Surfactant use for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in three New York city hospitals: discordance of practice from a community clinician consensus standard

Objective: To assess concordance with a locally developed standard of care for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for whom the standard recommends surfactant treatment within 2 h of birth, and to examine the association between clinical, demographic, and hospital characterist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of perinatology 2010-09, Vol.30 (9), p.590-595
Hauptverfasser: Howell, E A, Holzman, I, Kleinman, L C, Wang, J, Chassin, M R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 595
container_issue 9
container_start_page 590
container_title Journal of perinatology
container_volume 30
creator Howell, E A
Holzman, I
Kleinman, L C
Wang, J
Chassin, M R
description Objective: To assess concordance with a locally developed standard of care for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for whom the standard recommends surfactant treatment within 2 h of birth, and to examine the association between clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics with discordance from the standard. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 773 infants weighing ⩽1750 g born in any of the three New York City hospitals between 1999 and 2002. Result: 227 of the 773 infants (29%) met criteria for treatment according to the standard. Of these, 37% received surfactant by 2 h. By 4 h, 70% of infants who met the standard received surfactant. White infants were more likely to receive surfactant by 4 h (85%) than African American (61%) or Latino infants (67%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed significant odds ratios predicting discordance from the relaxed criteria (4 h) for African American race (4.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 13.00), 100 g of birth weight (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.34), and hospital of birth. Conclusion: Many infants with RDS failed to receive surfactant replacement therapy at 2 and 4 h after birth. African Americans and those born larger were less likely to receive surfactant. If these data can be generalized, there is a large opportunity to reduce infant morbidity from RDS and to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in birth outcomes by increasing the rate and speed with which surfactant is delivered to these infants.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/jp.2010.6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2888640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A236730962</galeid><sourcerecordid>A236730962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-a99b1ada7b28715d76ba15a92767ecef96aee15bb0bde2c0f91c32968af9ecaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEotuFA38AWSCBQNrFcRIn4YBUVXxJFRyAAyfLccYbL4md2k6r_VX8RSba0nb5UA6OPc_7jmfGSfIopeuUZtWr7bhmFDf8TrJI85KviiLP7iYLWubZqspyfpQch7CldA6W95MjpCuWZ3yR_PwyeS1VlDaSKQDRzpPRwyDj5IEYqzEQyKWJHfEQRuNldH5HWhMi7gMJO9t6N8woiZ0HIJ_gknx3_gdRJu5I51AUZR9ezxrlfCutAuI0ZsG0Bv816okkyg3DZGeN6o01ykiLZzaADRPmwRu20rcPknsa3eDh1bpMvr17-_X0w-rs8_uPpydnK1VwFleyrptUtrJsWFWmRVvyRqaFrBnWDwp0zSVAWjQNbVpgiuo6VRmreSV1DUrqbJm82fuOUzNAq8BGL3sxejNIvxNOGnEYsaYTG3chWFVVPKdo8PzKwLvzCUIUA9YPfS8tuCmIMq8prTOcwjJ58ge5dZO3WB1CFa1yls12T_8HMUzHU87T_IbayB4ETs_h3dScWJywjJcZrTlDav0PCr8WBoMtB23w_EDw7JagA9nHLrh-igbncwi-2IPKuxA86OuGpVTMT1VsRzE_VcGRfXy7w9fk77eJwMs9EDBkN-BvSv7b7RdBXPX0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640616614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surfactant use for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in three New York city hospitals: discordance of practice from a community clinician consensus standard</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Howell, E A ; Holzman, I ; Kleinman, L C ; Wang, J ; Chassin, M R</creator><creatorcontrib>Howell, E A ; Holzman, I ; Kleinman, L C ; Wang, J ; Chassin, M R</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To assess concordance with a locally developed standard of care for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for whom the standard recommends surfactant treatment within 2 h of birth, and to examine the association between clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics with discordance from the standard. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 773 infants weighing ⩽1750 g born in any of the three New York City hospitals between 1999 and 2002. Result: 227 of the 773 infants (29%) met criteria for treatment according to the standard. Of these, 37% received surfactant by 2 h. By 4 h, 70% of infants who met the standard received surfactant. White infants were more likely to receive surfactant by 4 h (85%) than African American (61%) or Latino infants (67%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed significant odds ratios predicting discordance from the relaxed criteria (4 h) for African American race (4.