Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women
BACKGROUND: Food reinforcement, ie, motivation to obtain food, is associated with energy intake and obesity. Finding ways to decrease the reinforcing value of unhealthy foods may help with adherence to diets and maintenance of weight loss. Our previous study in nonobese adults showed that daily cons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of clinical nutrition 2009-08, Vol.90 (2), p.304-313 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 313 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 304 |
container_title | The American journal of clinical nutrition |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Temple, Jennifer L Bulkley, Alison M Badawy, Rebecca L Krause, Nicole McCann, Sarah Epstein, Leonard H |
description | BACKGROUND: Food reinforcement, ie, motivation to obtain food, is associated with energy intake and obesity. Finding ways to decrease the reinforcing value of unhealthy foods may help with adherence to diets and maintenance of weight loss. Our previous study in nonobese adults showed that daily consumption of the same snack food (food consumed apart from meals) for 14 d significantly decreased its reinforcing value. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to replicate and extend these findings to obese individuals and to examine the effects of different portion sizes of snack foods on food reinforcement. DESIGN: Food reinforcement and liking were tested in 31 obese and 27 nonobese women at baseline and after 2 wk of daily consumption of 0, 100, or 300 kcal/d of the same snack food. RESULTS: We found a significant interaction of phase, portion size, and body mass index on the pattern of operant responding for food. Obese women had a significant increase in food reinforcement after consuming the 300-kcal portion of food for 2 wk, whereas nonobese women had the opposite response. No significant differences were found on the reinforcing value with the 0- and 100-kcal portion-size conditions. Women in the 300-kcal group (obese and nonobese) reported a significant decrease in snack food liking from baseline to after daily intake. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that obese and nonobese women respond differently to the daily intake of a snack food and that this may not be a viable mechanism for reducing food reinforcement in obese women. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00837694. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27283 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2709308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67506534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-d5b1bdf124f57a4090326217a74b8205bf1b196b941a8bdd8286c02811917aeb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9vFCEUx4nR2LV69qbERG-zfcDMABcTU1s1aeJBeybAwJbtLFSYqel_L9ud1B8XT0D4fB_vfb8g9JLAmsm2O9FbG9cUQKwpp4I9QisimWgYBf4YrQCANpL03RF6VsoWgNBW9E_REalaAUSs0PgxeO-yi1PQI3Z1b6eCk8eDDuMdLlHba-xTGnCIk752OEU8XTmcXYg-ZRviBt_qcXZ7zcLhZFxxWMcBxxQPh59p5-Jz9MTrsbgXy3qMLs_Pvp9-bi6-fvpy-uGisV0vp2boDDGDr836jusWJDDaU8I1b42g0BlPDJG9kS3RwgyDoKK3QAUhskLOsGP0_lD3ZjY7N9g6Xdajuslhp_OdSjqov29iuFKbdKsoB8lA1ALvlgI5_ZhdmdQuFOvGUUeX5qJ63kHfsfa_IIVqs-Sygm_-AbdpzrG6oCirmcn-_tmTA2RzKiU7_9AyAbXPW-3zVvu81X3eVfHqz0l_80vAFXi7ALpYPfqsow3lgauuSs45qdzrA-d1UnqTK3P5jQJhUL-PIC2wXxuHvUY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231939608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Temple, Jennifer L ; Bulkley, Alison M ; Badawy, Rebecca L ; Krause, Nicole ; McCann, Sarah ; Epstein, Leonard H</creator><creatorcontrib>Temple, Jennifer L ; Bulkley, Alison M ; Badawy, Rebecca L ; Krause, Nicole ; McCann, Sarah ; Epstein, Leonard H</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Food reinforcement, ie, motivation to obtain food, is associated with energy intake and obesity. Finding ways to decrease the reinforcing value of unhealthy foods may help with adherence to diets and maintenance of weight loss. Our previous study in nonobese adults showed that daily consumption of the same snack food (food consumed apart from meals) for 14 d significantly decreased its reinforcing value. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to replicate and extend these findings to obese individuals and to examine the effects of different portion sizes of snack foods on food reinforcement. DESIGN: Food reinforcement and liking were tested in 31 obese and 27 nonobese women at baseline and after 2 wk of daily consumption of 0, 100, or 300 kcal/d of the same snack food. RESULTS: We found a significant interaction of phase, portion size, and body mass index on the pattern of operant responding for food. Obese women had a significant increase in food reinforcement after consuming the 300-kcal portion of food for 2 wk, whereas nonobese women had the opposite response. No significant differences were found on the reinforcing value with the 0- and 100-kcal portion-size conditions. Women in the 300-kcal group (obese and nonobese) reported a significant decrease in snack food liking from baseline to after daily intake. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that obese and nonobese women respond differently to the daily intake of a snack food and that this may not be a viable mechanism for reducing food reinforcement in obese women. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00837694.