Analysis of the comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain
Reducing barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) remains an ongoing goal. One major reported barrier is lancing pain. This analysis was written in response to the article by Kocher and associates in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology in which 157 patients with diabe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of diabetes science and technology 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1144-1145 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1145 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1144 |
| container_title | Journal of diabetes science and technology |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Lekarcyk, Joyce Ghiloni, Suzanne |
| description | Reducing barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) remains an ongoing goal. One major reported barrier is lancing pain. This analysis was written in response to the article by Kocher and associates in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology in which 157 patients with diabetes experienced in the use of SMBG compared high market share blood glucose monitoring systems and lancing devices. Upon review of their findings, we found that their conclusions-Accu-check systems and lancing devices were preferred-were valid within the limitations of the study. However, we noted some factors that would warrant further study and possibly change the outcome. Information from this and other studies on the topic will be useful as a reference for patients and providers in working towards removing barriers to SMBG. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/193229680900300518 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2769911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733120268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-f2de6582202c186ae6ffe837d866504ed1d47155b5f6c232971d9992fa89cd003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUUlLAzEUDqLYuvwBDzI3T6NZZrJchFLcQPCi55AmLzUyM6lJR-i_d4bWonhKeN_ylg-hC4KvCRHihihGqeISK4wZxjWRB2g6FktGsDjc_UfGBJ3k_DFQKinEMZpQTKqqonKKwqwzzSaHXERfrN-hsLFdmRRy7MZKYzobumXh4CtYyIWPqcjQ-LKNXVjHNGIDbdHE6Ipl09uYoUiwNMmN0I98ZUJ3ho68aTKc795T9HZ_9zp_LJ9fHp7ms-fSsprL0lMHvJaUYmqJ5Aa49yCZcJLzGlfgiKsEqetF7bmljCpBnFKKeiOVdcMhTtHt1nfVL1pwFrp1Mo1epdCatNHRBP0X6cK7XsYvTQVXipDB4GpnkOJnD3mt25AtNMMyEPusBWNkmI7LgUm3TJtizgn8vgvBeoxI_49oEF3-nm8v-cmEfQMzH42l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733120268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of the comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lekarcyk, Joyce ; Ghiloni, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Lekarcyk, Joyce ; Ghiloni, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Reducing barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) remains an ongoing goal. One major reported barrier is lancing pain. This analysis was written in response to the article by Kocher and associates in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology in which 157 patients with diabetes experienced in the use of SMBG compared high market share blood glucose monitoring systems and lancing devices. Upon review of their findings, we found that their conclusions-Accu-check systems and lancing devices were preferred-were valid within the limitations of the study. However, we noted some factors that would warrant further study and possibly change the outcome. Information from this and other studies on the topic will be useful as a reference for patients and providers in working towards removing barriers to SMBG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-3107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20144428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Diabetes Technology Society</publisher><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation ; Diabetes Mellitus - blood ; Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis ; Diagnostic Equipment ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Needles ; Original ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Preference ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Punctures - adverse effects ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1144-1145</ispartof><rights>2009 Diabetes Technology Society.</rights><rights>2009 Diabetes Technology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-f2de6582202c186ae6ffe837d866504ed1d47155b5f6c232971d9992fa89cd003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-f2de6582202c186ae6ffe837d866504ed1d47155b5f6c232971d9992fa89cd003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769911/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2769911/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20144428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lekarcyk, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghiloni, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of the comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain</title><title>Journal of diabetes science and technology</title><addtitle>J Diabetes Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Reducing barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) remains an ongoing goal. One major reported barrier is lancing pain. This analysis was written in response to the article by Kocher and associates in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology in which 157 patients with diabetes experienced in the use of SMBG compared high market share blood glucose monitoring systems and lancing devices. Upon review of their findings, we found that their conclusions-Accu-check systems and lancing devices were preferred-were valid within the limitations of the study. However, we noted some factors that would warrant further study and possibly change the outcome. Information from this and other studies on the topic will be useful as a reference for patients and providers in working towards removing barriers to SMBG.</description><subject>Blood Glucose - metabolism</subject><subject>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Equipment</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Needles</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Punctures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1932-2968</issn><issn>1932-3107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplUUlLAzEUDqLYuvwBDzI3T6NZZrJchFLcQPCi55AmLzUyM6lJR-i_d4bWonhKeN_ylg-hC4KvCRHihihGqeISK4wZxjWRB2g6FktGsDjc_UfGBJ3k_DFQKinEMZpQTKqqonKKwqwzzSaHXERfrN-hsLFdmRRy7MZKYzobumXh4CtYyIWPqcjQ-LKNXVjHNGIDbdHE6Ipl09uYoUiwNMmN0I98ZUJ3ho68aTKc795T9HZ_9zp_LJ9fHp7ms-fSsprL0lMHvJaUYmqJ5Aa49yCZcJLzGlfgiKsEqetF7bmljCpBnFKKeiOVdcMhTtHt1nfVL1pwFrp1Mo1epdCatNHRBP0X6cK7XsYvTQVXipDB4GpnkOJnD3mt25AtNMMyEPusBWNkmI7LgUm3TJtizgn8vgvBeoxI_49oEF3-nm8v-cmEfQMzH42l</recordid><startdate>200909</startdate><enddate>200909</enddate><creator>Lekarcyk, Joyce</creator><creator>Ghiloni, Suzanne</creator><general>Diabetes Technology Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200909</creationdate><title>Analysis of the comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain</title><author>Lekarcyk, Joyce ; Ghiloni, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-f2de6582202c186ae6ffe837d866504ed1d47155b5f6c232971d9992fa89cd003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Blood Glucose - metabolism</topic><topic>Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Equipment</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Needles</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Punctures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lekarcyk, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghiloni, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of diabetes science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lekarcyk, Joyce</au><au>Ghiloni, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of the comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of diabetes science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>J Diabetes Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2009-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1144</spage><epage>1145</epage><pages>1144-1145</pages><issn>1932-2968</issn><eissn>1932-3107</eissn><abstract>Reducing barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) remains an ongoing goal. One major reported barrier is lancing pain. This analysis was written in response to the article by Kocher and associates in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology in which 157 patients with diabetes experienced in the use of SMBG compared high market share blood glucose monitoring systems and lancing devices. Upon review of their findings, we found that their conclusions-Accu-check systems and lancing devices were preferred-were valid within the limitations of the study. However, we noted some factors that would warrant further study and possibly change the outcome. Information from this and other studies on the topic will be useful as a reference for patients and providers in working towards removing barriers to SMBG.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Diabetes Technology Society</pub><pmid>20144428</pmid><doi>10.1177/193229680900300518</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-2968 |
| ispartof | Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009-09, Vol.3 (5), p.1144-1145 |
| issn | 1932-2968 1932-3107 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2769911 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Blood Glucose - metabolism Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring - instrumentation Diabetes Mellitus - blood Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis Diagnostic Equipment Equipment Design Humans Needles Original Pain - etiology Pain Measurement Patient Preference Predictive Value of Tests Punctures - adverse effects Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors |
| title | Analysis of the comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A27%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20the%20comparison%20of%20lancing%20devices%20for%20self-monitoring%20of%20blood%20glucose%20regarding%20lancing%20pain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20diabetes%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Lekarcyk,%20Joyce&rft.date=2009-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1144&rft.epage=1145&rft.pages=1144-1145&rft.issn=1932-2968&rft.eissn=1932-3107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/193229680900300518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733120268%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733120268&rft_id=info:pmid/20144428&rfr_iscdi=true |