Physician Cultural Competence and Patient Ratings of the Patient-Physician Relationship

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To determine the association of patients’ ratings of the patient-physician relationship with physicians’ self-reported cultural competence (CC). METHODS Physicians completed a survey assessing their CC in three domains: motivation to learn about other cultures (motivation attitude...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2009-04, Vol.24 (4), p.495-498
Hauptverfasser: Paez, Kathryn A., Allen, Jerilyn K., Beach, Mary Catherine, Carson, Kathryn A., Cooper, Lisa A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 498
container_issue 4
container_start_page 495
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 24
creator Paez, Kathryn A.
Allen, Jerilyn K.
Beach, Mary Catherine
Carson, Kathryn A.
Cooper, Lisa A.
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To determine the association of patients’ ratings of the patient-physician relationship with physicians’ self-reported cultural competence (CC). METHODS Physicians completed a survey assessing their CC in three domains: motivation to learn about other cultures (motivation attitudes), awareness of white privilege and acceptance of a racial group’s choice to retain distinct customs and values (power assimilation attitudes), and clinical behaviors reflective of CC. Their African-American and white patients completed interviews assessing satisfaction with the medical visit, trust in their physician, perceptions of their physician’s respect for them and their participation in care. We conducted regression analyses to explore the associations between CC and patient ratings of the relationship. RESULTS Patients of physicians reporting more motivation to learn about other cultures were more satisfied (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.4), perceived their physicians were more facilitative (β = 0.4, p = 0.02) and reported seeking and sharing more information during the medical visit (β = 0.2, p = 0.03). Physicians’ power assimilation attitudes were associated with patients’ ratings of physician facilitation (β = 0.4, p = 0.02). Patients of physicians reporting more frequent CC behaviors were more satisfied (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4–6.9) and reported seeking and sharing more information (β = 0.3, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Attitudinal and behavioral components of CC are important to developing higher quality, participative relationships between patients and their physicians.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11606-009-0919-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2659158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2395279701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-90fb9c95dd383afa9e530adcd72154ad38fdbbd43e3d3e4164554677b15ddad23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7rj6A3yRRtC3aKpzfxGWwRssuCyKjyGdpGey9CRj0i3svzfLjDsq-FRQ9dWpUxyEngN5A4TItxVAEIEJ0Zho0Fg-QCvgPcfAtHyIVkQphpWk7Aw9qfWGEKB9rx6jM2g0k0Ku0Per7W2NLtrUrZdpXoqdunXe7cMckgudTb67snMMae6uW02b2uWxm7fhdxufBK7D1Ho51W3cP0WPRjvV8OxYz9G3D--_rj_hyy8fP68vLrFrFmesyThop7n3VFE7Wh04JdY7L3vgzLbu6IfBMxqop4GBYJwzIeUAbcX6np6jdwfd_TLsgnfNUXvB7Evc2XJrso3m70mKW7PJP00vuAaumsDro0DJP5ZQZ7OL1YVpsinkpRohCVNSQANf_gPe5KWk9pxRkgulQPMGwQFyJddawnjvBIi5y8wcMjMtM3OXmZFt58WfL5w2jiE14NURsNXZaSw2uVjvuR4Uo0Bo4_oDV9sobUI5Ofz_9V9S17C2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>875688195</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physician Cultural Competence and Patient Ratings of the Patient-Physician Relationship</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Paez, Kathryn A. ; Allen, Jerilyn K. ; Beach, Mary Catherine ; Carson, Kathryn A. ; Cooper, Lisa A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paez, Kathryn A. ; Allen, Jerilyn K. ; Beach, Mary Catherine ; Carson, Kathryn A. ; Cooper, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To determine the association of patients’ ratings of the patient-physician relationship with physicians’ self-reported cultural competence (CC). METHODS Physicians completed a survey assessing their CC in three domains: motivation to learn about other cultures (motivation attitudes), awareness of white privilege and acceptance of a racial group’s choice to retain distinct customs and values (power assimilation attitudes), and clinical behaviors reflective of CC. Their African-American and white patients completed interviews assessing satisfaction with the medical visit, trust in their physician, perceptions of their physician’s respect for them and their participation in care. We conducted regression analyses to explore the associations between CC and patient ratings of the relationship. RESULTS Patients of physicians reporting more motivation to learn about other cultures were more satisfied (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.4), perceived their physicians were more facilitative (β = 0.4, p = 0.02) and reported seeking and sharing more information during the medical visit (β = 0.2, p = 0.03). Physicians’ power assimilation attitudes were associated with patients’ ratings of physician facilitation (β = 0.4, p = 0.02). Patients of physicians reporting more frequent CC behaviors were more satisfied (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4–6.9) and reported seeking and sharing more information (β = 0.3, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Attitudinal and behavioral components of CC are important to developing higher quality, participative relationships between patients and their physicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-0919-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19194767</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; African Americans ; Attitudes ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cultural Competency ; European Continental Ancestry Group ; Female ; General aspects ; Health participants ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Interview, Psychological ; Male ; Maryland ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Original ; Original Article ; Patients - psychology ; Personal Satisfaction ; Physician patient relationships ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians, Family - psychology ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Primary care ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Quality of care ; Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2009-04, Vol.24 (4), p.495-498</ispartof><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-90fb9c95dd383afa9e530adcd72154ad38fdbbd43e3d3e4164554677b15ddad23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-90fb9c95dd383afa9e530adcd72154ad38fdbbd43e3d3e4164554677b15ddad23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659158/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659158/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21843103$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19194767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paez, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jerilyn K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Mary Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><title>Physician Cultural Competence and Patient Ratings of