Prevalence of TMPRSS2–ERG and SLC45A3–ERG gene fusions in a large prostatectomy cohort

The majority of prostate cancers harbor recurrent gene fusions between the hormone-regulated TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS family of transcription factors, most commonly ERG . Prostate cancer with ERG rearrangements represent a distinct sub-class of tumor based on studies reporting associations wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern pathology 2010-04, Vol.23 (4), p.539-546
Hauptverfasser: Esgueva, Raquel, Perner, Sven, J LaFargue, Christopher, Scheble, Veit, Stephan, Carsten, Lein, Michael, Fritzsche, Florian R, Dietel, Manfred, Kristiansen, Glen, Rubin, Mark A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 4
container_start_page 539
container_title Modern pathology
container_volume 23
creator Esgueva, Raquel
Perner, Sven
J LaFargue, Christopher
Scheble, Veit
Stephan, Carsten
Lein, Michael
Fritzsche, Florian R
Dietel, Manfred
Kristiansen, Glen
Rubin, Mark A
description The majority of prostate cancers harbor recurrent gene fusions between the hormone-regulated TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS family of transcription factors, most commonly ERG . Prostate cancer with ERG rearrangements represent a distinct sub-class of tumor based on studies reporting associations with histomorphologic features, characteristic somatic copy number alterations, and gene expression signatures. This study describes the frequency of ERG rearrangement prostate cancer and three 5 prime (5′) gene fusion partners (ie, TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1 ) in a large prostatectomy cohort. ERG gene rearrangements and mechanism of rearrangement, as well as rearrangements of TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1, were assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on prostate cancer samples from 614 patients treated using radical prostatectomy. ERG rearrangement occurred in 53% of the 540 assessable cases. TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 were the only 5′ partner in 78% and 6% of these ERG rearranged cases, respectively. Interestingly, 11% of the ERG rearranged cases showed concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements. TMPRSS2 or SLC45A3 rearrangements could not be identified for 5% of the ERG rearranged cases. From these remaining cases we identified one case with NDRG1 rearrangement. We did not observe any associations with pathologic parameters or clinical outcome. This is the first study to describe the frequency of SLC45A3–ERG fusions in a large clinical cohort. Most studies have assumed that all ERG rearranged prostate cancers harbor TMPRSS2–ERG fusions. This is also the first study to report concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements in the same tumor focus, suggesting additional complexity that had not been previously appreciated. This study has important clinical implications for the development of diagnostic assays to detect ETS rearranged prostate cancer. Incorporation of these less common ERG rearranged prostate cancer fusion assays could further increase the sensitivity of the current PCR-based approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/modpathol.2009.193
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2848699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>746161567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-b507e4fab7a248ee3907267901ba3d706347d6299b023ef88ea79c134cc550d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuEzEUhi0EomnhBVggiw2rCb6MbxukKioFKYiqKRs2lsdzJplqxg72TKXueAfesE_CRAnhsgBvLPl857d9PoReUDKnhOs3fay3btjEbs4IMXNq-CM0o4KTgjAtHqMZ0YYX3Ah2gk5zviWElkKzp-iEEUq1oWSGvlwluHMdBA84Nvjm49X1asUevn2_uL7ELtR4tVyU4pwfTtYQADdjbmPIuA3Y4c6lNeBtinlwA_gh9vfYx01MwzP0pHFdhueH_Qx9fndxs3hfLD9dflicLwsvFBmKShAFZeMq5VipAbghikllCK0crxWRvFS1ZMZUhHFotAanjKe89F4IUlN-ht7uc7dj1UPtIQzJdXab2t6lextda_-shHZj1_HOMl1qacwU8PoQkOLXEfJg-zZ76DoXII7ZqlJSSYVU_yf5bpWSTOSrv8jbOKYwzcEyRqmUSooJYnvIT-PLCZrjoymxO8X2qNjuFNtJ8dT08vfvHlt-Op0AvgfyVAprSL-u_kfsDyd5tgM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221166765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of TMPRSS2–ERG and SLC45A3–ERG gene fusions in a large prostatectomy cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Esgueva, Raquel ; Perner, Sven ; J LaFargue, Christopher ; Scheble, Veit ; Stephan, Carsten ; Lein, Michael ; Fritzsche, Florian R ; Dietel, Manfred ; Kristiansen, Glen ; Rubin, Mark A</creator><creatorcontrib>Esgueva, Raquel ; Perner, Sven ; J LaFargue, Christopher ; Scheble, Veit ; Stephan, Carsten ; Lein, Michael ; Fritzsche, Florian R ; Dietel, Manfred ; Kristiansen, Glen ; Rubin, Mark A</creatorcontrib><description>The majority of prostate cancers harbor recurrent gene fusions between the hormone-regulated TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS family of transcription factors, most commonly ERG . Prostate cancer with ERG rearrangements represent a distinct sub-class of tumor based on studies reporting associations with histomorphologic features, characteristic somatic copy number alterations, and gene expression signatures. This study describes the frequency of ERG rearrangement prostate cancer and three 5 prime (5′) gene fusion partners (ie, TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1 ) in a large prostatectomy cohort. ERG gene rearrangements and mechanism of rearrangement, as well as rearrangements of TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1, were assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on prostate cancer samples from 614 patients treated using radical prostatectomy. ERG rearrangement occurred in 53% of the 540 assessable cases. TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 were the only 5′ partner in 78% and 6% of these ERG rearranged cases, respectively. Interestingly, 11% of the ERG rearranged cases showed concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements. TMPRSS2 or SLC45A3 rearrangements could not be identified for 5% of the ERG rearranged cases. From these remaining