Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: A meta-analysis

Abstract Purpose The effectiveness of resistance exercise for strength improvement among aging persons is inconsistent across investigations, and there is a lack of research synthesis for multiple strength outcomes. Methods The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ageing research reviews 2010-07, Vol.9 (3), p.226-237
Hauptverfasser: Peterson, Mark D, Rhea, Matthew R, Sen, Ananda, Gordon, Paul M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 226
container_title Ageing research reviews
container_volume 9
creator Peterson, Mark D
Rhea, Matthew R
Sen, Ananda
Gordon, Paul M
description Abstract Purpose The effectiveness of resistance exercise for strength improvement among aging persons is inconsistent across investigations, and there is a lack of research synthesis for multiple strength outcomes. Methods The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effect of resistance exercise (RE) for multiple strength outcomes in aging adults. Randomized-controlled trials and randomized or non-randomized studies among adults ≥ 50 years, were included. Data were pooled using random-effect models. Outcomes for 4 common strength tests were analyzed for main effects. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochran Q and I2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through physical inspection of funnel plots as well as formal rank-correlation statistics. A linear mixed model regression was incorporated to examine differences between outcomes, as well as potential study-level predictor variables. Results Forty-seven studies were included, representing 1079 participants. A positive effect for each of the strength outcomes was determined however there was heterogeneity between studies. Regression revealed that higher intensity training was associated with greater improvement. Strength increases ranged from 9.8 to 31.6 kg, and percent changes were 29 ± 2, 24 ± 2, 33 ± 3, and 25 ± 2, respectively for leg press, chest press, knee extension, and lat pull. Conclusions RE is effective for improving strength among older adults, particularly with higher intensity training. Findings therefore suggest that RE may be considered a viable strategy to prevent generalized muscular weakness associated with aging.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2892859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1568163710000279</els_id><sourcerecordid>733124957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-67306ecf9dc94c554b0b2c4e4b99fcc6c7b02bf39ce916e866f85bc6a26d14f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1TAQhS0Eog_4AWxQdqxy8TsxC6SqAgqqhNTCeuRMJq0vTlLspOL-e3zVUlpvxtbMOR6dj7E3gm8EF_b9duNT2khe3lxtONfP2KFoG1k7q93zcje2rYVVzQE7ynnLi8ZZ-ZIdSK5aI40-ZN8uKIe8-Ampoj-UMGSqhjlV45pxjT5VeUk0XS3XVZiqOfaUKt-vcckfqpNqpMXXfvJxV0xesReDj5le39dj9vPzpx-nZ_X59y9fT0_Oa9RGLbVtFLeEg-vRaTRGd7yTqEl3zg2IFpuOy25QDskJS621Q2s6tF7aXuhBq2P28c73Zu1G6pGmJfkINymMPu1g9gGedqZwDVfzLcjWyda4YvDu3iDNv1fKC4whI8XoJ5rXDI1SQmpnmjIp7iYxzTknGh5-ERz2CGALBQHsEQBXUBAUzdvH6z0o_mX-f38qId0GSoAxTAF9_EU7ytt5TSXRDAKyBA6Xe4p7iIKXIxun_gJ_kpnZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733124957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: A meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Peterson, Mark D ; Rhea, Matthew R ; Sen, Ananda ; Gordon, Paul M</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Mark D ; Rhea, Matthew R ; Sen, Ananda ; Gordon, Paul M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose The effectiveness of resistance exercise for strength improvement among aging persons is inconsistent across investigations, and there is a lack of research synthesis for multiple strength outcomes. Methods The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effect of resistance exercise (RE) for multiple strength outcomes in aging adults. Randomized-controlled trials and randomized or non-randomized studies among adults ≥ 50 years, were included. Data were pooled using random-effect models. Outcomes for 4 common strength tests were analyzed for main effects. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochran Q and I2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through physical inspection of funnel plots as well as formal rank-correlation statistics. A linear mixed model regression was incorporated to examine differences between outcomes, as well as potential study-level predictor variables. Results Forty-seven studies were included, representing 1079 participants. A positive effect for each of the strength outcomes was determined however there was heterogeneity between studies. Regression revealed that higher intensity training was associated with greater improvement. Strength increases ranged from 9.8 to 31.6 kg, and percent changes were 29 ± 2, 24 ± 2, 33 ± 3, and 25 ± 2, respectively for leg press, chest press, knee extension, and lat pull. Conclusions RE is effective for improving strength among older adults, particularly with higher intensity training. Findings therefore suggest that RE may be considered a viable strategy to prevent generalized muscular weakness associated with aging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-1637</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20385254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Weakness - prevention &amp; control ; Muscle Weakness - therapy ; Neurology ; Resistance Training ; Sarcopenia - therapy</subject><ispartof>Ageing research reviews, 2010-07, Vol.9 (3), p.226-237</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-67306ecf9dc94c554b0b2c4e4b99fcc6c7b02bf39ce916e866f85bc6a26d14f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-67306ecf9dc94c554b0b2c4e4b99fcc6c7b02bf39ce916e866f85bc6a26d14f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20385254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhea, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Paul M</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: A meta-analysis</title><title>Ageing research reviews</title><addtitle>Ageing Res Rev</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose The effectiveness of resistance exercise for strength improvement among aging persons is inconsistent across investigations, and there is a lack of research synthesis for multiple strength outcomes. Methods The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effect of resistance exercise (RE) for multiple strength outcomes in aging adults. Randomized-controlled trials and randomized or non-randomized studies among adults ≥ 50 years, were included. Data were pooled using random-effect models. Outcomes for 4 common strength tests were analyzed for main effects. