Antioxidant supplementation of culture medium during embryo development and/or after vitrification-warming; which is the most important?

Purpose To determine the most optimal stage for antioxidant supplementation of culture medium to improve developmental competence, cryotolerance and DNA-fragmentation of bovine embryos. Methods Presumptive zygotes were first cultured in presence or absence of β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), for 8 days. Su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2009-06, Vol.26 (6), p.355-364
Hauptverfasser: Hosseini, S. M., Forouzanfar, M., Hajian, M., Asgari, V., Abedi, P., Hosseini, L., Ostadhosseini, S., Moulavi, F., Safahani Langrroodi, M., Sadeghi, H., Bahramian, H., Eghbalsaied, Sh, Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 364
container_issue 6
container_start_page 355
container_title Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
container_volume 26
creator Hosseini, S. M.
Forouzanfar, M.
Hajian, M.
Asgari, V.
Abedi, P.
Hosseini, L.
Ostadhosseini, S.
Moulavi, F.
Safahani Langrroodi, M.
Sadeghi, H.
Bahramian, H.
Eghbalsaied, Sh
Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.
description Purpose To determine the most optimal stage for antioxidant supplementation of culture medium to improve developmental competence, cryotolerance and DNA-fragmentation of bovine embryos. Methods Presumptive zygotes were first cultured in presence or absence of β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), for 8 days. Subsequently, half of the expanded blastocysts developed in both groups were vitrified, warmed within 30 min and post-warming embryos along with their corresponding non-vitrified embryos were cultured for two further days in presence or absence of (100 µM) βME. Results For vitrified and non-vitrified embryos, the best effect was found when βME was added from day 1 of in vitro culture in continuation with post-warming culture period. Day 1–8 supplementation significantly increased the rates of cleavage, day 7 and day 8 blastocyst production. For non-vitrified embryos, βME addition during day 1–8 and/or 9–10 of embryo culture improved both hatching rate and quality of hatched embryos. For vitrified embryos, however, the percentage of DNA-fragmentation (18.5%) was significantly higher ( p  ≤ 0.05) than that of embryos developed in absence of βME but supplemented with βME during post-warming period (13.5%). Conclusions Exogenous antioxidant increases the chance of embryos, even those of fair-quality, to develop to blastocyst. However, antioxidant inclusion during in vitro embryo development is not sufficient to maintain the redox state of these embryos during the critical period of post-warming embryo culture, and therefore, there should be a surplus source of exogenous antioxidant during post-warming embryo culture.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10815-009-9317-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2729855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733131111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c8aa33de2006c8e564cde8318d692b97367a76f6551c0b4d3036f129bc01e33c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktrFTEUx4Motl79AG4kuLCrsXlMHoNQKcUXFNzoOmSSTG_KzGTM49Z-Az92M96LVUGzSTj5nf95AvAco9cYIXGaMJKYNQh1TUexaMQDcIyZoI2gFD2sb8Rkg1ouj8CTlK5RBSWhj8ER7lhLJWmPwY_zOfvw3Vs9Z5jKsoxucnPW1TjDMEBTxlyig5OzvkzQlujnK-imPt4GaN3OjWFZHaCe7WmIUA_ZRbjzOfrBm58yzY2OU_V6A2-23myhTzBvq2JIGfppCTHX2G-fgkeDHpN7drg34Ov7d18uPjaXnz98uji_bAzjLDdGak2pdQQhbqRjvDXWSYql5R3pO0G50IIPnDFsUN9aiigfMOl6g7Cj1NANONvrLqWvRZmae9SjWqKfdLxVQXv158_st-oq7BQRpJOMVYGTg0AM34pLWU0-GTeOenahJFV7jymup5Kv_ksS1LVdy9sKvvwLvA4lzrUNimDOK0dWCO8hE0NK0Q2_csZIreug9uug6pTVug41kw148Xux9x6H-VeA7IG0rIN18T7yv1XvAF4Xw9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216620924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antioxidant supplementation of culture medium during embryo development and/or after vitrification-warming; which is the most important?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hosseini, S. M. ; Forouzanfar, M. ; Hajian, M. ; Asgari, V. ; Abedi, P. ; Hosseini, L. ; Ostadhosseini, S. ; Moulavi, F. ; Safahani Langrroodi, M. ; Sadeghi, H. ; Bahramian, H. ; Eghbalsaied, Sh ; Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, S. M. ; Forouzanfar, M. ; Hajian, M. ; Asgari, V. ; Abedi, P. ; Hosseini, L. ; Ostadhosseini, S. ; Moulavi, F. ; Safahani Langrroodi, M. ; Sadeghi, H. ; Bahramian, H. ; Eghbalsaied, Sh ; Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine the most optimal stage for antioxidant supplementation of culture medium to improve developmental competence, cryotolerance and DNA-fragmentation of bovine embryos. Methods Presumptive zygotes were first cultured in presence or absence of β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), for 8 days. Subsequently, half of the expanded blastocysts developed in both groups were vitrified, warmed within 30 min and post-warming embryos along with their corresponding non-vitrified embryos were cultured for two further days in presence or absence of (100 µM) βME. Results For vitrified and non-vitrified embryos, the best effect was found when βME was added from day 1 of in vitro culture in continuation with post-warming culture period. Day 1–8 supplementation significantly increased the rates of cleavage, day 7 and day 8 blastocyst production. For non-vitrified embryos, βME addition during day 1–8 and/or 9–10 of