Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
The National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) was formed in the fall of 2004 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) health IT portfolio to support its grantees. One of the core functions of the NRC was to assist grantees in their evaluation efforts of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2009-09, Vol.16 (5), p.631-636 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 636 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 631 |
container_title | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Poon, Eric G Cusack, Caitlin M McGowan, Julie J |
description | The National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) was formed in the fall of 2004 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) health IT portfolio to support its grantees. One of the core functions of the NRC was to assist grantees in their evaluation efforts of Health IT. This manuscript highlights some common challenges experienced by health IT project teams at nonacademic institutions, including inappropriately scoped and resourced evaluation efforts, inappropriate choice of metrics, inadequate planning for data collection and analysis, and lack of consideration of qualitative methodologies. Many of these challenges can be avoided or overcome. The strategies adopted by various AHRQ grantees and the lessons learned from their projects should become part of the toolset for current and future implementers of health IT as the nation moves rapidly towards its widespread adoption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1197/jamia.M3033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2744713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733688329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-a885a3466db4c89cefb5a4c61719dfe137d1e323d760f68d184de0e0589f45f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhSMEoqVw4o5841Cl2HFiOxyQqqpQpCIEAombNWuPN64Su9jOSvsP-Vmk6YrCjdOMxm--N9arqpeMnjHWyzc3MHk4-8Qp54-qY9Y1su5l--Px0lMh64428qh6lvMNpUw0vHtaHbG-E1JRelz9utzBOEPxYUsGhLEMBhISH1xM0zKOgRQ0Q4hj3O5JnEv2Fkl0BAxYXIzfkrjJmHarNhOX4kTKgCSsAxhJwhznZJAYDAUTWcD_4QRlpZxvMZj9unP1sPMVM0IyA4FgyZcZRl_2z6snDsaMLw71pPr-_vLbxVV9_fnDx4vz69pwRUsNSnXAWyHspjWqN-g2HbRGMMl665BxaRnyhlspqBPKMtVapEg71bu2cx0_qd7dc2_nzYT27lMJRn2b_ARpryN4_e9L8IPexp1uZNtKxhfA6wMgxZ8z5qInnw2OIwSMc9aSc6EUb_pFeXqvNCnmnND9cWFU30Wv1-j1Gv2ifvX3YQ_aQ9b8N6iXssY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733688329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Poon, Eric G ; Cusack, Caitlin M ; McGowan, Julie J</creator><creatorcontrib>Poon, Eric G ; Cusack, Caitlin M ; McGowan, Julie J</creatorcontrib><description>The National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) was formed in the fall of 2004 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) health IT portfolio to support its grantees. One of the core functions of the NRC was to assist grantees in their evaluation efforts of Health IT. This manuscript highlights some common challenges experienced by health IT project teams at nonacademic institutions, including inappropriately scoped and resourced evaluation efforts, inappropriate choice of metrics, inadequate planning for data collection and analysis, and lack of consideration of qualitative methodologies. Many of these challenges can be avoided or overcome. The strategies adopted by various AHRQ grantees and the lessons learned from their projects should become part of the toolset for current and future implementers of health IT as the nation moves rapidly towards its widespread adoption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19567800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American Medical Informatics Association</publisher><subject>Health Plan Implementation ; Health Planning Technical Assistance ; Humans ; Information Systems - organization & administration ; Program Evaluation - methods ; s on Informatics: Viewpoint Paper ; United States ; United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2009-09, Vol.16 (5), p.631-636</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009, American Medical Informatics Association 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-a885a3466db4c89cefb5a4c61719dfe137d1e323d760f68d184de0e0589f45f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-a885a3466db4c89cefb5a4c61719dfe137d1e323d760f68d184de0e0589f45f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744713/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744713/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19567800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poon, Eric G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cusack, Caitlin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Julie J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</title><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><description>The National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) was formed in the fall of 2004 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) health IT portfolio to support its grantees. One of the core functions of the NRC was to assist grantees in their evaluation efforts of Health IT. This manuscript highlights some common challenges experienced by health IT project teams at nonacademic institutions, including inappropriately scoped and resourced evaluation efforts, inappropriate choice of metrics, inadequate planning for data collection and analysis, and lack of consideration of qualitative methodologies. Many of these challenges can be avoided or overcome. The strategies adopted by various AHRQ grantees and the lessons learned from their projects should become part of the toolset for current and future implementers of health IT as the nation moves rapidly towards its widespread adoption.