Most Campylobacter subtypes from sporadic infections can be found in retail poultry products and food animals

The subtypes of Campylobacter isolates from human infections in two Danish counties were compared to isolates from retail food samples and faecal samples from chickens, pigs and cattle. During a 1-year period, 1285 Campylobacter isolates from these sources were typed by two methods: ‘Penner’ heat-st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epidemiology and infection 2006-08, Vol.134 (4), p.758-767
Hauptverfasser: NIELSEN, E. M., FUSSING, V., ENGBERG, J., NIELSEN, N. L., NEIMANN, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 767
container_issue 4
container_start_page 758
container_title Epidemiology and infection
container_volume 134
creator NIELSEN, E. M.
FUSSING, V.
ENGBERG, J.
NIELSEN, N. L.
NEIMANN, J.
description The subtypes of Campylobacter isolates from human infections in two Danish counties were compared to isolates from retail food samples and faecal samples from chickens, pigs and cattle. During a 1-year period, 1285 Campylobacter isolates from these sources were typed by two methods: ‘Penner’ heat-stable serotyping and automated ribotyping (RiboPrinting). C. jejuni was the dominating species, but C. coli was more prevalent among food and chicken isolates (16%) compared to human isolates (4%). In total, 356 different combined sero-ribotypes (subtypes) were found. A large subtype overlap was seen between human isolates and isolates from food (66%), chickens (59%) and cattle (83%). This was verified by PFGE typing of 212 isolates representing selected subtypes. All frequent (n>3) subtypes found in food were also present in humans. Sixty-one per cent of the isolates from domestically acquired infections had subtypes that were also found in food as opposed to 31% of travel-associated infections. The results showed differences in the various Campylobacter populations, e.g. the Danish population as reflected in the domestically acquired infections and the Danish-produced food was more uniform than the isolates originating from outside the country. The study shows that most C. jejuni subtypes found in poultry food samples, broiler chickens, and cattle were represented in the domestically acquired cases, indicating that C. jejuni from these reservoirs are likely sources of human infections in Denmark.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0950268805005509
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2870449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0950268805005509</cupid><jstor_id>3865964</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3865964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-da52e216bca1d582a7e210774bc5a99db27cdcaa440ca2f8d4ff5d77f4d43bd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7uzqDxBEgg_71lpJJ53OiyCDrsKoqOtzSOey9tjdaZO0OP_eDDPMesGnXL5TxTlVCD0i8IwAEc8_g-RAm7YFDsA5yDtoRVgjK8ZA3kWrPa72_Aydp7QFAElbcR-dkaYmDZOwQuO7kDJe63HeDaHTJruI09Ll3ewS9jGMOM0hatsb3E_emdyHKWGjJ9w57MMy2fKPo8u6H_AcliHHHZ5jsIvJCeuCfQi2XPpRD-kBuufL4R4ezwv05fWr6_WbavPh6u365aYynLe5sppTR0nTGU0sb6kW5QVCsM5wLaXtqDDWaF1iGk19a5n33ArhmWV1Z6G-QC8OfeelG501bspRD2qOxUXcqaB79SeZ-q_qJvxQZTzAmCwNLo8NYvi-uJTV2CfjhkFPLixJkTJIDqIuwqd_CbdhiVMJpyhwJlpKaRGRg8jEkFJ0_uSEgNpvUv2zyVLz5PcItxXH1RXB44Ngm3KIJ163DZcNK7g64D5l9_OEdfymGlELrpqrj4rDtfj0ft2qTdHXR4967GJvb9xtkv-7_AXK_cP7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205478222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Most Campylobacter subtypes from sporadic infections can be found in retail poultry products and food animals</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>NIELSEN, E. M. ; FUSSING, V. ; ENGBERG, J. ; NIELSEN, N. L. ; NEIMANN, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, E. M. ; FUSSING, V. ; ENGBERG, J. ; NIELSEN, N. L. ; NEIMANN, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The subtypes of Campylobacter isolates from human infections in two Danish counties were compared to isolates from retail food samples and faecal samples from chickens, pigs and cattle. During a 1-year period, 1285 Campylobacter isolates from these sources were typed by two methods: ‘Penner’ heat-stable serotyping and automated ribotyping (RiboPrinting). C. jejuni was the dominating species, but C. coli was more prevalent among food and chicken isolates (16%) compared to human isolates (4%). In total, 356 different combined sero-ribotypes (subtypes) were found. A large subtype overlap was seen between human isolates and isolates from food (66%), chickens (59%) and cattle (83%). This was verified by PFGE typing of 212 isolates representing selected subtypes. All frequent (n&gt;3) subtypes found in food were also present in humans. Sixty-one per cent of the isolates from domestically acquired infections had subtypes that were also found in food as opposed to 31% of travel-associated infections. The results showed differences in the various Campylobacter populations, e.g. the Danish population as reflected in the domestically acquired infections and the Danish-produced food was more uniform than the isolates originating from outside the country. The study shows that most C. jejuni subtypes found in poultry food samples, broiler chickens, and cattle were represented in the domestically acquired cases, indicating that C. jejuni from these reservoirs are likely sources of human infections in Denmark.