the Patient-Physician Relationship</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To determine the association of patients’ ratings of the patient-physician relationship with physicians’ self-reported cultural competence (CC). METHODS Physicians completed a survey assessing their CC in three domains: motivation to learn about other cultures (motivation attitudes), awareness of white privilege and acceptance of a racial group’s choice to retain distinct customs and values (power assimilation attitudes), and clinical behaviors reflective of CC. Their African-American and white patients completed interviews assessing satisfaction with the medical visit, trust in their physician, perceptions of their physician’s respect for them and their participation in care. We conducted regression analyses to explore the associations between CC and patient ratings of the relationship. RESULTS Patients of physicians reporting more motivation to learn about other cultures were more satisfied (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.4), perceived their physicians were more facilitative (β = 0.4, p = 0.02) and reported seeking and sharing more information during the medical visit (β = 0.2, p = 0.03). Physicians’ power assimilation attitudes were associated with patients’ ratings of physician facilitation (β = 0.4, p = 0.02). Patients of physicians reporting more frequent CC behaviors were more satisfied (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4–6.9) and reported seeking and sharing more information (β = 0.3, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Attitudinal and behavioral components of CC are important to developing higher quality, participative relationships between patients and their physicians.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cultural Competency</subject><subject>European Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physician patient relationships</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - psychology</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVuLFDEQhYMo7rj6A3yRRtC3aKpzfxGWwRssuCyKjyGdpGey9CRj0i3svzfLjDsq-FRQ9dWpUxyEngN5A4TItxVAEIEJ0Zho0Fg-QCvgPcfAtHyIVkQphpWk7Aw9qfWGEKB9rx6jM2g0k0Ku0Per7W2NLtrUrZdpXoqdunXe7cMckgudTb67snMMae6uW02b2uWxm7fhdxufBK7D1Ho51W3cP0WPRjvV8OxYz9G3D--_rj_hyy8fP68vLrFrFmesyThop7n3VFE7Wh04JdY7L3vgzLbu6IfBMxqop4GBYJwzIeUAbcX6np6jdwfd_TLsgnfNUXvB7Evc2XJrso3m70mKW7PJP00vuAaumsDro0DJP5ZQZ7OL1YVpsinkpRohCVNSQANf_gPe5KWk9pxRkgulQPMGwQFyJddawnjvBIi5y8wcMjMtM3OXmZFt58WfL5w2jiE14NURsNXZaSw2uVjvuR4Uo0Bo4_oDV9sobUI5Ofz_9V9S17C2</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Paez, Kathryn A.</creator><creator>Allen, Jerilyn K.</creator><creator>Beach, Mary Catherine</creator><creator>Carson, Kathryn A.</creator><creator>Cooper, Lisa A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Physician Cultural Competence and Patient Ratings of the Patient-Physician Relationship</title><author>Paez, Kathryn A. ; Allen, Jerilyn K. ; Beach, Mary Catherine ; Carson, Kathryn A. ; Cooper, Lisa A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-90fb9c95dd383afa9e530adcd72154ad38fdbbd43e3d3e4164554677b15ddad23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cultural Competency</topic><topic>European Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physician patient relationships</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - psychology</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paez, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jerilyn K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beach, Mary Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, Kathryn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Lisa A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paez, Kathryn A.</au><au>Allen, Jerilyn K.</au><au>Beach, Mary Catherine</au><au>Carson, Kathryn A.</au><au>Cooper, Lisa A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physician Cultural Competence and Patient Ratings of the Patient-Physician Relationship</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>495-498</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To determine the association of patients’ ratings of the patient-physician relationship with physicians’ self-reported cultural competence (CC). METHODS Physicians completed a survey assessing their CC in three domains: motivation to learn about other cultures (motivation attitudes), awareness of white privilege and acceptance of a racial group’s choice to retain distinct customs and values (power assimilation attitudes), and clinical behaviors reflective of CC. Their African-American and white patients completed interviews assessing satisfaction with the medical visit, trust in their physician, perceptions of their physician’s respect for them and their participation in care. We conducted regression analyses to explore the associations between CC and patient ratings of the relationship. RESULTS Patients of physicians reporting more motivation to learn about other cultures were more satisfied (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.4), perceived their physicians were more facilitative (β = 0.4, p = 0.02) and reported seeking and sharing more information during the medical visit (β = 0.2, p = 0.03). Physicians’ power assimilation attitudes were associated with patients’ ratings of physician facilitation (β = 0.4, p = 0.02). Patients of physicians reporting more frequent CC behaviors were more satisfied (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4–6.9) and reported seeking and sharing more information (β = 0.3, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Attitudinal and behavioral components of CC are important to developing higher quality, participative relationships between patients and their physicians.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>19194767</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-009-0919-7</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2009-04, Vol.24 (4), p.495-498
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2659158
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
African Americans
Attitudes
Biological and medical sciences
Cultural Competency
European Continental Ancestry Group
Female
General aspects
Health participants
Humans
Internal Medicine
Interview, Psychological
Male
Maryland
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Motivation
Original
Original Article
Patients - psychology
Personal Satisfaction
Physician patient relationships
Physician-Patient Relations
Physicians, Family - psychology
Polls & surveys
Primary care
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Quality of care
Ratings & rankings
title Physician Cultural Competence and Patient Ratings of the Patient-Physician Relationship
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A20%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physician%20Cultural%20Competence%20and%20Patient%20Ratings%20of%20the%20Patient-Physician%20Relationship&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Paez,%20Kathryn%20A.&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=495-498&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-009-0919-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2395279701%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=875688195&rft_id=info:pmid/19194767&rfr_iscdi=true