</description><subject>Health Plan Implementation</subject><subject>Health Planning Technical Assistance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Systems - organization & administration</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>s on Informatics: Viewpoint Paper</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</subject><issn>1067-5027</issn><issn>1527-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhSMEoqVw4o5841Cl2HFiOxyQqqpQpCIEAombNWuPN64Su9jOSvsP-Vmk6YrCjdOMxm--N9arqpeMnjHWyzc3MHk4-8Qp54-qY9Y1su5l--Px0lMh64428qh6lvMNpUw0vHtaHbG-E1JRelz9utzBOEPxYUsGhLEMBhISH1xM0zKOgRQ0Q4hj3O5JnEv2Fkl0BAxYXIzfkrjJmHarNhOX4kTKgCSsAxhJwhznZJAYDAUTWcD_4QRlpZxvMZj9unP1sPMVM0IyA4FgyZcZRl_2z6snDsaMLw71pPr-_vLbxVV9_fnDx4vz69pwRUsNSnXAWyHspjWqN-g2HbRGMMl665BxaRnyhlspqBPKMtVapEg71bu2cx0_qd7dc2_nzYT27lMJRn2b_ARpryN4_e9L8IPexp1uZNtKxhfA6wMgxZ8z5qInnw2OIwSMc9aSc6EUb_pFeXqvNCnmnND9cWFU30Wv1-j1Gv2ifvX3YQ_aQ9b8N6iXssY</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Poon, Eric G</creator><creator>Cusack, Caitlin M</creator><creator>McGowan, Julie J</creator><general>American Medical Informatics Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</title><author>Poon, Eric G ; Cusack, Caitlin M ; McGowan, Julie J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-a885a3466db4c89cefb5a4c61719dfe137d1e323d760f68d184de0e0589f45f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Health Plan Implementation</topic><topic>Health Planning Technical Assistance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Systems - organization & administration</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>s on Informatics: Viewpoint Paper</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poon, Eric G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cusack, Caitlin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Julie J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poon, Eric G</au><au>Cusack, Caitlin M</au><au>McGowan, Julie J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>631-636</pages><issn>1067-5027</issn><eissn>1527-974X</eissn><abstract>The National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) was formed in the fall of 2004 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) health IT portfolio to support its grantees. One of the core functions of the NRC was to assist grantees in their evaluation efforts of Health IT. This manuscript highlights some common challenges experienced by health IT project teams at nonacademic institutions, including inappropriately scoped and resourced evaluation efforts, inappropriate choice of metrics, inadequate planning for data collection and analysis, and lack of consideration of qualitative methodologies. Many of these challenges can be avoided or overcome. The strategies adopted by various AHRQ grantees and the lessons learned from their projects should become part of the toolset for current and future implementers of health IT as the nation moves rapidly towards its widespread adoption.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American Medical Informatics Association</pub><pmid>19567800</pmid><doi>10.1197/jamia.M3033</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-5027 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2009-09, Vol.16 (5), p.631-636 |
issn | 1067-5027 1527-974X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2744713 |
source | Electronic Journals Library; MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Health Plan Implementation Health Planning Technical Assistance Humans Information Systems - organization & administration Program Evaluation - methods s on Informatics: Viewpoint Paper United States United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality |
title | Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A20%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20healthcare%20information%20technology%20outside%20of%20academia:%20observations%20from%20the%20national%20resource%20center%20for%20healthcare%20information%20technology%20at%20the%20Agency%20for%20Healthcare%20Research%20and%20Quality&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Informatics%20Association%20:%20JAMIA&rft.au=Poon,%20Eric%20G&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=631-636&rft.issn=1067-5027&rft.eissn=1527-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1197/jamia.M3033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733688329%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733688329&rft_id=info:pmid/19567800&rfr_iscdi=true |