Long-term care of the disabled elderly: do children increase caregiving by spouses?
Do adult children affect the care elderly parents provide each other? We develop two models in which the anticipated behavior of adult children provides incentives for nondisabled elderly parents to increase care for their disabled spouses. The “demonstration effect” postulates that adult children l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of economics of the household 2009-09, Vol.7 (3), p.323-339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Review of economics of the household |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Pezzin, Liliana E. Pollak, Robert A. Schone, Barbara S. |
description | Do adult children affect the care elderly parents provide each other? We develop two models in which the anticipated behavior of adult children provides incentives for nondisabled elderly parents to increase care for their disabled spouses. The “demonstration effect” postulates that adult children learn from a parent’s example that family caregiving is appropriate behavior. The “punishment effect” postulates that adult children may punish parents who fail to provide spousal care by not providing future care for the nondisabled spouse if and when necessary. Thus, joint children act as a commitment mechanism, increasing the probability that elderly parents will provide care for their disabled spouses. We argue that stepchildren provide weaker incentives for spousal care because the attachment of a stepchild to a stepparent is likely to be weaker than the attachment of children to parents in a traditional nuclear family. Using data from the HRS, we find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that joint children provide stronger incentives than stepchildren for nondisabled elderly parents to provide care for their disabled spouse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11150-009-9057-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2869093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835551373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-dc060e173a28a1d0acaba340bba0710672a52d0993095d3875356b4d1715def73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS1ERUvhA3BBFicupmM7Xq85UKGKP5UicQDOlteebFxt7GBvKuXb45BSoBKnsTS_98ZPj5AXHN5wAH1ROecKGIBhBpRm3SNyxpWWTHMlHh_enWFKSHNKntZ6AyBUz-EJORWw0FIqfUa-LnMa2YxlQ70rSPOKzmukIVY3TBgoTgHLtH9LQ6Z-HadQMNGYfEFX8ZdkjLcxjXTY07rNu4r18hk5Wbmp4vO7eU6-f_zw7eozW375dH31fsm8MnpmwUMHyLV0onc8gPNucHIBw-BAc-i0cEoEMEaCUUH2WknVDYvAW7qAKy3Pybuj73Y3bDB4THNxk92WuHFlb7OL9t9Nims75lsr-s6Akc3g9Z1ByT92WGe7idXjNLmELYrlvVRKcakP6KsH6E3eldTiWSG44FovVIP4EfIl11pwdf8XDvbQmD02Zltj9tCY7Zrm5d8h7hW_K2qAOAK1rdKI5c_l_7v-BNyIoNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221217745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term care of the disabled elderly: do children increase caregiving by spouses?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pezzin, Liliana E. ; Pollak, Robert A. ; Schone, Barbara S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pezzin, Liliana E. ; Pollak, Robert A. ; Schone, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><description>Do adult children affect the care elderly parents provide each other? We develop two models in which the anticipated behavior of adult children provides incentives for nondisabled elderly parents to increase care for their disabled spouses. The “demonstration effect” postulates that adult children learn from a parent’s example that family caregiving is appropriate behavior. The “punishment effect” postulates that adult children may punish parents who fail to provide spousal care by not providing future care for the nondisabled spouse if and when necessary. Thus, joint children act as a commitment mechanism, increasing the probability that elderly parents will provide care for their disabled spouses. We argue that stepchildren provide weaker incentives for spousal care because the attachment of a stepchild to a stepparent is likely to be weaker than the attachment of children to parents in a traditional nuclear family. Using data from the HRS, we find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that joint children provide stronger incentives than stepchildren for nondisabled elderly parents to provide care for their disabled spouse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-5239</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7152</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11150-009-9057-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20473357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult children ; Altruism ; Attachment ; Caregivers ; Couples ; Disability ; Economic analysis ; Economic models ; Economic statistics ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Families & family life ; Health economics ; Households ; Husbands ; Incentives ; Labor Economics ; Long term health care ; Microeconomics ; Norms ; Parents & parenting ; Population Economics ; Social Sciences ; Stepfamilies ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Review of economics of the household, 2009-09, Vol.7 (3), p.323-339</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-dc060e173a28a1d0acaba340bba0710672a52d0993095d3875356b4d1715def73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-dc060e173a28a1d0acaba340bba0710672a52d0993095d3875356b4d1715def73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11150-009-9057-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11150-009-9057-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27322,27902,27903,33752,41466,42535,51296</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20473357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pezzin, Liliana E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollak, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schone, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term care of the disabled elderly: do children increase caregiving by spouses?