Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates

To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions impli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cortex 2009-05, Vol.45 (5), p.575-591
Hauptverfasser: Rapcsak, Steven Z., Beeson, Pélagie M., Henry, Maya L., Leyden, Anne, Kim, Esther, Rising, Kindle, Andersen, Sarah, Cho, HyeSuk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 591
container_issue 5
container_start_page 575
container_title Cortex
container_volume 45
creator Rapcsak, Steven Z.
Beeson, Pélagie M.
Henry, Maya L.
Leyden, Anne
Kim, Esther
Rising, Kindle
Andersen, Sarah
Cho, HyeSuk
description To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2689874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010945208001330</els_id><sourcerecordid>85699135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EapfCN0BoT9wSxn_jcEBCKyhIlegBzpbjTHa9SuLFTlbtt6-3u2rppT2NrHnvzXh-hHygUFKg6vO2dCFOeFMyAF2CKAHUK7KgdcULTYG9JgsACkUtJDsnb1PaAjDQUp6Rc6oVk6IWC3J9vQlj6MPaO9sv29vU4423Szu2h8c62t3G2y_LVViPfvJ7XA7oNnb0aUj3ohHnmI1pbtIU7YTpHXnT2T7h-1O9IH9_fP-z-llc_b78tfp2VTip66moNQrBuOacugotNrJxbSutbbhtQOlKAKVS8c61imHDrHLY8a5RCkTFVMsvyNdj7m5uBmwdjnl-b3bRDzbemmC9edoZ_casw94wpescnwM-nQJi-Ddjmszgk8O-tyOGORktVV1TLl8Uqgok0Iq-KMygKiY5ZKE4Cl0MKUXsHtamYA5wzdYc4R482oAwGW62ffz_y4-mE83Hm2A-_N5jNMl5HB22PqKbTBv88xPuAF8-ukc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20072530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rapcsak, Steven Z. ; Beeson, Pélagie M. ; Henry, Maya L. ; Leyden, Anne ; Kim, Esther ; Rising, Kindle ; Andersen, Sarah ; Cho, HyeSuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Rapcsak, Steven Z. ; Beeson, Pélagie M. ; Henry, Maya L. ; Leyden, Anne ; Kim, Esther ; Rising, Kindle ; Andersen, Sarah ; Cho, HyeSuk</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18625494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Srl</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Agraphia - etiology ; Agraphia - pathology ; Agraphia - physiopathology ; Analysis of Variance ; Aphasia - complications ; Aphasia - pathology ; Aphasia - physiopathology ; Case-Control Studies ; Cerebral Cortex - pathology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Cognition - physiology ; Cohort Studies ; Dyslexia - etiology ; Dyslexia - pathology ; Dyslexia - physiopathology ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Language ; Middle Aged ; Neural Pathways - physiology ; Neural Pathways - physiopathology ; Perisylvian cortex ; Phonetics ; Phonological deficit ; Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia ; Psychological Theory ; Reading ; Reference Values ; Speech - physiology ; Verbal Behavior - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cortex, 2009-05, Vol.45 (5), p.575-591</ispartof><rights>2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945208001330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeson, Pélagie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Maya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rising, Kindle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, HyeSuk</creatorcontrib><title>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</title><title>Cortex</title><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><description>To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Agraphia - etiology</subject><subject>Agraphia - pathology</subject><subject>Agraphia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Aphasia - complications</subject><subject>Aphasia - pathology</subject><subject>Aphasia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dyslexia - etiology</subject><subject>Dyslexia - pathology</subject><subject>Dyslexia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiopathology</subject><subject>Perisylvian cortex</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonological deficit</subject><subject>Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Speech - physiology</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior - physiology</subject><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EapfCN0BoT9wSxn_jcEBCKyhIlegBzpbjTHa9SuLFTlbtt6-3u2rppT2NrHnvzXh-hHygUFKg6vO2dCFOeFMyAF2CKAHUK7KgdcULTYG9JgsACkUtJDsnb1PaAjDQUp6Rc6oVk6IWC3J9vQlj6MPaO9sv29vU4423Szu2h8c62t3G2y_LVViPfvJ7XA7oNnb0aUj3ohHnmI1pbtIU7YTpHXnT2T7h-1O9IH9_fP-z-llc_b78tfp2VTip66moNQrBuOacugotNrJxbSutbbhtQOlKAKVS8c61imHDrHLY8a5RCkTFVMsvyNdj7m5uBmwdjnl-b3bRDzbemmC9edoZ_casw94wpescnwM-nQJi-Ddjmszgk8O-tyOGORktVV1TLl8Uqgok0Iq-KMygKiY5ZKE4Cl0MKUXsHtamYA5wzdYc4R482oAwGW62ffz_y4-mE83Hm2A-_N5jNMl5HB22PqKbTBv88xPuAF8-ukc</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</creator><creator>Beeson, Pélagie M.</creator><creator>Henry, Maya L.</creator><creator>Leyden, Anne</creator><creator>Kim, Esther</creator><creator>Rising, Kindle</creator><creator>Andersen, Sarah</creator><creator>Cho, HyeSuk</creator><general>Elsevier Srl</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</title><author>Rapcsak, Steven Z. ; Beeson, Pélagie M. ; Henry, Maya L. ; Leyden, Anne ; Kim, Esther ; Rising, Kindle ; Andersen, Sarah ; Cho, HyeSuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Agraphia - etiology</topic><topic>Agraphia - pathology</topic><topic>Agraphia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Aphasia - complications</topic><topic>Aphasia - pathology</topic><topic>Aphasia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dyslexia - etiology</topic><topic>Dyslexia - pathology</topic><topic>Dyslexia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiopathology</topic><topic>Perisylvian cortex</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonological deficit</topic><topic>Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Speech - physiology</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeson, Pélagie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Maya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rising, Kindle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, HyeSuk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</au><au>Beeson, Pélagie M.</au><au>Henry, Maya L.</au><au>Leyden, Anne</au><au>Kim, Esther</au><au>Rising, Kindle</au><au>Andersen, Sarah</au><au>Cho, HyeSuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</atitle><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>575-591</pages><issn>0010-9452</issn><eissn>1973-8102</eissn><abstract>To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Srl</pub><pmid>18625494</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-9452
ispartof Cortex, 2009-05, Vol.45 (5), p.575-591
issn 0010-9452
1973-8102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2689874
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Agraphia - etiology
Agraphia - pathology
Agraphia - physiopathology
Analysis of Variance
Aphasia - complications
Aphasia - pathology
Aphasia - physiopathology
Case-Control Studies
Cerebral Cortex - pathology
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
Cognition - physiology
Cohort Studies
Dyslexia - etiology
Dyslexia - pathology
Dyslexia - physiopathology
Functional Laterality
Humans
Language
Middle Aged
Neural Pathways - physiology
Neural Pathways - physiopathology
Perisylvian cortex
Phonetics
Phonological deficit
Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia
Psychological Theory
Reading
Reference Values
Speech - physiology
Verbal Behavior - physiology
title Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A50%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phonological%20dyslexia%20and%20dysgraphia:%20Cognitive%20mechanisms%20and%20neural%20substrates&rft.jtitle=Cortex&rft.au=Rapcsak,%20Steven%20Z.&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=575-591&rft.issn=0010-9452&rft.eissn=1973-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E85699135%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20072530&rft_id=info:pmid/18625494&rft_els_id=S0010945208001330&rfr_iscdi=true