embryo culture improved both hatching rate and quality of hatched embryos. For vitrified embryos, however, the percentage of DNA-fragmentation (18.5%) was significantly higher ( p  ≤ 0.05) than that of embryos developed in absence of βME but supplemented with βME during post-warming period (13.5%). Conclusions Exogenous antioxidant increases the chance of embryos, even those of fair-quality, to develop to blastocyst. However, antioxidant inclusion during in vitro embryo development is not sufficient to maintain the redox state of these embryos during the critical period of post-warming embryo culture, and therefore, there should be a surplus source of exogenous antioxidant during post-warming embryo culture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9317-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19543824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Animal Experimentation ; Animals ; Antioxidants - pharmacology ; Blastocyst - drug effects ; Cattle ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Culture Media ; Embryo Culture Techniques ; Embryo Transfer ; Female ; Freezing ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mercaptoethanol - pharmacology ; Reproductive Medicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2009-06, Vol.26 (6), p.355-364</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c8aa33de2006c8e564cde8318d692b97367a76f6551c0b4d3036f129bc01e33c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c8aa33de2006c8e564cde8318d692b97367a76f6551c0b4d3036f129bc01e33c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729855/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729855/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,27933,27934,41497,42566,51328,53800,53802</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19543824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forouzanfar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajian, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgari, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abedi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostadhosseini, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulavi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safahani Langrroodi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahramian, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghbalsaied, Sh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.</creatorcontrib><title>Antioxidant supplementation of culture medium during embryo development and/or after vitrification-warming; which is the most important?</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine the most optimal stage for antioxidant supplementation of culture medium to improve developmental competence, cryotolerance and DNA-fragmentation of bovine embryos. Methods Presumptive zygotes were first cultured in presence or absence of β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), for 8 days. Subsequently, half of the expanded blastocysts developed in both groups were vitrified, warmed within 30 min and post-warming embryos along with their corresponding non-vitrified embryos were cultured for two further days in presence or absence of (100 µM) βME. Results For vitrified and non-vitrified embryos, the best effect was found when βME was added from day 1 of in vitro culture in continuation with post-warming culture period. Day 1–8 supplementation significantly increased the rates of cleavage, day 7 and day 8 blastocyst production. For non-vitrified embryos, βME addition during day 1–8 and/or 9–10 of embryo culture improved both hatching rate and quality of hatched embryos. For vitrified embryos, however, the percentage of DNA-fragmentation (18.5%) was significantly higher ( p  ≤ 0.05) than that of embryos developed in absence of βME but supplemented with βME during post-warming period (13.5%). Conclusions Exogenous antioxidant increases the chance of embryos, even those of fair-quality, to develop to blastocyst. However, antioxidant inclusion during in vitro embryo development is not sufficient to maintain the redox state of these embryos during the critical period of post-warming embryo culture, and therefore, there should be a surplus source of exogenous antioxidant during post-warming embryo culture.</description><subject>Animal Experimentation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antioxidants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Blastocyst - drug effects</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Embryo Culture Techniques</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mercaptoethanol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktrFTEUx4Motl79AG4kuLCrsXlMHoNQKcUXFNzoOmSSTG_KzGTM49Z-Az92M96LVUGzSTj5nf95AvAco9cYIXGaMJKYNQh1TUexaMQDcIyZoI2gFD2sb8Rkg1ouj8CTlK5RBSWhj8ER7lhLJWmPwY_zOfvw3Vs9Z5jKsoxucnPW1TjDMEBTxlyig5OzvkzQlujnK-imPt4GaN3OjWFZHaCe7WmIUA_ZRbjzOfrBm58yzY2OU_V6A2-23myhTzBvq2JIGfppCTHX2G-fgkeDHpN7drg34Ov7d18uPjaXnz98uji_bAzjLDdGak2pdQQhbqRjvDXWSYql5R3pO0G50IIPnDFsUN9aiigfMOl6g7Cj1NANONvrLqWvRZmae9SjWqKfdLxVQXv158_st-oq7BQRpJOMVYGTg0AM34pLWU0-GTeOenahJFV7jymup5Kv_ksS1LVdy9sKvvwLvA4lzrUNimDOK0dWCO8hE0NK0Q2_csZIreug9uug6pTVug41kw148Xux9x6H-VeA7IG0rIN18T7yv1XvAF4Xw9A</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Hosseini, S. M.</creator><creator>Forouzanfar, M.</creator><creator>Hajian, M.</creator><creator>Asgari, V.</creator><creator>Abedi, P.</creator><creator>Hosseini, L.</creator><creator>Ostadhosseini, S.