How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?
Objectives: To quantify the contribution of patient delay, provider delay, and diversion between services to delayed access to genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. To describe the factors associated with delay, and their contribution to STI transmission. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 3184 cons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexually transmitted infections 2007-08, Vol.83 (5), p.400-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 400 |
container_title | Sexually transmitted infections |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Mercer, Catherine H Sutcliffe, Lorna Johnson, Anne M White, Peter J Brook, Gary Ross, Jonathan D C Dhar, Jyoti Horner, Paddy Keane, Frances Jungmann, Eva Sweeney, John Kinghorn, George Garnett, Geoff G Stephenson, Judith M Cassell, Jackie A |
description | Objectives: To quantify the contribution of patient delay, provider delay, and diversion between services to delayed access to genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. To describe the factors associated with delay, and their contribution to STI transmission. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 3184 consecutive new patients attending four GUM clinics purposively selected from across England to represent different types of population. Patients completed a short written questionnaire that collected data on sociodemographics, access, and health-seeking behaviour. Questionnaires were then linked to routinely collected individual-level demographic and diagnostic data. Results: Patient delay is a median of 7 days, and does not vary by demographic or social characteristics, or by clinic. However, attendance at a walk-in appointment was associated with a marked reduction in patient delay and provider delay. Among symptomatics, 44.8% of men and 58.0% of women continued to have sex while awaiting treatment, with 7.0% reporting sex with >1 partner; 4.2% of symptomatic patients reported sex without using condoms with new partner(s) since their symptoms had begun. Approximately 25% of all patients had already sought or received care in general practice, and these patients experienced greater provider delay. Conclusions: Walk-in services are associated with a reduction in patient and provider delay, and should be available to all populations. Patients attending primary care require clear care pathways when referred on to GUM clinics. Health promotion should encourage symptomatic patients to seek care quickly, and to avoid sexual contact before treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/sti.2006.024554 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2659040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4026474531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-f5d385bab93af3ce9513afcb3650c9e0c0f9512ade6251b01ec2e468c6a6119b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5oYsITigZuuP2E4uILR8tKUqhxauluNMGm-TuNjJQn9B_3a9TbQFLj3NeOaZVzN-k-QlwQtCmDgIg11QjMUC04zz7FGySzJJU0YFexxzJvI0KyTbSZ6FsMIRlLx4muwQmUkucrab3By636gbTYMqhypo9TVUqAHdDo3RHlAAuLT9xf62d1e98m5tg3X9PtJ9hSq7Br95otq7LnZtp_31hBrXD96W4wBocGhoYvC6D50NdwOuRmfnR-HD8-RJrdsAL-a4l_z48vl8eZiefP96tPx4kpac0iGtecVyXuqyYLpmBgpOYmJKJjg2BWCD61iiugJBOSkxAUMhE7kRWhBSlGwveT_pXo1lB5WBuJ1u1byyctqqfzu9bdSFWysqeIEzHAXezgLe_RohDCqeYqBtdQ9uDErkhIuMiwi-_g9cudH38ThFZE6EJJzJSB1MlPEuBA_1dhWC1cZiFS1WG4vVZHGcePX3Bff87GkE3syADka3dfxuY8M9lxcZYXzDpRNnwwB_tn3tL5WQTHJ1-nOpjs9I1Dz-pL5F_t3El93qwS1vARrCzg0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781671537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mercer, Catherine H ; Sutcliffe, Lorna ; Johnson, Anne M ; White, Peter J ; Brook, Gary ; Ross, Jonathan D C ; Dhar, Jyoti ; Horner, Paddy ; Keane, Frances ; Jungmann, Eva ; Sweeney, John ; Kinghorn, George ; Garnett, Geoff G ; Stephenson, Judith M ; Cassell, Jackie A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Catherine H ; Sutcliffe, Lorna ; Johnson, Anne M ; White, Peter J ; Brook, Gary ; Ross, Jonathan D C ; Dhar, Jyoti ; Horner, Paddy ; Keane, Frances ; Jungmann, Eva ; Sweeney, John ; Kinghorn, George ; Garnett, Geoff G ; Stephenson, Judith M ; Cassell, Jackie A</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To quantify the contribution of patient delay, provider delay, and diversion between services to delayed access to genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. To describe the factors associated with delay, and their contribution to STI transmission. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 3184 consecutive new patients attending four GUM clinics purposively selected from across England to represent different types of population. Patients completed a short written questionnaire that collected data on sociodemographics, access, and health-seeking behaviour. Questionnaires were then linked to routinely collected individual-level demographic and diagnostic data. Results: Patient delay is a median of 7 days, and does not vary by demographic or social characteristics, or by clinic. However, attendance at a walk-in appointment was associated with a marked reduction in patient delay and provider delay. Among symptomatics, 44.8% of men and 58.0% of women continued to have sex while awaiting treatment, with 7.0% reporting sex with >1 partner; 4.2% of symptomatic patients reported sex without using condoms with new partner(s) since their symptoms had begun. Approximately 25% of all patients had already sought or received care in general practice, and these patients experienced greater provider delay. Conclusions: Walk-in services are associated with a reduction in patient and provider delay, and should be available to all populations. Patients attending primary care require clear care pathways when referred on to GUM clinics. Health promotion should encourage symptomatic patients to seek care quickly, and to avoid sexual contact before treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/sti.2006.024554</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17475683</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care ; Behaviour ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinics ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Delivery of Health Care ; England ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; Family Practice - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; General aspects ; Gonorrhea ; Health services ; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Patients ; Primary care ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Risk Factors ; Sexual health ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission ; STD ; Women</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted infections, 2007-08, Vol.83 (5), p.400-405</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Sexually Transmitted Infections</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2007 Copyright 2007 Sexually Transmitted Infections</rights><rights>Copyright ©2007 BMJ Publishing Group.