A new framework for designing programmes of assessment
Research on assessment in medical education has strongly focused on individual measurement instruments and their psychometric quality. Without detracting from the value of this research, such an approach is not sufficient to high quality assessment of competence as a whole. A programmatic approach i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2010-08, Vol.15 (3), p.379-393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 393 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 379 |
container_title | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Dijkstra, J. Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. Schuwirth, L. W. T. |
description | Research on assessment in medical education has strongly focused on individual measurement instruments and their psychometric quality. Without detracting from the value of this research, such an approach is not sufficient to high quality assessment of competence
as a whole.
A programmatic approach is advocated which presupposes criteria for designing comprehensive assessment programmes and for assuring their quality. The paucity of research with relevance to programmatic assessment, and especially its development, prompted us to embark on a research project to develop design principles for programmes of assessment. We conducted focus group interviews to explore the experiences and views of nine assessment experts concerning good practices and new ideas about theoretical and practical issues in programmes of assessment. The discussion was analysed, mapping all aspects relevant for design onto a framework, which was iteratively adjusted to fit the data until saturation was reached. The overarching framework for designing programmes of assessment consists of six assessment programme dimensions:
Goals
,
Programme in Action
,
Support
,
Documenting
,
Improving
and
Accounting
. The model described in this paper can help to frame programmes of assessment; it not only provides a common language, but also a comprehensive picture of the dimensions to be covered when formulating design principles. It helps identifying areas concerning assessment in which ample research and development has been done. But, more importantly, it also helps to detect underserved areas. A guiding principle in design of assessment programmes is
fitness for purpose.
High quality assessment can only be defined in terms of its goals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2940030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ898296</ericid><sourcerecordid>2259156378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-55aba93b7cef4f1c1aad7c578794f9a8bb83832a145812cba7218827600196293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gCAy4MLVaJKZTJKNUEp9UXCj65BJk3FqJ6lJx2J_vSlT6gNcJXC-e--59wBwiuAVgpBeBwRzwlMIecoxJOl6D_QRoVmKCkr34z9jOM05L3rgKIQZhDBDjB2CHuIMx1rcB8UwsXqVGC8bvXL-LTHOJ1Md6srWtkoW3lVRanRInElkCDqERtvlMTgwch70yfYdgJfb8fPoPp083T2MhpNU5RwuU0JkKXlWUqVNbpBCUk6pIpRRnhsuWVmyjGVYopwwhFUpKY4GMS0gRLzAPBuAm67voi0bPVVxtJdzsfB1I_2ncLIWvxVbv4rKfQjM87gtjA0utw28e291WIqmDkrP59Jq1wZBCUEsnqyI5MUfcuZab-N2AmPCESkyyiKFOkp5F4LXZucFQbEJRXShiBiK2IQi1rHm_OcS3xXbFCJw1gHa12onjx9ZBPjGGe7kECVbaf_t7P-hX8nKoLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259156378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new framework for designing programmes of assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dijkstra, J. ; Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. ; Schuwirth, L. W. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dijkstra, J. ; Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. ; Schuwirth, L. W. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Research on assessment in medical education has strongly focused on individual measurement instruments and their psychometric quality. Without detracting from the value of this research, such an approach is not sufficient to high quality assessment of competence
as a whole.
A programmatic approach is advocated which presupposes criteria for designing comprehensive assessment programmes and for assuring their quality. The paucity of research with relevance to programmatic assessment, and especially its development, prompted us to embark on a research project to develop design principles for programmes of assessment. We conducted focus group interviews to explore the experiences and views of nine assessment experts concerning good practices and new ideas about theoretical and practical issues in programmes of assessment. The discussion was analysed, mapping all aspects relevant for design onto a framework, which was iteratively adjusted to fit the data until saturation was reached. The overarching framework for designing programmes of assessment consists of six assessment programme dimensions:
Goals
,
Programme in Action
,
Support
,
Documenting
,
Improving
and
Accounting
. The model described in this paper can help to frame programmes of assessment; it not only provides a common language, but also a comprehensive picture of the dimensions to be covered when formulating design principles. It helps identifying areas concerning assessment in which ample research and development has been done. But, more importantly, it also helps to detect underserved areas. A guiding principle in design of assessment programmes is
fitness for purpose.
High quality assessment can only be defined in terms of its goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19821042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Competence ; Comprehensive Programs ; Curriculum ; Education ; Educational Measurement - methods ; Evaluation ; Focus Groups ; Goals ; Humans ; Interviews ; Learning ; Measurement ; Medical Education ; Models, Educational ; Program Design ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Psychometrics ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research and Development ; Research Projects ; Tape Recording ; Teaching ; Theory Practice Relationship</subject><ispartof>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2010-08, Vol.15 (3), p.379-393</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2009</rights><rights>Advances in Health Sciences Education is a copyright of Springer, (2009). All Rights Reserved. © 2009. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-55aba93b7cef4f1c1aad7c578794f9a8bb83832a145812cba7218827600196293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-55aba93b7cef4f1c1aad7c578794f9a8bb83832a145812cba7218827600196293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ898296$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19821042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dijkstra, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuwirth, L. W. T.</creatorcontrib><title>A new framework for designing programmes of assessment</title><title>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</title><addtitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><description>Research on assessment in medical education has strongly focused on individual measurement instruments and their psychometric quality. Without detracting from the value of this research, such an approach is not sufficient to high quality assessment of competence
as a whole.