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-2688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0950268805005509</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16316490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacterial infections ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification ; Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Campylobacter Infections - microbiology ; Campylobacter jejuni ; Cattle ; Chickens ; Denmark - epidemiology ; Epidemiology ; Feces - microbiology ; Food contamination &amp; poisoning ; Food Microbiology ; Foodborne illnesses ; Hogs ; Humans ; Infections ; Milk ; Pathogens ; Pork ; Poultry ; Poultry Products - microbiology ; Risk factors ; Serotyping ; Serotyping - methods ; Serotyping - veterinary ; Surveillance ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and infection, 2006-08, Vol.134 (4), p.758-767</ispartof><rights>2005 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2005 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-da52e216bca1d582a7e210774bc5a99db27cdcaa440ca2f8d4ff5d77f4d43bd03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3865964$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3865964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16316490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUSSING, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGBERG, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, N. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEIMANN, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Most Campylobacter subtypes from sporadic infections can be found in retail poultry products and food animals</title><title>Epidemiology and infection</title><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><description>The subtypes of Campylobacter isolates from human infections in two Danish counties were compared to isolates from retail food samples and faecal samples from chickens, pigs and cattle. During a 1-year period, 1285 Campylobacter isolates from these sources were typed by two methods: ‘Penner’ heat-stable serotyping and automated ribotyping (RiboPrinting). C. jejuni was the dominating species, but C. coli was more prevalent among food and chicken isolates (16%) compared to human isolates (4%). In total, 356 different combined sero-ribotypes (subtypes) were found. A large subtype overlap was seen between human isolates and isolates from food (66%), chickens (59%) and cattle (83%). This was verified by PFGE typing of 212 isolates representing selected subtypes. All frequent (n&gt;3) subtypes found in food were also present in humans. Sixty-one per cent of the isolates from domestically acquired infections had subtypes that were also found in food as opposed to 31% of travel-associated infections. The results showed differences in the various Campylobacter populations, e.g. the Danish population as reflected in the domestically acquired infections and the Danish-produced food was more uniform than the isolates originating from outside the country. The study shows that most C. jejuni subtypes found in poultry food samples, broiler chickens, and cattle were represented in the domestically acquired cases, indicating that C. jejuni from these reservoirs are likely sources of human infections in Denmark.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Foodborne illnesses</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry Products - microbiology</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Serotyping</subject><subject>Serotyping - methods</subject><subject>Serotyping - veterinary</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0950-2688</issn><issn>1469-4409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7uzqDxBEgg_71lpJJ53OiyCDrsKoqOtzSOey9tjdaZO0OP_eDDPMesGnXL5TxTlVCD0i8IwAEc8_g-RAm7YFDsA5yDtoRVgjK8ZA3kWrPa72_Aydp7QFAElbcR-dkaYmDZOwQuO7kDJe63HeDaHTJruI09Ll3ewS9jGMOM0hatsb3E_emdyHKWGjJ9w57MMy2fKPo8u6H_AcliHHHZ5jsIvJCeuCfQi2XPpRD-kBuufL4R4ezwv05fWr6_WbavPh6u365aYynLe5sppTR0nTGU0sb6kW5QVCsM5wLaXtqDDWaF1iGk19a5n33ArhmWV1Z6G-QC8OfeelG501bspRD2qOxUXcqaB79SeZ-q_qJvxQZTzAmCwNLo8NYvi-uJTV2CfjhkFPLixJkTJIDqIuwqd_CbdhiVMJpyhwJlpKaRGRg8jEkFJ0_uSEgNpvUv2zyVLz5PcItxXH1RXB44Ngm3KIJ163DZcNK7g64D5l9_OEdfymGlELrpqrj4rDtfj0ft2qTdHXR4967GJvb9xtkv-7_AXK_cP7</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>NIELSEN, E. M.