Nonlinear and anisotropic tensile properties of graft materials used in soft tissue applications

Abstract Background The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix grafts that are intended to augment or replace soft tissues should be comparable to the native tissue. Such grafts are often used in fiber-reinforced tissue applications that undergo multi-axial loading and therefore knowledge of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2010-05, Vol.25 (4), p.378-382
Hauptverfasser: Yoder, Jonathon H, Elliott, Dawn M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 382
container_issue 4
container_start_page 378
container_title Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)
container_volume 25
creator Yoder, Jonathon H
Elliott, Dawn M
description Abstract Background The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix grafts that are intended to augment or replace soft tissues should be comparable to the native tissue. Such grafts are often used in fiber-reinforced tissue applications that undergo multi-axial loading and therefore knowledge of the anisotropic and nonlinear properties are needed, including the moduli and Poisson’s ratio in two orthogonal directions within the plane of the graft. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile mechanical properties of several marketed grafts: Alloderm, Restore, CuffPatch, and OrthADAPT. Methods The degree of anisotropy and non-linearity within each graft was evaluated from uniaxial tensile tests and compared to their native tissue. Findings The Alloderm graft was anisotropic in both the toe- and linear-region of the stress–strain response, was highly nonlinear, and generally had low properties. The Restore and CuffPatch grafts had similar stress–strain responses, were largely isotropic, had a linear-region modulus of 18 MPa, and were nonlinear. OrthADAPT was anisotropic in the linear-region (131 MPA vs 47 MPa in the toe-region) and was highly nonlinear. The Poisson ratio for all grafts was between 0.4 and 0.7, except for the parallel orientation of Restore which was greater than 1.0. Interpretation Having an informed understanding of how the available grafts perform mechanically will allow for better assessment by the physician for which graft to apply depending upon its application.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.01.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2846988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268003310000227</els_id><sourcerecordid>733499058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-3efaf71798684caf78fa51da0c43f28553a4c5d08b2a685ca8c79551d63486003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v3CAQhlHVqtmm_QsVPfXkLR-2wZdI1apfUtQekp4pi8cJWxtcwJHy7zPWplHaUw4IGJ55B3iHkHecbTnj7YfD1o0-7H2cwF1vBcM441vG6mdkw7XqKi4Uf042TLS6YkzKE_Iq5wNDQjTqJTnBFNEpoTfk1_cYUAtsojb0OHyOJcXZO1ogZD8CnXELqXjINA70Ktmh0MkWSN6OmS4ZeuoDzRHDxee8ALXzPHpni48hvyYvBuTgzf18Sn5-_nS5-1qd__jybffxvHKNVKWSMNhBcdXpVtcOl3qwDe8tc7UchG4aaWvX9EzvhW1146x2qmuQaGWtW3zjKTk76s7LfoLeQSjJjmZOfrLp1kTrzb8nwV-bq3hjhK7bTmsUeH8vkOKfBXIxk88OxtEGiEs2Ssq661izkt2RdCnmnGB4qMKZWQ0yB_PIILMaZBg3-P2Y-_bxNR8y_zqCwO4IAH7WjYdksvMQHPQ-gSumj_5JZc7-U1lJ9GT8DbeQD3FJAd0w3GRhmLlYO2VtFI49woRQ8g4dmr91</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733499058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonlinear and anisotropic tensile properties of graft materials used in soft tissue applications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yoder, Jonathon H ; Elliott, Dawn M</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Jonathon H ; Elliott, Dawn M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix grafts that are intended to augment or replace soft tissues should be comparable to the native tissue. Such grafts are often used in fiber-reinforced tissue applications that undergo multi-axial loading and therefore knowledge of the anisotropic and nonlinear properties are needed, including the moduli and Poisson’s ratio in two orthogonal directions within the plane of the graft. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile mechanical properties of several marketed grafts: Alloderm, Restore, CuffPatch, and OrthADAPT. Methods The degree of anisotropy and non-linearity within each graft was evaluated from uniaxial tensile tests and compared to their native tissue. Findings The Alloderm graft was anisotropic in both the toe- and linear-region of the stress–strain response, was highly nonlinear, and generally had low properties. The Restore and CuffPatch grafts had similar stress–strain responses, were largely isotropic, had a linear-region modulus of 18 MPa, and were nonlinear. OrthADAPT was anisotropic in the linear-region (131 MPA vs 47 MPa in the toe-region) and was highly nonlinear. The Poisson ratio for all grafts was between 0.4 and 0.7, except for the parallel orientation of Restore which was greater than 1.0. Interpretation Having an informed understanding of how the available grafts perform mechanically will allow for better assessment by the physician for which graft to apply depending upon its application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.01.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20129728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anisotropy ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; Connective Tissue - surgery ; Elastic Modulus ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Graft material ; Materials Testing ; Non-linearity ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tensile mechanics ; Tensile Strength ; Transplants</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2010-05, Vol.25 (4), p.378-382</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-3efaf71798684caf78fa51da0c43f28553a4c5d08b2a685ca8c79551d63486003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-3efaf71798684caf78fa51da0c43f28553a4c5d08b2a685ca8c79551d63486003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003310000227$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20129728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Jonathon H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Dawn M</creatorcontrib><title>Nonlinear and anisotropic tensile properties of graft materials used in soft tissue applications</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix grafts that are intended to augment or replace soft tissues should be comparable to the native tissue. Such grafts are often used in fiber-reinforced tissue applications that undergo multi-axial loading and therefore knowledge of the anisotropic and nonlinear properties are needed, including the moduli and Poisson’s ratio in two orthogonal directions within the plane of the graft. