Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group
Choosing the right operation for metastatic spinal tumours is often difficult, and depends on many factors, including life expectancy and the balance of the risk of surgery against the likelihood of improving quality of life. Several prognostic scores have been devised to help the clinician decide t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European spine journal 2010-02, Vol.19 (2), p.215-222 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 222 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 215 |
| container_title | European spine journal |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Choi, David Crockard, A. Bunger, C. Harms, J. Kawahara, N. Mazel, C. Melcher, R. Tomita, K. |
| description | Choosing the right operation for metastatic spinal tumours is often difficult, and depends on many factors, including life expectancy and the balance of the risk of surgery against the likelihood of improving quality of life. Several prognostic scores have been devised to help the clinician decide the most appropriate course of action, but there still remains controversy over how to choose the best option; more often the decision is influenced by habit, belief and subjective experience. The purpose of this article is to review the present systems available for classifying spinal metastases, how these classifications can be used to help surgical planning, discuss surgical outcomes, and make suggestions for future research. It is important for spinal surgeons to reach a consensus regarding the classification of spinal metastases and surgical strategies. The authors of this article constitute the Global Spine Tumour Study Group: an international group of spinal surgeons who are dedicated to studying the techniques and outcomes of surgery for spinal tumours, to build on the existing evidence base for the surgical treatment of spinal tumours. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2899817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733978959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-2e081c5b6eaab7a462715e709191c7f42714bf0245a656ae0bd6d7689dd29ee23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBFhtWKWMntmMWSKiCW6RKSLSsLceZtK6S-GInpfcdeGgccik_EitrfM58M6NDyHMGJwxAvU4AopYFgC4YF7y4e0A2rCp5AbrkD8kGdAWFVEwfkScp3QAwoUE-JkccoNRQVxvy_TPeevxGQ0cHnGya7OQdTTs_Ip3mIcyRut6m5DvvshRGaseW-rE9lIl2IdI0xyuM-zd0ukbq8i-OaU50oeGA47TgF2nbh8b29OIn_nLFX0xzu6fbGObdU_Kos33CZ4f3mHz58P7y9Kw4_7T9ePruvHCCyangCDVzopFobaNsJbliAhVopplTXZXLqumAV8JKIS1C08pWyVq3LdeIvDwmb1fubm4GbF3eMNre7KIfbNybYL35Wxn9tbkKt4bXWtdMZcCrAyCGrzOmyQw-Oex7O2KYk1FlqVWthc7Ol_84b_LRY77O8BIqWYt6wbHV5GJIKWJ3vwoDsyRt1qRNTtosSZu73PPizxvuO35Fmw18NaQsjTme35P_T_0BDFG4PQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230468587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Choi, David ; Crockard, A. ; Bunger, C. ; Harms, J. ; Kawahara, N. ; Mazel, C. ; Melcher, R. ; Tomita, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, David ; Crockard, A. ; Bunger, C. ; Harms, J. ; Kawahara, N. ; Mazel, C. ; Melcher, R. ; Tomita, K. ; Global Spine Tumor Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Choosing the right operation for metastatic spinal tumours is often difficult, and depends on many factors, including life expectancy and the balance of the risk of surgery against the likelihood of improving quality of life. Several prognostic scores have been devised to help the clinician decide the most appropriate course of action, but there still remains controversy over how to choose the best option; more often the decision is influenced by habit, belief and subjective experience. The purpose of this article is to review the present systems available for classifying spinal metastases, how these classifications can be used to help surgical planning, discuss surgical outcomes, and make suggestions for future research. It is important for spinal surgeons to reach a consensus regarding the classification of spinal metastases and surgical strategies. The authors of this article constitute the Global Spine Tumour Study Group: an international group of spinal surgeons who are dedicated to studying the techniques and outcomes of surgery for spinal tumours, to build on the existing evidence base for the surgical treatment of spinal tumours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20039084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Protocols - standards ; Decision Support Techniques ; Disease Progression ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - physiopathology ; Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology ; Neoplasm Metastasis - physiopathology ; Neoplasm Metastasis - therapy ; Neurosurgery ; Neurosurgical Procedures - standards ; Prognosis ; Review ; Review Article ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spinal Neoplasms - classification ; Spinal Neoplasms - secondary ; Spinal Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2010-02, Vol.19 (2), p.215-222</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-2e081c5b6eaab7a462715e709191c7f42714bf0245a656ae0bd6d7689dd29ee23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-2e081c5b6eaab7a462715e709191c7f42714bf0245a656ae0bd6d7689dd29ee23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899817/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899817/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20039084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crockard, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazel, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcher, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Global Spine Tumor Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Choosing the right operation for metastatic spinal tumours is often difficult, and depends on many factors, including life expectancy and the balance