Increased endothelin‐1 reactivity and endothelial dysfunction in carotid arteries from rats with hyperhomocysteinemia

Background and purpose:  There are interactions between endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) and endothelial vascular injury in hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy), but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we evaluated the effects of HHcy on the endothelin system in rat carotid arteries. Experimental approa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of pharmacology 2009-06, Vol.157 (4), p.568-580
Hauptverfasser: De Andrade, CR, Leite, PF, Montezano, AC, Casolari, DA, Yogi, A, Tostes, RC, Haddad, R, Eberlin, MN, Laurindo, FRM, De Souza, HP, Corrêa, FMA, De Oliveira, AM
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and purpose:  There are interactions between endothelin‐1 (ET‐1) and endothelial vascular injury in hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy), but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we evaluated the effects of HHcy on the endothelin system in rat carotid arteries. Experimental approach:  Vascular reactivity to ET‐1 and ETA and ETB receptor antagonists was assessed in rings of carotid arteries from normal rats and those with HHcy. ETA and ETB receptor expression was assessed by mRNA (RT‐PCR), immunohistochemistry and binding of [125I]‐ET‐1. Key results:  HHcy enhanced ET‐1‐induced contractions of carotid rings with intact endothelium. Selective antagonism of ETA or ETB receptors produced concentration‐dependent rightward displacements of ET‐1 concentration response curves. Antagonism of ETA but not of ETB receptors abolished enhancement in HHcy tissues. ETA and ETB receptor gene expressions were not up‐regulated. ETA receptor expression in the arterial media was higher in HHcy arteries. Contractions to big ET‐1 served as indicators of endothelin‐converting enzyme activity, which was decreased by HHcy, without reduction of ET‐1 levels. ET‐1‐induced Rho‐kinase activity, calcium release and influx were increased by HHcy. Pre‐treatment with indomethacin reversed enhanced responses to ET‐1 in HHcy tissues, which were reduced also by a thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist. Induced relaxation was reduced by BQ788, absent in endothelium‐denuded arteries and was decreased in HHcy due to reduced bioavailability of NO. Conclusions and implications:  Increased ETA receptor density plays a fundamental role in endothelial injury induced by HHcy. ET‐1 activation of ETA receptors in HHcy changed the balance between endothelium‐derived relaxing and contracting factors, favouring enhanced contractility. British Journal of Pharmacology (2009) 157, 568–580; doi:10.1111/j.1476‐5381.2009.00165.x; published online 9 April 2009 This article is part of a themed section on Endothelium in Pharmacology. For a list of all articles in this section see the end of this paper, or visit: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121548564/issueyear?year=2009
ISSN:0007-1188
1476-5381
DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00165.x