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile mechanical properties of several marketed grafts: Alloderm, Restore, CuffPatch, and OrthADAPT. Methods The degree of anisotropy and non-linearity within each graft was evaluated from uniaxial tensile tests and compared to their native tissue. Findings The Alloderm graft was anisotropic in both the toe- and linear-region of the stress–strain response, was highly nonlinear, and generally had low properties. The Restore and CuffPatch grafts had similar stress–strain responses, were largely isotropic, had a linear-region modulus of 18 MPa, and were nonlinear. OrthADAPT was anisotropic in the linear-region (131 MPA vs 47 MPa in the toe-region) and was highly nonlinear. The Poisson ratio for all grafts was between 0.4 and 0.7, except for the parallel orientation of Restore which was greater than 1.0. Interpretation Having an informed understanding of how the available grafts perform mechanically will allow for better assessment by the physician for which graft to apply depending upon its application.</description><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Connective Tissue - surgery</subject><subject>Elastic Modulus</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Graft material</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Non-linearity</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tensile mechanics</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v3CAQhlHVqtmm_QsVPfXkLR-2wZdI1apfUtQekp4pi8cJWxtcwJHy7zPWplHaUw4IGJ55B3iHkHecbTnj7YfD1o0-7H2cwF1vBcM441vG6mdkw7XqKi4Uf042TLS6YkzKE_Iq5wNDQjTqJTnBFNEpoTfk1_cYUAtsojb0OHyOJcXZO1ogZD8CnXELqXjINA70Ktmh0MkWSN6OmS4ZeuoDzRHDxee8ALXzPHpni48hvyYvBuTgzf18Sn5-_nS5-1qd__jybffxvHKNVKWSMNhBcdXpVtcOl3qwDe8tc7UchG4aaWvX9EzvhW1146x2qmuQaGWtW3zjKTk76s7LfoLeQSjJjmZOfrLp1kTrzb8nwV-bq3hjhK7bTmsUeH8vkOKfBXIxk88OxtEGiEs2Ssq661izkt2RdCnmnGB4qMKZWQ0yB_PIILMaZBg3-P2Y-_bxNR8y_zqCwO4IAH7WjYdksvMQHPQ-gSumj_5JZc7-U1lJ9GT8DbeQD3FJAd0w3GRhmLlYO2VtFI49woRQ8g4dmr91</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Yoder, Jonathon H</creator><creator>Elliott, Dawn M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Nonlinear and anisotropic tensile properties of graft materials used in soft tissue applications</title><author>Yoder, Jonathon H ; Elliott, Dawn M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-3efaf71798684caf78fa51da0c43f28553a4c5d08b2a685ca8c79551d63486003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Connective Tissue - surgery</topic><topic>Elastic Modulus</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Graft material</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Non-linearity</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tensile mechanics</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Jonathon H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Dawn M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoder, Jonathon H</au><au>Elliott, Dawn M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonlinear and anisotropic tensile properties of graft materials used in soft tissue applications</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>378-382</pages><issn>0268-0033</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The mechanical properties of extracellular matrix grafts that are intended to augment or replace soft tissues should be comparable to the native tissue. Such grafts are often used in fiber-reinforced tissue applications that undergo multi-axial loading and therefore knowledge of the anisotropic and nonlinear properties are needed, including the moduli and Poisson’s ratio in two orthogonal directions within the plane of the graft. The objective of this study was to measure the tensile mechanical properties of several marketed grafts: Alloderm, Restore, CuffPatch, and OrthADAPT. Methods The degree of anisotropy and non-linearity within each graft was evaluated from uniaxial tensile tests and compared to their native tissue. Findings The Alloderm graft was anisotropic in both the toe- and linear-region of the stress–strain response, was highly nonlinear, and generally had low properties. The Restore and CuffPatch grafts had similar stress–strain responses, were largely isotropic, had a linear-region modulus of 18 MPa, and were nonlinear. OrthADAPT was anisotropic in the linear-region (131 MPA vs 47 MPa in the toe-region) and was highly nonlinear. The Poisson ratio for all grafts was between 0.4 and 0.7, except for the parallel orientation of Restore which was greater than 1.0. Interpretation Having an informed understanding of how the available grafts perform mechanically will allow for better assessment by the physician for which graft to apply depending upon its application.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20129728</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.01.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-0033
ispartof Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2010-05, Vol.25 (4), p.378-382
issn 0268-0033
1879-1271
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2846988
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anisotropy
Biocompatible Materials - chemistry
Connective Tissue - surgery
Elastic Modulus
Equipment Failure Analysis
Graft material
Materials Testing
Non-linearity
Nonlinear Dynamics
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Stress, Mechanical
Tensile mechanics
Tensile Strength
Transplants
title Nonlinear and anisotropic tensile properties of graft materials used in soft tissue applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T17%3A41%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonlinear%20and%20anisotropic%20tensile%20properties%20of%20graft%20materials%20used%20in%20soft%20tissue%20applications&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Yoder,%20Jonathon%20H&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=378-382&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733499058%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733499058&rft_id=info:pmid/20129728&rft_els_id=S0268003310000227&rfr_iscdi=true