of the risk of surgery against the likelihood of improving quality of life. Several prognostic scores have been devised to help the clinician decide the most appropriate course of action, but there still remains controversy over how to choose the best option; more often the decision is influenced by habit, belief and subjective experience. The purpose of this article is to review the present systems available for classifying spinal metastases, how these classifications can be used to help surgical planning, discuss surgical outcomes, and make suggestions for future research. It is important for spinal surgeons to reach a consensus regarding the classification of spinal metastases and surgical strategies. The authors of this article constitute the Global Spine Tumour Study Group: an international group of spinal surgeons who are dedicated to studying the techniques and outcomes of surgery for spinal tumours, to build on the existing evidence base for the surgical treatment of spinal tumours.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Protocols - standards</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - physiopathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis - therapy</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBFhtWKWMntmMWSKiCW6RKSLSsLceZtK6S-GInpfcdeGgccik_EitrfM58M6NDyHMGJwxAvU4AopYFgC4YF7y4e0A2rCp5AbrkD8kGdAWFVEwfkScp3QAwoUE-JkccoNRQVxvy_TPeevxGQ0cHnGya7OQdTTs_Ip3mIcyRut6m5DvvshRGaseW-rE9lIl2IdI0xyuM-zd0ukbq8i-OaU50oeGA47TgF2nbh8b29OIn_nLFX0xzu6fbGObdU_Kos33CZ4f3mHz58P7y9Kw4_7T9ePruvHCCyangCDVzopFobaNsJbliAhVopplTXZXLqumAV8JKIS1C08pWyVq3LdeIvDwmb1fubm4GbF3eMNre7KIfbNybYL35Wxn9tbkKt4bXWtdMZcCrAyCGrzOmyQw-Oex7O2KYk1FlqVWthc7Ol_84b_LRY77O8BIqWYt6wbHV5GJIKWJ3vwoDsyRt1qRNTtosSZu73PPizxvuO35Fmw18NaQsjTme35P_T_0BDFG4PQ</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Choi, David</creator><creator>Crockard, A.</creator><creator>Bunger, C.</creator><creator>Harms, J.</creator><creator>Kawahara, N.</creator><creator>Mazel, C.</creator><creator>Melcher, R.</creator><creator>Tomita, K.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group</title><author>Choi, David ; Crockard, A. ; Bunger, C. ; Harms, J. ; Kawahara, N. ; Mazel, C. ; Melcher, R. ; Tomita, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-2e081c5b6eaab7a462715e709191c7f42714bf0245a656ae0bd6d7689dd29ee23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Protocols - standards</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - physiopathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis - therapy</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crockard, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunger, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harms, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawahara, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazel, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcher, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Global Spine Tumor Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, David</au><au>Crockard, A.</au><au>Bunger, C.</au><au>Harms, J.</au><au>Kawahara, N.</au><au>Mazel, C.</au><au>Melcher, R.</au><au>Tomita, K.</au><aucorp>Global Spine Tumor Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>215-222</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Choosing the right operation for metastatic spinal tumours is often difficult, and depends on many factors, including life expectancy and the balance of the risk of surgery against the likelihood of improving quality of life. Several prognostic scores have been devised to help the clinician decide the most appropriate course of action, but there still remains controversy over how to choose the best option; more often the decision is influenced by habit, belief and subjective experience. The purpose of this article is to review the present systems available for classifying spinal metastases, how these classifications can be used to help surgical planning, discuss surgical outcomes, and make suggestions for future research. It is important for spinal surgeons to reach a consensus regarding the classification of spinal metastases and surgical strategies. The authors of this article constitute the Global Spine Tumour Study Group: an international group of spinal surgeons who are dedicated to studying the techniques and outcomes of surgery for spinal tumours, to build on the existing evidence base for the surgical treatment of spinal tumours.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20039084</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
| ispartof | European spine journal, 2010-02, Vol.19 (2), p.215-222 |
| issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2899817 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Antineoplastic Protocols - standards Decision Support Techniques Disease Progression Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnosis Neoplasm Invasiveness - physiopathology Neoplasm Metastasis - pathology Neoplasm Metastasis - physiopathology Neoplasm Metastasis - therapy Neurosurgery Neurosurgical Procedures - standards Prognosis Review Review Article Severity of Illness Index Spinal Neoplasms - classification Spinal Neoplasms - secondary Spinal Neoplasms - surgery Surgical Orthopedics |
| title | Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T22%3A12%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20metastatic%20spine%20tumour%20classification%20and%20indications%20for%20surgery:%20the%20consensus%20statement%20of%20the%20Global%20Spine%20Tumour%20Study%20Group&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Choi,%20David&rft.aucorp=Global%20Spine%20Tumor%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=215-222&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733978959%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230468587&rft_id=info:pmid/20039084&rfr_iscdi=true |