</creator><creator>Moulavi, F.</creator><creator>Safahani Langrroodi, M.</creator><creator>Sadeghi, H.</creator><creator>Bahramian, H.</creator><creator>Eghbalsaied, Sh</creator><creator>Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Antioxidant supplementation of culture medium during embryo development and/or after vitrification-warming; which is the most important?</title><author>Hosseini, S. M. ; Forouzanfar, M. ; Hajian, M. ; Asgari, V. ; Abedi, P. ; Hosseini, L. ; Ostadhosseini, S. ; Moulavi, F. ; Safahani Langrroodi, M. ; Sadeghi, H. ; Bahramian, H. ; Eghbalsaied, Sh ; Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c8aa33de2006c8e564cde8318d692b97367a76f6551c0b4d3036f129bc01e33c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal Experimentation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antioxidants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Blastocyst - drug effects</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Embryo Culture Techniques</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mercaptoethanol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forouzanfar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajian, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asgari, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abedi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostadhosseini, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulavi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safahani Langrroodi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahramian, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghbalsaied, Sh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hosseini, S. M.</au><au>Forouzanfar, M.</au><au>Hajian, M.</au><au>Asgari, V.</au><au>Abedi, P.</au><au>Hosseini, L.</au><au>Ostadhosseini, S.</au><au>Moulavi, F.</au><au>Safahani Langrroodi, M.</au><au>Sadeghi, H.</au><au>Bahramian, H.</au><au>Eghbalsaied, Sh</au><au>Nasr-Esfahani, Mohammad H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antioxidant supplementation of culture medium during embryo development and/or after vitrification-warming; which is the most important?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>364</epage><pages>355-364</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose To determine the most optimal stage for antioxidant supplementation of culture medium to improve developmental competence, cryotolerance and DNA-fragmentation of bovine embryos. Methods Presumptive zygotes were first cultured in presence or absence of β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), for 8 days. Subsequently, half of the expanded blastocysts developed in both groups were vitrified, warmed within 30 min and post-warming embryos along with their corresponding non-vitrified embryos were cultured for two further days in presence or absence of (100 µM) βME. Results For vitrified and non-vitrified embryos, the best effect was found when βME was added from day 1 of in vitro culture in continuation with post-warming culture period. Day 1–8 supplementation significantly increased the rates of cleavage, day 7 and day 8 blastocyst production. For non-vitrified embryos, βME addition during day 1–8 and/or 9–10 of embryo culture improved both hatching rate and quality of hatched embryos. For vitrified embryos, however, the percentage of DNA-fragmentation (18.5%) was significantly higher ( p  ≤ 0.05) than that of embryos developed in absence of βME but supplemented with βME during post-warming period (13.5%). Conclusions Exogenous antioxidant increases the chance of embryos, even those of fair-quality, to develop to blastocyst. However, antioxidant inclusion during in vitro embryo development is not sufficient to maintain the redox state of these embryos during the critical period of post-warming embryo culture, and therefore, there should be a surplus source of exogenous antioxidant during post-warming embryo culture.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>19543824</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-009-9317-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0468
ispartof Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2009-06, Vol.26 (6), p.355-364
issn 1058-0468
1573-7330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2729855
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animal Experimentation
Animals
Antioxidants - pharmacology
Blastocyst - drug effects
Cattle
Cryopreservation - methods
Culture Media
Embryo Culture Techniques
Embryo Transfer
Female
Freezing
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mercaptoethanol - pharmacology
Reproductive Medicine
title Antioxidant supplementation of culture medium during embryo development and/or after vitrification-warming; which is the most important?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-30T22%3A33%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antioxidant%20supplementation%20of%20culture%20medium%20during%20embryo%20development%20and/or%20after%20vitrification-warming;%20which%20is%20the%20most%20important?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Hosseini,%20S.%20M.&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=364&rft.pages=355-364&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-009-9317-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733131111%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216620924&rft_id=info:pmid/19543824&rfr_iscdi=true