Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey

Objective To describe fertility patients' preferences for disposition of cryopreserved embryos and determine factors important to these preferences. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between June 2006 and July 2007. Setting Nine geographically diverse U.S. fertility clinics. Patient(s) 10...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2010-01, Vol.93 (2), p.499-509
Hauptverfasser: Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A, Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D, Voils, Corrine, Ph.D, Namey, Emily, M.A, Alexander, Carolyn, M.D, Bankowski, Brandon, M.D, Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D, Dodson, William C., M.D, Gates, Elena, M.D, Jungheim, Emily S., M.D, McGovern, Peter G., M.D, Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H, Osborn, Barbara, M.D, Schlaff, William, M.D, Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A, Tulsky, James A., M.D, Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D, Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H, Wallach, Edward, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 509
container_issue 2
container_start_page 499
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 93
creator Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A
Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D
Voils, Corrine, Ph.D
Namey, Emily, M.A
Alexander, Carolyn, M.D
Bankowski, Brandon, M.D
Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D
Dodson, William C., M.D
Gates, Elena, M.D
Jungheim, Emily S., M.D
McGovern, Peter G., M.D
Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H
Osborn, Barbara, M.D
Schlaff, William, M.D
Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A
Tulsky, James A., M.D
Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D
Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H
Wallach, Edward, M.D
description Objective To describe fertility patients' preferences for disposition of cryopreserved embryos and determine factors important to these preferences. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between June 2006 and July 2007. Setting Nine geographically diverse U.S. fertility clinics. Patient(s) 1020 fertility patients with cryopreserved embryos. Intervention(s) Self-administered questionnaire. Main Outcome Measure(s) Likelihood of selecting each of five conventional embryo disposition options: store for reproduction, thaw and discard, donate to another couple, freeze indefinitely, and donate for research; likelihood of selecting each of two alternative options identified in previous research: placement of embryos in the woman's body at an infertile time, or a disposal ceremony; importance of each of 26 considerations to disposition decisions; and views on the embryo's moral status. Result(s) We found that 54% of respondents with cryopreserved embryos were very likely to use them for reproduction, 21% were very likely to donate for research, 7% or fewer were very likely to choose any other option. Respondents who ascribed high importance to concerns about the health or well-being of the embryo, fetus, or future child were more likely to thaw and discard embryos or freeze them indefinitely. Conclusion(s) Fertility patients frequently prefer disposition options that are not available to them or find the available options unacceptable. Restructuring and standardizing the informed consent process and ensuring availability of all disposition options may benefit patients, facilitate disposition decisions, and address problems of long-term storage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2828821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028208042040</els_id><sourcerecordid>734260715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-1d047a63cb948929d31d665e224bd5e7d3e14e33cb1ebc5a4c36bfdd368367f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQjRCIbgt_AfmCekrwR-IkHCpBRQGpEofSs-XYk-IliRePsyj8-jrsqgVOXGxr3ps343mTZYTRglEm32yLHkKcMKaz4JQ2KVxQVj3JNqyqZF7JSjzNNjSFcsobfpKdIm4ppZLV_Hl2wtr0attmk91dJQk3uLiQnY4OpojnZO_gJxLd-TmSPvhfMBEYu7B4Yh3uPLro_PSWBMB5iEh8TzQZ09PlLvXk4rzieiC3xU1BcA57WF5kz3o9ILw83mfZ7dWHr5ef8usvHz9fvrvOjeRtzJmlZa2lMF1bNi1vrWBWygo4LztbQW0FsBJEwhl0ptKlEbLrrRWyEbLuW3GWXRx0d3M3gjXpQ0EPahfcqMOivHbqb2Ry39Sd36s0pabhLAmcHwWC_zEDRjU6NDAMegI_o6pFySWtWZWYzYFpgkcM0D9UYVStNqmterRJrTatCP2d-urPLh8Tj74kwusjQaPRQx_0ZBw-8DgXLeV85b0_8CDNNNkWFJpkogHrApiorHf_083FPyJmcJNLdb_DArj1c0huomIKuaLqZl2rdatoQ0tOSyruAYQfzns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734260715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A ; Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D ; Voils, Corrine, Ph.D ; Namey, Emily, M.A ; Alexander, Carolyn, M.D ; Bankowski, Brandon, M.D ; Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D ; Dodson, William C., M.D ; Gates, Elena, M.D ; Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; McGovern, Peter G., M.D ; Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H ; Osborn, Barbara, M.D ; Schlaff, William, M.D ; Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A ; Tulsky, James A., M.D ; Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D ; Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H ; Wallach, Edward, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A ; Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D ; Voils, Corrine, Ph.D ; Namey, Emily, M.A ; Alexander, Carolyn, M.D ; Bankowski, Brandon, M.D ; Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D ; Dodson, William C., M.D ; Gates, Elena, M.D ; Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; McGovern, Peter G., M.D ; Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H ; Osborn, Barbara, M.D ; Schlaff, William, M.D ; Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A ; Tulsky, James A., M.D ; Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D ; Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H ; Wallach, Edward, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To describe fertility patients' preferences for disposition of cryopreserved embryos and determine factors important to these preferences. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between June 2006 and July 2007. Setting Nine geographically diverse U.S. fertility clinics. Patient(s) 1020 fertility patients with cryopreserved embryos. Intervention(s) Self-administered questionnaire. Main Outcome Measure(s) Likelihood of selecting each of five conventional embryo disposition options: store for reproduction, thaw and discard, donate to another couple, freeze indefinitely, and donate for research; likelihood of selecting each of two alternative options identified in previous research: placement of embryos in the woman's body at an infertile time, or a disposal ceremony; importance of each of 26 considerations to disposition decisions; and views on the embryo's moral status. Result(s) We found that 54% of respondents with cryopreserved embryos were very likely to use them for reproduction, 21% were very likely to donate for research, 7% or fewer were very likely to choose any other option. Respondents who ascribed high importance to concerns about the health or well-being of the embryo, fetus, or future child were more likely to thaw and discard embryos or freeze them indefinitely. Conclusion(s) Fertility patients frequently prefer disposition options that are not available to them or find the available options unacceptable. Restructuring and standardizing the informed consent process and ensuring availability of all disposition options may benefit patients, facilitate disposition decisions, and address problems of long-term storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19061998</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Continental Population Groups ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Cryopreserved embryos ; discarding embryos ; embryo disposition ; Embryo Disposition - statistics &amp; numerical data ; embryo donation ; embryo research ; Embryo Research - ethics ; ethics ; Female ; Fertility - physiology ; Fertilization in Vitro - ethics ; frozen embryos ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; informed consent ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Morals ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2010-01, Vol.93 (2), p.499-509</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-1d047a63cb948929d31d665e224bd5e7d3e14e33cb1ebc5a4c36bfdd368367f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-1d047a63cb948929d31d665e224bd5e7d3e14e33cb1ebc5a4c36bfdd368367f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028208042040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22390228$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19061998$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voils, Corrine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namey, Emily, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Carolyn, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankowski, Brandon, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodson, William C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Elena, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Peter G., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Barbara, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlaff, William, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulsky, James A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallach, Edward, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To describe fertility patients' preferences for disposition of cryopreserved embryos and determine factors important to these preferences. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between June 2006 and July 2007. Setting Nine geographically diverse U.S. fertility clinics. Patient(s) 1020 fertility patients with cryopreserved embryos. Intervention(s) Self-administered questionnaire. Main Outcome Measure(s) Likelihood of selecting each of five conventional embryo disposition options: store for reproduction, thaw and discard, donate to another couple, freeze indefinitely, and donate for research; likelihood of selecting each of two alternative options identified in previous research: placement of embryos in the woman's body at an infertile time, or a disposal ceremony; importance of each of 26 considerations to disposition decisions; and views on the embryo's moral status. Result(s) We found that 54% of respondents with cryopreserved embryos were very likely to use them for reproduction, 21% were very likely to donate for research, 7% or fewer were very likely to choose any other option. Respondents who ascribed high importance to concerns about the health or well-being of the embryo, fetus, or future child were more likely to thaw and discard embryos or freeze them indefinitely. Conclusion(s) Fertility patients frequently prefer disposition options that are not available to them or find the available options unacceptable. Restructuring and standardizing the informed consent process and ensuring availability of all disposition options may benefit patients, facilitate disposition decisions, and address problems of long-term storage.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Cryopreserved embryos</subject><subject>discarding embryos</subject><subject>embryo disposition</subject><subject>Embryo Disposition - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>embryo donation</subject><subject>embryo research</subject><subject>Embryo Research - ethics</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility - physiology</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - ethics</subject><subject>frozen embryos</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>informed consent</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQjRCIbgt_AfmCekrwR-IkHCpBRQGpEofSs-XYk-IliRePsyj8-jrsqgVOXGxr3ps343mTZYTRglEm32yLHkKcMKaz4JQ2KVxQVj3JNqyqZF7JSjzNNjSFcsobfpKdIm4ppZLV_Hl2wtr0attmk91dJQk3uLiQnY4OpojnZO_gJxLd-TmSPvhfMBEYu7B4Yh3uPLro_PSWBMB5iEh8TzQZ09PlLvXk4rzieiC3xU1BcA57WF5kz3o9ILw83mfZ7dWHr5ef8usvHz9fvrvOjeRtzJmlZa2lMF1bNi1vrWBWygo4LztbQW0FsBJEwhl0ptKlEbLrrRWyEbLuW3GWXRx0d3M3gjXpQ0EPahfcqMOivHbqb2Ry39Sd36s0pabhLAmcHwWC_zEDRjU6NDAMegI_o6pFySWtWZWYzYFpgkcM0D9UYVStNqmterRJrTatCP2d-urPLh8Tj74kwusjQaPRQx_0ZBw-8DgXLeV85b0_8CDNNNkWFJpkogHrApiorHf_083FPyJmcJNLdb_DArj1c0huomIKuaLqZl2rdatoQ0tOSyruAYQfzns</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A</creator><creator>Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D</creator><creator>Voils, Corrine, Ph.D</creator><creator>Namey, Emily, M.A</creator><creator>Alexander, Carolyn, M.D</creator><creator>Bankowski, Brandon, M.D</creator><creator>Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D</creator><creator>Dodson, William C., M.D</creator><creator>Gates, Elena, M.D</creator><creator>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creator><creator>McGovern, Peter