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochran Q and I2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through physical inspection of funnel plots as well as formal rank-correlation statistics. A linear mixed model regression was incorporated to examine differences between outcomes, as well as potential study-level predictor variables. Results Forty-seven studies were included, representing 1079 participants. A positive effect for each of the strength outcomes was determined however there was heterogeneity between studies. Regression revealed that higher intensity training was associated with greater improvement. Strength increases ranged from 9.8 to 31.6 kg, and percent changes were 29 ± 2, 24 ± 2, 33 ± 3, and 25 ± 2, respectively for leg press, chest press, knee extension, and lat pull. Conclusions RE is effective for improving strength among older adults, particularly with higher intensity training. Findings therefore suggest that RE may be considered a viable strategy to prevent generalized muscular weakness associated with aging.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Weakness - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Muscle Weakness - therapy</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>Sarcopenia - therapy</subject><issn>1568-1637</issn><issn>1872-9649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtv1TAQhS0Eog_4AWxQdqxy8TsxC6SqAgqqhNTCeuRMJq0vTlLspOL-e3zVUlpvxtbMOR6dj7E3gm8EF_b9duNT2khe3lxtONfP2KFoG1k7q93zcje2rYVVzQE7ynnLi8ZZ-ZIdSK5aI40-ZN8uKIe8-Ampoj-UMGSqhjlV45pxjT5VeUk0XS3XVZiqOfaUKt-vcckfqpNqpMXXfvJxV0xesReDj5le39dj9vPzpx-nZ_X59y9fT0_Oa9RGLbVtFLeEg-vRaTRGd7yTqEl3zg2IFpuOy25QDskJS621Q2s6tF7aXuhBq2P28c73Zu1G6pGmJfkINymMPu1g9gGedqZwDVfzLcjWyda4YvDu3iDNv1fKC4whI8XoJ5rXDI1SQmpnmjIp7iYxzTknGh5-ERz2CGALBQHsEQBXUBAUzdvH6z0o_mX-f38qId0GSoAxTAF9_EU7ytt5TSXRDAKyBA6Xe4p7iIKXIxun_gJ_kpnZ</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Peterson, Mark D</creator><creator>Rhea, Matthew R</creator><creator>Sen, Ananda</creator><creator>Gordon, Paul M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: A meta-analysis</title><author>Peterson, Mark D ; Rhea, Matthew R ; Sen, Ananda ; Gordon, Paul M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-67306ecf9dc94c554b0b2c4e4b99fcc6c7b02bf39ce916e866f85bc6a26d14f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Weakness - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Muscle Weakness - therapy</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>Sarcopenia - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhea, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Paul M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ageing research reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Mark D</au><au>Rhea, Matthew R</au><au>Sen, Ananda</au><au>Gordon, Paul M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Ageing research reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Ageing Res Rev</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>226-237</pages><issn>1568-1637</issn><eissn>1872-9649</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose The effectiveness of resistance exercise for strength improvement among aging persons is inconsistent across investigations, and there is a lack of research synthesis for multiple strength outcomes. Methods The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effect of resistance exercise (RE) for multiple strength outcomes in aging adults. Randomized-controlled trials and randomized or non-randomized studies among adults ≥ 50 years, were included. Data were pooled using random-effect models. Outcomes for 4 common strength tests were analyzed for main effects. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochran Q and I2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through physical inspection of funnel plots as well as formal rank-correlation statistics. A linear mixed model regression was incorporated to examine differences between outcomes, as well as potential study-level predictor variables. Results Forty-seven studies were included, representing 1079 participants. A positive effect for each of the strength outcomes was determined however there was heterogeneity between studies. Regression revealed that higher intensity training was associated with greater improvement. Strength increases ranged from 9.8 to 31.6 kg, and percent changes were 29 ± 2, 24 ± 2, 33 ± 3, and 25 ± 2, respectively for leg press, chest press, knee extension, and lat pull. Conclusions RE is effective for improving strength among older adults, particularly with higher intensity training. Findings therefore suggest that RE may be considered a viable strategy to prevent generalized muscular weakness associated with aging.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>20385254</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1568-1637
ispartof Ageing research reviews, 2010-07, Vol.9 (3), p.226-237
issn 1568-1637
1872-9649
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2892859
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
Female
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Weakness - prevention & control
Muscle Weakness - therapy
Neurology
Resistance Training
Sarcopenia - therapy
title Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: A meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A20%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20exercise%20for%20muscular%20strength%20in%20older%20adults:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Ageing%20research%20reviews&rft.au=Peterson,%20Mark%20D&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=226-237&rft.issn=1568-1637&rft.eissn=1872-9649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733124957%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733124957&rft_id=info:pmid/20385254&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1568163710000279&rfr_iscdi=true