MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: Methods, reliability and descriptive statistics

Purpose: To measure carotid plaque components using MRI and estimate reliability in the population‐based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Materials and Methods: Contrast‐enhanced high‐resolution (0.51 × 0.58 × 2 mm3) MRI images were acquired through internal (ICA) and common carotid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2010-02, Vol.31 (2), p.406-415
Hauptverfasser: Wasserman, Bruce A., Astor, Brad C., Sharrett, A. Richey, Swingen, Cory, Catellier, Diane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 415
container_issue 2
container_start_page 406
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 31
creator Wasserman, Bruce A.
Astor, Brad C.
Sharrett, A. Richey
Swingen, Cory
Catellier, Diane
description Purpose: To measure carotid plaque components using MRI and estimate reliability in the population‐based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Materials and Methods: Contrast‐enhanced high‐resolution (0.51 × 0.58 × 2 mm3) MRI images were acquired through internal (ICA) and common carotid arteries (CCA) of 2066 ARIC participants at four sites. Sixty‐one exams were repeated and 164 pairs had repeated interpretations. Plaque component thicknesses, areas and volumes over eight slices (1.6‐cm segment) were measured. Intraplaque hemorrhage was recorded. Reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlations and κ statistics. Results: There were 1769 successful MRI exams (mean age 71 years; 57% females; 81% white; 19% African‐Americans). Repeat scan reliability was highest for CCA lumen area (0.94) and maximum wall thickness (0.89), ICA lumen area (0.89) and maximum wall thickness (0.77) and total wall volume (0.79), and lowest for small structures—core volume (0.30) and mean cap thickness (0.38). Overall reliability was primarily related to reader variability rather than scan acquisition. K's for presence of core, calcification and hemorrhage were fair to good. White men had the thickest plaques (average maximum ICA wall thickness = 2.3 mm) and the most cores (34%). Conclusion: The most important limiting factor for MRI measurements of plaque components is reader variability. Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010; 31: 406–415. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.22043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2963866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733885425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5233-88a338be8bfdcfe9684c202bdffe581cc6aade81bacc860545f7c2f39ec40bc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdtu1DAQhiNERUvhhgdAvuOgpjh2nDhcIJVVKYu6RS2nS8uxJ-y0OSy207LPwEvjsO0KbrgZjzTf_DOeP0meZPQwo5S9uuwcHjJGc34v2csEYykTsrgfcyp4mkla7iYPvb-klFZVLh4ku2zKuMj3kl-LiznpQPvRQQd98GRoiNFuCGjJqtU_RiDYk7AEomNwgzftFNETh_5qqpmh68YeA4Inz48u5rMXxIfRrl-TBYTlYP0BcdCirrHFsCa6t8SCNw5XAa8hsjqgD2j8o2Sn0a2Hx7fvfvLl3fHn2fv09OPJfHZ0mhrBOE-l1JzLGmTdWNNAVcjcMMpq2zQgZGZMobUFmdXaGFlQkYumNKzhFZic1ibj-8mbje5qrDuwJn7b6VatHHbardWgUf1b6XGpvg_XilUFl0URBZ7dCrghHsgH1aE30La6h2H0qoz7SZEzEcmXG9LEm3kHzXZKRtVknprMU3_Mi_DTv_faonduRSDbADfYwvo_UupDtPVONN30xBvDz22PdleqKHkp1LezE5XT809nX88X6i3_DToZuTU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733885425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: Methods, reliability and descriptive statistics</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wasserman, Bruce A. ; Astor, Brad C. ; Sharrett, A. Richey ; Swingen, Cory ; Catellier, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Bruce A. ; Astor, Brad C. ; Sharrett, A. Richey ; Swingen, Cory ; Catellier, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To measure carotid plaque components using MRI and estimate reliability in the population‐based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Materials and Methods: Contrast‐enhanced high‐resolution (0.51 × 0.58 × 2 mm3) MRI images were acquired through internal (ICA) and common carotid arteries (CCA) of 2066 ARIC participants at four sites. Sixty‐one exams were repeated and 164 pairs had repeated interpretations. Plaque component thicknesses, areas and volumes over eight slices (1.6‐cm segment) were measured. Intraplaque hemorrhage was recorded. Reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlations and κ statistics. Results: There were 1769 successful MRI exams (mean age 71 years; 57% females; 81% white; 19% African‐Americans). Repeat scan reliability was highest for CCA lumen area (0.94) and maximum wall thickness (0.89), ICA lumen area (0.89) and maximum wall thickness (0.77) and total wall volume (0.79), and lowest for small structures—core volume (0.30) and mean cap thickness (0.38). Overall reliability was primarily related to reader variability rather than scan acquisition. K's for presence of core, calcification and hemorrhage were fair to good. White men had the thickest plaques (average maximum ICA wall thickness = 2.3 mm) and the most cores (34%). Conclusion: The most important limiting factor for MRI measurements of plaque components is reader variability. Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010; 31: 406–415. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20099354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>atherosclerosis ; Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis ; Carotid Stenosis - epidemiology ; Comorbidity ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnosis ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; plaque ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; statistics</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2010-02, Vol.31 (2), p.406-415</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5233-88a338be8bfdcfe9684c202bdffe581cc6aade81bacc860545f7c2f39ec40bc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5233-88a338be8bfdcfe9684c202bdffe581cc6aade81bacc860545f7c2f39ec40bc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.22043$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.22043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20099354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astor, Brad C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharrett, A. Richey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swingen, Cory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catellier, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: Methods, reliability and descriptive statistics</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose: To measure carotid plaque components using MRI and estimate reliability in the