Measuring FMD in the brachial artery: how important is QRS gating?

Recommendations for the measurement of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) typically suggest images be obtained at identical times in the cardiac cycle, usually end diastole (QRS complex onset). This recommendation presumes that inter-individual differences in arterial compliance are minimized. Ho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2010-10, Vol.109 (4), p.959-965
Hauptverfasser: KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J, GUTTERMAN, David D, PHILLIPS, Shane A, JURVA, Jason W, ARTHUR, Emily I. L, DAS, Emon, WIDLANSKY, Michael E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 965
container_issue 4
container_start_page 959
container_title Journal of applied physiology (1985)
container_volume 109
creator KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J
GUTTERMAN, David D
PHILLIPS, Shane A
JURVA, Jason W
ARTHUR, Emily I. L
DAS, Emon
WIDLANSKY, Michael E
description Recommendations for the measurement of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) typically suggest images be obtained at identical times in the cardiac cycle, usually end diastole (QRS complex onset). This recommendation presumes that inter-individual differences in arterial compliance are minimized. However, published evidence is conflicting. Furthermore, ECG gating is not available on many ultrasound systems; it requires an expensive software upgrade or increased image processing time. We tested whether analysis of images acquired with QRS gating or with the more simplified method of image averaging would yield similar results. We analyzed FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) in 29 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in 31 older adults and 12 young adults without diabetes, yielding a range of brachial artery distensibility. FMD and NMD were measured using recommended QRS-gated brachial artery diameter measurements and, alternatively, the average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval. We found strong agreement between both methods for FMD and NMD (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.88-0.99). Measuring FMD and NMD using average diameter measurements significantly reduced post-image-processing time (658.9 ± 71.6 vs. 1,024.1 ± 167.6 s for QRS-gated analysis, P < 0.001). FMD and NMD measurements based on average diameter measurements can be performed without reducing accuracy. This finding may allow for simplification of FMD measurement and aid in the development of FMD as a potentially useful clinical tool.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2963331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>758135085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-6364c128855f886715c77479a691c7e2538a75a4bb339a3a812a2e12cb0209ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtv1DAQha2Kii6FvwAWEuIpi-2JY4cHEPQGUisELc_WxPVuvMrGwU5a7b-v225L4Wke5jtnLoeQN5zNOZfiwwqHoRvaTfKhmzMmQcwF42yHzHJXFLxi_BmZaSVZoaRWe-RFSivGeFlK_pzsCVYpzgBm5OuZwzRF3y_p8dkh9T0dW0ebiLb12FGMo4ubj7QN19SvhxBH7EfqE_3565wuccy6zy_J7gK75F5t6z75fXx0cfCtOP1x8v3gy2lhJdRjUUFVWi60lnKhdZ4vrVKlqrGquVVOSNCoJJZNA1AjoOYChePCNkyw2l3CPvl07ztMzdpdWtePETszRL_GuDEBvfm30_vWLMOVEXUFADwbvN8axPBncmk0a5-s6zrsXZiSyZ_iIJmWmXz7H7kKU-zzdUZVvASW_5shdQ_ZGFKKbvG4CmfmNiXzNCVzl5K5TSkrXz-95FH3EEsG3m0BTBa7RcTe-vSXA1FrWQLcALG6nPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>761430601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring FMD in the brachial artery: how important is QRS gating?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J ; GUTTERMAN, David D ; PHILLIPS, Shane A ; JURVA, Jason W ; ARTHUR, Emily I. L ; DAS, Emon ; WIDLANSKY, Michael E</creator><creatorcontrib>KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J ; GUTTERMAN, David D ; PHILLIPS, Shane A ; JURVA, Jason W ; ARTHUR, Emily I. L ; DAS, Emon ; WIDLANSKY, Michael E</creatorcontrib><description>Recommendations for the measurement of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) typically suggest images be obtained at identical times in the cardiac cycle, usually end diastole (QRS complex onset). This recommendation presumes that inter-individual differences in arterial compliance are minimized. However, published evidence is conflicting. Furthermore, ECG gating is not available on many ultrasound systems; it requires an expensive software upgrade or increased image processing time. We tested whether analysis of images acquired with QRS gating or with the more simplified method of image averaging would yield similar results. We analyzed FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) in 29 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in 31 older adults and 12 young adults without diabetes, yielding a range of brachial artery distensibility. FMD and NMD were measured using recommended QRS-gated brachial artery diameter measurements and, alternatively, the average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval. We found strong agreement between both methods for FMD and NMD (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.88-0.99). Measuring FMD and NMD using average diameter measurements significantly reduced post-image-processing time (658.9 ± 71.6 vs. 1,024.1 ± 167.6 s for QRS-gated analysis, P &lt; 0.001). FMD and NMD measurements based