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27283</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19458018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCNAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: American Society for Clinical Nutrition</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Choice Behavior ; Clinical trials ; Cross-Over Studies ; Diet ; diet-related diseases ; dietary surveys ; Eating - psychology ; eating habits ; energy intake ; Energy Intake - physiology ; Feeding Behavior ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; food frequency questionnaires ; food intake ; Food Preferences - psychology ; food reinforcement ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; human nutrition ; Humans ; Motivation ; Nutritional status, dietary intake, and body composition ; Obesity ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Obesity - etiology ; Obesity - psychology ; Original Research Communications ; overeating ; portion size ; reinforcement schedule ; Reinforcement, Psychology ; Snack foods ; Thinness - psychology ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2009-08, Vol.90 (2), p.304-313</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc. Aug 1, 2009</rights><rights>2009 American Society for Nutrition 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-d5b1bdf124f57a4090326217a74b8205bf1b196b941a8bdd8286c02811917aeb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-d5b1bdf124f57a4090326217a74b8205bf1b196b941a8bdd8286c02811917aeb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21797771$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19458018$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Temple, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulkley, Alison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badawy, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard H</creatorcontrib><title>Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women</title><title>The American journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Food reinforcement, ie, motivation to obtain food, is associated with energy intake and obesity. Finding ways to decrease the reinforcing value of unhealthy foods may help with adherence to diets and maintenance of weight loss. Our previous study in nonobese adults showed that daily consumption of the same snack food (food consumed apart from meals) for 14 d significantly decreased its reinforcing value. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to replicate and extend these findings to obese individuals and to examine the effects of different portion sizes of snack foods on food reinforcement. DESIGN: Food reinforcement and liking were tested in 31 obese and 27 nonobese women at baseline and after 2 wk of daily consumption of 0, 100, or 300 kcal/d of the same snack food. RESULTS: We found a significant interaction of phase, portion size, and body mass index on the pattern of operant responding for food. Obese women had a significant increase in food reinforcement after consuming the 300-kcal portion of food for 2 wk, whereas nonobese women had the opposite response. No significant differences were found on the reinforcing value with the 0- and 100-kcal portion-size conditions. Women in the 300-kcal group (obese and nonobese) reported a significant decrease in snack food liking from baseline to after daily intake. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that obese and nonobese women respond differently to the daily intake of a snack food and that this may not be a viable mechanism for reducing food reinforcement in obese women. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00837694.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>diet-related diseases</subject><subject>dietary surveys</subject><subject>Eating - psychology</subject><subject>eating habits</subject><subject>energy intake</subject><subject>Energy Intake - physiology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>food frequency questionnaires</subject><subject>food intake</subject><subject>Food Preferences - psychology</subject><subject>food reinforcement</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>human nutrition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Nutritional status, dietary intake, and body composition</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity - etiology</subject><subject>Obesity - psychology</subject><subject>Original Research Communications</subject><subject>overeating</subject><subject>portion size</subject><subject>reinforcement schedule</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Psychology</subject><subject>Snack foods</subject><subject>Thinness - psychology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0002-9165</issn><issn>1938-3207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9vFCEUx4nR2LV69qbERG-zfcDMABcTU1s1aeJBeybAwJbtLFSYqel_L9ud1B8XT0D4fB_vfb8g9JLAmsm2O9FbG9cUQKwpp4I9QisimWgYBf4YrQCANpL03RF6VsoWgNBW9E_REalaAUSs0PgxeO-yi1PQI3Z1b6eCk8eDDuMdLlHba-xTGnCIk752OEU8XTmcXYg-ZRviBt_qcXZ7zcLhZFxxWMcBxxQPh59p5-Jz9MTrsbgXy3qMLs_Pvp9-bi6-fvpy-uGisV0vp2boDDGDr836jusWJDDaU8I1b42g0BlPDJG9kS3RwgyDoKK3QAUhskLOsGP0_lD3ZjY7N9g6Xdajuslhp_OdSjqov29iuFKbdKsoB8lA1ALvlgI5_ZhdmdQuFOvGUUeX5qJ63kHfsfa_IIVqs-Sygm_-AbdpzrG6oCirmcn-_tmTA2RzKiU7_9AyAbXPW-3zVvu81X3eVfHqz0l_80vAFXi7ALpYPfqsow3lgauuSs45qdzrA-d1UnqTK3P5jQJhUL-PIC2wXxuHvUY</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Temple, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Bulkley, Alison M</creator><creator>Badawy, Rebecca L</creator><creator>Krause, Nicole</creator><creator>McCann, Sarah</creator><creator>Epstein, Leonard