A programmatic approach is advocated which presupposes criteria for designing comprehensive assessment programmes and for assuring their quality. The paucity of research with relevance to programmatic assessment, and especially its development, prompted us to embark on a research project to develop design principles for programmes of assessment. We conducted focus group interviews to explore the experiences and views of nine assessment experts concerning good practices and new ideas about theoretical and practical issues in programmes of assessment. The discussion was analysed, mapping all aspects relevant for design onto a framework, which was iteratively adjusted to fit the data until saturation was reached. The overarching framework for designing programmes of assessment consists of six assessment programme dimensions:
Goals
,
Programme in Action
,
Support
,
Documenting
,
Improving
and
Accounting
. The model described in this paper can help to frame programmes of assessment; it not only provides a common language, but also a comprehensive picture of the dimensions to be covered when formulating design principles. It helps identifying areas concerning assessment in which ample research and development has been done. But, more importantly, it also helps to detect underserved areas. A guiding principle in design of assessment programmes is
fitness for purpose.
High quality assessment can only be defined in terms of its goals.</description><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Comprehensive Programs</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Models, Educational</subject><subject>Program Design</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research and Development</subject><subject>Research Projects</subject><subject>Tape Recording</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><issn>1382-4996</issn><issn>1573-1677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMotlZ_gCAy4MLVaJKZTJKNUEp9UXCj65BJk3FqJ6lJx2J_vSlT6gNcJXC-e--59wBwiuAVgpBeBwRzwlMIecoxJOl6D_QRoVmKCkr34z9jOM05L3rgKIQZhDBDjB2CHuIMx1rcB8UwsXqVGC8bvXL-LTHOJ1Md6srWtkoW3lVRanRInElkCDqERtvlMTgwch70yfYdgJfb8fPoPp083T2MhpNU5RwuU0JkKXlWUqVNbpBCUk6pIpRRnhsuWVmyjGVYopwwhFUpKY4GMS0gRLzAPBuAm67voi0bPVVxtJdzsfB1I_2ncLIWvxVbv4rKfQjM87gtjA0utw28e291WIqmDkrP59Jq1wZBCUEsnqyI5MUfcuZab-N2AmPCESkyyiKFOkp5F4LXZucFQbEJRXShiBiK2IQi1rHm_OcS3xXbFCJw1gHa12onjx9ZBPjGGe7kECVbaf_t7P-hX8nKoLQ</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Dijkstra, J.</creator><creator>Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.</creator><creator>Schuwirth, L. W. T.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>A new framework for designing programmes of assessment</title><author>Dijkstra, J. ; Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. ; Schuwirth, L. W. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-55aba93b7cef4f1c1aad7c578794f9a8bb83832a145812cba7218827600196293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Comprehensive Programs</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Models, Educational</topic><topic>Program Design</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research and Development</topic><topic>Research Projects</topic><topic>Tape Recording</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dijkstra, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuwirth, L. W. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dijkstra, J.</au><au>Van der Vleuten, C. P. M.</au><au>Schuwirth, L. W. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ898296</ericid><atitle>A new framework for designing programmes of assessment</atitle><jtitle>Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice</jtitle><stitle>Adv in Health Sci Educ</stitle><addtitle>Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>379-393</pages><issn>1382-4996</issn><eissn>1573-1677</eissn><abstract>Research on assessment in medical education has strongly focused on individual measurement instruments and their psychometric quality. Without detracting from the value of this research, such an approach is not sufficient to high quality assessment of competence
as a whole.
A programmatic approach is advocated which presupposes criteria for designing comprehensive assessment programmes and for assuring their quality. The paucity of research with relevance to programmatic assessment, and especially its development, prompted us to embark on a research project to develop design principles for programmes of assessment. We conducted focus group interviews to explore the experiences and views of nine assessment experts concerning good practices and new ideas about theoretical and practical issues in programmes of assessment. The discussion was analysed, mapping all aspects relevant for design onto a framework, which was iteratively adjusted to fit the data until saturation was reached. The overarching framework for designing programmes of assessment consists of six assessment programme dimensions:
Goals
,
Programme in Action
,
Support
,
Documenting
,
Improving
and
Accounting
. The model described in this paper can help to frame programmes of assessment; it not only provides a common language, but also a comprehensive picture of the dimensions to be covered when formulating design principles. It helps identifying areas concerning assessment in which ample research and development has been done. But, more importantly, it also helps to detect underserved areas. A guiding principle in design of assessment programmes is
fitness for purpose.
High quality assessment can only be defined in terms of its goals.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>19821042</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1382-4996 |
ispartof | Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2010-08, Vol.15 (3), p.379-393 |
issn | 1382-4996 1573-1677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2940030 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Competence Comprehensive Programs Curriculum Education Educational Measurement - methods Evaluation Focus Groups Goals Humans Interviews Learning Measurement Medical Education Models, Educational Program Design Program Development Program Evaluation Psychometrics R&D Research & development Research and Development Research Projects Tape Recording Teaching Theory Practice Relationship |
title | A new framework for designing programmes of assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20framework%20for%20designing%20programmes%20of%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20health%20sciences%20education%20:%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Dijkstra,%20J.&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=379-393&rft.issn=1382-4996&rft.eissn=1573-1677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2259156378%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259156378&rft_id=info:pmid/19821042&rft_ericid=EJ898296&rfr_iscdi=true |