Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution
BACKGROUND: The amount of DNA comprising the genome of an organism (its genome size) varies a remarkable 40 000-fold across eukaryotes, yet most groups are characterized by much narrower ranges (e.g. 14-fold in gymnosperms, 3- to 4-fold in mammals). Angiosperms stand out as one of the most variable...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of botany 2009-08, Vol.104 (3), p.469-481 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 481 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 469 |
container_title | Annals of botany |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Leitch, I.J Kahandawala, I Suda, J Hanson, L Ingrouille, M.J Chase, M.W Fay, M.F |
description | BACKGROUND: The amount of DNA comprising the genome of an organism (its genome size) varies a remarkable 40 000-fold across eukaryotes, yet most groups are characterized by much narrower ranges (e.g. 14-fold in gymnosperms, 3- to 4-fold in mammals). Angiosperms stand out as one of the most variable groups with genome sizes varying nearly 2000-fold. Nevertheless within angiosperms the majority of families are characterized by genomes which are small and vary little. Species with large genomes are mostly restricted to a few monocots families including Orchidaceae. SCOPE: A survey of the literature revealed that genome size data for Orchidaceae are comparatively rare representing just 327 species. Nevertheless they reveal that Orchidaceae are currently the most variable angiosperm family with genome sizes ranging 168-fold (1C = 0·33-55·4 pg). Analysing the data provided insights into the distribution, evolution and possible consequences to the plant of this genome size diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Superimposing the data onto the increasingly robust phylogenetic tree of Orchidaceae revealed how different subfamilies were characterized by distinct genome size profiles. Epidendroideae possessed the greatest range of genome sizes, although the majority of species had small genomes. In contrast, the largest genomes were found in subfamilies Cypripedioideae and Vanilloideae. Genome size evolution within this subfamily was analysed as this is the only one with reasonable representation of data. This approach highlighted striking differences in genome size and karyotype evolution between the closely related Cypripedium, Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium. As to the consequences of genome size diversity, various studies revealed that this has both practical (e.g. application of genetic fingerprinting techniques) and biological consequences (e.g. affecting where and when an orchid may grow) and emphasizes the importance of obtaining further genome size data given the considerable phylogenetic gaps which have been highlighted by the current study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/aob/mcp003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2720655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43576308</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/aob/mcp003</oup_id><sourcerecordid>43576308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-e6ae084ad270c763a8a40aca87d04c7635e8e614b247a1c282af9c501a4d12ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9rFDEcxYModq1evKuDUA_C2G9-Z0SEumgrFD3UYuklZDPZNtudZE1mFutfb5ZZ1h8HPQW-78Mj7z2EHmN4haGhhybODju7AqB30KRceK1IA3fRBCjwWlLB9tCDnBcAQESD76M93GChlIAJenPsQuxclf0PV7V-7VL2_W3lQxWTvfZtfl3ZGLL7NrhgXa5MaCu3jsuh9zE8RPfmZpndo-27j84_vP8yPalPPx9_nB6d1pYz1ddOGAeKmZZIsFJQowwDY42SLbDNgTvlBGYzwqTBlihi5o3lgA1rMZkZuo_ejr6rYda51rrQJ7PUq-Q7k251NF7_qQR_ra_iWhNJQHBeDF5sDVIsSXKvO5-tWy5NcHHIWkjORcPUf0ECUmEiN47P_wIXcUihtKBxw0EIoLRAL0fIpphzcvPdlzHozXS6TKfH6Qr89PeQv9DtVgU4GIE4rP5t9GTkFrmPaUcyykvVsMlYj7rPvfu-0026KT1QyfXJxaW-mL4D8enrmb4s_LORn5uozVXyWZ-fEcAUsBCMS0Z_AlVTxAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195066033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Leitch, I.J ; Kahandawala, I ; Suda, J ; Hanson, L ; Ingrouille, M.J ; Chase, M.W ; Fay, M.F</creator><creatorcontrib>Leitch, I.J ; Kahandawala, I ; Suda, J ; Hanson, L ; Ingrouille, M.J ; Chase, M.W ; Fay, M.F</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: The amount of DNA comprising the genome of an organism (its genome size) varies a remarkable 40 000-fold across eukaryotes, yet most groups are characterized by much narrower ranges (e.g. 14-fold in gymnosperms, 3- to 4-fold in mammals). Angiosperms stand out as one of the most variable groups with genome sizes varying nearly 2000-fold. Nevertheless within angiosperms the majority of families are characterized by genomes which are small and vary little. Species with large genomes are mostly restricted to a few monocots families including Orchidaceae. SCOPE: A survey of the literature revealed that genome size data for Orchidaceae are comparatively rare representing just 327 species. Nevertheless they reveal that Orchidaceae are currently the most variable angiosperm family with genome sizes ranging 168-fold (1C = 0·33-55·4 pg). Analysing the data provided insights into the distribution, evolution and possible consequences to the plant of this genome size diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Superimposing the data onto the increasingly robust phylogenetic tree of Orchidaceae revealed how different subfamilies were characterized by distinct genome size profiles. Epidendroideae possessed the greatest range of genome sizes, although the majority of species had small genomes. In contrast, the largest genomes were found in subfamilies Cypripedioideae and Vanilloideae. Genome size evolution within this subfamily was analysed as this is the only one with reasonable representation of data. This approach highlighted striking differences in genome size and karyotype evolution between the closely related Cypripedium, Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium. As to