Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless

The purpose of this study is to reassess the projected rate of Electronic Health Record (EHR) diffusion and examine how the federal government's efforts to promote the use of EHR technology have influenced physicians' willingness to adopt such systems. The study recreates and extends the a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2009-05, Vol.16 (3), p.274-281
Hauptverfasser: Ford, Eric W, Menachemi, Nir, Peterson, Lori T, Huerta, Timothy R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 281
container_issue 3
container_start_page 274
container_title Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
container_volume 16
creator Ford, Eric W
Menachemi, Nir
Peterson, Lori T
Huerta, Timothy R
description The purpose of this study is to reassess the projected rate of Electronic Health Record (EHR) diffusion and examine how the federal government's efforts to promote the use of EHR technology have influenced physicians' willingness to adopt such systems. The study recreates and extends the analyses conducted by Ford et al. (1) The two periods examined come before and after the U.S. Federal Government's concerted activity to promote EHR adoption. Meta-analysis and bass modeling are used to compare EHR diffusion rates for two distinct periods of government activity. Very low levels of government activity to promote EHR diffusion marked the first period, before 2004. In 2004, the President of the United States called for a "Universal EHR Adoption" by 2014 (10 yrs), creating the major wave of activity and increased awareness of how EHRs will impact physicians' practices. EHR adoption parameters--external and internal coefficients of influence--are estimated using bass diffusion models and future adoption rates are projected. Comparing the EHR adoption rates before and after 2004 (2001-2004 and 2001-2007 respectively) indicate the physicians' resistance to adoption has increased during the second period. Based on current levels of adoption, less than half the physicians working in small practices will have implemented an EHR by 2014 (47.3%). The external forces driving EHR diffusion have grown in importance since 2004 relative to physicians' internal motivation to adopt such systems. Several national forces are likely contributing to the slowing pace of EHR diffusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1197/jamia.M3042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2732222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67193485</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-92c0e5ba3fa89735a4f6f51839d8f7540e21c36caf3c39d2098d4fde9310d5f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtLAzEQh4MotlZP3iUnL7I1j81m14MgpVqhIhQFbyHNJm3K7qZusor_vekDH7lMmPn4zfABcI7REOOCX69kbeXwiaKUHIA-ZoQnBU_fDuMfZTxhiPAeOPF-hRDOCGXHoIcLkuGC4j6YzrS3PshGaWg9NF2wlb6B8y5AGzYdX7lP2yxgWGq4lpFyBo4nMyhLtw7WNbBxjY7DSnt_Co6MrLw-29cBeL0fv4wmyfT54XF0N01USnBICqKQZnNJjcwLTplMTWYYzmlR5oazFGmCFc2UNFTFHkFFXqam1PFgVDKT0wG43eWuu3mtS6Wb0MpKrFtby_ZLOGnF_0ljl2LhPgThlMQXAy73Aa1777QPorZe6aqSjXadFxmPdtKcRfBqB6rWed9q87MEI7GxL7b2xdZ-pC_-3vXL7nXTb3Ysghg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67193485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ford, Eric W ; Menachemi, Nir ; Peterson, Lori T ; Huerta, Timothy R</creator><creatorcontrib>Ford, Eric W ; Menachemi, Nir ; Peterson, Lori T ; Huerta, Timothy R</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study is to reassess the projected rate of Electronic Health Record (EHR) diffusion and examine how the federal government's efforts to promote the use of EHR technology have influenced physicians' willingness to adopt such systems. The study recreates and extends the analyses conducted by Ford et al. (1) The two periods examined come before and after the U.S. Federal Government's concerted activity to promote EHR adoption. Meta-analysis and bass modeling are used to compare EHR diffusion rates for two distinct periods of government activity. Very low levels of government activity to promote EHR diffusion marked the first period, before 2004. In 2004, the President of the United States called for a "Universal EHR Adoption" by 2014 (10 yrs), creating the major wave of activity and increased awareness of how EHRs will impact physicians' practices. EHR adoption parameters--external and internal coefficients of influence--are estimated using bass diffusion models and future adoption rates are projected. Comparing the EHR adoption rates before and after 2004 (2001-2004 and 2001-2007 respectively) indicate the physicians' resistance to adoption has increased during the second period. Based on current levels of adoption, less than half the physicians working in small practices will have implemented an EHR by 2014 (47.3%). The external forces driving EHR diffusion have grown in importance since 2004 relative to physicians' internal motivation to adopt such systems. Several national forces are likely contributing to the slowing pace of EHR diffusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19261931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American Medical Informatics Association</publisher><subject>Attitude to Computers ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Federal Government ; Focus on U.S. Health IT Adoption: Research Paper ; Humans ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized ; Models, Theoretical ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2009-05, Vol.16 (3), p.274-281</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009, American Medical Informatics Association 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-92c0e5ba3fa89735a4f6f51839d8f7540e21c36caf3c39d2098d4fde9310d5f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-92c0e5ba3fa89735a4f6f51839d8f7540e21c36caf3c39d2098d4fde9310d5f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2732222/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2732222/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19261931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ford, Eric W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menachemi, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Lori T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huerta, Timothy R</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</title><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study