Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL

Hepatic fat fraction (HFF) was measured in 28 lean/obese humans by single‐voxel proton spectroscopy (MRS), a two‐point Dixon (2PD), and a three‐point iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL) method (3PI). For the lean, obese, and total subject...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2008-03, Vol.59 (3), p.521-527
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Hyeonjin, Taksali, Sara E., Dufour, Sylvie, Befroy, Douglas, Goodman, T. Robin, Petersen, Kitt Falk, Shulman, Gerald I., Caprio, Sonia, Constable, R. Todd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 527
container_issue 3
container_start_page 521
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 59
creator Kim, Hyeonjin
Taksali, Sara E.
Dufour, Sylvie
Befroy, Douglas
Goodman, T. Robin
Petersen, Kitt Falk
Shulman, Gerald I.
Caprio, Sonia
Constable, R. Todd
description Hepatic fat fraction (HFF) was measured in 28 lean/obese humans by single‐voxel proton spectroscopy (MRS), a two‐point Dixon (2PD), and a three‐point iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL) method (3PI). For the lean, obese, and total subject groups, the range of HFF measured by MRS was 0.3–3.5% (1.1 ± 1.4%), 0.3–41.5% (11.7 ± 12.1), and 0.3–41.5% (10.1 ± 11.6%), respectively. For the same groups, the HFF measured by 2PD was −6.3–2.2% (−2.0 ± 3.7%), −2.4–42.9% (12.9 ± 13.8%), and −6.3–42.9% (10.5 ± 13.7%), respectively, and for 3PI they were 7.9–12.8% (10.1 ± 2.0%), 11.1–49.3% (22.0 ± 12.2%), and 7.9–49.3% (20.0 ± 11.8%), respectively. The HFF measured by MRS was highly correlated with those measured by 2PD (r = 0.954, P < 0.001) and 3PI (r = 0.973, P < 0.001). With the MRS data as a reference, the percentages of correct differentiation between normal and fatty liver with the MRI methods ranged from 68–93% for 2PD and 64–89% for 3PI. Our study demonstrates that the apparent HFF measured by the MRI methods can significantly vary depending on the choice of water–fat separation methods and sequences. Such variability may limit the clinical application of the MRI methods, particularly when a diagnosis of early fatty liver needs to be performed. Therefore, protocol‐specific establishment of cutoffs for liver fat content may be necessary. Magn Reson Med 59:521–527, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.21561
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2818363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20857969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5481-cd5ebea7303d4edf0d47d03b682c49b57d3e655b0dec884bd7447cc99cced5683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhwB9APiEhkdaJ7Ti5IFVLaSvtgrSAOFqOPekakji1ne3ujZ-Oyy4FDoiLLb33zdNoHkLPc3KSE1Kc9r4_KXJe5g_QLOdFkRW8Zg_RjAhGMprX7Ag9CeErIaSuBXuMjvKKkpIRNkPf564flVfRbgAvVzjEyeywa_EaxiRq3KqIbyY1RNtanRQ34CnY4RrfPR1kG7eFDo_exeSEEXT0Lmg37l7jeOuy0dkhYmO3yVWDwXHtAQ7q1dvzs8VT9KhVXYBnh_8YfX53_ml-mS0-XFzNzxaZ5qzKM204NKAEJdQwMC0xTBhCm7IqNKsbLgyFkvOGGNBVxRojGBNa17XWYHhZ0WP0Zp87Tk0PRsMQverk6G2v_E46ZeXfzmDX8tptZFGla5U0Bbw8BHh3M0GIsrdBQ9epAdwUpCCUl4zz_4IFqbioyzqBr_agTicLHtr7bXIi74qVqVj5s9jEvvhz_d_kockEnO6BW9vB7t9Jcrla_orM9hM2RNjeTyj_TZaCCi6_vL-Qeb28XH1cMEnpD9y4wEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20857969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kim, Hyeonjin ; Taksali, Sara E. ; Dufour, Sylvie ; Befroy, Douglas ; Goodman, T. Robin ; Petersen, Kitt Falk ; Shulman, Gerald I. ; Caprio, Sonia ; Constable, R. Todd</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeonjin ; Taksali, Sara E. ; Dufour, Sylvie ; Befroy, Douglas ; Goodman, T. Robin ; Petersen, Kitt Falk ; Shulman, Gerald I. ; Caprio, Sonia ; Constable, R. Todd</creatorcontrib><description>Hepatic fat fraction (HFF) was measured in 28 lean/obese humans by single‐voxel proton spectroscopy (MRS), a two‐point Dixon (2PD), and a three‐point iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL) method (3PI). For the lean, obese, and total subject groups, the range of HFF measured by MRS was 0.3–3.5% (1.1 ± 1.4%), 0.3–41.5% (11.7 ± 12.1), and 0.3–41.5% (10.1 ± 11.6%), respectively. For the same groups, the HFF measured by 2PD was −6.3–2.2% (−2.0 ± 3.7%), −2.4–42.9% (12.9 ± 13.8%), and −6.3–42.9% (10.5 ± 13.7%), respectively, and for 3PI they were 7.9–12.8% (10.1 ± 2.0%), 11.1–49.3% (22.0 ± 12.2%), and 7.9–49.3% (20.0 ± 11.8%), respectively. The HFF measured by MRS was highly correlated with those measured by 2PD (r = 0.954, P &lt; 0.001) and 3PI (r = 0.973, P &lt; 0.001). With the MRS data as a reference, the percentages of correct differentiation between normal and fatty liver with the MRI methods ranged from 68–93% for 