the consequences of genome size diversity, various studies revealed that this has both practical (e.g. application of genetic fingerprinting techniques) and biological consequences (e.g. affecting where and when an orchid may grow) and emphasizes the importance of obtaining further genome size data given the considerable phylogenetic gaps which have been highlighted by the current study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7364</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1095-8290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19168860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>AFLP ; Biological taxonomies ; C-value ; chromosome ; Chromosomes ; Coniferophyta ; Cypripedium ; Databases, Genetic ; DNA ; Evolution ; Evolution, Molecular ; genetic techniques and protocols ; Genetic Variation ; genome ; Genome size ; Genome, Plant - genetics ; Genomes ; guard cell size ; mammals ; Orchidaceae ; Orchidaceae - genetics ; Paphiopedilum ; Phragmipedium ; Phylogenetics ; phylogeny ; Plants ; Ploidies ; REVIEW ; Robertsonian fission ; Robertsonian fusion ; Species diversity ; surveys</subject><ispartof>Annals of botany, 2009-08, Vol.104 (3), p.469-481</ispartof><rights>Annals of Botany Company 2009</rights><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2009</rights><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-e6ae084ad270c763a8a40aca87d04c7635e8e614b247a1c282af9c501a4d12ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-e6ae084ad270c763a8a40aca87d04c7635e8e614b247a1c282af9c501a4d12ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43576308$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43576308$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,804,886,1585,27929,27930,53796,53798,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19168860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leitch, I.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahandawala, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suda, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingrouille, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, M.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, M.F</creatorcontrib><title>Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution</title><title>Annals of botany</title><addtitle>Ann Bot</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: The amount of DNA comprising the genome of an organism (its genome size) varies a remarkable 40 000-fold across eukaryotes, yet most groups are characterized by much narrower ranges (e.g. 14-fold in gymnosperms, 3- to 4-fold in mammals). Angiosperms stand out as one of the most variable groups with genome sizes varying nearly 2000-fold. Nevertheless within angiosperms the majority of families are characterized by genomes which are small and vary little. Species with large genomes are mostly restricted to a few monocots families including Orchidaceae. SCOPE: A survey of the literature revealed that genome size data for Orchidaceae are comparatively rare representing just 327 species. Nevertheless they reveal that Orchidaceae are currently the most variable angiosperm family with genome sizes ranging 168-fold (1C = 0·33-55·4 pg). Analysing the data provided insights into the distribution, evolution and possible consequences to the plant of this genome size diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Superimposing the data onto the increasingly robust phylogenetic tree of Orchidaceae revealed how different subfamilies were characterized by distinct genome size profiles. Epidendroideae possessed the greatest range of genome sizes, although the majority of species had small genomes. In contrast, the largest genomes were found in subfamilies Cypripedioideae and Vanilloideae. Genome size evolution within this subfamily was analysed as this is the only one with reasonable representation of data. This approach highlighted striking differences in genome size and karyotype evolution between the closely related Cypripedium, Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium. As to the consequences of genome size diversity, various studies revealed that this has both practical (e.g. application of genetic fingerprinting techniques) and biological consequences (e.g. affecting where and when an orchid may grow) and emphasizes the importance of obtaining further genome size data given the considerable phylogenetic gaps which have been highlighted by the current study.</description><subject>AFLP</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>C-value</subject><subject>chromosome</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Coniferophyta</subject><subject>Cypripedium</subject><subject>Databases, Genetic</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>genetic techniques and protocols</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>genome</subject><subject>Genome size</subject><subject>Genome, Plant - genetics</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>guard cell size</subject><subject>mammals</subject><subject>Orchidaceae</subject><subject>Orchidaceae - genetics</subject><subject>Paphiopedilum</subject><subject>Phragmipedium</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Ploidies</subject><subject>REVIEW</subject><subject>Robertsonian fission</subject><subject>Robertsonian fusion</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>surveys</subject><issn>0305-7364</issn><issn>1095-8290</issn><issn>1095-8290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9rFDEcxYModq1evKuDUA_C2G9-Z0SEumgrFD3UYuklZDPZNtudZE1mFutfb5ZZ1h8HPQW-78Mj7z2EHmN4haGhhybODju7AqB30KRceK1IA3fRBCjwWlLB9tCDnBcAQESD76M93GChlIAJenPsQuxclf0PV7V-7VL2_W3lQxWTvfZtfl3ZGLL7NrhgXa5MaCu3jsuh9zE8RPfmZpndo-27j84_vP8yPalPPx9_nB6d1pYz1ddOGAeKmZZIsFJQowwDY42SLbDNgTvlBGYzwqTBlihi5o3lgA1rMZkZuo_ejr6rYda51rrQJ7PUq-Q7k251NF7_qQR_ra_iWhNJQHBeDF5sDVIsSXKvO5-tWy5NcHHIWkjORcPUf0ECUmEiN47P_wIXcUihtKBxw0EIoLRAL0fIpphzcvPdlzHozXS6TKfH6Qr89PeQv9DtVgU4GIE4rP5t9GTkFrmPaUcyykvVsMlYj7rPvfu-0026KT1QyfXJxaW-mL4D8enrmb4s_LORn5uozVXyWZ-fEcAUsBCMS0Z_AlVTxAM</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Leitch, I.J</creator><creator>Kahandawala, I</creator><creator>Suda, J</creator><creator>Hanson, L</creator><creator>Ingrouille, M.J</creator><creator>Chase, M.W</creator><creator>Fay, M.F</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution</title><author>Leitch, I.J ; Kahandawala, I ; Suda, J ; Hanson, L ; Ingrouille, M.J ; Chase, M.W ; Fay, M.F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c548t-e6ae084ad270c763a8a40aca87d04c7635e8e614b247a1c282af9c501a4d12ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>AFLP</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>C-value</topic><topic>chromosome</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Coniferophyta</topic><topic>Cypripedium</topic><topic>Databases, Genetic</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>genetic techniques and protocols</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>genome</topic><topic>Genome size</topic><topic>Genome, Plant - genetics</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>guard cell size</topic><topic>mammals</topic><topic>Orchidaceae</topic><topic>Orchidaceae - genetics</topic><topic>Paphiopedilum</topic><topic>Phragmipedium</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Ploidies</topic><topic>REVIEW</topic><topic>Robertsonian fission</topic><topic>Robertsonian fusion</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leitch, I.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahandawala, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suda, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingrouille, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, M.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, M.F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leitch, I.J</au><au>Kahandawala, I</au><au>Suda, J</au><au>Hanson, L</au><au>Ingrouille, M.J</au><au>Chase, M.W</au><au>Fay, M.F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution</atitle><jtitle>Annals of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Bot</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>469-481</pages><issn>0305-7364</issn><issn>1095-8290</issn><eissn>1095-8290</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: The amount of DNA comprising the genome of an organism (its genome size) varies a remarkable 40 000-fold across eukaryotes, yet most groups are characterized by much narrower ranges (e.g. 14-fold in gymnosperms, 3- to 4-fold in mammals). Angiosperms stand out as one of the most variable groups with genome sizes varying nearly 2000-fold. Nevertheless within angiosperms the majority of families are characterized by genomes which are small and vary little. Species with large genomes are mostly restricted to a few monocots families including Orchidaceae. SCOPE: A survey of the literature revealed that genome size data for Orchidaceae are comparatively rare representing just 327 species. Nevertheless they reveal that Orchidaceae are currently the most variable angiosperm family with genome sizes ranging 168-fold (1C = 0·33-55·4 pg). Analysing the data provided insights into the distribution, evolution and possible consequences to the plant of this genome size diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Superimposing the data onto the increasingly robust phylogenetic tree of Orchidaceae revealed how different subfamilies were characterized by distinct genome size profiles. Epidendroideae possessed the greatest range of genome sizes, although the majority of species had small genomes. In contrast, the largest genomes were found in subfamilies Cypripedioideae and Vanilloideae. Genome size evolution within this subfamily was analysed as this is the only one with reasonable representation of data. This approach highlighted striking differences in genome size and karyotype evolution between the closely related Cypripedium, Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium. As to the consequences of genome size diversity, various studies revealed that this has both practical (e.g. application of genetic fingerprinting techniques) and biological consequences (e.g. affecting where and when an orchid may grow) and emphasizes the importance of obtaining further genome size data given the considerable phylogenetic gaps which have been highlighted by the current study.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19168860</pmid><doi>10.1093/aob/mcp003</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-7364 |
ispartof | Annals of botany, 2009-08, Vol.104 (3), p.469-481 |
issn | 0305-7364 1095-8290 1095-8290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2720655 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | AFLP Biological taxonomies C-value chromosome Chromosomes Coniferophyta Cypripedium Databases, Genetic DNA Evolution Evolution, Molecular genetic techniques and protocols Genetic Variation genome Genome size Genome, Plant - genetics Genomes guard cell size mammals Orchidaceae Orchidaceae - genetics Paphiopedilum Phragmipedium Phylogenetics phylogeny Plants Ploidies REVIEW Robertsonian fission Robertsonian fusion Species diversity surveys |
title | Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A49%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genome%20size%20diversity%20in%20orchids:%20consequences%20and%20evolution&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20botany&rft.au=Leitch,%20I.J&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=469-481&rft.issn=0305-7364&rft.eissn=1095-8290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aob/mcp003&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E43576308%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195066033&rft_id=info:pmid/19168860&rft_jstor_id=43576308&rft_oup_id=10.1093/aob/mcp003&rfr_iscdi=true |