Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke
Foot drop is a common gait impairment after stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles during the swing phase of gait can help correct foot drop. Compared with constant-frequency trains (CFTs), which typically are used during FES, novel stimulation patterns call...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical therapy 2010-01, Vol.90 (1), p.55-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 66 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Physical therapy |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Kesar, Trisha M Perumal, Ramu Jancosko, Angela Reisman, Darcy S Rudolph, Katherine S Higginson, Jill S Binder-Macleod, Stuart A |
description | Foot drop is a common gait impairment after stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles during the swing phase of gait can help correct foot drop. Compared with constant-frequency trains (CFTs), which typically are used during FES, novel stimulation patterns called variable-frequency trains (VFTs) have been shown to enhance isometric and nonisometric muscle performance. However, VFTs have never been used for FES during gait.
The purpose of this study was to compare knee and ankle kinematics during the swing phase of gait when FES was delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using VFTs versus CFTs.
A repeated-measures design was used in this study.
Thirteen individuals with hemiparesis following stroke (9 men, 4 women; age=46-72 years) participated in the study.
Participants completed 20- to 40-second bouts of walking at their self-selected walking speeds. Three walking conditions were compared: walking without FES, walking with dorsiflexor muscle FES using CFTs, and walking with dorsiflexor FES using VFTs.
Functional electrical stimulation using both CFTs and VFTs improved ankle dorsiflexion angles during the swing phase of gait compared with walking without FES (X+/-SE=-2.9 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees). Greater ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase was generated during walking with FES using VFTs (X+/-SE=2.1 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees) versus CFTs (X+/-SE=0.3+/-1.3 degrees). Surprisingly, dorsiflexor FES resulted in reduced knee flexion during the swing phase and reduced ankle plantar flexion at toe-off.
The findings suggest that novel FES systems capable of delivering VFTs during gait can produce enhanced correction of foot drop compared with traditional FES systems that deliver CFTs. The results also suggest that the timing of delivery of FES during gait is critical and merits further investigation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2522/ptj.20090140 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2802826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A217245122</galeid><sourcerecordid>A217245122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c788t-d8c7d8434ab12182b74e352d8ca2a9ff2e54592d370dc76fc853a14b1c7a4e393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV01tv0zAUB_AIgVgZvPGMLHhAIFp8ycV5QZq6rqtUtonBs-W6J6mLExfbKeND8J1xaRkUVVyUh0Q-P_8V6_gkyWOCBzSj9PUqLAcU4xKTFN9JeiRjvJ8XNL2b9DBmpF9iyo6SB94vMcakSMv7yREpS5rnnPSSrxd2DQZdyRDAtR7ZCp11rQrattKgkQEVnFbx8zropjNyU0Dncg1ItmjSNDDXMgAaVVWUKNZOrfO6MnBjHXrbeWXgNhCddk63NRpLHVAV61dgV7F-ZX3wwdmP8DC5V0nj4dHufZx8OBu9H573p5fjyfBk2lcF56E_56qY85SlckYo4XRWpMAyGpcllWVVUcjSrKRzVuC5KvJK8YxJks6IKmSUJTtO3mxzV90sHkFBG5w0YuV0I90XYaUW-5VWL0Rt14JyTDnNY8DzXYCznzrwQTTaKzBGtmA7L3iOGc9Jlv5VFozlLMWERvn0N7m0nYtt8IJSRgjLCI7o2RbV0oDQbWXj_6lNpDihJLY9I3QT1T-gamghHsa2UOm4vOcHB3x85tBodXDDi70N0QS4CbXsvBeT63f_YS_-2fLx9E-H3FlljYEaRLwww8t9_2rrlbPeO6hu-02w2IySiKMkfoxS5E9-vSM_8W52Ini5BQtdLz5rB8I30pjIvydte1diQUSWsW8uAyTs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223113510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kesar, Trisha M ; Perumal, Ramu ; Jancosko, Angela ; Reisman, Darcy S ; Rudolph, Katherine S ; Higginson, Jill S ; Binder-Macleod, Stuart A</creator><creatorcontrib>Kesar, Trisha M ; Perumal, Ramu ; Jancosko, Angela ; Reisman, Darcy S ; Rudolph, Katherine S ; Higginson, Jill S ; Binder-Macleod, Stuart A</creatorcontrib><description>Foot drop is a common gait impairment after stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles during the swing phase of gait can help correct foot drop. Compared with constant-frequency trains (CFTs), which typically are used during FES, novel stimulation patterns called variable-frequency trains (VFTs) have been shown to enhance isometric and nonisometric muscle performance. However, VFTs have never been used for FES during gait.
The purpose of this study was to compare knee and ankle kinematics during the swing phase of gait when FES was delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using VFTs versus CFTs.
A repeated-measures design was used in this study.