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 13.00), 100 g of birth weight (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.34), and hospital of birth. Conclusion: Many infants with RDS failed to receive surfactant replacement therapy at 2 and 4 h after birth. African Americans and those born larger were less likely to receive surfactant. If these data can be generalized, there is a large opportunity to reduce infant morbidity from RDS and to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in birth outcomes by increasing the rate and speed with which surfactant is delivered to these infants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-8346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/jp.2010.6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20182436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>692/699/1785 ; 692/700/1720 ; 692/700/565/1436 ; African Americans ; Birth weight ; Care and treatment ; Cohort Studies ; Community ; Confidence intervals ; Criteria ; Design standards ; Discordance ; Ethnic factors ; Female ; Guideline Adherence ; Health aspects ; Health services ; Healthcare Disparities - ethnology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight ; Infants ; Infants (Premature) ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Morbidity ; Neonates ; New York City ; Newborn babies ; Obstetrics ; original-article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Premature babies ; Premature birth ; Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use ; Race ; Respiratory distress syndrome ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - ethnology ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Surface active agents ; Surfactants ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Journal of perinatology, 2010-09, Vol.30 (9), p.590-595</ispartof><rights>Nature America, Inc. 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Nature America, Inc. 2010.</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-a99b1ada7b28715d76ba15a92767ecef96aee15bb0bde2c0f91c32968af9ecaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-a99b1ada7b28715d76ba15a92767ecef96aee15bb0bde2c0f91c32968af9ecaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/jp.2010.6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/jp.2010.6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20182436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howell, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzman, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chassin, M R</creatorcontrib><title>Surfactant use for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in three New York city hospitals: discordance of practice from a community clinician consensus standard</title><title>Journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><description>Objective: To assess concordance with a locally developed standard of care for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for whom the standard recommends surfactant treatment within 2 h of birth, and to examine the association between clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics with discordance from the standard. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 773 infants weighing ⩽1750 g born in any of the three New York City hospitals between 1999 and 2002. Result: 227 of the 773 infants (29%) met criteria for treatment according to the standard. Of these, 37% received surfactant by 2 h. By 4 h, 70% of infants who met the standard received surfactant. White infants were more likely to receive surfactant by 4 h (85%) than African American (61%) or Latino infants (67%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed significant odds ratios predicting discordance from the relaxed criteria (4 h) for African American race (4.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 13.00), 100 g of birth weight (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.34), and hospital of birth. Conclusion: Many infants with RDS failed to receive surfactant replacement therapy at 2 and 4 h after birth. African Americans and those born larger were less likely to receive surfactant. If these data can be generalized, there is a large opportunity to reduce infant morbidity from RDS and to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in birth outcomes by increasing the rate and speed with which surfactant is delivered to these infants.</description><subject>692/699/1785</subject><subject>692/700/1720</subject><subject>692/700/565/1436</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Design standards</subject><subject>Discordance</subject><subject>Ethnic factors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - ethnology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infants (Premature)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>New York City</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Premature babies</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Respiratory distress syndrome</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - ethnology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface active agents</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>0743-8346</issn><issn>1476-5543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1v1DAQhiMEotuFA38AWSCBQNrFcRIn4YBUVXxJFRyAAyfLccYbL4md2k6r_VX8RSba0nb5UA6OPc_7jmfGSfIopeuUZtWr7bhmFDf8TrJI85KviiLP7iYLWubZqspyfpQch7CldA6W95MjpCuWZ3yR_PwyeS1VlDaSKQDRzpPRwyDj5IEYqzEQyKWJHfEQRuNldH5HWhMi7gMJO9t6N8woiZ0HIJ_gknx3_gdRJu5I51AUZR9ezxrlfCutAuI0ZsG0Bv816okkyg3DZGeN6o01ykiLZzaADRPmwRu20rcPknsa3eDh1bpMvr17-_X0w-rs8_uPpydnK1VwFleyrptUtrJsWFWmRVvyRqaFrBnWDwp0zSVAWjQNbVpgiuo6VRmreSV1DUrqbJm82fuOUzNAq8BGL3sxejNIvxNOGnEYsaYTG3chWFVVPKdo8PzKwLvzCUIUA9YPfS8tuCmIMq8prTOcwjJ58ge5dZO3WB1CFa1yls12T_8HMUzHU87T_IbayB4ETs_h3dScWJywjJcZrTlDav0PCr8WBoMtB23w_EDw7JagA9nHLrh-igbncwi-2IPKuxA86OuGpVTMT1VsRzE_VcGRfXy7w9fk77eJwMs9EDBkN-BvSv7b7RdBXPX0</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Howell, E A</creator><creator>Holzman, I</creator><creator>Kleinman, L C</creator><creator>Wang, J</creator><creator>Chassin, M R</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Surfactant use for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in three New York city hospitals: discordance of practice from a