Biomarker Validation for Aging: Lessons from mtDNA Heteroplasmy Analyses in Early Cancer Detection

The anticipated biological and clinical utility of biomarkers has attracted significant interest recently. Aging and early cancer detection represent areas active in the search for predictive and prognostic biomarkers. While applications differ, overlapping biological features, analytical technologi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomarker insights 2009-11, Vol.4, p.165-179
Hauptverfasser: Barker, Peter E, Murthy, Mahadev
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue
container_start_page 165
container_title Biomarker insights
container_volume 4
creator Barker, Peter E
Murthy, Mahadev
description The anticipated biological and clinical utility of biomarkers has attracted significant interest recently. Aging and early cancer detection represent areas active in the search for predictive and prognostic biomarkers. While applications differ, overlapping biological features, analytical technologies and specific biomarker analytes bear comparison. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as a biomarker in both biological models has been evaluated. However, it remains unclear whether mtDNA changes in aging and cancer represent biological relationships that are causal, incidental, or a combination of both. This article focuses on evaluation of mtDNA-based biomarkers, emerging strategies for quantitating mtDNA admixtures, and how current understanding of mtDNA in aging and cancer evolves with introduction of new technologies. Whether for cancer or aging, lessons from mtDNA based biomarker evaluations are several. Biological systems are inherently dynamic and heterogeneous. Detection limits for mtDNA sequencing technologies differ among methods for low-level DNA sequence admixtures in healthy and diseased states. Performance metrics of analytical mtDNA technology should be validated prior to application in heterogeneous biologically-based systems. Critical in evaluating biomarker performance is the ability to distinguish measurement system variance from inherent biological variance, because it is within the latter that background healthy variability as well as high-value, disease-specific information reside.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2796862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1171885697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p256t-4faf8972b82ee3d952d8ecd32b6f5bd072988cd9e87eae60c589812fe61657713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhoMgtlb_gix40Etgs-l-eRBiWz-g6EW9hk0yqVuT3bqbCPn3brGKevA0h3l4ZuadvWicJJzHhCdyFB16v8aYMkHwQTQiGBPJKB5HxZW2rXKv4NCzanSlOm0Nqq1D2Uqb1QVagvfWeFQ726K2m99n6BY6cHbTKN8OKDOqGTx4pA1aKNcMaKZMGXTzQJVb21G0X6vGw_GuTqKn68Xj7DZePtzczbJlvCGUdfG0VrWQnBSCAKSVpKQSUFYpKVhNiwpzIoUoKwmCgwKGSyqkSEgNLGGU8ySdRJef3k1ftFCVYDqnmnzjdDhwyK3S-e-O0S_5yr7nhEsmGAmCs53A2bcefJe32pfQNMqA7X3O0ynBU0m2o87_JUPwiRCUSR7Q0z_o2vYuhBYonHLOWSq21MnP3b-X_npU-gFMhY6f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037776387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomarker Validation for Aging: Lessons from mtDNA Heteroplasmy Analyses in Early Cancer Detection</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Barker, Peter E ; Murthy, Mahadev</creator><creatorcontrib>Barker, Peter E ; Murthy, Mahadev</creatorcontrib><description>The anticipated biological and clinical utility of biomarkers has attracted significant interest recently. Aging and early cancer detection represent areas active in the search for predictive and prognostic biomarkers. While applications differ, overlapping biological features, analytical technologies and specific biomarker analytes bear comparison. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as a biomarker in both biological models has been evaluated. However, it remains unclear whether mtDNA changes in aging and cancer represent biological relationships that are causal, incidental, or a combination of both. This article focuses on evaluation of mtDNA-based biomarkers, emerging strategies for quantitating mtDNA admixtures, and how current understanding of mtDNA in aging and cancer evolves with introduction of new technologies. Whether for cancer or aging, lessons from mtDNA based biomarker evaluations are several. Biological systems are inherently dynamic and heterogeneous. Detection limits for mtDNA sequencing technologies differ among methods for low-level DNA sequence admixtures in healthy and diseased states. Performance metrics of analytical mtDNA technology should be validated prior to application in heterogeneous biologically-based systems. Critical in evaluating biomarker performance is the ability to distinguish measurement system variance from inherent biological variance, because it is within the latter that background healthy variability as well as high-value, disease-specific information reside.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1177-2719</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20029650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Aging ; biomarkers ; Cancer ; heteroplasmy ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Nucleotide sequence ; Review</subject><ispartof>Biomarker insights, 2009-11, Vol.4, p.165-179</ispartof><rights>Copyright Libertas Academica Ltd 2009</rights><rights>2009 by the authors 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2796862/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2796862/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20029650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barker, Peter E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Mahadev</creatorcontrib><title>Biomarker Validation for Aging: Lessons from mtDNA Heteroplasmy Analyses in Early Cancer Detection</title><title>Biomarker insights</title><addtitle>Biomark Insights</addtitle><description>The anticipated biological and clinical utility of biomarkers has attracted significant interest recently. Aging and early cancer detection represent areas active in the search for predictive and prognostic biomarkers. While applications differ, overlapping biological features, analytical technologies and specific biomarker analytes bear comparison. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as a biomarker in both biological models has been evaluated. However, it remains unclear whether mtDNA changes in aging and cancer represent biological relationships that are causal, incidental, or a combination of both. This article focuses on evaluation of mtDNA-based biomarkers, emerging strategies for quantitating mtDNA admixtures, and how current understanding of mtDNA in aging and cancer evolves with introduction of new technologies. Whether for cancer or aging, lessons from mtDNA based biomarker evaluations are several. Biological systems are inherently dynamic and heterogeneous. Detection limits for mtDNA sequencing technologies differ among methods for low-level DNA sequence admixtures in healthy and diseased states. Performance metrics of analytical mtDNA technology should be validated prior to application in heterogeneous biologically-based systems. Critical in evaluating biomarker performance is the ability to distinguish measurement system variance from inherent biological variance, because it is within the latter that background healthy variability as well as high-value, disease-specific information reside.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>heteroplasmy</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>1177-2719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhoMgtlb_gix40Etgs-l-eRBiWz-g6EW9hk0yqVuT3bqbCPn3brGKevA0h3l4ZuadvWicJJzHhCdyFB16v8aYMkHwQTQiGBPJKB5HxZW2rXKv4NCzanSlOm0Nqq1D2Uqb1QVagvfWeFQ726K2m99n6BY6cHbTKN8OKDOqGTx4pA1aKNcMaKZMGXTzQJVb21G0X6vGw_GuTqKn68Xj7DZePtzczbJlvCGUdfG0VrWQnBSCAKSVpKQSUFYpKVhNiwpzIoUoKwmCgwKGSyqkSEgNLGGU8ySdRJef3k1ftFCVYDqnmnzjdDhwyK3S-e-O0S_5yr7nhEsmGAmCs53A2bcefJe32pfQNMqA7X3O0ynBU0m2o87_JUPwiRCUSR7Q0z_o2vYuhBYonHLOWSq21MnP3b-X_npU-gFMhY6f</recordid><startdate>20091127</startdate><enddate>20091127</enddate><creator>Barker, Peter E</creator><creator>Murthy, Mahadev</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>Libertas Academica</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091127</creationdate><title>Biomarker Validation for Aging: Lessons from mtDNA Heteroplasmy Analyses in Early Cancer Detection</title><author>Barker, Peter E ; Murthy, Mahadev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p256t-4faf8972b82ee3d952d8ecd32b6f5bd072988cd9e87eae60c589812fe61657713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>heteroplasmy</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barker, Peter E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Mahadev</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biomarker insights</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barker, Peter E</au><au>Murthy, Mahadev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomarker Validation for Aging: Lessons from mtDNA Heteroplasmy Analyses in Early Cancer Detection</atitle><jtitle>Biomarker insights</jtitle><addtitle>Biomark Insights</addtitle><date>2009-11-27</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>165</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>165-179</pages><eissn>1177-2719</eissn><abstract>The anticipated biological and clinical utility of biomarkers has attracted significant interest recently. Aging and early cancer detection represent areas active in the search for predictive and prognostic biomarkers. While applications differ, overlapping biological features, analytical technologies and specific biomarker analytes bear comparison. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) as a biomarker in both biological models has been evaluated. However, it remains unclear whether mtDNA changes in aging and cancer represent biological relationships that are causal, incidental, or a combination of both. This article focuses on evaluation of mtDNA-based biomarkers, emerging strategies for quantitating mtDNA admixtures, and how current understanding of mtDNA in aging and cancer evolves with introduction of new technologies. Whether for cancer or aging, lessons from mtDNA based biomarker evaluations are several. Biological systems are inherently dynamic and heterogeneous. Detection limits for mtDNA sequencing technologies differ among methods for low-level DNA sequence admixtures in healthy and diseased states. Performance metrics of analytical mtDNA technology should be validated prior to application in heterogeneous biologically-based systems. Critical in evaluating biomarker performance is the ability to distinguish measurement system variance from inherent biological variance, because it is within the latter that background healthy variability as well as high-value, disease-specific information reside.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub><pmid>20029650</pmid><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1177-2719
ispartof Biomarker insights, 2009-11, Vol.4, p.165-179
issn 1177-2719
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2796862
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Aging
biomarkers
Cancer
heteroplasmy
Mitochondrial DNA
Nucleotide sequence
Review
title Biomarker Validation for Aging: Lessons from mtDNA Heteroplasmy Analyses in Early Cancer Detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T20%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomarker%20Validation%20for%20Aging:%20Lessons%20from%20mtDNA%20Heteroplasmy%20Analyses%20in%20Early%20Cancer%20Detection&rft.jtitle=Biomarker%20insights&rft.au=Barker,%20Peter%20E&rft.date=2009-11-27&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=165-179&rft.eissn=1177-2719&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1171885697%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037776387&rft_id=info:pmid/20029650&rfr_iscdi=true