The Role of Polyethylene Design on Postoperative TKA Flexion: An Analysis of 1534 Cases

The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2010-01, Vol.468 (1), p.108-114
Hauptverfasser: McCalden, Richard W., MacDonald, Steven J., Charron, Kory D. J., Bourne, Robert B., Naudie, Douglas D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue 1
container_start_page 108
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 468
creator McCalden, Richard W.
MacDonald, Steven J.
Charron, Kory D. J.
Bourne, Robert B.
Naudie, Douglas D.
description The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design influences longterm flexion. We prospectively collected data on patients receiving a primary Genesis II™ total knee replacement with a minimum of 1-year followup (mean, 5.4 years; range, 1–13 years). We recorded pre- and postoperative outcome measures, patient demographics, and implant design (cruciate retaining [CR, n = 160], posterior stabilized [PS, n = 1177], high-flex posterior stabilized [HF-PS, n = 197]). Backward stepwise linear regression modeling identified the following factors affecting postoperative flexion: preoperative flexion, gender, body mass index, and implant design. Independent of gender, body mass index, and preoperative flexion, patients who received a HF-PS and PS design implant had a mean of 8° and 5° more flexion, respectively, than those who received a CR implant. Patients with low flexion preoperatively ( 120°) were most likely to maintain or lose flexion postoperatively. Controlling for implant design, patients with high flexion preoperatively (> 120°) were more likely to gain flexion with the HF-PS design implant (HF-PS = 32.0%; PS = 15.1%; CR = 4.5%). Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11999-009-1127-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2795822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734220442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p265t-d5b101c7b09393de55af6dfc82798deee46c38a553fae2e850ec0f1157e6841a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtrGzEQhUVoaJy0P6AvRfSlT5todNmV-lAwbm40kFJcmjch787aG2TJXa1D_e-jxWnaBgRidA6fZuYQ8g7YKTBWnSUAY0zBmCkAeFWYAzIBxXWuBH9FJmxUDIe7I3Kc0n0uhVT8NTkCo2WlNEzIz_kK6ffokcaWfot-h8Nq5zEg_YKpWwYaQ35OQ9xg74buAen865ReePzdxfCJTkM-zu9Sl0YAKCHpzCVMb8hh63zCt0_3CflxcT6fXRU3t5fXs-lNseGlGopGLYBBXS2YEUY0qJRry6atNa-MbhBRlrXQTinROuSoFcOatQCqwlJLcOKEfN5zN9vFGpsaw9A7bzd9t3b9zkbX2f-V0K3sMj7Y_IHSnGfAxydAH39tMQ123aUavXcB4zbZSkjOmZSj88ML533c9nn6ZLkQpWaV1Nn0_t9-nhv5s_Fs4HtDylJYYv-XAsyOsdp9rDaHZ8dYrRGPoPKSPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233680748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Polyethylene Design on Postoperative TKA Flexion: An Analysis of 1534 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McCalden, Richard W. ; MacDonald, Steven J. ; Charron, Kory D. J. ; Bourne, Robert B. ; Naudie, Douglas D.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCalden, Richard W. ; MacDonald, Steven J. ; Charron, Kory D. J. ; Bourne, Robert B. ; Naudie, Douglas D.</creatorcontrib><description>The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design influences longterm flexion. We prospectively collected data on patients receiving a primary Genesis II™ total knee replacement with a minimum of 1-year followup (mean, 5.4 years; range, 1–13 years). We recorded pre- and postoperative outcome measures, patient demographics, and implant design (cruciate retaining [CR, n = 160], posterior stabilized [PS, n = 1177], high-flex posterior stabilized [HF-PS, n = 197]). Backward stepwise linear regression modeling identified the following factors affecting postoperative flexion: preoperative flexion, gender, body mass index, and implant design. Independent of gender, body mass index, and preoperative flexion, patients who received a HF-PS and PS design implant had a mean of 8° and 5° more flexion, respectively, than those who received a CR implant. Patients with low flexion preoperatively (&lt; 100°) were more likely to gain flexion, whereas those with high flexion preoperatively (&gt; 120°) were most likely to maintain or lose flexion postoperatively. Controlling for implant design, patients with high flexion preoperatively (&gt; 120°) were more likely to gain flexion with the HF-PS design implant (HF-PS = 32.0%; PS = 15.1%; CR = 4.5%). Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1127-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19847581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Conservative Orthopedics ; Female ; Humans ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Linear Models ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Polyethylene ; Prosthesis Design ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Sports Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2010-01, Vol.468 (1), p.108-114</ispartof><rights>The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2009</rights><rights>The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795822/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2795822/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19847581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCalden, Richard W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charron, Kory D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourne, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naudie, Douglas D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Polyethylene Design on Postoperative TKA Flexion: An Analysis of 1534 Cases</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design influences longterm flexion. We prospectively collected data on patients receiving a primary Genesis II™ total knee replacement with a minimum of 1-year followup (mean, 5.4 years; range, 1–13 years). We recorded pre- and postoperative outcome measures, patient demographics, and implant design (cruciate retaining [CR, n = 160], posterior stabilized [PS, n = 1177], high-flex posterior stabilized [HF-PS, n = 197]). Backward stepwise linear regression modeling identified the following factors affecting postoperative flexion: preoperative flexion, gender, body mass index, and implant design. Independent of gender, body mass index, and preoperative flexion, patients who received a HF-PS and PS design implant had a mean of 8° and 5° more flexion, respectively, than those who received a CR implant. Patients with low flexion preoperatively (&lt; 100°) were more likely to gain flexion, whereas those with high flexion preoperatively (&gt; 120°) were most likely to maintain or lose flexion postoperatively. Controlling for implant design, patients with high flexion preoperatively (&gt; 120°) were more likely to gain flexion with the HF-PS design implant (HF-PS = 32.0%; PS = 15.1%; CR = 4.5%). Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Conservative Orthopedics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVtrGzEQhUVoaJy0P6AvRfSlT5todNmV-lAwbm40kFJcmjch787aG2TJXa1D_e-jxWnaBgRidA6fZuYQ8g7YKTBWnSUAY0zBmCkAeFWYAzIBxXWuBH9FJmxUDIe7I3Kc0n0uhVT8NTkCo2WlNEzIz_kK6ffokcaWfot-h8Nq5zEg_YKpWwYaQ35OQ9xg74buAen865ReePzdxfCJTkM-zu9Sl0YAKCHpzCVMb8hh63zCt0_3CflxcT6fXRU3t5fXs-lNseGlGopGLYBBXS2YEUY0qJRry6atNa-MbhBRlrXQTinROuSoFcOatQCqwlJLcOKEfN5zN9vFGpsaw9A7bzd9t3b9zkbX2f-V0K3sMj7Y_IHSnGfAxydAH39tMQ123aUavXcB4zbZSkjOmZSj88ML533c9nn6ZLkQpWaV1Nn0_t9-nhv5s_Fs4HtDylJYYv-XAsyOsdp9rDaHZ8dYrRGPoPKSPw</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>McCalden, Richard W.</creator><creator>MacDonald, Steven J.</creator><creator>Charron, Kory D. J.</creator><creator>Bourne, Robert B.</creator><creator>Naudie, Douglas D.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>The Role of Polyethylene Design on Postoperative TKA Flexion: An Analysis of 1534 Cases</title><author>McCalden, Richard W. ; MacDonald, Steven J. ; Charron, Kory D. J. ; Bourne, Robert B. ; Naudie, Douglas D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p265t-d5b101c7b09393de55af6dfc82798deee46c38a553fae2e850ec0f1157e6841a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Conservative Orthopedics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCalden, Richard W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charron, Kory D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourne, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naudie, Douglas D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCalden, Richard W.</au><au>MacDonald, Steven J.</au><au>Charron, Kory D. J.</au><au>Bourne, Robert B.</au><au>Naudie, Douglas D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Polyethylene Design on Postoperative TKA Flexion: An Analysis of 1534 Cases</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><stitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</stitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>468</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>108-114</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><abstract>The range of motion after TKA depends on many patient, surgical technique, and implant factors. Recently, high-flexion designs have been introduced as a means of ensuring or gaining flexion after TKA. We therefore evaluated factors affecting postoperative flexion to determine whether implant design influences longterm flexion. We prospectively collected data on patients receiving a primary Genesis II™ total knee replacement with a minimum of 1-year followup (mean, 5.4 years; range, 1–13 years). We recorded pre- and postoperative outcome measures, patient demographics, and implant design (cruciate retaining [CR, n = 160], posterior stabilized [PS, n = 1177], high-flex posterior stabilized [HF-PS, n = 197]). Backward stepwise linear regression modeling identified the following factors affecting postoperative flexion: preoperative flexion, gender, body mass index, and implant design. Independent of gender, body mass index, and preoperative flexion, patients who received a HF-PS and PS design implant had a mean of 8° and 5° more flexion, respectively, than those who received a CR implant. Patients with low flexion preoperatively (&lt; 100°) were more likely to gain flexion, whereas those with high flexion preoperatively (&gt; 120°) were most likely to maintain or lose flexion postoperatively. Controlling for implant design, patients with high flexion preoperatively (&gt; 120°) were more likely to gain flexion with the HF-PS design implant (HF-PS = 32.0%; PS = 15.1%; CR = 4.5%). Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19847581</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11999-009-1127-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2010-01, Vol.468 (1), p.108-114
issn 0009-921X
1528-1132
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2795822
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - rehabilitation
Biomechanical Phenomena
Conservative Orthopedics
Female
Humans
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Linear Models
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis, Knee - physiopathology
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Polyethylene
Prosthesis Design
Range of Motion, Articular
Retrospective Studies
Sports Medicine
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society
title The Role of Polyethylene Design on Postoperative TKA Flexion: An Analysis of 1534 Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Polyethylene%20Design%20on%20Postoperative%20TKA%20Flexion:%20An%20Analysis%20of%201534%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=McCalden,%20Richard%20W.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=468&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=108-114&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11999-009-1127-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E734220442%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233680748&rft_id=info:pmid/19847581&rfr_iscdi=true