Physical Binding Pocket Induction for Affinity Prediction
Computational methods for predicting ligand affinity where no protein structure is known generally take the form of regression analysis based on molecular features that have only a tangential relationship to a protein/ligand binding event. Such methods have limited utility when structural variation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medicinal chemistry 2009-10, Vol.52 (19), p.6107-6125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6125 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 6107 |
container_title | Journal of medicinal chemistry |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Langham, James J Cleves, Ann E Spitzer, Russell Kirshner, Daniel Jain, Ajay N |
description | Computational methods for predicting ligand affinity where no protein structure is known generally take the form of regression analysis based on molecular features that have only a tangential relationship to a protein/ligand binding event. Such methods have limited utility when structural variation moves beyond congeneric series. We present a novel approach based on the multiple-instance learning method of Compass, where a physical model of a binding site is induced from ligands and their corresponding activity data. The model consists of molecular fragments that can account for multiple positions of literal protein residues. We demonstrate the method on 5HT1a ligands by training on a series with limited scaffold variation and testing on numerous ligands with variant scaffolds. Predictive error was between 0.5 and 1.0 log units (0.7−1.4 kcal/mol), with statistically significant rank correlations. Accurate activity predictions of novel ligands were demonstrated using a validation approach where a small number of ligands of limited structural variation known at a fixed time point were used to make predictions on a blind test set of widely varying molecules, some discovered at a much later time point. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/jm901096y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2766559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67673339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-bf875b0eb6c9b3cfbb5ca7d559e3612e7a5fefe1d40c72743ada6147a39e832b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEURYMotlYX_gGZjYKL0XxN0tkItfhRKNiFrkMmk7Sp06QmM8L8e6e2VAVXD9473Ps4AJwjeIMgRrfLVQ4RzFl7APoowzClQ0gPQR9CjFPMMOmBkxiXEEKCMDkGPZTzjGKI-iCfLdpolaySe-tK6-bJzKt3XScTVzaqtt4lxodkZIx1tm6TWdCl_d6fgiMjq6jPdnMA3h4fXsfP6fTlaTIeTVNJCanTwgx5VkBdMJUXRJmiyJTkZZblmjCENZeZ0UajkkLFMadElpIhyiXJ9ZDgggzA3TZ33RQrXSrt6iArsQ52JUMrvLTi78XZhZj7T4E5Y11NF3C1Cwj-o9GxFisbla4q6bRvomCccULIBrzegir4GIM2-xIExUa02Ivu2IvfX_2QO7MdcLkDZOz0miCdsnHPYQzZkFL6w0kVxdI3wXUy_yn8AqGaku4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67673339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical Binding Pocket Induction for Affinity Prediction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Langham, James J ; Cleves, Ann E ; Spitzer, Russell ; Kirshner, Daniel ; Jain, Ajay N</creator><creatorcontrib>Langham, James J ; Cleves, Ann E ; Spitzer, Russell ; Kirshner, Daniel ; Jain, Ajay N</creatorcontrib><description>Computational methods for predicting ligand affinity where no protein structure is known generally take the form of regression analysis based on molecular features that have only a tangential relationship to a protein/ligand binding event. Such methods have limited utility when structural variation moves beyond congeneric series. We present a novel approach based on the multiple-instance learning method of Compass, where a physical model of a binding site is induced from ligands and their corresponding activity data. The model consists of molecular fragments that can account for multiple positions of literal protein residues. We demonstrate the method on 5HT1a ligands by training on a series with limited scaffold variation and testing on numerous ligands with variant scaffolds. Predictive error was between 0.5 and 1.0 log units (0.7−1.4 kcal/mol), with statistically significant rank correlations. Accurate activity predictions of novel ligands were demonstrated using a validation approach where a small number of ligands of limited structural variation known at a fixed time point were used to make predictions on a blind test set of widely varying molecules, some discovered at a much later time point.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-4804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jm901096y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19754201</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMCMAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus, OH: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Binding Sites ; Biological and medical sciences ; General pharmacology ; Ligands ; Medical sciences ; Models, Molecular ; Neural Networks (Computer) ; Peptide Fragments ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Physicochemical properties. Structure-activity relationships ; Protein Binding ; Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2009-10, Vol.52 (19), p.6107-6125</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-bf875b0eb6c9b3cfbb5ca7d559e3612e7a5fefe1d40c72743ada6147a39e832b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-bf875b0eb6c9b3cfbb5ca7d559e3612e7a5fefe1d40c72743ada6147a39e832b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jm901096y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm901096y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,2763,27075,27923,27924,56737,56787</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22068444$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19754201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langham, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleves, Ann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirshner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Ajay N</creatorcontrib><title>Physical Binding Pocket Induction for Affinity Prediction</title><title>Journal of medicinal chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Med. Chem</addtitle><description>Computational methods for predicting ligand affinity where no protein structure is known generally take the form