Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE. To investigate the characteristics of a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) image phenomenon known as the mirror artifact, calculate its prevalence, analyze potential risk factors, measure severity, and correlate it to spherical equivalent and central visual acuity (VA). M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2010-07, Vol.51 (7), p.3714-3720
Hauptverfasser: Ho, Joseph, Castro, Dinorah P E, Castro, Leonardo C, Chen, Yueli, Liu, Jonathan, Mattox, Cynthia, Krishnan, Chandrasekharan, Fujimoto, James G, Schuman, Joel S, Duker, Jay S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3720
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3714
container_title Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
container_volume 51
creator Ho, Joseph
Castro, Dinorah P E
Castro, Leonardo C
Chen, Yueli
Liu, Jonathan
Mattox, Cynthia
Krishnan, Chandrasekharan
Fujimoto, James G
Schuman, Joel S
Duker, Jay S
description PURPOSE. To investigate the characteristics of a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) image phenomenon known as the mirror artifact, calculate its prevalence, analyze potential risk factors, measure severity, and correlate it to spherical equivalent and central visual acuity (VA). METHODS. OCT macular cube 512 x 128 scans taken between January 2008 and February 2009 at the New England Eye Center were analyzed for the presence of mirror artifacts. Artifact severity was determined by the degree of segmentation breakdown that it caused on the macular map. A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of patients with artifacts and of a random control group without artifacts. RESULTS. Of 1592 patients, 9.3% (148 patients, 200 eyes) had scans that contained mirror artifacts. A significantly more myopic spherical equivalent (P < 0.001), worse VA (P < 0.001), longer axial lengths (P = 0.004), and higher proportions of moderate to high myopia (P < 0.001) were found in patients with mirror artifacts than in patients without artifacts. Worse VA was associated with increased artifact severity (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS. In all scans analyzed, a high prevalence of mirror artifacts was found. This image artifact was often associated with patients with moderate to high myopia. Improvements in instrumentation may be necessary to resolve this problem in moderately and highly myopic eyes. Operators should be advised to properly position the retina when scanning eyes. In cases in which peripheral abnormalities in topographic measurements of retinal thickness are found, corresponding OCT scans should be examined for the presence of mirror artifacts.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.09-4057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2904018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733400553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-dedfd1953fe186e4e49351dbee10e71873246a9a67efc0382b180220efb7631b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1Lw0AQXUSxtXrzLLl5MXX2Kx8XQYpfUPCieFw2m0m7kmTjblrovze1tehpZpg3bx7vEXJJYUppkt5atw5TyGMBMj0iYyoli2Wa8eM__YichfAJwChlcEpGDGhGMwFj8jGrbWuNriMdAobQYNtHrooa673zkfa9rbTpQ2TbKHRoeq_ruHSNHmbX9T-Xxi3RY2sw6l3jFl53y805Oal0HfBiXyfk_fHhbfYcz1-fXmb389gIkfdxiWVV0lzyCmmWoECRc0nLApECpjRLOROJznWSYmWAZ6ygGTAGWBVpwmnBJ-Rux9utigZLM8gfFKrO20b7jXLaqv-b1i7Vwq0Vy0EMLgwE13sC775WGHrV2GCwrnWLbhVUyrkAkJIPyJsd0ngXgsfq8IWC2kahtlEoyNU2igF-9VfZAfzrPf8G4h2H-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733400553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ho, Joseph ; Castro, Dinorah P E ; Castro, Leonardo C ; Chen, Yueli ; Liu, Jonathan ; Mattox, Cynthia ; Krishnan, Chandrasekharan ; Fujimoto, James G ; Schuman, Joel S ; Duker, Jay S</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, Joseph ; Castro, Dinorah P E ; Castro, Leonardo C ; Chen, Yueli ; Liu, Jonathan ; Mattox, Cynthia ; Krishnan, Chandrasekharan ; Fujimoto, James G ; Schuman, Joel S ; Duker, Jay S</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE. To investigate the characteristics of a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) image phenomenon known as the mirror artifact, calculate its prevalence, analyze potential risk factors, measure severity, and correlate it to spherical equivalent and central visual acuity (VA). METHODS. OCT macular cube 512 x 128 scans taken between January 2008 and February 2009 at the New England Eye Center were analyzed for the presence of mirror artifacts. Artifact severity was determined by the degree of segmentation breakdown that it caused on the macular map. A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of patients with artifacts and of a random