Addressing the question of the effect of RBC storage on clinical outcomes: The Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) (Section 7)

Abstract The question of whether storage of red blood cells (RBCs) alters their capacity to deliver oxygen and affects patient outcomes remains in a state of clinical equipoise. Studies of the changes which occur while RBCs are stored have led to several physiologically plausible hypotheses that the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion and apheresis science 2010-08, Vol.43 (1), p.107-116
Hauptverfasser: Steiner, M.E, Assmann, S.F, Levy, J.H, Marshall, J, Pulkrabek, S, Sloan, S.R, Triulzi, D, Stowell, C.P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title Transfusion and apheresis science
container_volume 43
creator Steiner, M.E
Assmann, S.F
Levy, J.H
Marshall, J
Pulkrabek, S
Sloan, S.R
Triulzi, D
Stowell, C.P
description Abstract The question of whether storage of red blood cells (RBCs) alters their capacity to deliver oxygen and affects patient outcomes remains in a state of clinical equipoise. Studies of the changes which occur while RBCs are stored have led to several physiologically plausible hypotheses that these changes impair RBC function when the units are transfused. Although there is some evidence of this effect in vivo from animal model experiments, the results of several largely retrospective patient studies have not been consistent. Some studies have shown an association between worse clinical outcomes and transfusion of RBC which have been stored for longer periods of time, while others have found no effect. Three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials have been developed to address this important, but currently unanswered, question. Two clinical trials, one in low birth weight neonates and the other in intensive care unit patients, are enrolling subjects in Canada (the Age of Red Blood Cells in Premature Infants; the Age of Blood Study). The third trial, which is being developed in the United States, is the Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS). This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures who are likely to require RBC transfusion will be randomized to receive RBC units stored for either 10 or fewer days or 21 or more days. Randomization will only occur if the blood bank has enough units of RBC of both storage times to meet the crossmatch request; hence, subjects randomized to the ⩾21 day arm will receive RBC of the same storage time as they would have following standard inventory practice of “oldest units out first”. The primary outcome is the change in the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), a composite measure of multiorgan dysfunction, by day 7. Secondary outcomes include the change in the MODS by day 28, all-cause mortality, and several composite and single measures of specific organ system function. The estimated total sample size required will be 1434 evaluable subjects (717 per arm). The RECESS trial is registered through the US National Institutes of Health (clinicaltrials.gov) as NCT00991341.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transci.2010.05.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2918709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1473050210000972</els_id><sourcerecordid>748959999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-f3b720427dfe998ea57066a9177715c6b06d854268edcfe5e25e8d31a3f8ac773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAPlGe8hiO3HscCgq6fIhVULalLPldSZbL9m4tZNKe-aPd7K7rYALvtgz8-aN_Z6T5C2jM0ZZ8WE9G4Lpo3UzTjFHxYyy_FlyzJRUKStU9hzPucxSKig_Sl7FuKaUSVYWL5MjTgshFJXHye-LpgkQo-tXZLgBcjdCHJzviW93MbQt2GGKFp8rEgcfzAoI1m3nemdNR_w4WL-B-JFcI34BDamg60h9gF6OwewI62FstuR0Ma_mdX1GTmvknfLy7HXyojVdhDeH_ST5-WV-XX1Lr358_V5dXKVWcDakbbaUnOZcNi2UpQIjJC0KUzIpJRO2WNKiUSLnhYLGtiCAC1BNxkzWKmOlzE6S8z3v7bjcIAZ6lLDTt8FtTNhqb5z-u9K7G73y95qXqCotkeD9gSD4nVB646LF15oe_Bi1zFUpSlyIFHukDT7GAO3TFEb15J9e64N_evJPU6HRP-x79-cVn7oeDUPApz0AUKh7B0EjBfQWGhdQUN14998R5_8wPFr5C7YQ134MPbqgmY5cU11Pn2j6Q4ziKiXPHgDkWMQP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748959999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addressing the question of the effect of RBC storage on clinical outcomes: The Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) (Section 7)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Steiner, M.E ; Assmann, S.F ; Levy, J.H ; Marshall, J ; Pulkrabek, S ; Sloan, S.R ; Triulzi, D ; Stowell, C.P</creator><creatorcontrib>Steiner, M.E ; Assmann, S.F ; Levy, J.H ; Marshall, J ; Pulkrabek, S ; Sloan, S.R ; Triulzi, D ; Stowell, C.P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The question of whether storage of red blood cells (RBCs) alters their capacity to deliver oxygen and affects patient outcomes remains in a state of clinical equipoise. Studies of the changes which occur while RBCs are stored have led to several physiologically plausible hypotheses that these changes impair RBC function when the units are transfused. Although there is some evidence of this effect in vivo from animal model experiments, the results of several largely retrospective patient studies have not been consistent. Some studies have shown an association between worse clinical outcomes and transfusion of RBC which have been stored for longer periods of time, while others have found no effect. Three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials have been developed to address this important, but currently unanswered, question. Two clinical trials, one in low birth weight neonates and the other in intensive care unit patients, are enrolling subjects in Canada (the Age of Red Blood Cells in Premature Infants; the Age of Blood Study). The third trial, which is being developed in the United States, is the Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS). This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures who are likely to require RBC transfusion will be randomized to receive RBC units stored for either 10 or fewer days or 21 or more days. Randomization will only occur if the blood bank has enough units of RBC of both storage times to meet the crossmatch request; hence, subjects randomized to the ⩾21 day arm will receive RBC of the same storage time as they would have following standard inventory practice of “oldest units out first”. The primary outcome is the change in the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), a composite measure of multiorgan dysfunction, by day 7. Secondary outcomes include the change in the MODS by day 28, all-cause mortality, and several composite and single measures of specific organ system function. The estimated total sample size required will be 1434 evaluable subjects (717 per arm). The RECESS trial is registered through the US National Institutes of Health (clinicaltrials.gov) as NCT00991341.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-0502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2010.05.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20655807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Blood Preservation - adverse effects ; Blood Preservation - methods ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods ; Erythrocyte Transfusion ; Erythrocytes - metabolism ; Female ; Health technology assessment ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Oxygen - blood ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transfusion and apheresis science, 2010-08, Vol.43 (1), p.107-116</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>(c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-f3b720427dfe998ea57066a9177715c6b06d854268edcfe5e25e8d31a3f8ac773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-f3b720427dfe998ea57066a9177715c6b06d854268edcfe5e25e8d31a3f8ac773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050210000972$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20655807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steiner, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assmann, S.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, J.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulkrabek, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloan, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triulzi, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowell, C.P</creatorcontrib><title>Addressing the question of the effect of RBC storage on clinical outcomes: The Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) (Section 7)</title><title>Transfusion and apheresis science</title><addtitle>Transfus Apher Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract The question of whether storage of red blood cells (RBCs) alters their capacity to deliver oxygen and affects patient outcomes remains in a state of clinical equipoise. Studies of the changes which occur while RBCs are stored have led to several physiologically plausible hypotheses that these changes impair RBC function when the units are transfused. Although there is some evidence of this effect in vivo from animal model experiments, the results of several largely retrospective patient studies have not been consistent. Some studies have shown an association between worse clinical outcomes and transfusion of RBC which have been stored for longer periods of time, while others have found no effect. Three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials have been developed to address this important, but currently unanswered, question. Two clinical trials, one in low birth weight neonates and the other in intensive care unit patients, are enrolling subjects in Canada (the Age of Red Blood Cells in Premature Infants; the Age of Blood Study). The third trial, which is being developed in the United States, is the Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS). This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures who are likely to require RBC transfusion will be randomized to receive RBC units stored for either 10 or fewer days or 21 or more days. Randomization will only occur if the blood bank has enough units of RBC of both storage times to meet the crossmatch request; hence, subjects randomized to the ⩾21 day arm will receive RBC of the same storage time as they would have following standard inventory practice of “oldest units out first”. The primary outcome is the change in the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), a composite measure of multiorgan dysfunction, by day 7. Secondary outcomes include the change in the MODS by day 28, all-cause mortality, and several composite and single measures of specific organ system function. The estimated total sample size required will be 1434 evaluable subjects (717 per arm). The RECESS trial is registered through the US National Institutes of Health (clinicaltrials.gov) as NCT00991341.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood Preservation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Transfusion</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen - blood</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1473-0502</issn><issn>1878-1683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsJPAPlGe8hiO3HscCgq6fIhVULalLPldSZbL9m4tZNKe-aPd7K7rYALvtgz8-aN_Z6T5C2jM0ZZ8WE9G4Lpo3UzTjFHxYyy_FlyzJRUKStU9hzPucxSKig_Sl7FuKaUSVYWL5MjTgshFJXHye-LpgkQo-tXZLgBcjdCHJzviW93MbQt2GGKFp8rEgcfzAoI1m3nemdNR_w4WL-B-JFcI34BDamg60h9gF6OwewI62FstuR0Ma_mdX1GTmvknfLy7HXyojVdhDeH_ST5-WV-XX1Lr358_V5dXKVWcDakbbaUnOZcNi2UpQIjJC0KUzIpJRO2WNKiUSLnhYLGtiCAC1BNxkzWKmOlzE6S8z3v7bjcIAZ6lLDTt8FtTNhqb5z-u9K7G73y95qXqCotkeD9gSD4nVB646LF15oe_Bi1zFUpSlyIFHukDT7GAO3TFEb15J9e64N_evJPU6HRP-x79-cVn7oeDUPApz0AUKh7B0EjBfQWGhdQUN14998R5_8wPFr5C7YQ134MPbqgmY5cU11Pn2j6Q4ziKiXPHgDkWMQP</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Steiner, M.E</creator><creator>Assmann, S.F</creator><creator>Levy, J.H</creator><creator>Marshall, J</creator><creator>Pulkrabek, S</creator><creator>Sloan, S.R</creator><creator>Triulzi, D</creator><creator>Stowell, C.P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Addressing the question of the effect of RBC storage on clinical outcomes: The Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) (Section 7)</title><author>Steiner, M.E ; Assmann, S.F ; Levy, J.H ; Marshall, J ; Pulkrabek, S ; Sloan, S.R ; Triulzi, D ; Stowell, C.