis similar studies include opportunities to link biological factors with diverse content from other MIDUS projects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0898264310374355 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2972372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0898264310374355</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1928233283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-37cccaca7917bd67a2c8f6d6203cea79b3aa2502536eb2247f474f1a1a96a9243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1rFDEUxYNY7Lr67pMEffBlR_OdTB8EXdtaaFVY-2q4m8m0U2Yma5Ip9r83y9ZSC4VAwj2_e26Sg9ArSt5TqvUHYmrDlOCUcC24lE_QjErJKmWMfopmW7na6vvoeUpXhBBGCX2G9hkxWnElZujX5y50Y9M5yCEm3I04X3p8dvLlfIW_Qe7CCD1e5am5OcA_YsjBhX6BzzykKfq0wCsYNr1fYBgbvAzDBmJpuvblPGb_J79Aey30yb-83efo_Ojw5_Jrdfr9-GT56bRywphcce2cAwe6pnrdKA3MmVY1ihHufKmuOQCThEmu_JoxoVuhRUuBQq2gZoLP0ced72ZaD75xfswReruJ3QDxxgbo7P_K2F3ai3BtWa0ZL2uO3t0axPB78inboUvO9z2MPkzJalWm1rXQhXzzgLwKUyzflKyRTGpmlCzQ28cgWjPDOGeGF4rsKBdDStG3dxemxG4Dtg8DLi2v7z_0ruFfogWodkCCC39v6mOGfwGgR6yN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928233283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol, Measures, Sample, and Comparative Context</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dienberg Love, Gayle ; Seeman, Teresa E. ; Weinstein, Maxine ; Ryff, Carol D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dienberg Love, Gayle ; Seeman, Teresa E. ; Weinstein, Maxine ; Ryff, Carol D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) is a national study of health and aging among individuals aged 25 to 74 at baseline (1995-1996). Longitudinal survey assessments (2004-2005), were followed by biological assessments on a subsample (aged 35-85).To facilitate public use, we describe the protocol, measures, and sample. Method: Respondents traveled to clinics for a 2-day data-collection protocol that included fasting blood specimens, 12-hr urine specimen, medical history, physical exam, bone densitometry, and a laboratory challenge (heart rate variability, blood pressure, respiration, salivary cortisol). Results: Response rates for the biological protocol (N = 1,255) were 39.3% or 43.1% (adjusting for those who could not be located or contacted). Reasons for nonparticipation were travel, family obligations, and being too busy. Respondents were comparable to the recruitment pool on most demographic characteristics and health assessments. Discussion: Strengths of the protocol vis-à-vis similar studies include opportunities to link biological factors with diverse content from other MIDUS projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0898264310374355</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20876364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Aging - physiology ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Blood Pressure ; Bone Density ; Clinical Protocols ; Comparative analysis ; Data Collection ; Demographics ; Fasting ; Female ; Health Status ; Health Surveys ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Participation ; Polls & surveys ; Program Evaluation ; Protocol ; Public health ; Saliva - chemistry ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of aging and health, 2010-12, Vol.22 (8), p.1059-1080</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Dec 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-37cccaca7917bd67a2c8f6d6203cea79b3aa2502536eb2247f474f1a1a96a9243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-37cccaca7917bd67a2c8f6d6203cea79b3aa2502536eb2247f474f1a1a96a9243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0898264310374355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0898264310374355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20876364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dienberg Love, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeman, Teresa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Maxine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryff, Carol D.</creatorcontrib><title>Bioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol, Measures, Sample, and Comparative Context</title><title>Journal of aging and health</title><addtitle>J Aging Health</addtitle><description>Objectives: Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) is a national study of health and aging among individuals aged 25 to 74 at baseline (1995-1996). Longitudinal survey assessments (2004-2005), were followed by biological assessments on a subsample (aged 35-85).To facilitate public use, we describe the protocol, measures, and sample. Method: Respondents traveled to clinics for a 2-day data-collection protocol that included fasting blood specimens, 12-hr urine specimen, medical history, physical exam, bone densitometry, and a laboratory challenge (heart rate variability, blood pressure, respiration, salivary cortisol). Results: Response rates for the biological protocol (N = 1,255) were 39.3% or 43.1% (adjusting for those who could not be located or contacted). Reasons for nonparticipation were travel, family obligations, and being too busy. Respondents were comparable to the recruitment pool on most demographic characteristics and health assessments. Discussion: Strengths of the protocol vis-à-vis similar studies include opportunities to link biological factors with diverse content from other MIDUS projects.