Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Test Measurements of Organic-Liquid/Water Interfacial Areas: Application to Soils and the Influence of Surface Roughness
Interfacial areas between an organic immiscible liquid and water were measured for two natural soils using the aqueous-phase interfacial partitioning tracer test method. The measured values were compared to measured values for silica sands compiled from the literature. The data were compared using t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2010-10, Vol.44 (19), p.7596-7600 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7600 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 7596 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Brusseau, Mark L. Narter, Matt Janousek, Hilary |
description | Interfacial areas between an organic immiscible liquid and water were measured for two natural soils using the aqueous-phase interfacial partitioning tracer test method. The measured values were compared to measured values for silica sands compiled from the literature. The data were compared using the maximum specific interfacial area as a system index, which is useful for cases wherein fluid saturations differ. The maximum specific interfacial areas measured for the soils were significantly larger than the values obtained for the sands. The disparity between the values was attributed to the impact of surface roughness on solid surface area and hence film-associated interfacial area. A good correlation was observed between maximum specific interfacial area and specific solid surface area measured with the N2/BET method. The correlation may serve as a means by which to estimate maximum specific organic-liquid/water interfacial areas. Interfacial areas measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer method were compared to interfacial areas measured with high-resolution microtomography. Values measured with the former method were consistently larger than those measured with the latter, consistent with the general inability of the microtomography method to characterize roughness-associated surface area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es101312n |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2957373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2176092791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a461t-3c357fbe1b9818a339b09f17e27ca8f9d2377e2eec975b01cb36c2ad05f6e14f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkV2LEzEUhgdR3Lp64R-QIIh4MW4-mknGC6EsfixUVtyK3oUz6UmbZZp0kxnBf-LPNWVru-pVSPKcJ-_JqaqnjL5mlLMzzIwywXi4V02Y5LSWWrL71YSW07oVzfeT6lHO15RSLqh-WJ1wqrlkSk-qXxdhwOTAeujJZ0iDH3wMPqzIIoHFRBaYB_IJIY8JNxiGTKIjl2kFwdt67m9Gvzz7BsVB7ppmqVS8IbPttvcWdkoyRHIVfZ8JhCUZ1lh4148YLO6MV-OuFMmXOK7WAXN-XD1w0Gd8sl9Pq6_v3y3OP9bzyw8X57N5DdOGDbWwQirXIetazTQI0Xa0dUwhVxa0a5dcqLJBtK2SHWW2E43lsKTSNcimTpxWb2-927Hb4NKWFhP0Zpv8BtJPE8Gbv2-CX5tV_GF4K5VQoghe7gUp3ozlt8zGZ4t9DwHjmI2Ssm20bKaFfP4PeR3HFEp3RjWM6WmJWKBXt5BNMeeE7hCFUbObtjlMu7DP7mY_kH_GW4AXewCyhd4lCNbnIye4pkLxIwc2H0P9_-BvxPfBNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>761184975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Test Measurements of Organic-Liquid/Water Interfacial Areas: Application to Soils and the Influence of Surface Roughness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Brusseau, Mark L. ; Narter, Matt ; Janousek, Hilary</creator><creatorcontrib>Brusseau, Mark L. ; Narter, Matt ; Janousek, Hilary</creatorcontrib><description>Interfacial areas between an organic immiscible liquid and water were measured for two natural soils using the aqueous-phase interfacial partitioning tracer test method. The measured values were compared to measured values for silica sands compiled from the literature. The data were compared using the maximum specific interfacial area as a system index, which is useful for cases wherein fluid saturations differ. The maximum specific interfacial areas measured for the soils were significantly larger than the values obtained for the sands. The disparity between the values was attributed to the impact of surface roughness on solid surface area and hence film-associated interfacial area. A good correlation was observed between maximum specific interfacial area and specific solid surface area measured with the N2/BET method. The correlation may serve as a means by which to estimate maximum specific organic-liquid/water interfacial areas. Interfacial areas measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer method were compared to interfacial areas measured with high-resolution microtomography. Values measured with the former method were consistently larger than those measured with the latter, consistent with the general inability of the microtomography method to characterize roughness-associated surface area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es101312n</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20825178</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Aqueous chemistry ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental Measurements Methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geochemistry ; Interfacial bonding ; Measurement ; Soil ; Soil and rock geochemistry ; Soils ; Surface Properties ; Surface roughness ; Surficial geology ; Water - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2010-10, Vol.44 (19), p.7596-7600</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Oct 1, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a461t-3c357fbe1b9818a339b09f17e27ca8f9d2377e2eec975b01cb36c2ad05f6e14f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a461t-3c357fbe1b9818a339b09f17e27ca8f9d2377e2eec975b01cb36c2ad05f6e14f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es101312n$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es101312n$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23280372$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20825178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brusseau, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narter, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janousek, Hilary</creatorcontrib><title>Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Test Measurements of Organic-Liquid/Water Interfacial Areas: Application to Soils and the Influence of Surface Roughness</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Interfacial areas between an organic immiscible liquid and