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-f3b720427dfe998ea57066a9177715c6b06d854268edcfe5e25e8d31a3f8ac773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood Preservation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Transfusion</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen - blood</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steiner, M.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assmann, S.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, J.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulkrabek, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloan, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triulzi, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowell, C.P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Transfusion and apheresis science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steiner, M.E</au><au>Assmann, S.F</au><au>Levy, J.H</au><au>Marshall, J</au><au>Pulkrabek, S</au><au>Sloan, S.R</au><au>Triulzi, D</au><au>Stowell, C.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Addressing the question of the effect of RBC storage on clinical outcomes: The Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) (Section 7)</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion and apheresis science</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Apher Sci</addtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>107-116</pages><issn>1473-0502</issn><eissn>1878-1683</eissn><abstract>Abstract The question of whether storage of red blood cells (RBCs) alters their capacity to deliver oxygen and affects patient outcomes remains in a state of clinical equipoise. Studies of the changes which occur while RBCs are stored have led to several physiologically plausible hypotheses that these changes impair RBC function when the units are transfused. Although there is some evidence of this effect in vivo from animal model experiments, the results of several largely retrospective patient studies have not been consistent. Some studies have shown an association between worse clinical outcomes and transfusion of RBC which have been stored for longer periods of time, while others have found no effect. Three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials have been developed to address this important, but currently unanswered, question. Two clinical trials, one in low birth weight neonates and the other in intensive care unit patients, are enrolling subjects in Canada (the Age of Red Blood Cells in Premature Infants; the Age of Blood Study). The third trial, which is being developed in the United States, is the Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS). This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures who are likely to require RBC transfusion will be randomized to receive RBC units stored for either 10 or fewer days or 21 or more days. Randomization will only occur if the blood bank has enough units of RBC of both storage times to meet the crossmatch request; hence, subjects randomized to the ⩾21 day arm will receive RBC of the same storage time as they would have following standard inventory practice of “oldest units out first”. The primary outcome is the change in the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), a composite measure of multiorgan dysfunction, by day 7. Secondary outcomes include the change in the MODS by day 28, all-cause mortality, and several composite and single measures of specific organ system function. The estimated total sample size required will be 1434 evaluable subjects (717 per arm). The RECESS trial is registered through the US National Institutes of Health (clinicaltrials.gov) as NCT00991341.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20655807</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transci.2010.05.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-0502
ispartof Transfusion and apheresis science, 2010-08, Vol.43 (1), p.107-116
issn 1473-0502
1878-1683
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2918709
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Blood Preservation - adverse effects
Blood Preservation - methods
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods
Erythrocyte Transfusion
Erythrocytes - metabolism
Female
Health technology assessment
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Male
Oxygen - blood
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Addressing the question of the effect of RBC storage on clinical outcomes: The Red Cell Storage Duration Study (RECESS) (Section 7)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addressing%20the%20question%20of%20the%20effect%20of%20RBC%20storage%20on%20clinical%20outcomes:%20The%20Red%20Cell%20Storage%20Duration%20Study%20(RECESS)%20(Section%207)&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20and%20apheresis%20science&rft.au=Steiner,%20M.E&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=107-116&rft.issn=1473-0502&rft.eissn=1878-1683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transci.2010.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E748959999%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748959999&rft_id=info:pmid/20655807&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1473050210000972&rfr_iscdi=true