on average diameter measurements can be performed without reducing accuracy. This finding may allow for simplification of FMD measurement and aid in the development of FMD as a potentially useful clinical tool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8750-7587</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1601</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20671033</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPHEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Blood Pressure ; Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Brachial Artery - physiopathology ; Case-Control Studies ; Compliance ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnostic imaging ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology ; Diastole ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Hyperemia - diagnostic imaging ; Hyperemia - physiopathology ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nitroglycerin ; Observer Variation ; Older people ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Regional Blood Flow ; Reproducibility of Results ; Ultrasonography ; Vasodilation ; Vasodilator Agents ; Veins &amp; arteries ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied physiology (1985), 2010-10, Vol.109 (4), p.959-965</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Physiological Society Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-6364c128855f886715c77479a691c7e2538a75a4bb339a3a812a2e12cb0209ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-6364c128855f886715c77479a691c7e2538a75a4bb339a3a812a2e12cb0209ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3026,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23298543$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20671033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUTTERMAN, David D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, Shane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JURVA, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARTHUR, Emily I. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAS, Emon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIDLANSKY, Michael E</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring FMD in the brachial artery: how important is QRS gating?</title><title>Journal of applied physiology (1985)</title><addtitle>J Appl Physiol (1985)</addtitle><description>Recommendations for the measurement of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) typically suggest images be obtained at identical times in the cardiac cycle, usually end diastole (QRS complex onset). This recommendation presumes that inter-individual differences in arterial compliance are minimized. However, published evidence is conflicting. Furthermore, ECG gating is not available on many ultrasound systems; it requires an expensive software upgrade or increased image processing time. We tested whether analysis of images acquired with QRS gating or with the more simplified method of image averaging would yield similar results. We analyzed FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) in 29 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in 31 older adults and 12 young adults without diabetes, yielding a range of brachial artery distensibility. FMD and NMD were measured using recommended QRS-gated brachial artery diameter measurements and, alternatively, the average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval. We found strong agreement between both methods for FMD and NMD (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.88-0.99). Measuring FMD and NMD using average diameter measurements significantly reduced post-image-processing time (658.9 ± 71.6 vs. 1,024.1 ± 167.6 s for QRS-gated analysis, P &lt; 0.001). FMD and NMD measurements based on average diameter measurements can be performed without reducing accuracy. This finding may allow for simplification of FMD measurement and aid in the development of FMD as a potentially useful clinical tool.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brachial Artery - physiopathology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diastole</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperemia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hyperemia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nitroglycerin</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Vasodilation</subject><subject>Vasodilator Agents</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>8750-7587</issn><issn>1522-1601</issn><issn>1522-1601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVtv1DAQha2Kii6FvwAWEuIpi-2JY4cHEPQGUisELc_WxPVuvMrGwU5a7b-v225L4Wke5jtnLoeQN5zNOZfiwwqHoRvaTfKhmzMmQcwF42yHzHJXFLxi_BmZaSVZoaRWe-RFSivGeFlK_pzsCVYpzgBm5OuZwzRF3y_p8dkh9T0dW0ebiLb12FGMo4ubj7QN19SvhxBH7EfqE_3565wuccy6zy_J7gK75F5t6z75fXx0cfCtOP1x8v3gy2lhJdRjUUFVWi60lnKhdZ4vrVKlqrGquVVOSNCoJJZNA1AjoOYChePCNkyw2l3CPvl07ztMzdpdWtePETszRL_GuDEBvfm30_vWLMOVEXUFADwbvN8axPBncmk0a5-s6zrsXZiSyZ_iIJmWmXz7H7kKU-zzdUZVvASW_5shdQ_ZGFKKbvG4CmfmNiXzNCVzl5K5TSkrXz-95FH3EEsG3m0BTBa7RcTe-vSXA1FrWQLcALG6nPk</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J</creator><creator>GUTTERMAN, David D</creator><creator>PHILLIPS, Shane A</creator><creator>JURVA, Jason W</creator><creator>ARTHUR, Emily I. L</creator><creator>DAS, Emon</creator><creator>WIDLANSKY, Michael E</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Measuring FMD in the brachial artery: how important is QRS gating?