Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates
To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions impli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cortex 2009-05, Vol.45 (5), p.575-591 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 591 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 575 |
container_title | Cortex |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Rapcsak, Steven Z. Beeson, Pélagie M. Henry, Maya L. Leyden, Anne Kim, Esther Rising, Kindle Andersen, Sarah Cho, HyeSuk |
description | To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2689874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010945208001330</els_id><sourcerecordid>85699135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EapfCN0BoT9wSxn_jcEBCKyhIlegBzpbjTHa9SuLFTlbtt6-3u2rppT2NrHnvzXh-hHygUFKg6vO2dCFOeFMyAF2CKAHUK7KgdcULTYG9JgsACkUtJDsnb1PaAjDQUp6Rc6oVk6IWC3J9vQlj6MPaO9sv29vU4423Szu2h8c62t3G2y_LVViPfvJ7XA7oNnb0aUj3ohHnmI1pbtIU7YTpHXnT2T7h-1O9IH9_fP-z-llc_b78tfp2VTip66moNQrBuOacugotNrJxbSutbbhtQOlKAKVS8c61imHDrHLY8a5RCkTFVMsvyNdj7m5uBmwdjnl-b3bRDzbemmC9edoZ_casw94wpescnwM-nQJi-Ddjmszgk8O-tyOGORktVV1TLl8Uqgok0Iq-KMygKiY5ZKE4Cl0MKUXsHtamYA5wzdYc4R482oAwGW62ffz_y4-mE83Hm2A-_N5jNMl5HB22PqKbTBv88xPuAF8-ukc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20072530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rapcsak, Steven Z. ; Beeson, Pélagie M. ; Henry, Maya L. ; Leyden, Anne ; Kim, Esther ; Rising, Kindle ; Andersen, Sarah ; Cho, HyeSuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Rapcsak, Steven Z. ; Beeson, Pélagie M. ; Henry, Maya L. ; Leyden, Anne ; Kim, Esther ; Rising, Kindle ; Andersen, Sarah ; Cho, HyeSuk</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18625494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Srl</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Agraphia - etiology ; Agraphia - pathology ; Agraphia - physiopathology ; Analysis of Variance ; Aphasia - complications ; Aphasia - pathology ; Aphasia - physiopathology ; Case-Control Studies ; Cerebral Cortex - pathology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiology ; Cognition - physiology ; Cohort Studies ; Dyslexia - etiology ; Dyslexia - pathology ; Dyslexia - physiopathology ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Language ; Middle Aged ; Neural Pathways - physiology ; Neural Pathways - physiopathology ; Perisylvian cortex ; Phonetics ; Phonological deficit ; Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia ; Psychological Theory ; Reading ; Reference Values ; Speech - physiology ; Verbal Behavior - physiology</subject><ispartof>Cortex, 2009-05, Vol.45 (5), p.575-591</ispartof><rights>2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945208001330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeson, Pélagie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Maya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rising, Kindle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, HyeSuk</creatorcontrib><title>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</title><title>Cortex</title><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><description>To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Agraphia - etiology</subject><subject>Agraphia - pathology</subject><subject>Agraphia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Aphasia - complications</subject><subject>Aphasia - pathology</subject><subject>Aphasia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Dyslexia - etiology</subject><subject>Dyslexia - pathology</subject><subject>Dyslexia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiopathology</subject><subject>Perisylvian cortex</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonological deficit</subject><subject>Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Speech - physiology</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior - physiology</subject><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EapfCN0BoT9wSxn_jcEBCKyhIlegBzpbjTHa9SuLFTlbtt6-3u2rppT2NrHnvzXh-hHygUFKg6vO2dCFOeFMyAF2CKAHUK7KgdcULTYG9JgsACkUtJDsnb1PaAjDQUp6Rc6oVk6IWC3J9vQlj6MPaO9sv29vU4423Szu2h8c62t3G2y_LVViPfvJ7XA7oNnb0aUj3ohHnmI1pbtIU7YTpHXnT2T7h-1O9IH9_fP-z-llc_b78tfp2VTip66moNQrBuOacugotNrJxbSutbbhtQOlKAKVS8c61imHDrHLY8a5RCkTFVMsvyNdj7m5uBmwdjnl-b3bRDzbemmC9edoZ_casw94wpescnwM-nQJi-Ddjmszgk8O-tyOGORktVV1TLl8Uqgok0Iq-KMygKiY5ZKE4Cl0MKUXsHtamYA5wzdYc4R482oAwGW62ffz_y4-mE83Hm2A-_N5jNMl5HB22PqKbTBv88xPuAF8-ukc</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</creator><creator>Beeson, Pélagie M.</creator><creator>Henry, Maya L.