Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: modified Delphi technique
Abstract Objectives: To identify the tasks that should constitute the work of preregistration house officers to provide the basis for the development of a self evaluation instrument. Design: Literature review and modified Delphi technique. Setting: Northern Deanery within the Northern and Yorkshire...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 1999-07, Vol.319 (7204), p.224-229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7204 |
container_start_page | 224 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 319 |
creator | Stewart, Jane O'Halloran, Catherine Harrigan, Patrick Spencer, John A Barton, J Roger Singleton, Stephen J |
description | Abstract Objectives: To identify the tasks that should constitute the work of preregistration house officers to provide the basis for the development of a self evaluation instrument. Design: Literature review and modified Delphi technique. Setting: Northern Deanery within the Northern and Yorkshire office NHS executive. Subjects: 67 educational supervisors of preregistration house officers. Main outcome measures: Percentage of agreement by educational supervisors to tasks identified from the literature. Results: Over 61% of communication items, 70% of on call patient care items, 75% of routine patient care items, 45% of practical procedure items, and over 63% of self management items achieved over 95% agreement that they should be part of the house job of preregistration house officers. Poor agreement was found for the laboratory and clinical investigations that house officers could perform with or without supervision. Conclusions: The tasks of house officers were identified but issues in using this method and in devising a universally acceptable list of tasks for preregistration house officers were apparent. Key messages More than 100 activities were identified as potential tasks for house officers, and 11 personal abilities were identified as self management skills The ability of preregistration house officers to perform all of the tasks independently would be restricted by their experiences and therefore may depend on the specialty in which they work The deliberation over what are and are not “shared tasks” was evident; some educational supervisors wanted the house officer to be capable of, but not practise, some tasks whereas others did not believe these tasks were within the remit of the house officer The Delphi technique is a useful method for gaining the autonomous opinions of individuals from a large group of geographically distant members |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.319.7204.224 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_28172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25185328</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25185328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b570t-43fcc66b5479fac5aa0732c8f26673eb8fa7b3a88f299041ec1385fab49a37113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2P0zAYhCMEYqtl71xAESAuKMUfcWwjLqh8LVRwKMvVeuParbtJHOwU0X-PQ6qyICFOkTzPODOeLLuP0RxjWj2v292cYjnnBJVzQspb2QyXlSiYoPR2NkOSyUJgKs6yixh3CCFCuZAVu5udYVRijkQ5y64u16YbnD24bpND3wffBweDyQeI1zG3PuTD1uR9MMFsXBwCDM53-cFAeJG3fu2sM-v8tWn6rcsHo7ed-7Y397I7FppoLo7f8-zq7Zsvi_fF8vO7y8WrZVEzjoaipFbrqqpZyaUFzQAQp0QLS6qKU1MLC7ymINKBlCmy0akOs1CXEihPj3CevZzu7fd1a9Y6VQnQqFShhXBQHpz6U-ncVm38d0UE5iTZnx7twafUcVCti9o0DXTG76OqpMSi_PWfR3-BO78PXaqmCKKSMURG6PG_IMw5r9CIJQpNlA4-xmDsKS1GatxVpV1V2lWNu6q0a7I8vNnyhmFaMQFPjgBEDY0N0GkXf3Mi1SAyYQ8mbBcHH04yYVgwSkTSi0lPO5sfJx3CtUpzcKY-fV2o1YotP6w-MjXyzyZ-TPzfFj8BXkPR7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777605502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: modified Delphi technique</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stewart, Jane ; O'Halloran, Catherine ; Harrigan, Patrick ; Spencer, John A ; Barton, J Roger ; Singleton, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jane ; O'Halloran, Catherine ; Harrigan, Patrick ; Spencer, John A ; Barton, J Roger ; Singleton, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives: To identify the tasks that should constitute the work of preregistration house officers to provide the basis for the development of a self evaluation instrument. Design: Literature review and modified Delphi technique. Setting: Northern Deanery within the Northern and Yorkshire office NHS executive. Subjects: 67 educational supervisors of preregistration house officers. Main outcome measures: Percentage of agreement by educational supervisors to tasks identified from the literature. Results: Over 61% of communication items, 70% of on call patient care items, 75% of routine patient care items, 45% of practical procedure items, and over 63% of self management items achieved over 95% agreement that they should be part of the house job of preregistration house officers. Poor agreement was found for the laboratory and clinical investigations that house officers could perform with or without supervision. Conclusions: The tasks of house officers were identified but issues in using this method and in devising a universally acceptable list of tasks for preregistration house officers were apparent. Key messages More than 100 activities were identified as potential tasks for house officers, and 11 personal abilities were