cases we identified one case with NDRG1 rearrangement. We did not observe any associations with pathologic parameters or clinical outcome. This is the first study to describe the frequency of SLC45A3–ERG fusions in a large clinical cohort. Most studies have assumed that all ERG rearranged prostate cancers harbor TMPRSS2–ERG fusions. This is also the first study to report concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements in the same tumor focus, suggesting additional complexity that had not been previously appreciated. This study has important clinical implications for the development of diagnostic assays to detect ETS rearranged prostate cancer. Incorporation of these less common ERG rearranged prostate cancer fusion assays could further increase the sensitivity of the current PCR-based approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.193</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20118910</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MODPEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>631/337 ; 692/699/67/589/466 ; 692/700/565/545 ; Adult ; Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Gene Rearrangement ; Hospitals ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion - genetics ; original-article ; Pathology ; Prevalence ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - genetics ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Tissue Array Analysis ; Trans-Activators - genetics ; Transcriptional Regulator ERG</subject><ispartof>Modern pathology, 2010-04, Vol.23 (4), p.539-546</ispartof><rights>United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2010</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-b507e4fab7a248ee3907267901ba3d706347d6299b023ef88ea79c134cc550d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-b507e4fab7a248ee3907267901ba3d706347d6299b023ef88ea79c134cc550d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20118910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esgueva, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perner, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J LaFargue, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheble, Veit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lein, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritzsche, Florian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietel, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Mark A</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of TMPRSS2–ERG and SLC45A3–ERG gene fusions in a large prostatectomy cohort</title><title>Modern pathology</title><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><description>The majority of prostate cancers harbor recurrent gene fusions between the hormone-regulated TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS family of transcription factors, most commonly ERG . Prostate cancer with ERG rearrangements represent a distinct sub-class of tumor based on studies reporting associations with histomorphologic features, characteristic somatic copy number alterations, and gene expression signatures. This study describes the frequency of ERG rearrangement prostate cancer and three 5 prime (5′) gene fusion partners (ie, TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1 ) in a large prostatectomy cohort. ERG gene rearrangements and mechanism of rearrangement, as well as rearrangements of TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1, were assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on prostate cancer samples from 614 patients treated using radical prostatectomy. ERG rearrangement occurred in 53% of the 540 assessable cases. TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 were the only 5′ partner in 78% and 6% of these ERG rearranged cases, respectively. Interestingly, 11% of the ERG rearranged cases showed concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements. TMPRSS2 or SLC45A3 rearrangements could not be identified for 5% of the ERG rearranged cases. From these remaining cases we identified one case with NDRG1 rearrangement. We did not observe any associations with pathologic parameters or clinical outcome. This is the first study to describe the frequency of SLC45A3–ERG fusions in a large clinical cohort. Most studies have assumed that all ERG rearranged prostate cancers harbor TMPRSS2–ERG fusions. This is also the first study to report concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements in the same tumor focus, suggesting additional complexity that had not been previously appreciated. This study has important clinical implications for the development of diagnostic assays to detect ETS rearranged prostate cancer. Incorporation of these less common ERG rearranged prostate cancer fusion assays could further increase the sensitivity of the current PCR-based approaches.</description><subject>631/337</subject><subject>692/699/67/589/466</subject><subject>692/700/565/545</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Gene Rearrangement</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncogene Proteins, Fusion - genetics</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Tissue Array Analysis</subject><subject>Trans-Activators - genetics</subject><subject>Transcriptional Regulator ERG</subject><issn>0893-3952</issn><issn>1530-0285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuEzEUhi0EomnhBVggiw2rCb6MbxukKioFKYiqKRs2lsdzJplqxg72TKXueAfesE_CRAnhsgBvLPl857d9PoReUDKnhOs3fay3btjEbs4IMXNq-CM0o4KTgjAtHqMZ0YYX3Ah2gk5zviWElkKzp-iEEUq1oWSGvlwluHMdBA84Nvjm49X1asUevn2_uL7ELtR4tVyU4pwfTtYQADdjbmPIuA3Y4c6lNeBtinlwA_gh9vfYx01MwzP0pHFdhueH_Qx9fndxs3hfLD9dflicLwsvFBmKShAFZeMq5VipAbghikllCK0crxWRvFS1ZMZUhHFotAanjKe89F4IUlN-ht7uc7dj1UPtIQzJdXab2t6lextda_-shHZj1_HOMl1qacwU8PoQkOLXEfJg-zZ76DoXII7ZqlJSSYVU_yf5bpWSTOSrv8jbOKYwzcEyRqmUSooJYnvIT-PLCZrjoymxO8X2qNjuFNtJ8dT08vfvHlt-Op0AvgfyVAprSL-u_kfsDyd5tgM</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Esgueva, Raquel</creator><creator>Perner, Sven</creator><creator>J