</creator><creator>Leyden, Anne</creator><creator>Kim, Esther</creator><creator>Rising, Kindle</creator><creator>Andersen, Sarah</creator><creator>Cho, HyeSuk</creator><general>Elsevier Srl</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</title><author>Rapcsak, Steven Z. ; Beeson, Pélagie M. ; Henry, Maya L. ; Leyden, Anne ; Kim, Esther ; Rising, Kindle ; Andersen, Sarah ; Cho, HyeSuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-98e44238331c7eaeb5bcdd5aab3ab06874011563fcd62eb2a6cef3fb6604726d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Agraphia - etiology</topic><topic>Agraphia - pathology</topic><topic>Agraphia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Aphasia - complications</topic><topic>Aphasia - pathology</topic><topic>Aphasia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Dyslexia - etiology</topic><topic>Dyslexia - pathology</topic><topic>Dyslexia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiopathology</topic><topic>Perisylvian cortex</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonological deficit</topic><topic>Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Speech - physiology</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeson, Pélagie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Maya L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leyden, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rising, Kindle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, HyeSuk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rapcsak, Steven Z.</au><au>Beeson, Pélagie M.</au><au>Henry, Maya L.</au><au>Leyden, Anne</au><au>Kim, Esther</au><au>Rising, Kindle</au><au>Andersen, Sarah</au><au>Cho, HyeSuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates</atitle><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>575-591</pages><issn>0010-9452</issn><eissn>1973-8102</eissn><abstract>To examine the validity of different theoretical assumptions about the neuropsychological mechanisms and lesion correlates of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia, we studied written and spoken language performance in a large cohort of patients with focal damage to perisylvian cortical regions implicated in phonological processing. Despite considerable variation in accuracy for both words and non-words, the majority of participants demonstrated the increased lexicality effects in reading and spelling that are considered the hallmark features of phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia. Increased lexicality effects were also documented in spoken language tasks such as oral repetition, and patients performed poorly on a battery of phonological tests that did not involve an orthographic component. Furthermore, a composite measure of general phonological ability was strongly predictive of both reading and spelling accuracy, and we obtained evidence that the continuum of severity that characterized the written language disorder of our patients was attributable to an underlying continuum of phonological impairment. Although patients demonstrated qualitatively similar deficits across measures of written and spoken language processing, there were quantitative differences in levels of performance reflecting task difficulty effects. Spelling was more severely affected than reading by the reduction in phonological capacity and this differential vulnerability accounted for occasional disparities between patterns of impairment on the two written language tasks. Our findings suggest that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in patients with perisylvian lesions are manifestations of a central or modality-independent phonological deficit rather than the result of damage to cognitive components dedicated to reading or spelling. Our results also provide empirical support for shared-components models of written language processing, according to which the same central cognitive systems support both reading and spelling. Lesion–deficit correlations indicated that phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia may be produced by damage to a variety of perisylvian cortical regions, consistent with distributed network models of phonological processing.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Srl</pub><pmid>18625494</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-9452 |
ispartof | Cortex, 2009-05, Vol.45 (5), p.575-591 |
issn | 0010-9452 1973-8102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2689874 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Agraphia - etiology Agraphia - pathology Agraphia - physiopathology Analysis of Variance Aphasia - complications Aphasia - pathology Aphasia - physiopathology Case-Control Studies Cerebral Cortex - pathology Cerebral Cortex - physiology Cognition - physiology Cohort Studies Dyslexia - etiology Dyslexia - pathology Dyslexia - physiopathology Functional Laterality Humans Language Middle Aged Neural Pathways - physiology Neural Pathways - physiopathology Perisylvian cortex Phonetics Phonological deficit Phonological dyslexia/dysgraphia Psychological Theory Reading Reference Values Speech - physiology Verbal Behavior - physiology |
title | Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A50%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phonological%20dyslexia%20and%20dysgraphia:%20Cognitive%20mechanisms%20and%20neural%20substrates&rft.jtitle=Cortex&rft.au=Rapcsak,%20Steven%20Z.&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=575-591&rft.issn=0010-9452&rft.eissn=1973-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E85699135%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20072530&rft_id=info:pmid/18625494&rft_els_id=S0010945208001330&rfr_iscdi=true |