</creator><creator>FUSSING, V.</creator><creator>ENGBERG, J.</creator><creator>NIELSEN, N. L.</creator><creator>NEIMANN, J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Most Campylobacter subtypes from sporadic infections can be found in retail poultry products and food animals</title><author>NIELSEN, E. M. ; FUSSING, V. ; ENGBERG, J. ; NIELSEN, N. L. ; NEIMANN, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-da52e216bca1d582a7e210774bc5a99db27cdcaa440ca2f8d4ff5d77f4d43bd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Foodborne illnesses</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry Products - microbiology</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Serotyping</topic><topic>Serotyping - methods</topic><topic>Serotyping - veterinary</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUSSING, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGBERG, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, N. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEIMANN, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NIELSEN, E. M.</au><au>FUSSING, V.</au><au>ENGBERG, J.</au><au>NIELSEN, N. L.</au><au>NEIMANN, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Most Campylobacter subtypes from sporadic infections can be found in retail poultry products and food animals</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>758</spage><epage>767</epage><pages>758-767</pages><issn>0950-2688</issn><eissn>1469-4409</eissn><abstract>The subtypes of Campylobacter isolates from human infections in two Danish counties were compared to isolates from retail food samples and faecal samples from chickens, pigs and cattle. During a 1-year period, 1285 Campylobacter isolates from these sources were typed by two methods: ‘Penner’ heat-stable serotyping and automated ribotyping (RiboPrinting). C. jejuni was the dominating species, but C. coli was more prevalent among food and chicken isolates (16%) compared to human isolates (4%). In total, 356 different combined sero-ribotypes (subtypes) were found. A large subtype overlap was seen between human isolates and isolates from food (66%), chickens (59%) and cattle (83%). This was verified by PFGE typing of 212 isolates representing selected subtypes. All frequent (n&gt;3) subtypes found in food were also present in humans. Sixty-one per cent of the isolates from domestically acquired infections had subtypes that were also found in food as opposed to 31% of travel-associated infections. The results showed differences in the various Campylobacter populations, e.g. the Danish population as reflected in the domestically acquired infections and the Danish-produced food was more uniform than the isolates originating from outside the country. The study shows that most C. jejuni subtypes found in poultry food samples, broiler chickens, and cattle were represented in the domestically acquired cases, indicating that C. jejuni from these reservoirs are likely sources of human infections in Denmark.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>16316490</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0950268805005509</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-2688
ispartof Epidemiology and infection, 2006-08, Vol.134 (4), p.758-767
issn 0950-2688
1469-4409
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2870449
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Bacterial infections
Campylobacter
Campylobacter - isolation & purification
Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology
Campylobacter Infections - microbiology
Campylobacter jejuni
Cattle
Chickens
Denmark - epidemiology
Epidemiology
Feces - microbiology
Food contamination & poisoning
Food Microbiology
Foodborne illnesses
Hogs
Humans
Infections
Milk
Pathogens
Pork
Poultry
Poultry Products - microbiology
Risk factors
Serotyping
Serotyping - methods
Serotyping - veterinary
Surveillance
Swine
title Most Campylobacter subtypes from sporadic infections can be found in retail poultry products and food animals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A11%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Most%20Campylobacter%20subtypes%20from%20sporadic%20infections%20can%20be%20found%20in%20retail%20poultry%20products%20and%20food%20animals&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=NIELSEN,%20E.%20M.&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=758&rft.epage=767&rft.pages=758-767&rft.issn=0950-2688&rft.eissn=1469-4409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0950268805005509&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E3865964%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205478222&rft_id=info:pmid/16316490&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0950268805005509&rft_jstor_id=3865964&rfr_iscdi=true