G., M.D</creator><creator>Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H</creator><creator>Osborn, Barbara, M.D</creator><creator>Schlaff, William, M.D</creator><creator>Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A</creator><creator>Tulsky, James A., M.D</creator><creator>Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H</creator><creator>Wallach, Edward, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey</title><author>Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A ; Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D ; Voils, Corrine, Ph.D ; Namey, Emily, M.A ; Alexander, Carolyn, M.D ; Bankowski, Brandon, M.D ; Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D ; Dodson, William C., M.D ; Gates, Elena, M.D ; Jungheim, Emily S., M.D ; McGovern, Peter G., M.D ; Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H ; Osborn, Barbara, M.D ; Schlaff, William, M.D ; Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A ; Tulsky, James A., M.D ; Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D ; Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H ; Wallach, Edward, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-1d047a63cb948929d31d665e224bd5e7d3e14e33cb1ebc5a4c36bfdd368367f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Cryopreserved embryos</topic><topic>discarding embryos</topic><topic>embryo disposition</topic><topic>Embryo Disposition - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>embryo donation</topic><topic>embryo research</topic><topic>Embryo Research - ethics</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility - physiology</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - ethics</topic><topic>frozen embryos</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>informed consent</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voils, Corrine, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namey, Emily, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Carolyn, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankowski, Brandon, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodson, William C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Elena, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Peter G., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Barbara, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlaff, William, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulsky, James A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallach, Edward, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lyerly, Anne Drapkin, M.D., M.A</au><au>Steinhauser, Karen, Ph.D</au><au>Voils, Corrine, Ph.D</au><au>Namey, Emily, M.A</au><au>Alexander, Carolyn, M.D</au><au>Bankowski, Brandon, M.D</au><au>Cook-Deegan, Robert, M.D</au><au>Dodson, William C., M.D</au><au>Gates, Elena, M.D</au><au>Jungheim, Emily S., M.D</au><au>McGovern, Peter G., M.D</au><au>Myers, Evan R., M.D., M.P.H</au><au>Osborn, Barbara, M.D</au><au>Schlaff, William, M.D</au><au>Sugarman, Jeremy, M.D., M.P.H., M.A</au><au>Tulsky, James A., M.D</au><au>Walmer, David, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Faden, Ruth R., Ph.D., M.P.H</au><au>Wallach, Edward, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>499-509</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>Objective To describe fertility patients' preferences for disposition of cryopreserved embryos and determine factors important to these preferences. Design Cross-sectional survey conducted between June 2006 and July 2007. Setting Nine geographically diverse U.S. fertility clinics. Patient(s) 1020 fertility patients with cryopreserved embryos. Intervention(s) Self-administered questionnaire. Main Outcome Measure(s) Likelihood of selecting each of five conventional embryo disposition options: store for reproduction, thaw and discard, donate to another couple, freeze indefinitely, and donate for research; likelihood of selecting each of two alternative options identified in previous research: placement of embryos in the woman's body at an infertile time, or a disposal ceremony; importance of each of 26 considerations to disposition decisions; and views on the embryo's moral status. Result(s) We found that 54% of respondents with cryopreserved embryos were very likely to use them for reproduction, 21% were very likely to donate for research, 7% or fewer were very likely to choose any other option. Respondents who ascribed high importance to concerns about the health or well-being of the embryo, fetus, or future child were more likely to thaw and discard embryos or freeze them indefinitely. Conclusion(s) Fertility patients frequently prefer disposition options that are not available to them or find the available options unacceptable. Restructuring and standardizing the informed consent process and ensuring availability of all disposition options may benefit patients, facilitate disposition decisions, and address problems of long-term storage.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19061998</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.015</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2010-01, Vol.93 (2), p.499-509
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2828821
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Continental Population Groups
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cryopreservation - methods
Cryopreserved embryos
discarding embryos
embryo disposition
Embryo Disposition - statistics & numerical data
embryo donation
embryo research
Embryo Research - ethics
ethics
Female
Fertility - physiology
Fertilization in Vitro - ethics
frozen embryos
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health Surveys
Humans
informed consent
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Morals
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A13%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fertility%20patients'%20views%20about%20frozen%20embryo%20disposition:%20results%20of%20a%20multi-institutional%20U.S.%20survey&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Lyerly,%20Anne%20Drapkin,%20M.D.,%20M.A&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=499-509&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E734260715%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734260715&rft_id=info:pmid/19061998&rft_els_id=S0015028208042040&rfr_iscdi=true