population‐based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Materials and Methods: Contrast‐enhanced high‐resolution (0.51 × 0.58 × 2 mm3) MRI images were acquired through internal (ICA) and common carotid arteries (CCA) of 2066 ARIC participants at four sites. Sixty‐one exams were repeated and 164 pairs had repeated interpretations. Plaque component thicknesses, areas and volumes over eight slices (1.6‐cm segment) were measured. Intraplaque hemorrhage was recorded. Reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlations and κ statistics. Results: There were 1769 successful MRI exams (mean age 71 years; 57% females; 81% white; 19% African‐Americans). Repeat scan reliability was highest for CCA lumen area (0.94) and maximum wall thickness (0.89), ICA lumen area (0.89) and maximum wall thickness (0.77) and total wall volume (0.79), and lowest for small structures—core volume (0.30) and mean cap thickness (0.38). Overall reliability was primarily related to reader variability rather than scan acquisition. K's for presence of core, calcification and hemorrhage were fair to good. White men had the thickest plaques (average maximum ICA wall thickness = 2.3 mm) and the most cores (34%). Conclusion: The most important limiting factor for MRI measurements of plaque components is reader variability. Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010; 31: 406–415. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>atherosclerosis</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>plaque</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>statistics</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdtu1DAQhiNERUvhhgdAvuOgpjh2nDhcIJVVKYu6RS2nS8uxJ-y0OSy207LPwEvjsO0KbrgZjzTf_DOeP0meZPQwo5S9uuwcHjJGc34v2csEYykTsrgfcyp4mkla7iYPvb-klFZVLh4ku2zKuMj3kl-LiznpQPvRQQd98GRoiNFuCGjJqtU_RiDYk7AEomNwgzftFNETh_5qqpmh68YeA4Inz48u5rMXxIfRrl-TBYTlYP0BcdCirrHFsCa6t8SCNw5XAa8hsjqgD2j8o2Sn0a2Hx7fvfvLl3fHn2fv09OPJfHZ0mhrBOE-l1JzLGmTdWNNAVcjcMMpq2zQgZGZMobUFmdXaGFlQkYumNKzhFZic1ibj-8mbje5qrDuwJn7b6VatHHbardWgUf1b6XGpvg_XilUFl0URBZ7dCrghHsgH1aE30La6h2H0qoz7SZEzEcmXG9LEm3kHzXZKRtVknprMU3_Mi_DTv_faonduRSDbADfYwvo_UupDtPVONN30xBvDz22PdleqKHkp1LezE5XT809nX88X6i3_DToZuTU</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Wasserman, Bruce A.</creator><creator>Astor, Brad C.</creator><creator>Sharrett, A. Richey</creator><creator>Swingen, Cory</creator><creator>Catellier, Diane</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: Methods, reliability and descriptive statistics</title><author>Wasserman, Bruce A. ; Astor, Brad C. ; Sharrett, A. Richey ; Swingen, Cory ; Catellier, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5233-88a338be8bfdcfe9684c202bdffe581cc6aade81bacc860545f7c2f39ec40bc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>atherosclerosis</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>plaque</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astor, Brad C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharrett, A. Richey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swingen, Cory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catellier, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wasserman, Bruce A.</au><au>Astor, Brad C.</au><au>Sharrett, A. Richey</au><au>Swingen, Cory</au><au>Catellier, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: Methods, reliability and descriptive statistics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>406</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>406-415</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To measure carotid plaque components using MRI and estimate reliability in the population‐based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Materials and Methods: Contrast‐enhanced high‐resolution (0.51 × 0.58 × 2 mm3) MRI images were acquired through internal (ICA) and common carotid arteries (CCA) of 2066 ARIC participants at four sites. Sixty‐one exams were repeated and 164 pairs had repeated interpretations. Plaque component thicknesses, areas and volumes over eight slices (1.6‐cm segment) were measured. Intraplaque hemorrhage was recorded. Reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlations and κ statistics. Results: There were 1769 successful MRI exams (mean age 71 years; 57% females; 81% white; 19% African‐Americans). Repeat scan reliability was highest for CCA lumen area (0.94) and maximum wall thickness (0.89), ICA lumen area (0.89) and maximum wall thickness (0.77) and total wall volume (0.79), and lowest for small structures—core volume (0.30) and mean cap thickness (0.38). Overall reliability was primarily related to reader variability rather than scan acquisition. K's for presence of core, calcification and hemorrhage were fair to good. White men had the thickest plaques (average maximum ICA wall thickness = 2.3 mm) and the most cores (34%). Conclusion: The most important limiting factor for MRI measurements of plaque components is reader variability. Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010; 31: 406–415. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20099354</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.22043</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2010-02, Vol.31 (2), p.406-415
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2963866
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects atherosclerosis
Carotid Stenosis - diagnosis
Carotid Stenosis - epidemiology
Comorbidity
Data Interpretation, Statistical
epidemiology
Female
Humans
Incidence
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnosis
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - epidemiology
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - statistics & numerical data
magnetic resonance imaging
Male
Middle Aged
plaque
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
statistics
title MRI measurements of carotid plaque in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study: Methods, reliability and descriptive statistics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A02%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MRI%20measurements%20of%20carotid%20plaque%20in%20the%20atherosclerosis%20risk%20in%20communities%20(ARIC)%20study:%20Methods,%20reliability%20and%20descriptive%20statistics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Wasserman,%20Bruce%20A.&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=406&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=406-415&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.22043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733885425%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733885425&rft_id=info:pmid/20099354&rfr_iscdi=true