control group without artifacts. RESULTS. Of 1592 patients, 9.3% (148 patients, 200 eyes) had scans that contained mirror artifacts. A significantly more myopic spherical equivalent (P &lt; 0.001), worse VA (P &lt; 0.001), longer axial lengths (P = 0.004), and higher proportions of moderate to high myopia (P &lt; 0.001) were found in patients with mirror artifacts than in patients without artifacts. Worse VA was associated with increased artifact severity (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS. In all scans analyzed, a high prevalence of mirror artifacts was found. This image artifact was often associated with patients with moderate to high myopia. Improvements in instrumentation may be necessary to resolve this problem in moderately and highly myopic eyes. Operators should be advised to properly position the retina when scanning eyes. In cases in which peripheral abnormalities in topographic measurements of retinal thickness are found, corresponding OCT scans should be examined for the presence of mirror artifacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20181840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Diagnostic Errors ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia - complications ; Prevalence ; Retina - pathology ; Retinal Diseases - diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science, 2010-07, Vol.51 (7), p.3714-3720</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-dedfd1953fe186e4e49351dbee10e71873246a9a67efc0382b180220efb7631b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2904018/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2904018/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20181840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Dinorah P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Leonardo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattox, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Chandrasekharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, James G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuman, Joel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duker, Jay S</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>PURPOSE. To investigate the characteristics of a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) image phenomenon known as the mirror artifact, calculate its prevalence, analyze potential risk factors, measure severity, and correlate it to spherical equivalent and central visual acuity (VA). METHODS. OCT macular cube 512 x 128 scans taken between January 2008 and February 2009 at the New England Eye Center were analyzed for the presence of mirror artifacts. Artifact severity was determined by the degree of segmentation breakdown that it caused on the macular map. A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of patients with artifacts and of a random control group without artifacts. RESULTS. Of 1592 patients, 9.3% (148 patients, 200 eyes) had scans that contained mirror artifacts. A significantly more myopic spherical equivalent (P &lt; 0.001), worse VA (P &lt; 0.001), longer axial lengths (P = 0.004), and higher proportions of moderate to high myopia (P &lt; 0.001) were found in patients with mirror artifacts than in patients without artifacts. Worse VA was associated with increased artifact severity (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS. In all scans analyzed, a high prevalence of mirror artifacts was found. This image artifact was often associated with patients with moderate to high myopia. Improvements in instrumentation may be necessary to resolve this problem in moderately and highly myopic eyes. Operators should be advised to properly position the retina when scanning eyes. In cases in which peripheral abnormalities in topographic measurements of retinal thickness are found, corresponding OCT scans should be examined for the presence of mirror artifacts.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia - complications</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retina - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1Lw0AQXUSxtXrzLLl5MXX2Kx8XQYpfUPCieFw2m0m7kmTjblrovze1tehpZpg3bx7vEXJJYUppkt5atw5TyGMBMj0iYyoli2Wa8eM__YichfAJwChlcEpGDGhGMwFj8jGrbWuNriMdAobQYNtHrooa673zkfa9rbTpQ2TbKHRoeq_ruHSNHmbX9T-Xxi3RY2sw6l3jFl53y805Oal0HfBiXyfk_fHhbfYcz1-fXmb389gIkfdxiWVV0lzyCmmWoECRc0nLApECpjRLOROJznWSYmWAZ6ygGTAGWBVpwmnBJ-Rux9utigZLM8gfFKrO20b7jXLaqv-b1i7Vwq0Vy0EMLgwE13sC775WGHrV2GCwrnWLbhVUyrkAkJIPyJsd0ngXgsfq8IWC2kahtlEoyNU2igF-9VfZAfzrPf8G4h2H-Q</recordid><startdate>201007</startdate><enddate>201007</enddate><creator>Ho, Joseph</creator><creator>Castro, Dinorah P E</creator><creator>Castro, Leonardo