2PD and 64–89% for 3PI. Our study demonstrates that the apparent HFF measured by the MRI methods can significantly vary depending on the choice of water–fat separation methods and sequences. Such variability may limit the clinical application of the MRI methods, particularly when a diagnosis of early fatty liver needs to be performed. Therefore, protocol‐specific establishment of cutoffs for liver fat content may be necessary. Magn Reson Med 59:521–527, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21561</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18306404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>1H-MRS ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Dixon ; Fatty Liver - pathology ; Female ; hepatic fat ; Humans ; IDEAL ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Linear Models ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Male ; multipoint water-fat separation MRI</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2008-03, Vol.59 (3), p.521-527</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>(c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5481-cd5ebea7303d4edf0d47d03b682c49b57d3e655b0dec884bd7447cc99cced5683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5481-cd5ebea7303d4edf0d47d03b682c49b57d3e655b0dec884bd7447cc99cced5683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmrm.21561$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmrm.21561$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18306404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeonjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taksali, Sara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dufour, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Befroy, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, T. Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Kitt Falk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shulman, Gerald I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caprio, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constable, R. Todd</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>Hepatic fat fraction (HFF) was measured in 28 lean/obese humans by single‐voxel proton spectroscopy (MRS), a two‐point Dixon (2PD), and a three‐point iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL) method (3PI). For the lean, obese, and total subject groups, the range of HFF measured by MRS was 0.3–3.5% (1.1 ± 1.4%), 0.3–41.5% (11.7 ± 12.1), and 0.3–41.5% (10.1 ± 11.6%), respectively. For the same groups, the HFF measured by 2PD was −6.3–2.2% (−2.0 ± 3.7%), −2.4–42.9% (12.9 ± 13.8%), and −6.3–42.9% (10.5 ± 13.7%), respectively, and for 3PI they were 7.9–12.8% (10.1 ± 2.0%), 11.1–49.3% (22.0 ± 12.2%), and 7.9–49.3% (20.0 ± 11.8%), respectively. The HFF measured by MRS was highly correlated with those measured by 2PD (r = 0.954, P &lt; 0.001) and 3PI (r = 0.973, P &lt; 0.001). With the MRS data as a reference, the percentages of correct differentiation between normal and fatty liver with the MRI methods ranged from 68–93% for 2PD and 64–89% for 3PI. Our study demonstrates that the apparent HFF measured by the MRI methods can significantly vary depending on the choice of water–fat separation methods and sequences. Such variability may limit the clinical application of the MRI methods, particularly when a diagnosis of early fatty liver needs to be performed. Therefore, protocol‐specific establishment of cutoffs for liver fat content may be necessary. Magn Reson Med 59:521–527, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>1H-MRS</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dixon</subject><subject>Fatty Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hepatic fat</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IDEAL</subject><subject>Least-Squares Analysis</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>multipoint water-fat separation MRI</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhwB9APiEhkdaJ7Ti5IFVLaSvtgrSAOFqOPekakji1ne3ujZ-Oyy4FDoiLLb33zdNoHkLPc3KSE1Kc9r4_KXJe5g_QLOdFkRW8Zg_RjAhGMprX7Ag9CeErIaSuBXuMjvKKkpIRNkPf564flVfRbgAvVzjEyeywa_EaxiRq3KqIbyY1RNtanRQ34CnY4RrfPR1kG7eFDo_exeSEEXT0Lmg37l7jeOuy0dkhYmO3yVWDwXHtAQ7q1dvzs8VT9KhVXYBnh_8YfX53_ml-mS0-XFzNzxaZ5qzKM204NKAEJdQwMC0xTBhCm7IqNKsbLgyFkvOGGNBVxRojGBNa17XWYHhZ0WP0Zp87Tk0PRsMQverk6G2v_E46ZeXfzmDX8tptZFGla5U0Bbw8BHh3M0GIsrdBQ9epAdwUpCCUl4zz_4IFqbioyzqBr_agTicLHtr7bXIi74qVqVj5s9jEvvhz_d_kockEnO6BW9vB7t9Jcrla_orM9hM2RNjeTyj_TZaCCi6_vL-Qeb28XH1cMEnpD9y4wEA</recordid><startdate>200803</startdate><enddate>200803</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyeonjin</creator><creator>Taksali, Sara E.