water were measured for two natural soils using the aqueous-phase interfacial partitioning tracer test method. The measured values were compared to measured values for silica sands compiled from the literature. The data were compared using the maximum specific interfacial area as a system index, which is useful for cases wherein fluid saturations differ. The maximum specific interfacial areas measured for the soils were significantly larger than the values obtained for the sands. The disparity between the values was attributed to the impact of surface roughness on solid surface area and hence film-associated interfacial area. A good correlation was observed between maximum specific interfacial area and specific solid surface area measured with the N2/BET method. The correlation may serve as a means by which to estimate maximum specific organic-liquid/water interfacial areas. Interfacial areas measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer method were compared to interfacial areas measured with high-resolution microtomography. Values measured with the former method were consistently larger than those measured with the latter, consistent with the general inability of the microtomography method to characterize roughness-associated surface area.</description><subject>Aqueous chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental Measurements Methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Interfacial bonding</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil and rock geochemistry</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Water - chemistry</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkV2LEzEUhgdR3Lp64R-QIIh4MW4-mknGC6EsfixUVtyK3oUz6UmbZZp0kxnBf-LPNWVru-pVSPKcJ-_JqaqnjL5mlLMzzIwywXi4V02Y5LSWWrL71YSW07oVzfeT6lHO15RSLqh-WJ1wqrlkSk-qXxdhwOTAeujJZ0iDH3wMPqzIIoHFRBaYB_IJIY8JNxiGTKIjl2kFwdt67m9Gvzz7BsVB7ppmqVS8IbPttvcWdkoyRHIVfZ8JhCUZ1lh4148YLO6MV-OuFMmXOK7WAXN-XD1w0Gd8sl9Pq6_v3y3OP9bzyw8X57N5DdOGDbWwQirXIetazTQI0Xa0dUwhVxa0a5dcqLJBtK2SHWW2E43lsKTSNcimTpxWb2-927Hb4NKWFhP0Zpv8BtJPE8Gbv2-CX5tV_GF4K5VQoghe7gUp3ozlt8zGZ4t9DwHjmI2Ssm20bKaFfP4PeR3HFEp3RjWM6WmJWKBXt5BNMeeE7hCFUbObtjlMu7DP7mY_kH_GW4AXewCyhd4lCNbnIye4pkLxIwc2H0P9_-BvxPfBNA</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Brusseau, Mark L.</creator><creator>Narter, Matt</creator><creator>Janousek, Hilary</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Test Measurements of Organic-Liquid/Water Interfacial Areas: Application to Soils and the Influence of Surface Roughness</title><author>Brusseau, Mark L. ; Narter, Matt ; Janousek, Hilary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a461t-3c357fbe1b9818a339b09f17e27ca8f9d2377e2eec975b01cb36c2ad05f6e14f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aqueous chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental Measurements Methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Interfacial bonding</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil and rock geochemistry</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Water - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brusseau, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narter, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janousek, Hilary</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brusseau, Mark L.</au><au>Narter, Matt</au><au>Janousek, Hilary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Test Measurements of Organic-Liquid/Water Interfacial Areas: Application to Soils and the Influence of Surface Roughness</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>7596</spage><epage>7600</epage><pages>7596-7600</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Interfacial areas between an organic immiscible liquid and water were measured for two natural soils using the aqueous-phase interfacial partitioning tracer test method. The measured values were compared to measured values for silica sands compiled from the literature. The data were compared using the maximum specific interfacial area as a system index, which is useful for cases wherein fluid saturations differ. The maximum specific interfacial areas measured for the soils were significantly larger than the values obtained for the sands. The disparity between the values was attributed to the impact of surface roughness on solid surface area and hence film-associated interfacial area. A good correlation was observed between maximum specific interfacial area and specific solid surface area measured with the N2/BET method. The correlation may serve as a means by which to estimate maximum specific organic-liquid/water interfacial areas. Interfacial areas measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer method were compared to interfacial areas measured with high-resolution microtomography. Values measured with the former method were consistently larger than those measured with the latter, consistent with the general inability of the microtomography method to characterize roughness-associated surface area.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>20825178</pmid><doi>10.1021/es101312n</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2010-10, Vol.44 (19), p.7596-7600 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2957373 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | Aqueous chemistry Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Environmental Measurements Methods Exact sciences and technology Geochemistry Interfacial bonding Measurement Soil Soil and rock geochemistry Soils Surface Properties Surface roughness Surficial geology Water - chemistry |
title | Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Test Measurements of Organic-Liquid/Water Interfacial Areas: Application to Soils and the Influence of Surface Roughness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interfacial%20Partitioning%20Tracer%20Test%20Measurements%20of%20Organic-Liquid/Water%20Interfacial%20Areas:%20Application%20to%20Soils%20and%20the%20Influence%20of%20Surface%20Roughness&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Brusseau,%20Mark%20L.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=7596&rft.epage=7600&rft.pages=7596-7600&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es101312n&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2176092791%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=761184975&rft_id=info:pmid/20825178&rfr_iscdi=true |