Comparison of Recruitment Efforts Targeted at Primary Care Physicians versus the Community At Large for Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

Inefficient and delayed recruitment into clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease are major obstacles impeding progress in the discovery of more effective therapeutic strategies to combat this disease. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, limited empirical data demonstrating the effect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer disease and associated disorders 2010-01, Vol.24 (2), p.165-170
Hauptverfasser: Carr, Sarah A., Davis, Roberta, Spencer, Diane, Smart, Marie, Hudson, Joanna, Freeman, Stephanie, Cooper, Greg E., Schmitt, Fred A., Markesbery, William R., Danner, Deborah, Jicha, Greg A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 170
container_issue 2
container_start_page 165
container_title Alzheimer disease and associated disorders
container_volume 24
creator Carr, Sarah A.
Davis, Roberta
Spencer, Diane
Smart, Marie
Hudson, Joanna
Freeman, Stephanie
Cooper, Greg E.
Schmitt, Fred A.
Markesbery, William R.
Danner, Deborah
Jicha, Greg A.
description Inefficient and delayed recruitment into clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease are major obstacles impeding progress in the discovery of more effective therapeutic strategies to combat this disease. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, limited empirical data demonstrating the effectiveness of specific recruitment strategies are available to guide recruitment endeavors. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of recruitment efforts targeting either the primary care health professionals (PCP) or patients and families with a community grass-roots outreach event (COE). The primary outcome measure was actual study recruitment and participation in the four months post-intervention. No research subjects were recruited from the PCP intervention, while 69 subjects were recruited into clinical studies from the COE activity (0% vs. 28%, P
doi_str_mv 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181aba927
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2877762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2877762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_28777623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljr1Ow0AQhE8IRMLPG1BsR5VwZ8c5u0GKkiAKighZorTWzjpeZJ-tu3Ok8Cw8LIegoaaaYma-GSHulJwrmemHt9VmLkupYopVqrDELNJnYqqSxXK2UMnyXExlmsUzGS_URFw59y6l1HEiL8VEZYlWOkqn4nPddwNadr2BvoZXquzIviPjYVvXvfUOcrQH8rQH9LCz3KE9wRotwa45Oa4YjYMjWTc68A1BAHajYX-ClYeX7y4EDuzQ-hAe0HOYYgOr9qMh7sjeO9iwI3Sh27LhClvILWPrbsRFHYRuf_VaPD5t8_XzbBjLjvZVeGmxLYafU0WPXPx1DDfFoT8WUaq1XkbxvwFf0yB8LA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Recruitment Efforts Targeted at Primary Care Physicians versus the Community At Large for Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Carr, Sarah A. ; Davis, Roberta ; Spencer, Diane ; Smart, Marie ; Hudson, Joanna ; Freeman, Stephanie ; Cooper, Greg E. ; Schmitt, Fred A. ; Markesbery, William R. ; Danner, Deborah ; Jicha, Greg A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carr, Sarah A. ; Davis, Roberta ; Spencer, Diane ; Smart, Marie ; Hudson, Joanna ; Freeman, Stephanie ; Cooper, Greg E. ; Schmitt, Fred A. ; Markesbery, William R. ; Danner, Deborah ; Jicha, Greg A.</creatorcontrib><description>Inefficient and delayed recruitment into clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease are major obstacles impeding progress in the discovery of more effective therapeutic strategies to combat this disease. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, limited empirical data demonstrating the effectiveness of specific recruitment strategies are available to guide recruitment endeavors. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of recruitment efforts targeting either the primary care health professionals (PCP) or patients and families with a community grass-roots outreach event (COE). The primary outcome measure was actual study recruitment and participation in the four months post-intervention. No research subjects were recruited from the PCP intervention, while 69 subjects were recruited into clinical studies from the COE activity (0% vs. 28%, P &lt;0.0001, Fisher exact test). Barriers to recruitment success in the PCP arm included a perception of perceived harm to subjects from research participation and fear of losing patients through clinical research participation. Our results suggest that outreach efforts directed at the potential study subject/caregiver are not only cost-effective but are able to easily accomplish the desired result of direct recruitment into clinical research studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-0341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-4156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181aba927</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19571728</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders, 2010-01, Vol.24 (2), p.165-170</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carr, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Greg E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Fred A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markesbery, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danner, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jicha, Greg A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Recruitment Efforts Targeted at Primary Care Physicians versus the Community At Large for Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials</title><title>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders</title><description>Inefficient and delayed recruitment into clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease are major obstacles impeding progress in the discovery of more effective therapeutic strategies to combat this disease. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, limited empirical data demonstrating the effectiveness of specific recruitment strategies are available to guide recruitment endeavors. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of recruitment efforts targeting either the primary care health professionals (PCP) or patients and families with a community grass-roots outreach event (COE). The primary outcome measure was actual study recruitment and participation in the four months post-intervention. No research subjects were recruited from the PCP intervention, while 69 subjects were recruited into clinical studies from the COE activity (0% vs. 28%, P &lt;0.0001, Fisher exact test). Barriers to recruitment success in the PCP arm included a perception of perceived harm to subjects from research participation and fear of losing patients through clinical research participation. Our results suggest that outreach efforts directed at the potential study subject/caregiver are not only cost-effective but are able to easily accomplish the desired result of direct recruitment into clinical research studies.</description><issn>0893-0341</issn><issn>1546-4156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqljr1Ow0AQhE8IRMLPG1BsR5VwZ8c5u0GKkiAKighZorTWzjpeZJ-tu3Ok8Cw8LIegoaaaYma-GSHulJwrmemHt9VmLkupYopVqrDELNJnYqqSxXK2UMnyXExlmsUzGS_URFw59y6l1HEiL8VEZYlWOkqn4nPddwNadr2BvoZXquzIviPjYVvXvfUOcrQH8rQH9LCz3KE9wRotwa45Oa4YjYMjWTc68A1BAHajYX-ClYeX7y4EDuzQ-hAe0HOYYgOr9qMh7sjeO9iwI3Sh27LhClvILWPrbsRFHYRuf_VaPD5t8_XzbBjLjvZVeGmxLYafU0WPXPx1DDfFoT8WUaq1XkbxvwFf0yB8LA</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Carr, Sarah A.</creator><creator>Davis, Roberta</creator><creator>Spencer, Diane</creator><creator>Smart, Marie</creator><creator>Hudson, Joanna</creator><creator>Freeman, Stephanie</creator><creator>Cooper, Greg E.</creator><creator>Schmitt, Fred A.</creator><creator>Markesbery, William R.</creator><creator>Danner, Deborah</creator><creator>Jicha, Greg A.</creator><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Recruitment Efforts Targeted at Primary Care Physicians versus the Community At Large for Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials</title><author>Carr, Sarah A. ; Davis, Roberta ; Spencer, Diane ; Smart, Marie ; Hudson, Joanna ; Freeman, Stephanie ; Cooper, Greg E. ; Schmitt, Fred A. ; Markesbery, William R. ; Danner, Deborah ; Jicha, Greg A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_28777623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carr, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Greg E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Fred A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markesbery, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danner, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jicha, Greg A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carr, Sarah A.</au><au>Davis, Roberta</au><au>Spencer, Diane</au><au>Smart, Marie</au><au>Hudson, Joanna</au><au>Freeman, Stephanie</au><au>Cooper, Greg E.</au><au>Schmitt, Fred A.</au><au>Markesbery, William R.</au><au>Danner, Deborah</au><au>Jicha, Greg A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Recruitment Efforts Targeted at Primary Care Physicians versus the Community At Large for Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>165-170</pages><issn>0893-0341</issn><eissn>1546-4156</eissn><abstract>Inefficient and delayed recruitment into clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease are major obstacles impeding progress in the discovery of more effective therapeutic strategies to combat this disease. Despite widespread recognition of this problem, limited empirical data demonstrating the effectiveness of specific recruitment strategies are available to guide recruitment endeavors. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of recruitment efforts targeting either the primary care health professionals (PCP) or patients and families with a community grass-roots outreach event (COE). The primary outcome measure was actual study recruitment and participation in the four months post-intervention. No research subjects were recruited from the PCP intervention, while 69 subjects were recruited into clinical studies from the COE activity (0% vs. 28%, P &lt;0.0001, Fisher exact test). Barriers to recruitment success in the PCP arm included a perception of perceived harm to subjects from research participation and fear of losing patients through clinical research participation. Our results suggest that outreach efforts directed at the potential study subject/caregiver are not only cost-effective but are able to easily accomplish the desired result of direct recruitment into clinical research studies.</abstract><pmid>19571728</pmid><doi>10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181aba927</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-0341
ispartof Alzheimer disease and associated disorders, 2010-01, Vol.24 (2), p.165-170
issn 0893-0341
1546-4156
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2877762
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Comparison of Recruitment Efforts Targeted at Primary Care Physicians versus the Community At Large for Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Recruitment%20Efforts%20Targeted%20at%20Primary%20Care%20Physicians%20versus%20the%20Community%20At%20Large%20for%20Participation%20in%20Alzheimer's%20Disease%20Clinical%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer%20disease%20and%20associated%20disorders&rft.au=Carr,%20Sarah%20A.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=165-170&rft.issn=0893-0341&rft.eissn=1546-4156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181aba927&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2877762%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/19571728&rfr_iscdi=true