Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SC) between obese and healthy-weight women. Study Design Baseline and postoperative data were analyzed from the Colpopexy And Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized trial of SC with or without Burch colposuspensio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2008-01, Vol.199 (6), p.690.e1-690.e8
Hauptverfasser: Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE, Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS, Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD, Gao, Xin, MS, Zyczynski, Halina M., MD, Weber, Anne M., MD, MS, Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 690.e8
container_issue 6
container_start_page 690.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 199
creator Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE
Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS
Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD
Gao, Xin, MS
Zyczynski, Halina M., MD
Weber, Anne M., MD, MS
Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS
description Objective The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SC) between obese and healthy-weight women. Study Design Baseline and postoperative data were analyzed from the Colpopexy And Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized trial of SC with or without Burch colposuspension in stress continent women with stages II-IV prolapse. Outcomes and complications were compared between obese and healthy-weight women. Results CARE participants included 74 obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 ), 122 overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2 ), and 125 healthy-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ) women, and 1 underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2 ) woman. Compared to healthy-weight women, obese women were younger (59.0 ± 9.9 vs 62.1 ± 10.3 yrs; P = .04), more likely to have stage II prolapse (25.7% vs 11.2%; P = .01), and had longer operative times (189 ± 52 vs 169 ± 58 min; P = .02). Two years after surgery, stress incontinence, prolapse, symptom resolution, and satisfaction did not differ between the obese and healthy-weight groups. Conclusion Most outcomes and complication rates after SC are similar in obese and healthy-weight women.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2918409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002937808008119</els_id><sourcerecordid>69888333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-2ee092fd6ac51acc130a403408daa6c178e62205895c217983759b61d532924d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxS0EotuFL8AB7QUkDgljO3FsCVWqKgpIlXoAziOvMykO2Xixk4r99jjaVflzwBfL8ps3z78xYy84lBy4etuXtg93pQDQJTQlSHjEVhxMUyit9GO2AgBRGNnoM3aeUr8chRFP2RnXuqqF1iv25nZLyU-HjR3bTZgnF3aUNrabKG6SdTG4MOzDnn4enrEnnR0SPT_ta_b1-v2Xq4_Fze2HT1eXN4WrpZ4KQQRGdK2yrubWOS7BViAr0K21yvFGkxICam1qJ3hjtGxqs1W8rWXOVrVyzS6Ovvt5u6PW0ThFO-A--p2NBwzW4983o_-Gd-EeheG6ApMNXp8MYvgxU5pw55OjYbAjhTmhMlprmdeaiaMwPzOlSN1DEw64EMYeF8K4EEZoMBPORS__jPe75IQ0C16dBDY5O3TRjs6nB50AUysJPOveHXWUYd57ipicp9FR6yO5Cdvg_5_j4p9yN_jR547f6UCpD3Mc85iQYxII-HkZ_vIVQGcTzo38BZrhrfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69888333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE ; Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS ; Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD ; Gao, Xin, MS ; Zyczynski, Halina M., MD ; Weber, Anne M., MD, MS ; Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE ; Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS ; Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD ; Gao, Xin, MS ; Zyczynski, Halina M., MD ; Weber, Anne M., MD, MS ; Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS ; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SC) between obese and healthy-weight women. Study Design Baseline and postoperative data were analyzed from the Colpopexy And Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized trial of SC with or without Burch colposuspension in stress continent women with stages II-IV prolapse. Outcomes and complications were compared between obese and healthy-weight women. Results CARE participants included 74 obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 ), 122 overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2 ), and 125 healthy-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ) women, and 1 underweight (&lt; 18.5 kg/m2 ) woman. Compared to healthy-weight women, obese women were younger (59.0 ± 9.9 vs 62.1 ± 10.3 yrs; P = .04), more likely to have stage II prolapse (25.7% vs 11.2%; P = .01), and had longer operative times (189 ± 52 vs 169 ± 58 min; P = .02). Two years after surgery, stress incontinence, prolapse, symptom resolution, and satisfaction did not differ between the obese and healthy-weight groups. Conclusion Most outcomes and complication rates after SC are similar in obese and healthy-weight women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18845288</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>abdominal sacrocolpopexy ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Colposcopy - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Metabolic diseases ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Obesity - complications ; Obesity - diagnosis ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; postoperative complications ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Reference Values ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Suburethral Slings ; Surgical Mesh ; surgical outcomes ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urodynamics ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Uterine Prolapse - diagnosis ; Uterine Prolapse - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2008-01, Vol.199 (6), p.690.e1-690.e8</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-2ee092fd6ac51acc130a403408daa6c178e62205895c217983759b61d532924d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-2ee092fd6ac51acc130a403408daa6c178e62205895c217983759b61d532924d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,3548,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20956301$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18845288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xin, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zyczynski, Halina M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Anne M., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelvic Floor Disorders Network</creatorcontrib><title>Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SC) between obese and healthy-weight women. Study Design Baseline and postoperative data were analyzed from the Colpopexy And Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized trial of SC with or without Burch colposuspension in stress continent women with stages II-IV prolapse. Outcomes and complications were compared between obese and healthy-weight women. Results CARE participants included 74 obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 ), 122 overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2 ), and 125 healthy-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ) women, and 1 underweight (&lt; 18.5 kg/m2 ) woman. Compared to healthy-weight women, obese women were younger (59.0 ± 9.9 vs 62.1 ± 10.3 yrs; P = .04), more likely to have stage II prolapse (25.7% vs 11.2%; P = .01), and had longer operative times (189 ± 52 vs 169 ± 58 min; P = .02). Two years after surgery, stress incontinence, prolapse, symptom resolution, and satisfaction did not differ between the obese and healthy-weight groups. Conclusion Most outcomes and complication rates after SC are similar in obese and healthy-weight women.