Thirteen individuals with hemiparesis following stroke (9 men, 4 women; age=46-72 years) participated in the study.
Participants completed 20- to 40-second bouts of walking at their self-selected walking speeds. Three walking conditions were compared: walking without FES, walking with dorsiflexor muscle FES using CFTs, and walking with dorsiflexor FES using VFTs.
Functional electrical stimulation using both CFTs and VFTs improved ankle dorsiflexion angles during the swing phase of gait compared with walking without FES (X+/-SE=-2.9 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees). Greater ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase was generated during walking with FES using VFTs (X+/-SE=2.1 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees) versus CFTs (X+/-SE=0.3+/-1.3 degrees). Surprisingly, dorsiflexor FES resulted in reduced knee flexion during the swing phase and reduced ankle plantar flexion at toe-off.
The findings suggest that novel FES systems capable of delivering VFTs during gait can produce enhanced correction of foot drop compared with traditional FES systems that deliver CFTs. The results also suggest that the timing of delivery of FES during gait is critical and merits further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-6724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20090140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19926681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physical Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ankle Joint - physiopathology ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Care and treatment ; Electric stimulation ; Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods ; Female ; Gait - physiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic apparatus ; Physical therapy ; Rehabilitation ; Research Reports ; Spinal cord injuries ; Stroke ; Stroke (Disease) ; Stroke - physiopathology ; Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Physical therapy, 2010-01, Vol.90 (1), p.55-66</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION Jan 2010</rights><rights>2010 American Physical Therapy Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c788t-d8c7d8434ab12182b74e352d8ca2a9ff2e54592d370dc76fc853a14b1c7a4e393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c788t-d8c7d8434ab12182b74e352d8ca2a9ff2e54592d370dc76fc853a14b1c7a4e393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19926681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kesar, Trisha M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perumal, Ramu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jancosko, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisman, Darcy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Katherine S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Jill S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder-Macleod, Stuart A</creatorcontrib><title>Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke</title><title>Physical therapy</title><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Foot drop is a common gait impairment after stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles during the swing phase of gait can help correct foot drop. Compared with constant-frequency trains (CFTs), which typically are used during FES, novel stimulation patterns called variable-frequency trains (VFTs) have been shown to enhance isometric and nonisometric muscle performance. However, VFTs have never been used for FES during gait.
The purpose of this study was to compare knee and ankle kinematics during the swing phase of gait when FES was delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using VFTs versus CFTs.
A repeated-measures design was used in this study.
Thirteen individuals with hemiparesis following stroke (9 men, 4 women; age=46-72 years) participated in the study.
Participants completed 20- to 40-second bouts of walking at their self-selected walking speeds. Three walking conditions were compared: walking without FES, walking with dorsiflexor muscle FES using CFTs, and walking with dorsiflexor FES using VFTs.
Functional electrical stimulation using both CFTs and VFTs improved ankle dorsiflexion angles during the swing phase of gait compared with walking without FES (X+/-SE=-2.9 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees). Greater ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase was generated during walking with FES using VFTs (X+/-SE=2.1 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees) versus CFTs (X+/-SE=0.3+/-1.3 degrees). Surprisingly, dorsiflexor FES resulted in reduced knee flexion during the swing phase and reduced ankle plantar flexion at toe-off.
The findings suggest that novel FES systems capable of delivering VFTs during gait can produce enhanced correction of foot drop compared with traditional FES systems that deliver CFTs. The results also suggest that the timing of delivery of FES during gait is critical and merits further investigation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Electric stimulation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic apparatus</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke (Disease)</subject><subject>Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation</subject><issn>0031-9023</issn><issn>1538-6724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqV01tv0zAUB_AIgVgZvPGMLHhAIFp8ycV5QZq6rqtUtonBs-W6J6mLExfbKeND8J1xaRkUVVyUh0Q-P_8V6_gkyWOCBzSj9PUqLAcU4xKTFN9JeiRjvJ8XNL2b9DBmpF9iyo6SB94vMcakSMv7yREpS5rnnPSSrxd2DQZdyRDAtR7ZCp11rQrattKgkQEVnFbx8zropjNyU0Dncg1ItmjSNDDXMgAaVVWUKNZOrfO6MnBjHXrbeWXgNhCddk63NRpLHVAV61dgV7F-ZX3wwdmP8DC5V0nj4dHufZx8OBu9H573p5fjyfBk2lcF56E_56qY85SlckYo4XRWpMAyGpcllWVVUcjSrKRzVuC5KvJK8YxJks6IKmSUJTtO3mxzV90sHkFBG5w0YuV0I90XYaUW-5VWL0Rt14JyTDnNY8DzXYCznzrwQTTaKzBGtmA7L3iOGc9Jlv5VFozlLMWERvn0N7m0nYtt8IJSRgjLCI7o2RbV0oDQbWXj_6lNpDihJLY9I3QT1T-gamghHsa2UOm4vOcHB3x85tBodXDDi70N0QS4CbXsvBeT63f_YS_-2fLx9E-H3FlljYEaRLwww8t9_2rrlbPeO6hu-02w2IySiKMkfoxS5E9-vSM_8W52Ini5BQtdLz5rB8I30pjIvydte1diQUSWsW8uAyTs</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Kesar, Trisha