community clinician consensus standard</title><author>Howell, E A ; Holzman, I ; Kleinman, L C ; Wang, J ; Chassin, M R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-a99b1ada7b28715d76ba15a92767ecef96aee15bb0bde2c0f91c32968af9ecaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>692/699/1785</topic><topic>692/700/1720</topic><topic>692/700/565/1436</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Design standards</topic><topic>Discordance</topic><topic>Ethnic factors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - ethnology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Infant, Very Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infants (Premature)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>New York City</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Premature babies</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Respiratory distress syndrome</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - ethnology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface active agents</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howell, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzman, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chassin, M R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howell, E A</au><au>Holzman, I</au><au>Kleinman, L C</au><au>Wang, J</au><au>Chassin, M R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surfactant use for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in three New York city hospitals: discordance of practice from a community clinician consensus standard</atitle><jtitle>Journal of perinatology</jtitle><stitle>J Perinatol</stitle><addtitle>J Perinatol</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>590</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>590-595</pages><issn>0743-8346</issn><eissn>1476-5543</eissn><abstract>Objective: To assess concordance with a locally developed standard of care for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) for whom the standard recommends surfactant treatment within 2 h of birth, and to examine the association between clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics with discordance from the standard. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 773 infants weighing ⩽1750 g born in any of the three New York City hospitals between 1999 and 2002. Result: 227 of the 773 infants (29%) met criteria for treatment according to the standard. Of these, 37% received surfactant by 2 h. By 4 h, 70% of infants who met the standard received surfactant. White infants were more likely to receive surfactant by 4 h (85%) than African American (61%) or Latino infants (67%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed significant odds ratios predicting discordance from the relaxed criteria (4 h) for African American race (4.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 13.00), 100 g of birth weight (odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.34), and hospital of birth. Conclusion: Many infants with RDS failed to receive surfactant replacement therapy at 2 and 4 h after birth. African Americans and those born larger were less likely to receive surfactant. If these data can be generalized, there is a large opportunity to reduce infant morbidity from RDS and to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in birth outcomes by increasing the rate and speed with which surfactant is delivered to these infants.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>20182436</pmid><doi>10.1038/jp.2010.6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-8346
ispartof Journal of perinatology, 2010-09, Vol.30 (9), p.590-595
issn 0743-8346
1476-5543
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2888640
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects 692/699/1785
692/700/1720
692/700/565/1436
African Americans
Birth weight
Care and treatment
Cohort Studies
Community
Confidence intervals
Criteria
Design standards
Discordance
Ethnic factors
Female
Guideline Adherence
Health aspects
Health services
Healthcare Disparities - ethnology
Hospitals
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Infants
Infants (Premature)
Male
Medical Audit
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minority & ethnic groups
Morbidity
Neonates
New York City
Newborn babies
Obstetrics
original-article
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Premature babies
Premature birth
Pulmonary Surfactants - therapeutic use
Race
Respiratory distress syndrome
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - ethnology
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Surface active agents
Surfactants
Ventilators
title Surfactant use for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome in three New York city hospitals: discordance of practice from a community clinician consensus standard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A53%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surfactant%20use%20for%20premature%20infants%20with%20respiratory%20distress%20syndrome%20in%20three%20New%20York%20city%20hospitals:%20discordance%20of%20practice%20from%20a%20community%20clinician%20consensus%20standard&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Howell,%20E%20A&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=590-595&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.eissn=1476-5543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/jp.2010.6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA236730962%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640616614&rft_id=info:pmid/20182436&rft_galeid=A236730962&rfr_iscdi=true