of regression analysis based on molecular features that have only a tangential relationship to a protein/ligand binding event. Such methods have limited utility when structural variation moves beyond congeneric series. We present a novel approach based on the multiple-instance learning method of Compass, where a physical model of a binding site is induced from ligands and their corresponding activity data. The model consists of molecular fragments that can account for multiple positions of literal protein residues. We demonstrate the method on 5HT1a ligands by training on a series with limited scaffold variation and testing on numerous ligands with variant scaffolds. Predictive error was between 0.5 and 1.0 log units (0.7−1.4 kcal/mol), with statistically significant rank correlations. Accurate activity predictions of novel ligands were demonstrated using a validation approach where a small number of ligands of limited structural variation known at a fixed time point were used to make predictions on a blind test set of widely varying molecules, some discovered at a much later time point.</description><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Neural Networks (Computer)</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Physicochemical properties. Structure-activity relationships</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A - metabolism</subject><issn>0022-2623</issn><issn>1520-4804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEURYMotlYX_gGZjYKL0XxN0tkItfhRKNiFrkMmk7Sp06QmM8L8e6e2VAVXD9473Ps4AJwjeIMgRrfLVQ4RzFl7APoowzClQ0gPQR9CjFPMMOmBkxiXEEKCMDkGPZTzjGKI-iCfLdpolaySe-tK6-bJzKt3XScTVzaqtt4lxodkZIx1tm6TWdCl_d6fgiMjq6jPdnMA3h4fXsfP6fTlaTIeTVNJCanTwgx5VkBdMJUXRJmiyJTkZZblmjCENZeZ0UajkkLFMadElpIhyiXJ9ZDgggzA3TZ33RQrXSrt6iArsQ52JUMrvLTi78XZhZj7T4E5Y11NF3C1Cwj-o9GxFisbla4q6bRvomCccULIBrzegir4GIM2-xIExUa02Ivu2IvfX_2QO7MdcLkDZOz0miCdsnHPYQzZkFL6w0kVxdI3wXUy_yn8AqGaku4</recordid><startdate>20091008</startdate><enddate>20091008</enddate><creator>Langham, James J</creator><creator>Cleves, Ann E</creator><creator>Spitzer, Russell</creator><creator>Kirshner, Daniel</creator><creator>Jain, Ajay N</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091008</creationdate><title>Physical Binding Pocket Induction for Affinity Prediction</title><author>Langham, James J ; Cleves, Ann E ; Spitzer, Russell ; Kirshner, Daniel ; Jain, Ajay N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a433t-bf875b0eb6c9b3cfbb5ca7d559e3612e7a5fefe1d40c72743ada6147a39e832b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Neural Networks (Computer)</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Physicochemical properties. Structure-activity relationships</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langham, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleves, Ann E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirshner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Ajay N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medicinal chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langham, James J</au><au>Cleves, Ann E</au><au>Spitzer, Russell</au><au>Kirshner, Daniel</au><au>Jain, Ajay N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical Binding Pocket Induction for Affinity Prediction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medicinal chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Med. Chem</addtitle><date>2009-10-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>6107</spage><epage>6125</epage><pages>6107-6125</pages><issn>0022-2623</issn><eissn>1520-4804</eissn><coden>JMCMAR</coden><abstract>Computational methods for predicting ligand affinity where no protein structure is known generally take the form of regression analysis based on molecular features that have only a tangential relationship to a protein/ligand binding event. Such methods have limited utility when structural variation moves beyond congeneric series. We present a novel approach based on the multiple-instance learning method of Compass, where a physical model of a binding site is induced from ligands and their corresponding activity data. The model consists of molecular fragments that can account for multiple positions of literal protein residues. We demonstrate the method on 5HT1a ligands by training on a series with limited scaffold variation and testing on numerous ligands with variant scaffolds. Predictive error was between 0.5 and 1.0 log units (0.7−1.4 kcal/mol), with statistically significant rank correlations. Accurate activity predictions of novel ligands were demonstrated using a validation approach where a small number of ligands of limited structural variation known at a fixed time point were used to make predictions on a blind test set of widely varying molecules, some discovered at a much later time point.</abstract><cop>Columbus, OH</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>19754201</pmid><doi>10.1021/jm901096y</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2623 |
ispartof | Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2009-10, Vol.52 (19), p.6107-6125 |
issn | 0022-2623 1520-4804 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2766559 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | Binding Sites Biological and medical sciences General pharmacology Ligands Medical sciences Models, Molecular Neural Networks (Computer) Peptide Fragments Pharmacology. Drug treatments Physicochemical properties. Structure-activity relationships Protein Binding Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A - metabolism |
title | Physical Binding Pocket Induction for Affinity Prediction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A24%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20Binding%20Pocket%20Induction%20for%20Affinity%20Prediction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medicinal%20chemistry&rft.au=Langham,%20James%20J&rft.date=2009-10-08&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=6107&rft.epage=6125&rft.pages=6107-6125&rft.issn=0022-2623&rft.eissn=1520-4804&rft.coden=JMCMAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jm901096y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67673339%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67673339&rft_id=info:pmid/19754201&rfr_iscdi=true |