M</creator><creator>Perumal, Ramu</creator><creator>Jancosko, Angela</creator><creator>Reisman, Darcy S</creator><creator>Rudolph, Katherine S</creator><creator>Higginson, Jill S</creator><creator>Binder-Macleod, Stuart A</creator><general>American Physical Therapy Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke</title><author>Kesar, Trisha M ; Perumal, Ramu ; Jancosko, Angela ; Reisman, Darcy S ; Rudolph, Katherine S ; Higginson, Jill S ; Binder-Macleod, Stuart A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c788t-d8c7d8434ab12182b74e352d8ca2a9ff2e54592d370dc76fc853a14b1c7a4e393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Electric stimulation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic apparatus</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke (Disease)</topic><topic>Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kesar, Trisha M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perumal, Ramu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jancosko, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisman, Darcy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Katherine S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Jill S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder-Macleod, Stuart A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kesar, Trisha M</au><au>Perumal, Ramu</au><au>Jancosko, Angela</au><au>Reisman, Darcy S</au><au>Rudolph, Katherine S</au><au>Higginson, Jill S</au><au>Binder-Macleod, Stuart A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke</atitle><jtitle>Physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>55-66</pages><issn>0031-9023</issn><eissn>1538-6724</eissn><abstract>Foot drop is a common gait impairment after stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles during the swing phase of gait can help correct foot drop. Compared with constant-frequency trains (CFTs), which typically are used during FES, novel stimulation patterns called variable-frequency trains (VFTs) have been shown to enhance isometric and nonisometric muscle performance. However, VFTs have never been used for FES during gait.
The purpose of this study was to compare knee and ankle kinematics during the swing phase of gait when FES was delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using VFTs versus CFTs.
A repeated-measures design was used in this study.
Thirteen individuals with hemiparesis following stroke (9 men, 4 women; age=46-72 years) participated in the study.
Participants completed 20- to 40-second bouts of walking at their self-selected walking speeds. Three walking conditions were compared: walking without FES, walking with dorsiflexor muscle FES using CFTs, and walking with dorsiflexor FES using VFTs.
Functional electrical stimulation using both CFTs and VFTs improved ankle dorsiflexion angles during the swing phase of gait compared with walking without FES (X+/-SE=-2.9 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees). Greater ankle dorsiflexion in the swing phase was generated during walking with FES using VFTs (X+/-SE=2.1 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees) versus CFTs (X+/-SE=0.3+/-1.3 degrees). Surprisingly, dorsiflexor FES resulted in reduced knee flexion during the swing phase and reduced ankle plantar flexion at toe-off.
The findings suggest that novel FES systems capable of delivering VFTs during gait can produce enhanced correction of foot drop compared with traditional FES systems that deliver CFTs. The results also suggest that the timing of delivery of FES during gait is critical and merits further investigation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physical Therapy Association</pub><pmid>19926681</pmid><doi>10.2522/ptj.20090140</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9023 |
ispartof | Physical therapy, 2010-01, Vol.90 (1), p.55-66 |
issn | 0031-9023 1538-6724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2802826 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Ankle Joint - physiopathology Biomechanical Phenomena Care and treatment Electric stimulation Electric Stimulation Therapy - methods Female Gait - physiology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - physiopathology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation Health aspects Humans Knee Joint - physiopathology Male Middle Aged Orthopedic apparatus Physical therapy Rehabilitation Research Reports Spinal cord injuries Stroke Stroke (Disease) Stroke - physiopathology Stroke Rehabilitation |
title | Novel Patterns of Functional Electrical Stimulation Have an Immediate Effect on Dorsiflexor Muscle Function During Gait for People Poststroke |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T10%3A58%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20Patterns%20of%20Functional%20Electrical%20Stimulation%20Have%20an%20Immediate%20Effect%20on%20Dorsiflexor%20Muscle%20Function%20During%20Gait%20for%20People%20Poststroke&rft.jtitle=Physical%20therapy&rft.au=Kesar,%20Trisha%20M&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=55-66&rft.issn=0031-9023&rft.eissn=1538-6724&rft_id=info:doi/10.2522/ptj.20090140&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA217245122%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223113510&rft_id=info:pmid/19926681&rft_galeid=A217245122&rfr_iscdi=true |