H</creator><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</general><general>American Society for Nutrition</general><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women</title><author>Temple, Jennifer L ; Bulkley, Alison M ; Badawy, Rebecca L ; Krause, Nicole ; McCann, Sarah ; Epstein, Leonard H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-d5b1bdf124f57a4090326217a74b8205bf1b196b941a8bdd8286c02811917aeb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>diet-related diseases</topic><topic>dietary surveys</topic><topic>Eating - psychology</topic><topic>eating habits</topic><topic>energy intake</topic><topic>Energy Intake - physiology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>food frequency questionnaires</topic><topic>food intake</topic><topic>Food Preferences - psychology</topic><topic>food reinforcement</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>human nutrition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Nutritional status, dietary intake, and body composition</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity - etiology</topic><topic>Obesity - psychology</topic><topic>Original Research Communications</topic><topic>overeating</topic><topic>portion size</topic><topic>reinforcement schedule</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Psychology</topic><topic>Snack foods</topic><topic>Thinness - psychology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Temple, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulkley, Alison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badawy, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Leonard H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Temple, Jennifer L</au><au>Bulkley, Alison M</au><au>Badawy, Rebecca L</au><au>Krause, Nicole</au><au>McCann, Sarah</au><au>Epstein, Leonard H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>304-313</pages><issn>0002-9165</issn><eissn>1938-3207</eissn><coden>AJCNAC</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: Food reinforcement, ie, motivation to obtain food, is associated with energy intake and obesity. Finding ways to decrease the reinforcing value of unhealthy foods may help with adherence to diets and maintenance of weight loss. Our previous study in nonobese adults showed that daily consumption of the same snack food (food consumed apart from meals) for 14 d significantly decreased its reinforcing value. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to replicate and extend these findings to obese individuals and to examine the effects of different portion sizes of snack foods on food reinforcement. DESIGN: Food reinforcement and liking were tested in 31 obese and 27 nonobese women at baseline and after 2 wk of daily consumption of 0, 100, or 300 kcal/d of the same snack food. RESULTS: We found a significant interaction of phase, portion size, and body mass index on the pattern of operant responding for food. Obese women had a significant increase in food reinforcement after consuming the 300-kcal portion of food for 2 wk, whereas nonobese women had the opposite response. No significant differences were found on the reinforcing value with the 0- and 100-kcal portion-size conditions. Women in the 300-kcal group (obese and nonobese) reported a significant decrease in snack food liking from baseline to after daily intake. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that obese and nonobese women respond differently to the daily intake of a snack food and that this may not be a viable mechanism for reducing food reinforcement in obese women. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00837694.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</pub><pmid>19458018</pmid><doi>10.3945/ajcn.2008.27283</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9165 |
ispartof | The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2009-08, Vol.90 (2), p.304-313 |
issn | 0002-9165 1938-3207 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2709308 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Body Mass Index Choice Behavior Clinical trials Cross-Over Studies Diet diet-related diseases dietary surveys Eating - psychology eating habits energy intake Energy Intake - physiology Feeding Behavior Feeding. Feeding behavior Female food frequency questionnaires food intake Food Preferences - psychology food reinforcement Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology human nutrition Humans Motivation Nutritional status, dietary intake, and body composition Obesity Obesity - epidemiology Obesity - etiology Obesity - psychology Original Research Communications overeating portion size reinforcement schedule Reinforcement, Psychology Snack foods Thinness - psychology Time Factors Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems women Womens health |
title | Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A44%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20effects%20of%20daily%20snack%20food%20intake%20on%20the%20reinforcing%20value%20of%20food%20in%20obese%20and%20nonobese%20women&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=Temple,%20Jennifer%20L&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=304-313&rft.issn=0002-9165&rft.eissn=1938-3207&rft.coden=AJCNAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.3945/ajcn.2008.27283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67506534%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231939608&rft_id=info:pmid/19458018&rfr_iscdi=true |