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Fasting</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Saliva - chemistry</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0898-2643</issn><issn>1552-6887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1rFDEUxYNY7Lr67pMEffBlR_OdTB8EXdtaaFVY-2q4m8m0U2Yma5Ip9r83y9ZSC4VAwj2_e26Sg9ArSt5TqvUHYmrDlOCUcC24lE_QjErJKmWMfopmW7na6vvoeUpXhBBGCX2G9hkxWnElZujX5y50Y9M5yCEm3I04X3p8dvLlfIW_Qe7CCD1e5am5OcA_YsjBhX6BzzykKfq0wCsYNr1fYBgbvAzDBmJpuvblPGb_J79Aey30yb-83efo_Ojw5_Jrdfr9-GT56bRywphcce2cAwe6pnrdKA3MmVY1ihHufKmuOQCThEmu_JoxoVuhRUuBQq2gZoLP0ced72ZaD75xfswReruJ3QDxxgbo7P_K2F3ai3BtWa0ZL2uO3t0axPB78inboUvO9z2MPkzJalWm1rXQhXzzgLwKUyzflKyRTGpmlCzQ28cgWjPDOGeGF4rsKBdDStG3dxemxG4Dtg8DLi2v7z_0ruFfogWodkCCC39v6mOGfwGgR6yN</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Dienberg Love, Gayle</creator><creator>Seeman, Teresa E.</creator><creator>Weinstein, Maxine</creator><creator>Ryff, Carol D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Bioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol, Measures, Sample, and Comparative Context</title><author>Dienberg Love, Gayle ; Seeman, Teresa E. ; Weinstein, Maxine ; Ryff, Carol D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-37cccaca7917bd67a2c8f6d6203cea79b3aa2502536eb2247f474f1a1a96a9243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Fasting</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Saliva - chemistry</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dienberg Love, Gayle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeman, Teresa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Maxine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryff, Carol D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of aging and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dienberg Love, Gayle</au><au>Seeman, Teresa E.</au><au>Weinstein, Maxine</au><au>Ryff, Carol D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol, Measures, Sample, and Comparative Context</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aging and health</jtitle><addtitle>J Aging Health</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1059</spage><epage>1080</epage><pages>1059-1080</pages><issn>0898-2643</issn><eissn>1552-6887</eissn><abstract>Objectives: Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) is a national study of health and aging among individuals aged 25 to 74 at baseline (1995-1996). Longitudinal survey assessments (2004-2005), were followed by biological assessments on a subsample (aged 35-85).To facilitate public use, we describe the protocol, measures, and sample. Method: Respondents traveled to clinics for a 2-day data-collection protocol that included fasting blood specimens, 12-hr urine specimen, medical history, physical exam, bone densitometry, and a laboratory challenge (heart rate variability, blood pressure, respiration, salivary cortisol). Results: Response rates for the biological protocol (N = 1,255) were 39.3% or 43.1% (adjusting for those who could not be located or contacted). Reasons for nonparticipation were travel, family obligations, and being too busy. Respondents were comparable to the recruitment pool on most demographic characteristics and health assessments. Discussion: Strengths of the protocol vis-à-vis similar studies include opportunities to link biological factors with diverse content from other MIDUS projects.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20876364</pmid><doi>10.1177/0898264310374355</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0898-2643 |
| ispartof | Journal of aging and health, 2010-12, Vol.22 (8), p.1059-1080 |
| issn | 0898-2643 1552-6887 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2972372 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adult Adults Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Aging - physiology Biomarkers - analysis Blood Pressure Bone Density Clinical Protocols Comparative analysis Data Collection Demographics Fasting Female Health Status Health Surveys Heart Rate Humans Longitudinal Studies Male Middle Aged Patient Participation Polls & surveys Program Evaluation Protocol Public health Saliva - chemistry Studies Surveys and Questionnaires United States |
| title | Bioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol, Measures, Sample, and Comparative Context |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioindicators%20in%20the%20MIDUS%20National%20Study:%20Protocol,%20Measures,%20Sample,%20and%20Comparative%20Context&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aging%20and%20health&rft.au=Dienberg%20Love,%20Gayle&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1059&rft.epage=1080&rft.pages=1059-1080&rft.issn=0898-2643&rft.eissn=1552-6887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0898264310374355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1928233283%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928233283&rft_id=info:pmid/20876364&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0898264310374355&rfr_iscdi=true |