</creator><creator>Dufour, Sylvie</creator><creator>Befroy, Douglas</creator><creator>Goodman, T. Robin</creator><creator>Petersen, Kitt Falk</creator><creator>Shulman, Gerald I.</creator><creator>Caprio, Sonia</creator><creator>Constable, R. Todd</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200803</creationdate><title>Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL</title><author>Kim, Hyeonjin ; Taksali, Sara E. ; Dufour, Sylvie ; Befroy, Douglas ; Goodman, T. Robin ; Petersen, Kitt Falk ; Shulman, Gerald I. ; Caprio, Sonia ; Constable, R. Todd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5481-cd5ebea7303d4edf0d47d03b682c49b57d3e655b0dec884bd7447cc99cced5683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>1H-MRS</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dixon</topic><topic>Fatty Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hepatic fat</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IDEAL</topic><topic>Least-Squares Analysis</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>multipoint water-fat separation MRI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyeonjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taksali, Sara E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dufour, Sylvie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Befroy, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, T. Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Kitt Falk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shulman, Gerald I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caprio, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constable, R. Todd</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyeonjin</au><au>Taksali, Sara E.</au><au>Dufour, Sylvie</au><au>Befroy, Douglas</au><au>Goodman, T. Robin</au><au>Petersen, Kitt Falk</au><au>Shulman, Gerald I.</au><au>Caprio, Sonia</au><au>Constable, R. Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2008-03</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>521-527</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Hepatic fat fraction (HFF) was measured in 28 lean/obese humans by single‐voxel proton spectroscopy (MRS), a two‐point Dixon (2PD), and a three‐point iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least‐squares estimation (IDEAL) method (3PI). For the lean, obese, and total subject groups, the range of HFF measured by MRS was 0.3–3.5% (1.1 ± 1.4%), 0.3–41.5% (11.7 ± 12.1), and 0.3–41.5% (10.1 ± 11.6%), respectively. For the same groups, the HFF measured by 2PD was −6.3–2.2% (−2.0 ± 3.7%), −2.4–42.9% (12.9 ± 13.8%), and −6.3–42.9% (10.5 ± 13.7%), respectively, and for 3PI they were 7.9–12.8% (10.1 ± 2.0%), 11.1–49.3% (22.0 ± 12.2%), and 7.9–49.3% (20.0 ± 11.8%), respectively. The HFF measured by MRS was highly correlated with those measured by 2PD (r = 0.954, P &lt; 0.001) and 3PI (r = 0.973, P &lt; 0.001). With the MRS data as a reference, the percentages of correct differentiation between normal and fatty liver with the MRI methods ranged from 68–93% for 2PD and 64–89% for 3PI. Our study demonstrates that the apparent HFF measured by the MRI methods can significantly vary depending on the choice of water–fat separation methods and sequences. Such variability may limit the clinical application of the MRI methods, particularly when a diagnosis of early fatty liver needs to be performed. Therefore, protocol‐specific establishment of cutoffs for liver fat content may be necessary. Magn Reson Med 59:521–527, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18306404</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.21561</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2008-03, Vol.59 (3), p.521-527
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2818363
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 1H-MRS
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Dixon
Fatty Liver - pathology
Female
hepatic fat
Humans
IDEAL
Least-Squares Analysis
Linear Models
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods
Male
multipoint water-fat separation MRI
title Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T12%3A20%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20MR%20study%20of%20hepatic%20fat%20quantification%20using%20single-voxel%20proton%20spectroscopy,%20two-point%20dixon%20and%20three-point%20IDEAL&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyeonjin&rft.date=2008-03&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=521-527&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.21561&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E20857969%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20857969&rft_id=info:pmid/18306404&rfr_iscdi=true