</description><subject>abdominal sacrocolpopexy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Colposcopy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - complications</subject><subject>Obesity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Suburethral Slings</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Uterine Prolapse - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Prolapse - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxS0EotuFL8AB7QUkDgljO3FsCVWqKgpIlXoAziOvMykO2Xixk4r99jjaVflzwBfL8ps3z78xYy84lBy4etuXtg93pQDQJTQlSHjEVhxMUyit9GO2AgBRGNnoM3aeUr8chRFP2RnXuqqF1iv25nZLyU-HjR3bTZgnF3aUNrabKG6SdTG4MOzDnn4enrEnnR0SPT_ta_b1-v2Xq4_Fze2HT1eXN4WrpZ4KQQRGdK2yrubWOS7BViAr0K21yvFGkxICam1qJ3hjtGxqs1W8rWXOVrVyzS6Ovvt5u6PW0ThFO-A--p2NBwzW4983o_-Gd-EeheG6ApMNXp8MYvgxU5pw55OjYbAjhTmhMlprmdeaiaMwPzOlSN1DEw64EMYeF8K4EEZoMBPORS__jPe75IQ0C16dBDY5O3TRjs6nB50AUysJPOveHXWUYd57ipicp9FR6yO5Cdvg_5_j4p9yN_jR547f6UCpD3Mc85iQYxII-HkZ_vIVQGcTzo38BZrhrfY</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE</creator><creator>Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS</creator><creator>Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD</creator><creator>Gao, Xin, MS</creator><creator>Zyczynski, Halina M., MD</creator><creator>Weber, Anne M., MD, MS</creator><creator>Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy</title><author>Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE ; Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS ; Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD ; Gao, Xin, MS ; Zyczynski, Halina M., MD ; Weber, Anne M., MD, MS ; Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-2ee092fd6ac51acc130a403408daa6c178e62205895c217983759b61d532924d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>abdominal sacrocolpopexy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Colposcopy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - complications</topic><topic>Obesity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Suburethral Slings</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Uterine Prolapse - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Prolapse - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xin, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zyczynski, Halina M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Anne M., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelvic Floor Disorders Network</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Catherine S., MD, MSCE</au><au>Kenton, Kimberly S., MD, MS</au><au>Richter, Holly E., PhD, MD</au><au>Gao, Xin, MS</au><au>Zyczynski, Halina M., MD</au><au>Weber, Anne M., MD, MS</au><au>Nygaard, Ingrid E., MD, MS</au><aucorp>Pelvic Floor Disorders Network</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>199</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>690.e1</spage><epage>690.e8</epage><pages>690.e1-690.e8</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>Objective The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SC) between obese and healthy-weight women. Study Design Baseline and postoperative data were analyzed from the Colpopexy And Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized trial of SC with or without Burch colposuspension in stress continent women with stages II-IV prolapse. Outcomes and complications were compared between obese and healthy-weight women. Results CARE participants included 74 obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 ), 122 overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2 ), and 125 healthy-weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ) women, and 1 underweight (&lt; 18.5 kg/m2 ) woman. Compared to healthy-weight women, obese women were younger (59.0 ± 9.9 vs 62.1 ± 10.3 yrs; P = .04), more likely to have stage II prolapse (25.7% vs 11.2%; P = .01), and had longer operative times (189 ± 52 vs 169 ± 58 min; P = .02). Two years after surgery, stress incontinence, prolapse, symptom resolution, and satisfaction did not differ between the obese and healthy-weight groups. Conclusion Most outcomes and complication rates after SC are similar in obese and healthy-weight women.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>18845288</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.030</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2008-01, Vol.199 (6), p.690.e1-690.e8
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2918409
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects abdominal sacrocolpopexy
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Body Mass Index
Colposcopy - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Medical sciences
Metabolic diseases
Middle Aged
Obesity
Obesity - complications
Obesity - diagnosis
Obstetrics and Gynecology
postoperative complications
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Reference Values
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Suburethral Slings
Surgical Mesh
surgical outcomes
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery
Urodynamics
Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Uterine Prolapse - diagnosis
Uterine Prolapse - surgery
title Obesity and outcomes after sacrocolpopexy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Obesity%20and%20outcomes%20after%20sacrocolpopexy&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Bradley,%20Catherine%20S.,%20MD,%20MSCE&rft.aucorp=Pelvic%20Floor%20Disorders%20Network&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=199&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=690.e1&rft.epage=690.e8&rft.pages=690.e1-690.e8&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69888333%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69888333&rft_id=info:pmid/18845288&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002937808008119&rfr_iscdi=true