Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2010-05, Vol.121 (1), p.121-131
Hauptverfasser: Barrios, Carlos H, Liu, Mei-Ching, Lee, Soo Chin, Vanlemmens, Laurence, Ferrero, Jean-Marc, Tabei, Toshio, Pivot, Xavier, Iwata, Hiroji, Aogi, Kenjiro, Lugo-Quintana, Roberto, Harbeck, Nadia, Brickman, Marla J, Zhang, Ke, Kern, Kenneth A, Martin, Miguel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 121
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 121
creator Barrios, Carlos H
Liu, Mei-Ching
Lee, Soo Chin
Vanlemmens, Laurence
Ferrero, Jean-Marc
Tabei, Toshio
Pivot, Xavier
Iwata, Hiroji
Aogi, Kenjiro
Lugo-Quintana, Roberto
Harbeck, Nadia
Brickman, Marla J
Zhang, Ke
Kern, Kenneth A
Martin, Miguel
description This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative ABC that recurred after anthracycline and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to sunitinib 37.5 mg/day or capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² (1,000 mg/m² in patients >65 years) BID on days 1-14 q3w. The independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) determined during the first interim analysis (238 patients randomized to sunitinib, 244 to capecitabine) that the trial be terminated due to futility in reaching the primary endpoint. No statistical evidence supported the hypothesis that sunitinib improved PFS compared with capecitabine (one-sided P = 0.999). The data indicated that PFS was shorter with sunitinib than capecitabine (median 2.8 vs. 4.2 months, respectively; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; two-sided P = 0.002). Median overall survival (15.3 vs. 24.6 months; HR, 1.17; two-sided P = 0.350) and objective response rates (11 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.65; P = 0.109) were numerically inferior with sunitinib versus capecitabine. While no new or unexpected safety findings were reported, sunitinib treatment was associated with higher frequencies and greater severities of many common adverse events (AEs) compared with capecitabine, resulting in more temporary discontinuations due to AEs with sunitinib (66 vs. 51%). The relative dose intensity was lower with sunitinib than capecitabine (73 vs. 95%). Based on these efficacy and safety results, sunitinib should not be used as monotherapy for patients with ABC.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2855860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A356142725</galeid><sourcerecordid>A356142725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-adfc05c39364ade607c0cf7b2823c0debc0b20106ceebb9fd5d274f824aff3a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkGP0zAQhSMEYsvCD-ACEQhOZBnbSZxckKrVQitVAgF7thzHbr1K7WInQcuZH85UKUuLEMrBiud7b-zxS5KnBC4IAH8bCRR5nQGBDHhVZXAvmZGCs4xTwu8nMyAlz8oKyrPkUYw3AFBzqB8mZxQYq2vCZsnPTxsZdbpcLtMgXeu39odu0z5Y2aXepHFwtrfONumoQxxiquROK9vLxjqdWpfuZG-162P63fabdBf0aP0Qu1u00LJHq8XVZ5o5vUZu1KlsR-kUbjdYjj3a4V94nDwwsov6yWE9T67fX329XGSrjx-Wl_NVpsqC95lsjYJCsZqVuWx1CVyBMryhFWUKWt0oaCgOo1RaN01t2qKlPDcVzaUxTObsPHk3-e6GZqtbhQcPshO7YLcy3AovrTitOLsRaz8KWhVFVQIavJkMNn_JFvOVsC7qsBUAeZVjz5Eg_uLQL_hvg469uPFDcHhFQWpGC6gpRejlBK1lp9HEeGyttjYqMWdFSXLKaYHUxT8o_Fq9tco7bSzunwheHwk2Wnb9Jvpu6K138RQkE6iCjzFoc3cxAmIfMzHFTOBkxT5mYj-HZ8eDvFP8zhUCrw6AjEp2BrOlbPzDUV4yyvbN6cRFLLm1DkcT-k_355PISC_kOqDx9Rd8eAakYpQwwn4BIXD0Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>193250922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Barrios, Carlos H ; Liu, Mei-Ching ; Lee, Soo Chin ; Vanlemmens, Laurence ; Ferrero, Jean-Marc ; Tabei, Toshio ; Pivot, Xavier ; Iwata, Hiroji ; Aogi, Kenjiro ; Lugo-Quintana, Roberto ; Harbeck, Nadia ; Brickman, Marla J ; Zhang, Ke ; Kern, Kenneth A ; Martin, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrios, Carlos H ; Liu, Mei-Ching ; Lee, Soo Chin ; Vanlemmens, Laurence ; Ferrero, Jean-Marc ; Tabei, Toshio ; Pivot, Xavier ; Iwata, Hiroji ; Aogi, Kenjiro ; Lugo-Quintana, Roberto ; Harbeck, Nadia ; Brickman, Marla J ; Zhang, Ke ; Kern, Kenneth A ; Martin, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative ABC that recurred after anthracycline and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to sunitinib 37.5 mg/day or capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² (1,000 mg/m² in patients &gt;65 years) BID on days 1-14 q3w. The independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) determined during the first interim analysis (238 patients randomized to sunitinib, 244 to capecitabine) that the trial be terminated due to futility in reaching the primary endpoint. No statistical evidence supported the hypothesis that sunitinib improved PFS compared with capecitabine (one-sided P = 0.999). The data indicated that PFS was shorter with sunitinib than capecitabine (median 2.8 vs. 4.2 months, respectively; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; two-sided P = 0.002). Median overall survival (15.3 vs. 24.6 months; HR, 1.17; two-sided P = 0.350) and objective response rates (11 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.65; P = 0.109) were numerically inferior with sunitinib versus capecitabine. While no new or unexpected safety findings were reported, sunitinib treatment was associated with higher frequencies and greater severities of many common adverse events (AEs) compared with capecitabine, resulting in more temporary discontinuations due to AEs with sunitinib (66 vs. 51%). The relative dose intensity was lower with sunitinib than capecitabine (73 vs. 95%). Based on these efficacy and safety results, sunitinib should not be used as monotherapy for patients with ABC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20339913</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BCTRD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Boston : Springer US</publisher><subject>Anthracyclines ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Capecitabine ; Care and treatment ; Clinical Trial ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Deoxycytidine - therapeutic use ; Disease-Free Survival ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Fluorouracil - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Fluorouracil - therapeutic use ; Genes, erbB-2 ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Immunology ; Indoles - therapeutic use ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Life Sciences ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oncology ; Product development ; Pyrroles - therapeutic use ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2010-05, Vol.121 (1), p.121-131</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-adfc05c39364ade607c0cf7b2823c0debc0b20106ceebb9fd5d274f824aff3a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-adfc05c39364ade607c0cf7b2823c0debc0b20106ceebb9fd5d274f824aff3a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7799-1648 ; 0000-0003-0069-3743 ; 0000-0002-9744-7372</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22763235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20339913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://inserm.hal.science/inserm-00484824$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrios, Carlos H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mei-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soo Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanlemmens, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabei, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivot, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Hiroji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aogi, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugo-Quintana, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brickman, Marla J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative ABC that recurred after anthracycline and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to sunitinib 37.5 mg/day or capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² (1,000 mg/m² in patients &gt;65 years) BID on days 1-14 q3w. The independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) determined during the first interim analysis (238 patients randomized to sunitinib, 244 to capecitabine) that the trial be terminated due to futility in reaching the primary endpoint. No statistical evidence supported the hypothesis that sunitinib improved PFS compared with capecitabine (one-sided P = 0.999). The data indicated that PFS was shorter with sunitinib than capecitabine (median 2.8 vs. 4.2 months, respectively; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; two-sided P = 0.002). Median overall survival (15.3 vs. 24.6 months; HR, 1.17; two-sided P = 0.350) and objective response rates (11 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.65; P = 0.109) were numerically inferior with sunitinib versus capecitabine. While no new or unexpected safety findings were reported, sunitinib treatment was associated with higher frequencies and greater severities of many common adverse events (AEs) compared with capecitabine, resulting in more temporary discontinuations due to AEs with sunitinib (66 vs. 51%). The relative dose intensity was lower with sunitinib than capecitabine (73 vs. 95%). Based on these efficacy and safety results, sunitinib should not be used as monotherapy for patients with ABC.</description><subject>Anthracyclines</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Capecitabine</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical Trial</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Deoxycytidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Genes, erbB-2</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Indoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Pyrroles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kkGP0zAQhSMEYsvCD-ACEQhOZBnbSZxckKrVQitVAgF7thzHbr1K7WInQcuZH85UKUuLEMrBiud7b-zxS5KnBC4IAH8bCRR5nQGBDHhVZXAvmZGCs4xTwu8nMyAlz8oKyrPkUYw3AFBzqB8mZxQYq2vCZsnPTxsZdbpcLtMgXeu39odu0z5Y2aXepHFwtrfONumoQxxiquROK9vLxjqdWpfuZG-162P63fabdBf0aP0Qu1u00LJHq8XVZ5o5vUZu1KlsR-kUbjdYjj3a4V94nDwwsov6yWE9T67fX329XGSrjx-Wl_NVpsqC95lsjYJCsZqVuWx1CVyBMryhFWUKWt0oaCgOo1RaN01t2qKlPDcVzaUxTObsPHk3-e6GZqtbhQcPshO7YLcy3AovrTitOLsRaz8KWhVFVQIavJkMNn_JFvOVsC7qsBUAeZVjz5Eg_uLQL_hvg469uPFDcHhFQWpGC6gpRejlBK1lp9HEeGyttjYqMWdFSXLKaYHUxT8o_Fq9tco7bSzunwheHwk2Wnb9Jvpu6K138RQkE6iCjzFoc3cxAmIfMzHFTOBkxT5mYj-HZ8eDvFP8zhUCrw6AjEp2BrOlbPzDUV4yyvbN6cRFLLm1DkcT-k_355PISC_kOqDx9Rd8eAakYpQwwn4BIXD0Qw</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Barrios, Carlos H</creator><creator>Liu, Mei-Ching</creator><creator>Lee, Soo Chin</creator><creator>Vanlemmens, Laurence</creator><creator>Ferrero, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Tabei, Toshio</creator><creator>Pivot, Xavier</creator><creator>Iwata, Hiroji</creator><creator>Aogi, Kenjiro</creator><creator>Lugo-Quintana, Roberto</creator><creator>Harbeck, Nadia</creator><creator>Brickman, Marla J</creator><creator>Zhang, Ke</creator><creator>Kern, Kenneth A</creator><creator>Martin, Miguel</creator><general>Boston : Springer US</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-1648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-3743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-7372</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer</title><author>Barrios, Carlos H ; Liu, Mei-Ching ; Lee, Soo Chin ; Vanlemmens, Laurence ; Ferrero, Jean-Marc ; Tabei, Toshio ; Pivot, Xavier ; Iwata, Hiroji ; Aogi, Kenjiro ; Lugo-Quintana, Roberto ; Harbeck, Nadia ; Brickman, Marla J ; Zhang, Ke ; Kern, Kenneth A ; Martin, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c657t-adfc05c39364ade607c0cf7b2823c0debc0b20106ceebb9fd5d274f824aff3a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anthracyclines</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Capecitabine</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical Trial</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Deoxycytidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Genes, erbB-2</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Indoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Pyrroles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrios, Carlos H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mei-Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soo Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanlemmens, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrero, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabei, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivot, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Hiroji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aogi, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lugo-Quintana, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brickman, Marla J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kern, Kenneth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrios, Carlos H</au><au>Liu, Mei-Ching</au><au>Lee, Soo Chin</au><au>Vanlemmens, Laurence</au><au>Ferrero, Jean-Marc</au><au>Tabei, Toshio</au><au>Pivot, Xavier</au><au>Iwata, Hiroji</au><au>Aogi, Kenjiro</au><au>Lugo-Quintana, Roberto</au><au>Harbeck, Nadia</au><au>Brickman, Marla J</au><au>Zhang, Ke</au><au>Kern, Kenneth A</au><au>Martin, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>121-131</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><coden>BCTRD6</coden><abstract>This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial (planned enrollment: 700 patients) was conducted to test the hypothesis that single-agent sunitinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine as treatment for advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients with HER2-negative ABC that recurred after anthracycline and taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to sunitinib 37.5 mg/day or capecitabine 1,250 mg/m² (1,000 mg/m² in patients &gt;65 years) BID on days 1-14 q3w. The independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) determined during the first interim analysis (238 patients randomized to sunitinib, 244 to capecitabine) that the trial be terminated due to futility in reaching the primary endpoint. No statistical evidence supported the hypothesis that sunitinib improved PFS compared with capecitabine (one-sided P = 0.999). The data indicated that PFS was shorter with sunitinib than capecitabine (median 2.8 vs. 4.2 months, respectively; HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; two-sided P = 0.002). Median overall survival (15.3 vs. 24.6 months; HR, 1.17; two-sided P = 0.350) and objective response rates (11 vs. 16%; odds ratio, 0.65; P = 0.109) were numerically inferior with sunitinib versus capecitabine. While no new or unexpected safety findings were reported, sunitinib treatment was associated with higher frequencies and greater severities of many common adverse events (AEs) compared with capecitabine, resulting in more temporary discontinuations due to AEs with sunitinib (66 vs. 51%). The relative dose intensity was lower with sunitinib than capecitabine (73 vs. 95%). Based on these efficacy and safety results, sunitinib should not be used as monotherapy for patients with ABC.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Boston : Springer US</pub><pmid>20339913</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-1648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-3743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-7372</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2010-05, Vol.121 (1), p.121-131
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2855860
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Anthracyclines
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Cancer research
Cancer therapies
Capecitabine
Care and treatment
Clinical Trial
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Comparative studies
Deoxycytidine - analogs & derivatives
Deoxycytidine - therapeutic use
Disease-Free Survival
Drug therapy
Female
Fluorouracil - analogs & derivatives
Fluorouracil - therapeutic use
Genes, erbB-2
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Immunology
Indoles - therapeutic use
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Life Sciences
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Product development
Pyrroles - therapeutic use
Tumors
title Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A45%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phase%20III%20randomized%20trial%20of%20sunitinib%20versus%20capecitabine%20in%20patients%20with%20previously%20treated%20HER2-negative%20advanced%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Barrios,%20Carlos%20H&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=121-131&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft.coden=BCTRD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-010-0788-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA356142725%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=193250922&rft_id=info:pmid/20339913&rft_galeid=A356142725&rfr_iscdi=true