identified as self management skills The ability of preregistration house officers to perform all of the tasks independently would be restricted by their experiences and therefore may depend on the specialty in which they work The deliberation over what are and are not “shared tasks” was evident; some educational supervisors wanted the house officer to be capable of, but not practise, some tasks whereas others did not believe these tasks were within the remit of the house officer The Delphi technique is a useful method for gaining the autonomous opinions of individuals from a large group of geographically distant members</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7204.224</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10417084</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques ; Communication ; Delphi method ; Delphi Technique ; Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration ; Employee supervision ; Female ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Male ; Medical education ; Medical sciences ; Medical specialists ; Medical Staff, Hospital ; Patient Care ; Physicians ; Professional Practice ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Referral and Consultation ; State Medicine ; Supervisors ; Surgeons ; Teaching - methods ; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation ; Training ; Transponders ; Tutoring</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1999-07, Vol.319 (7204), p.224-229</ispartof><rights>1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 1999 (c) 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright British Medical Association Jul 24, 1999</rights><rights>Copyright © 1999, British Medical Journal 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b570t-43fcc66b5479fac5aa0732c8f26673eb8fa7b3a88f299041ec1385fab49a37113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25185328$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25185328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,30976,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1891829$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10417084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Halloran, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrigan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, J Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singleton, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: modified Delphi technique</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives: To identify the tasks that should constitute the work of preregistration house officers to provide the basis for the development of a self evaluation instrument. Design: Literature review and modified Delphi technique. Setting: Northern Deanery within the Northern and Yorkshire office NHS executive. Subjects: 67 educational supervisors of preregistration house officers. Main outcome measures: Percentage of agreement by educational supervisors to tasks identified from the literature. Results: Over 61% of communication items, 70% of on call patient care items, 75% of routine patient care items, 45% of practical procedure items, and over 63% of self management items achieved over 95% agreement that they should be part of the house job of preregistration house officers. Poor agreement was found for the laboratory and clinical investigations that house officers could perform with or without supervision. Conclusions: The tasks of house officers were identified but issues in using this method and in devising a universally acceptable list of tasks for preregistration house officers were apparent. Key messages More than 100 activities were identified as potential tasks for house officers, and 11 personal abilities were identified as self management skills The ability of preregistration house officers to perform all of the tasks independently would be restricted by their experiences and therefore may depend on the specialty in which they work The deliberation over what are and are not “shared tasks” was evident; some educational supervisors wanted the house officer to be capable of, but not practise, some tasks whereas others did not believe these tasks were within the remit of the house officer The Delphi technique is a useful method for gaining the autonomous opinions of individuals from a large group of geographically distant members</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration</subject><subject>Employee supervision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical specialists</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professional Practice</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><subject>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transponders</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2P0zAYhCMEYqtl71xAESAuKMUfcWwjLqh8LVRwKMvVeuParbtJHOwU0X-PQ6qyICFOkTzPODOeLLuP0RxjWj2v292cYjnnBJVzQspb2QyXlSiYoPR2NkOSyUJgKs6yixh3CCFCuZAVu5udYVRijkQ5y64u16YbnD24bpND3wffBweDyQeI1zG3PuTD1uR9MMFsXBwCDM53-cFAeJG3fu2sM-v8tWn6rcsHo7ed-7Y397I7FppoLo7f8-zq7Zsvi_fF8vO7y8WrZVEzjoaipFbrqqpZyaUFzQAQp0QLS6qKU1MLC7ymINKBlCmy0akOs1CXEihPj3CevZzu7fd1a9Y6VQnQqFShhXBQHpz6U-ncVm38d0UE5iTZnx7twafUcVCti9o0DXTG76OqpMSi_PWfR3-BO78PXaqmCKKSMURG6PG_IMw5r9CIJQpNlA4-xmDsKS1GatxVpV1V2lWNu6q0a7I8vNnyhmFaMQFPjgBEDY0N0GkXf3Mi1SAyYQ8mbBcHH04yYVgwSkTSi0lPO5sfJx3CtUpzcKY-fV2o1YotP6w-MjXyzyZ-TPzfFj8BXkPR7Q</recordid><startdate>19990724</startdate><enddate>19990724</enddate><creator>Stewart, Jane</creator><creator>O'Halloran, Catherine</creator><creator>Harrigan, Patrick</creator><creator>Spencer, John