Inhibitory motor control in response stopping and response switching

While much is known about the neural regions recruited in the human brain when a dominant motor response becomes inappropriate and must be stopped, less is known about the regions that support switching to a new, appropriate, response. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with two variants of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of neuroscience 2010-06, Vol.30 (25), p.8512-8518
Hauptverfasser: Kenner, Naomi M, Mumford, Jeanette A, Hommer, Rebecca E, Skup, Martha, Leibenluft, Ellen, Poldrack, Russell A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8518
container_issue 25
container_start_page 8512
container_title The Journal of neuroscience
container_volume 30
creator Kenner, Naomi M
Mumford, Jeanette A
Hommer, Rebecca E
Skup, Martha
Leibenluft, Ellen
Poldrack, Russell A
description While much is known about the neural regions recruited in the human brain when a dominant motor response becomes inappropriate and must be stopped, less is known about the regions that support switching to a new, appropriate, response. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with two variants of the stop-signal paradigm that require either stopping altogether or switching to a different response, we examined the brain systems involved in these two forms of executive control. Both stopping trials and switching trials showed common recruitment of the right inferior frontal gyrus, presupplementary motor area, and midbrain. Contrasting switching trials with stopping trials showed activation similar to that observed on response trials (where the initial response remains appropriate and no control is invoked), whereas there were no regions that showed significantly greater activity for stopping trials compared with switching trials. These results show that response switching can be supported by the same neural systems as response inhibition, and suggest that the same mechanism of rapid, nonselective response inhibition that is thought to support speeded response stopping can also support speeded response switching when paired with execution of the new, appropriate, response.
doi_str_mv 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1096-10.2010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2905623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>754536208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-74df557c0fc4e3601242791c20c3206e0b88af575dfe9a11fe926f4790cb39973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-BcnNU3T2O3sRpFatiAU_zkuy2bQraTZmU8V_7wa16MnLDLzzzssMD0LHGE4xJ_Ts9n72_LB4nM5PMSiRRpkAhh00jlOVEgZ4F42BSEgFk2yEDkJ4AQAJWO6jEQEuaaayMbqcNytXuN53H8nax5YY3_SdrxPXJJ0NrW-CTULv29Y1yyRvyl_qu-vNKsqHaK_K62CPvvsEPV_NnqY36d3iej69uEsNF6xPJSsrzqWByjBLBWDCiFTYEDCUgLBQZFleccnLyqoc41iJqJhUYAqqlKQTdP6V226KtS2NjZfmtW47t867D-1zp_9OGrfSS_-miQIuCI0BJ98BnX_d2NDrtQvG1nXeWL8JWnLGqSCQ_e-klDGRYRad4stpOh9CZ6vtPRj0wEpvWemB1SAPrOLi8e9vtms_cOgnxPiSEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733446814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inhibitory motor control in response stopping and response switching</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kenner, Naomi M ; Mumford, Jeanette A ; Hommer, Rebecca E ; Skup, Martha ; Leibenluft, Ellen ; Poldrack, Russell A</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenner, Naomi M ; Mumford, Jeanette A ; Hommer, Rebecca E ; Skup, Martha ; Leibenluft, Ellen ; Poldrack, Russell A</creatorcontrib><description>While much is known about the neural regions recruited in the human brain when a dominant motor response becomes inappropriate and must be stopped, less is known about the regions that support switching to a new, appropriate, response. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with two variants of the stop-signal paradigm that require either stopping altogether or switching to a different response, we examined the brain systems involved in these two forms of executive control. Both stopping trials and switching trials showed common recruitment of the right inferior frontal gyrus, presupplementary motor area, and midbrain. Contrasting switching trials with stopping trials showed activation similar to that observed on response trials (where the initial response remains appropriate and no control is invoked), whereas there were no regions that showed significantly greater activity for stopping trials compared with switching trials. These results show that response switching can be supported by the same neural systems as response inhibition, and suggest that the same mechanism of rapid, nonselective response inhibition that is thought to support speeded response stopping can also support speeded response switching when paired with execution of the new, appropriate, response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-6474</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-2401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1096-10.2010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20573898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Neuroscience</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Executive Function - physiology ; Female ; Frontal Lobe - physiology ; Humans ; Inhibition, Psychological ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Mesencephalon - physiology ; Motor Cortex - physiology ; Neural Inhibition - physiology ; Neural Pathways - physiology ; Neurons - physiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of neuroscience, 2010-06, Vol.30 (25), p.8512-8518</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 the authors 0270-6474/10/308512-07$15.00/0 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-74df557c0fc4e3601242791c20c3206e0b88af575dfe9a11fe926f4790cb39973</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905623/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2905623/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20573898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenner, Naomi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Jeanette A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hommer, Rebecca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skup, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibenluft, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poldrack, Russell A</creatorcontrib><title>Inhibitory motor control in response stopping and response switching</title><title>The Journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><description>While much is known about the neural regions recruited in the human brain when a dominant motor response becomes inappropriate and must be stopped, less is known about the regions that support switching to a new, appropriate, response. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with two variants of the stop-signal paradigm that require either stopping altogether or switching to a different response, we examined the brain systems involved in these two forms of executive control. Both stopping trials and switching trials showed common recruitment of the right inferior frontal gyrus, presupplementary motor area, and midbrain. Contrasting switching trials with stopping trials showed activation similar to that observed on response trials (where the initial response remains appropriate and no control is invoked), whereas there were no regions that showed significantly greater activity for stopping trials compared with switching trials. These results show that response switching can be supported by the same neural systems as response inhibition, and suggest that the same mechanism of rapid, nonselective response inhibition that is thought to support speeded response stopping can also support speeded response switching when paired with execution of the new, appropriate, response.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition, Psychological</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mesencephalon - physiology</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-BcnNU3T2O3sRpFatiAU_zkuy2bQraTZmU8V_7wa16MnLDLzzzssMD0LHGE4xJ_Ts9n72_LB4nM5PMSiRRpkAhh00jlOVEgZ4F42BSEgFk2yEDkJ4AQAJWO6jEQEuaaayMbqcNytXuN53H8nax5YY3_SdrxPXJJ0NrW-CTULv29Y1yyRvyl_qu-vNKsqHaK_K62CPvvsEPV_NnqY36d3iej69uEsNF6xPJSsrzqWByjBLBWDCiFTYEDCUgLBQZFleccnLyqoc41iJqJhUYAqqlKQTdP6V226KtS2NjZfmtW47t867D-1zp_9OGrfSS_-miQIuCI0BJ98BnX_d2NDrtQvG1nXeWL8JWnLGqSCQ_e-klDGRYRad4stpOh9CZ6vtPRj0wEpvWemB1SAPrOLi8e9vtms_cOgnxPiSEA</recordid><startdate>20100623</startdate><enddate>20100623</enddate><creator>Kenner, Naomi M</creator><creator>Mumford, Jeanette A</creator><creator>Hommer, Rebecca E</creator><creator>Skup, Martha</creator><creator>Leibenluft, Ellen</creator><creator>Poldrack, Russell A</creator><general>Society for Neuroscience</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100623</creationdate><title>Inhibitory motor control in response stopping and response switching</title><author>Kenner, Naomi M ; Mumford, Jeanette A ; Hommer, Rebecca E ; Skup, Martha ; Leibenluft, Ellen ; Poldrack, Russell A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-74df557c0fc4e3601242791c20c3206e0b88af575dfe9a11fe926f4790cb39973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition, Psychological</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mesencephalon - physiology</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenner, Naomi M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Jeanette A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hommer, Rebecca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skup, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibenluft, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poldrack, Russell A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenner, Naomi M</au><au>Mumford, Jeanette A</au><au>Hommer, Rebecca E</au><au>Skup, Martha</au><au>Leibenluft, Ellen</au><au>Poldrack, Russell A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inhibitory motor control in response stopping and response switching</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2010-06-23</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>8512</spage><epage>8518</epage><pages>8512-8518</pages><issn>0270-6474</issn><issn>1529-2401</issn><eissn>1529-2401</eissn><abstract>While much is known about the neural regions recruited in the human brain when a dominant motor response becomes inappropriate and must be stopped, less is known about the regions that support switching to a new, appropriate, response. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging with two variants of the stop-signal paradigm that require either stopping altogether or switching to a different response, we examined the brain systems involved in these two forms of executive control. Both stopping trials and switching trials showed common recruitment of the right inferior frontal gyrus, presupplementary motor area, and midbrain. Contrasting switching trials with stopping trials showed activation similar to that observed on response trials (where the initial response remains appropriate and no control is invoked), whereas there were no regions that showed significantly greater activity for stopping trials compared with switching trials. These results show that response switching can be supported by the same neural systems as response inhibition, and suggest that the same mechanism of rapid, nonselective response inhibition that is thought to support speeded response stopping can also support speeded response switching when paired with execution of the new, appropriate, response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Neuroscience</pub><pmid>20573898</pmid><doi>10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1096-10.2010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-6474
ispartof The Journal of neuroscience, 2010-06, Vol.30 (25), p.8512-8518
issn 0270-6474
1529-2401
1529-2401
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2905623
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Attention - physiology
Brain Mapping
Executive Function - physiology
Female
Frontal Lobe - physiology
Humans
Inhibition, Psychological
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Mesencephalon - physiology
Motor Cortex - physiology
Neural Inhibition - physiology
Neural Pathways - physiology
Neurons - physiology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
title Inhibitory motor control in response stopping and response switching
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A52%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inhibitory%20motor%20control%20in%20response%20stopping%20and%20response%20switching&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Kenner,%20Naomi%20M&rft.date=2010-06-23&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=8512&rft.epage=8518&rft.pages=8512-8518&rft.issn=0270-6474&rft.eissn=1529-2401&rft_id=info:doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1096-10.2010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E754536208%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733446814&rft_id=info:pmid/20573898&rfr_iscdi=true