</title><title>Review of economics of the household</title><addtitle>Rev Econ Household</addtitle><addtitle>Rev Econ Househ</addtitle><description>Do adult children affect the care elderly parents provide each other? We develop two models in which the anticipated behavior of adult children provides incentives for nondisabled elderly parents to increase care for their disabled spouses. The “demonstration effect” postulates that adult children learn from a parent’s example that family caregiving is appropriate behavior. The “punishment effect” postulates that adult children may punish parents who fail to provide spousal care by not providing future care for the nondisabled spouse if and when necessary. Thus, joint children act as a commitment mechanism, increasing the probability that elderly parents will provide care for their disabled spouses. We argue that stepchildren provide weaker incentives for spousal care because the attachment of a stepchild to a stepparent is likely to be weaker than the attachment of children to parents in a traditional nuclear family. Using data from the HRS, we find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that joint children provide stronger incentives than stepchildren for nondisabled elderly parents to provide care for their disabled spouse.</description><subject>Adult children</subject><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Labor Economics</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stepfamilies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1569-5239</issn><issn>1573-7152</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS1ERUvhA3BBFicupmM7Xq85UKGKP5UicQDOlteebFxt7GBvKuXb45BSoBKnsTS_98ZPj5AXHN5wAH1ROecKGIBhBpRm3SNyxpWWTHMlHh_enWFKSHNKntZ6AyBUz-EJORWw0FIqfUa-LnMa2YxlQ70rSPOKzmukIVY3TBgoTgHLtH9LQ6Z-HadQMNGYfEFX8ZdkjLcxjXTY07rNu4r18hk5Wbmp4vO7eU6-f_zw7eozW375dH31fsm8MnpmwUMHyLV0onc8gPNucHIBw-BAc-i0cEoEMEaCUUH2WknVDYvAW7qAKy3Pybuj73Y3bDB4THNxk92WuHFlb7OL9t9Nims75lsr-s6Akc3g9Z1ByT92WGe7idXjNLmELYrlvVRKcakP6KsH6E3eldTiWSG44FovVIP4EfIl11pwdf8XDvbQmD02Zltj9tCY7Zrm5d8h7hW_K2qAOAK1rdKI5c_l_7v-BNyIoNE</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Pezzin, Liliana E.</creator><creator>Pollak, Robert A.</creator><creator>Schone, Barbara S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Long-term care of the disabled elderly: do children increase caregiving by spouses?</title><author>Pezzin, Liliana E. ; Pollak, Robert A. ; Schone, Barbara S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-dc060e173a28a1d0acaba340bba0710672a52d0993095d3875356b4d1715def73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult children</topic><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Labor Economics</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stepfamilies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pezzin, Liliana E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollak, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schone, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Review of economics of the household</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pezzin, Liliana E.</au><au>Pollak, Robert A.</au><au>Schone, Barbara S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term care of the disabled elderly: do children increase caregiving by spouses?</atitle><jtitle>Review of economics of the household</jtitle><stitle>Rev Econ Household</stitle><addtitle>Rev Econ Househ</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>323-339</pages><issn>1569-5239</issn><eissn>1573-7152</eissn><abstract>Do adult children affect the care elderly parents provide each other? We develop two models in which the anticipated behavior of adult children provides incentives for nondisabled elderly parents to increase care for their disabled spouses. The “demonstration effect” postulates that adult children learn from a parent’s example that family caregiving is appropriate behavior. The “punishment effect” postulates that adult children may punish parents who fail to provide spousal care by not providing future care for the nondisabled spouse if and when necessary. Thus, joint children act as a commitment mechanism, increasing the probability that elderly parents will provide care for their disabled spouses. We argue that stepchildren provide weaker incentives for spousal care because the attachment of a stepchild to a stepparent is likely to be weaker than the attachment of children to parents in a traditional nuclear family. Using data from the HRS, we find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that joint children provide stronger incentives than stepchildren for nondisabled elderly parents to provide care for their disabled spouse.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>20473357</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11150-009-9057-6</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1569-5239 |
ispartof | Review of economics of the household, 2009-09, Vol.7 (3), p.323-339 |
issn | 1569-5239 1573-7152 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2869093 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adult children Altruism Attachment Caregivers Couples Disability Economic analysis Economic models Economic statistics Economic theory Economics Economics and Finance Families & family life Health economics Households Husbands Incentives Labor Economics Long term health care Microeconomics Norms Parents & parenting Population Economics Social Sciences Stepfamilies Studies |
title | Long-term care of the disabled elderly: do children increase caregiving by spouses? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A31%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20care%20of%20the%20disabled%20elderly:%20do%20children%20increase%20caregiving%20by%20spouses?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20economics%20of%20the%20household&rft.au=Pezzin,%20Liliana%20E.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=323-339&rft.issn=1569-5239&rft.eissn=1573-7152&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11150-009-9057-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835551373%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221217745&rft_id=info:pmid/20473357&rfr_iscdi=true |