A</creator><creator>Barton, J Roger</creator><creator>Singleton, Stephen J</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Journal</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990724</creationdate><title>Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: modified Delphi technique</title><author>Stewart, Jane ; O'Halloran, Catherine ; Harrigan, Patrick ; Spencer, John A ; Barton, J Roger ; Singleton, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b570t-43fcc66b5479fac5aa0732c8f26673eb8fa7b3a88f299041ec1385fab49a37113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration</topic><topic>Employee supervision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical specialists</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professional Practice</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><topic>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transponders</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Halloran, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrigan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, J Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singleton, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stewart, Jane</au><au>O'Halloran, Catherine</au><au>Harrigan, Patrick</au><au>Spencer, John A</au><au>Barton, J Roger</au><au>Singleton, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: modified Delphi technique</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>1999-07-24</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>319</volume><issue>7204</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>224-229</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>Abstract Objectives: To identify the tasks that should constitute the work of preregistration house officers to provide the basis for the development of a self evaluation instrument. Design: Literature review and modified Delphi technique. Setting: Northern Deanery within the Northern and Yorkshire office NHS executive. Subjects: 67 educational supervisors of preregistration house officers. Main outcome measures: Percentage of agreement by educational supervisors to tasks identified from the literature. Results: Over 61% of communication items, 70% of on call patient care items, 75% of routine patient care items, 45% of practical procedure items, and over 63% of self management items achieved over 95% agreement that they should be part of the house job of preregistration house officers. Poor agreement was found for the laboratory and clinical investigations that house officers could perform with or without supervision. Conclusions: The tasks of house officers were identified but issues in using this method and in devising a universally acceptable list of tasks for preregistration house officers were apparent. Key messages More than 100 activities were identified as potential tasks for house officers, and 11 personal abilities were identified as self management skills The ability of preregistration house officers to perform all of the tasks independently would be restricted by their experiences and therefore may depend on the specialty in which they work The deliberation over what are and are not “shared tasks” was evident; some educational supervisors wanted the house officer to be capable of, but not practise, some tasks whereas others did not believe these tasks were within the remit of the house officer The Delphi technique is a useful method for gaining the autonomous opinions of individuals from a large group of geographically distant members</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>10417084</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.319.7204.224</doi><tpages>6</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 1999-07, Vol.319 (7204), p.224-229 |
issn | 0959-8138 0959-8146 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_28172 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Blood Clinical Laboratory Techniques Communication Delphi method Delphi Technique Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration Employee supervision Female Hospitals, Teaching Humans Male Medical education Medical sciences Medical specialists Medical Staff, Hospital Patient Care Physicians Professional Practice Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Referral and Consultation State Medicine Supervisors Surgeons Teaching - methods Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation Training Transponders Tutoring |
title | Identifying appropriate tasks for the preregistration year: modified Delphi technique |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20appropriate%20tasks%20for%20the%20preregistration%20year:%20modified%20Delphi%20technique&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Stewart,%20Jane&rft.date=1999-07-24&rft.volume=319&rft.issue=7204&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=224-229&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.319.7204.224&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25185328%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777605502&rft_id=info:pmid/10417084&rft_jstor_id=25185328&rfr_iscdi=true |