is to reassess the projected rate of Electronic Health Record (EHR) diffusion and examine how the federal government's efforts to promote the use of EHR technology have influenced physicians' willingness to adopt such systems. The study recreates and extends the analyses conducted by Ford et al. (1) The two periods examined come before and after the U.S. Federal Government's concerted activity to promote EHR adoption. Meta-analysis and bass modeling are used to compare EHR diffusion rates for two distinct periods of government activity. Very low levels of government activity to promote EHR diffusion marked the first period, before 2004. In 2004, the President of the United States called for a "Universal EHR Adoption" by 2014 (10 yrs), creating the major wave of activity and increased awareness of how EHRs will impact physicians' practices. EHR adoption parameters--external and internal coefficients of influence--are estimated using bass diffusion models and future adoption rates are projected. Comparing the EHR adoption rates before and after 2004 (2001-2004 and 2001-2007 respectively) indicate the physicians' resistance to adoption has increased during the second period. Based on current levels of adoption, less than half the physicians working in small practices will have implemented an EHR by 2014 (47.3%). The external forces driving EHR diffusion have grown in importance since 2004 relative to physicians' internal motivation to adopt such systems. Several national forces are likely contributing to the slowing pace of EHR diffusion.</description><subject>Attitude to Computers</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Focus on U.S. Health IT Adoption: Research Paper</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1067-5027</issn><issn>1527-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtLAzEQh4MotlZP3iUnL7I1j81m14MgpVqhIhQFbyHNJm3K7qZusor_vekDH7lMmPn4zfABcI7REOOCX69kbeXwiaKUHIA-ZoQnBU_fDuMfZTxhiPAeOPF-hRDOCGXHoIcLkuGC4j6YzrS3PshGaWg9NF2wlb6B8y5AGzYdX7lP2yxgWGq4lpFyBo4nMyhLtw7WNbBxjY7DSnt_Co6MrLw-29cBeL0fv4wmyfT54XF0N01USnBICqKQZnNJjcwLTplMTWYYzmlR5oazFGmCFc2UNFTFHkFFXqam1PFgVDKT0wG43eWuu3mtS6Wb0MpKrFtby_ZLOGnF_0ljl2LhPgThlMQXAy73Aa1777QPorZe6aqSjXadFxmPdtKcRfBqB6rWed9q87MEI7GxL7b2xdZ-pC_-3vXL7nXTb3Ysghg</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Ford, Eric W</creator><creator>Menachemi, Nir</creator><creator>Peterson, Lori T</creator><creator>Huerta, Timothy R</creator><general>American Medical Informatics Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless</title><author>Ford, Eric W ; Menachemi, Nir ; Peterson, Lori T ; Huerta, Timothy R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-92c0e5ba3fa89735a4f6f51839d8f7540e21c36caf3c39d2098d4fde9310d5f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Attitude to Computers</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Focus on U.S. Health IT Adoption: Research Paper</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ford, Eric W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menachemi, Nir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Lori T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huerta, Timothy R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ford, Eric W</au><au>Menachemi, Nir</au><au>Peterson, Lori T</au><au>Huerta, Timothy R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>274-281</pages><issn>1067-5027</issn><eissn>1527-974X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study is to reassess the projected rate of Electronic Health Record (EHR) diffusion and examine how the federal government's efforts to promote the use of EHR technology have influenced physicians' willingness to adopt such systems. The study recreates and extends the analyses conducted by Ford et al. (1) The two periods examined come before and after the U.S. Federal Government's concerted activity to promote EHR adoption. Meta-analysis and bass modeling are used to compare EHR diffusion rates for two distinct periods of government activity. Very low levels of government activity to promote EHR diffusion marked the first period, before 2004. In 2004, the President of the United States called for a "Universal EHR Adoption" by 2014 (10 yrs), creating the major wave of activity and increased awareness of how EHRs will impact physicians' practices. EHR adoption parameters--external and internal coefficients of influence--are estimated using bass diffusion models and future adoption rates are projected. Comparing the EHR adoption rates before and after 2004 (2001-2004 and 2001-2007 respectively) indicate the physicians' resistance to adoption has increased during the second period. Based on current levels of adoption, less than half the physicians working in small practices will have implemented an EHR by 2014 (47.3%). The external forces driving EHR diffusion have grown in importance since 2004 relative to physicians' internal motivation to adopt such systems. Several national forces are likely contributing to the slowing pace of EHR diffusion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American Medical Informatics Association</pub><pmid>19261931</pmid><doi>10.1197/jamia.M3042</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-5027
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2009-05, Vol.16 (3), p.274-281
issn 1067-5027
1527-974X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2732222
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central
subjects Attitude to Computers
Diffusion of Innovation
Federal Government
Focus on U.S. Health IT Adoption: Research Paper
Humans
Medical Records Systems, Computerized
Models, Theoretical
Physicians - psychology
Physicians - statistics & numerical data
United States
title Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20is%20futile:%20but%20it%20is%20slowing%20the%20pace%20of%20EHR%20adoption%20nonetheless&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Informatics%20Association%20:%20JAMIA&rft.au=Ford,%20Eric%20W&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=274-281&rft.issn=1067-5027&rft.eissn=1527-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1197/jamia.M3042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67193485%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67193485&rft_id=info:pmid/19261931&rfr_iscdi=true