LaFargue, Christopher</creator><creator>Scheble, Veit</creator><creator>Stephan, Carsten</creator><creator>Lein, Michael</creator><creator>Fritzsche, Florian R</creator><creator>Dietel, Manfred</creator><creator>Kristiansen, Glen</creator><creator>Rubin, Mark A</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Prevalence of TMPRSS2–ERG and SLC45A3–ERG gene fusions in a large prostatectomy cohort</title><author>Esgueva, Raquel ; Perner, Sven ; J LaFargue, Christopher ; Scheble, Veit ; Stephan, Carsten ; Lein, Michael ; Fritzsche, Florian R ; Dietel, Manfred ; Kristiansen, Glen ; Rubin, Mark A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-b507e4fab7a248ee3907267901ba3d706347d6299b023ef88ea79c134cc550d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>631/337</topic><topic>692/699/67/589/466</topic><topic>692/700/565/545</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Gene Rearrangement</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncogene Proteins, Fusion - genetics</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Tissue Array Analysis</topic><topic>Trans-Activators - genetics</topic><topic>Transcriptional Regulator ERG</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esgueva, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perner, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J LaFargue, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheble, Veit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephan, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lein, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritzsche, Florian R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietel, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Glen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Mark A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esgueva, Raquel</au><au>Perner, Sven</au><au>J LaFargue, Christopher</au><au>Scheble, Veit</au><au>Stephan, Carsten</au><au>Lein, Michael</au><au>Fritzsche, Florian R</au><au>Dietel, Manfred</au><au>Kristiansen, Glen</au><au>Rubin, Mark A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of TMPRSS2–ERG and SLC45A3–ERG gene fusions in a large prostatectomy cohort</atitle><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle><stitle>Mod Pathol</stitle><addtitle>Mod Pathol</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>539-546</pages><issn>0893-3952</issn><eissn>1530-0285</eissn><coden>MODPEO</coden><abstract>The majority of prostate cancers harbor recurrent gene fusions between the hormone-regulated TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS family of transcription factors, most commonly ERG . Prostate cancer with ERG rearrangements represent a distinct sub-class of tumor based on studies reporting associations with histomorphologic features, characteristic somatic copy number alterations, and gene expression signatures. This study describes the frequency of ERG rearrangement prostate cancer and three 5 prime (5′) gene fusion partners (ie, TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1 ) in a large prostatectomy cohort. ERG gene rearrangements and mechanism of rearrangement, as well as rearrangements of TMPRSS2, SLC45A3, and NDRG1, were assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on prostate cancer samples from 614 patients treated using radical prostatectomy. ERG rearrangement occurred in 53% of the 540 assessable cases. TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 were the only 5′ partner in 78% and 6% of these ERG rearranged cases, respectively. Interestingly, 11% of the ERG rearranged cases showed concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements. TMPRSS2 or SLC45A3 rearrangements could not be identified for 5% of the ERG rearranged cases. From these remaining cases we identified one case with NDRG1 rearrangement. We did not observe any associations with pathologic parameters or clinical outcome. This is the first study to describe the frequency of SLC45A3–ERG fusions in a large clinical cohort. Most studies have assumed that all ERG rearranged prostate cancers harbor TMPRSS2–ERG fusions. This is also the first study to report concurrent TMPRSS2 and SLC45A3 rearrangements in the same tumor focus, suggesting additional complexity that had not been previously appreciated. This study has important clinical implications for the development of diagnostic assays to detect ETS rearranged prostate cancer. Incorporation of these less common ERG rearranged prostate cancer fusion assays could further increase the sensitivity of the current PCR-based approaches.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>20118910</pmid><doi>10.1038/modpathol.2009.193</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-3952
ispartof Modern pathology, 2010-04, Vol.23 (4), p.539-546
issn 0893-3952
1530-0285
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2848699
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects 631/337
692/699/67/589/466
692/700/565/545
Adult
Aged
Cohort Studies
Gene Rearrangement
Hospitals
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Laboratory Medicine
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion - genetics
original-article
Pathology
Prevalence
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms - genetics
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Tissue Array Analysis
Trans-Activators - genetics
Transcriptional Regulator ERG
title Prevalence of TMPRSS2–ERG and SLC45A3–ERG gene fusions in a large prostatectomy cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A57%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20TMPRSS2%E2%80%93ERG%20and%20SLC45A3%E2%80%93ERG%20gene%20fusions%20in%20a%20large%20prostatectomy%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Modern%20pathology&rft.au=Esgueva,%20Raquel&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=539-546&rft.issn=0893-3952&rft.eissn=1530-0285&rft.coden=MODPEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/modpathol.2009.193&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E746161567%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221166765&rft_id=info:pmid/20118910&rfr_iscdi=true