</title><author>KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J ; GUTTERMAN, David D ; PHILLIPS, Shane A ; JURVA, Jason W ; ARTHUR, Emily I. L ; DAS, Emon ; WIDLANSKY, Michael E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-6364c128855f886715c77479a691c7e2538a75a4bb339a3a812a2e12cb0209ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brachial Artery - physiopathology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diastole</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperemia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hyperemia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nitroglycerin</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Vasodilation</topic><topic>Vasodilator Agents</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUTTERMAN, David D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, Shane A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JURVA, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARTHUR, Emily I. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAS, Emon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WIDLANSKY, Michael E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied physiology (1985)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KIZHAKEKUTTU, Tinoy J</au><au>GUTTERMAN, David D</au><au>PHILLIPS, Shane A</au><au>JURVA, Jason W</au><au>ARTHUR, Emily I. L</au><au>DAS, Emon</au><au>WIDLANSKY, Michael E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring FMD in the brachial artery: how important is QRS gating?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied physiology (1985)</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Physiol (1985)</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>965</epage><pages>959-965</pages><issn>8750-7587</issn><issn>1522-1601</issn><eissn>1522-1601</eissn><coden>JAPHEV</coden><abstract>Recommendations for the measurement of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) typically suggest images be obtained at identical times in the cardiac cycle, usually end diastole (QRS complex onset). This recommendation presumes that inter-individual differences in arterial compliance are minimized. However, published evidence is conflicting. Furthermore, ECG gating is not available on many ultrasound systems; it requires an expensive software upgrade or increased image processing time. We tested whether analysis of images acquired with QRS gating or with the more simplified method of image averaging would yield similar results. We analyzed FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) in 29 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in 31 older adults and 12 young adults without diabetes, yielding a range of brachial artery distensibility. FMD and NMD were measured using recommended QRS-gated brachial artery diameter measurements and, alternatively, the average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval. We found strong agreement between both methods for FMD and NMD (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.88-0.99). Measuring FMD and NMD using average diameter measurements significantly reduced post-image-processing time (658.9 ± 71.6 vs. 1,024.1 ± 167.6 s for QRS-gated analysis, P &lt; 0.001). FMD and NMD measurements based on average diameter measurements can be performed without reducing accuracy. This finding may allow for simplification of FMD measurement and aid in the development of FMD as a potentially useful clinical tool.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>20671033</pmid><doi>10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8750-7587
ispartof Journal of applied physiology (1985), 2010-10, Vol.109 (4), p.959-965
issn 8750-7587
1522-1601
1522-1601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2963331
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Adults
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Flow Velocity
Blood Pressure
Brachial Artery - diagnostic imaging
Brachial Artery - physiopathology
Case-Control Studies
Compliance
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnostic imaging
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology
Diastole
Electrocardiography
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Heart Rate
Humans
Hyperemia - diagnostic imaging
Hyperemia - physiopathology
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Nitroglycerin
Observer Variation
Older people
Predictive Value of Tests
Regional Blood Flow
Reproducibility of Results
Ultrasonography
Vasodilation
Vasodilator Agents
Veins & arteries
Young Adult
title Measuring FMD in the brachial artery: how important is QRS gating?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T12%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20FMD%20in%20the%20brachial%20artery:%20how%20important%20is%20QRS%20gating?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20physiology%20(1985)&rft.au=KIZHAKEKUTTU,%20Tinoy%20J&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=965&rft.pages=959-965&rft.issn=8750-7587&rft.eissn=1522-1601&rft.coden=JAPHEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E758135085%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=761430601&rft_id=info:pmid/20671033&rfr_iscdi=true