C</creator><creator>Chen, Yueli</creator><creator>Liu, Jonathan</creator><creator>Mattox, Cynthia</creator><creator>Krishnan, Chandrasekharan</creator><creator>Fujimoto, James G</creator><creator>Schuman, Joel S</creator><creator>Duker, Jay S</creator><general>Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201007</creationdate><title>Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography</title><author>Ho, Joseph ; Castro, Dinorah P E ; Castro, Leonardo C ; Chen, Yueli ; Liu, Jonathan ; Mattox, Cynthia ; Krishnan, Chandrasekharan ; Fujimoto, James G ; Schuman, Joel S ; Duker, Jay S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-dedfd1953fe186e4e49351dbee10e71873246a9a67efc0382b180220efb7631b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia - complications</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retina - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Dinorah P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Leonardo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattox, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Chandrasekharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, James G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuman, Joel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duker, Jay S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Joseph</au><au>Castro, Dinorah P E</au><au>Castro, Leonardo C</au><au>Chen, Yueli</au><au>Liu, Jonathan</au><au>Mattox, Cynthia</au><au>Krishnan, Chandrasekharan</au><au>Fujimoto, James G</au><au>Schuman, Joel S</au><au>Duker, Jay S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2010-07</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3714</spage><epage>3720</epage><pages>3714-3720</pages><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>0146-0404</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE. To investigate the characteristics of a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) image phenomenon known as the mirror artifact, calculate its prevalence, analyze potential risk factors, measure severity, and correlate it to spherical equivalent and central visual acuity (VA). METHODS. OCT macular cube 512 x 128 scans taken between January 2008 and February 2009 at the New England Eye Center were analyzed for the presence of mirror artifacts. Artifact severity was determined by the degree of segmentation breakdown that it caused on the macular map. A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of patients with artifacts and of a random control group without artifacts. RESULTS. Of 1592 patients, 9.3% (148 patients, 200 eyes) had scans that contained mirror artifacts. A significantly more myopic spherical equivalent (P &lt; 0.001), worse VA (P &lt; 0.001), longer axial lengths (P = 0.004), and higher proportions of moderate to high myopia (P &lt; 0.001) were found in patients with mirror artifacts than in patients without artifacts. Worse VA was associated with increased artifact severity (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS. In all scans analyzed, a high prevalence of mirror artifacts was found. This image artifact was often associated with patients with moderate to high myopia. Improvements in instrumentation may be necessary to resolve this problem in moderately and highly myopic eyes. Operators should be advised to properly position the retina when scanning eyes. In cases in which peripheral abnormalities in topographic measurements of retinal thickness are found, corresponding OCT scans should be examined for the presence of mirror artifacts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc</pub><pmid>20181840</pmid><doi>10.1167/iovs.09-4057</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5783
ispartof Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010-07, Vol.51 (7), p.3714-3720
issn 1552-5783
0146-0404
1552-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2904018
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Diagnostic Errors
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myopia - complications
Prevalence
Retina - pathology
Retinal Diseases - diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation
Visual Acuity - physiology
title Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A18%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20assessment%20of%20mirror%20artifacts%20in%20spectral-domain%20optical%20coherence%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Ho,%20Joseph&rft.date=2010-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3714&rft.epage=3720&rft.pages=3714-3720&rft.issn=1552-5783&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/iovs.09-4057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733400553%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733400553&rft_id=info:pmid/20181840&rfr_iscdi=true