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-f5d385bab93af3ce9513afcb3650c9e0c0f9512ade6251b01ec2e468c6a6119b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sti.bmj.com/content/83/5/400.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sti.bmj.com/content/83/5/400.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,727,780,784,885,3196,23571,27924,27925,53791,53793,77600,77631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18941353$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17475683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Catherine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutcliffe, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Jonathan D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horner, Paddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungmann, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinghorn, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnett, Geoff G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephenson, Judith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassell, Jackie A</creatorcontrib><title>How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?</title><title>Sexually transmitted infections</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><description>Objectives: To quantify the contribution of patient delay, provider delay, and diversion between services to delayed access to genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. To describe the factors associated with delay, and their contribution to STI transmission. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 3184 consecutive new patients attending four GUM clinics purposively selected from across England to represent different types of population. Patients completed a short written questionnaire that collected data on sociodemographics, access, and health-seeking behaviour. Questionnaires were then linked to routinely collected individual-level demographic and diagnostic data. Results: Patient delay is a median of 7 days, and does not vary by demographic or social characteristics, or by clinic. However, attendance at a walk-in appointment was associated with a marked reduction in patient delay and provider delay. Among symptomatics, 44.8% of men and 58.0% of women continued to have sex while awaiting treatment, with 7.0% reporting sex with >1 partner; 4.2% of symptomatic patients reported sex without using condoms with new partner(s) since their symptoms had begun. Approximately 25% of all patients had already sought or received care in general practice, and these patients experienced greater provider delay. Conclusions: Walk-in services are associated with a reduction in patient and provider delay, and should be available to all populations. Patients attending primary care require clear care pathways when referred on to GUM clinics. Health promotion should encourage symptomatic patients to seek care quickly, and to avoid sexual contact before treatment.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>Family Practice - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gonorrhea</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sexual health</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1368-4973</issn><issn>1472-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5oYsITigZuuP2E4uILR8tKUqhxauluNMGm-TuNjJQn9B_3a9TbQFLj3NeOaZVzN-k-QlwQtCmDgIg11QjMUC04zz7FGySzJJU0YFexxzJvI0KyTbSZ6FsMIRlLx4muwQmUkucrab3By636gbTYMqhypo9TVUqAHdDo3RHlAAuLT9xf62d1e98m5tg3X9PtJ9hSq7Br95otq7LnZtp_31hBrXD96W4wBocGhoYvC6D50NdwOuRmfnR-HD8-RJrdsAL-a4l_z48vl8eZiefP96tPx4kpac0iGtecVyXuqyYLpmBgpOYmJKJjg2BWCD61iiugJBOSkxAUMhE7kRWhBSlGwveT_pXo1lB5WBuJ1u1byyctqqfzu9bdSFWysqeIEzHAXezgLe_RohDCqeYqBtdQ9uDErkhIuMiwi-_g9cudH38ThFZE6EJJzJSB1MlPEuBA_1dhWC1cZiFS1WG4vVZHGcePX3Bff87GkE3syADka3dfxuY8M9lxcZYXzDpRNnwwB_tn3tL5WQTHJ1-nOpjs9I1Dz-pL5F_t3El93qwS1vARrCzg0</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Mercer, Catherine H</creator><creator>Sutcliffe, Lorna</creator><creator>Johnson, Anne M</creator><creator>White, Peter J</creator><creator>Brook, Gary</creator><creator>Ross, Jonathan D C</creator><creator>Dhar, Jyoti</creator><creator>Horner, Paddy</creator><creator>Keane, Frances</creator><creator>Jungmann, Eva</creator><creator>Sweeney, John</creator><creator>Kinghorn, George</creator><creator>Garnett, Geoff G</creator><creator>Stephenson, Judith M</creator><creator>Cassell, Jackie A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?</title><author>Mercer, Catherine H ; Sutcliffe, Lorna ; Johnson, Anne M ; White, Peter J ; Brook, Gary ; Ross, Jonathan D C ; Dhar, Jyoti ; Horner, Paddy ; Keane, Frances ; Jungmann, Eva ; Sweeney, John ; Kinghorn, George ; Garnett, Geoff G ; Stephenson, Judith M ; Cassell, Jackie A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b522t-f5d385bab93af3ce9513afcb3650c9e0c0f9512ade6251b01ec2e468c6a6119b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>Family Practice - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gonorrhea</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sexual health</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Catherine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutcliffe, Lorna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Jonathan D C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhar, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horner, Paddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungmann, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinghorn, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnett, Geoff G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephenson, Judith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassell, Jackie A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mercer, Catherine H</au><au>Sutcliffe, Lorna</au><au>Johnson, Anne M</au><au>White, Peter J</au><au>Brook, Gary</au><au>Ross, Jonathan D C</au><au>Dhar, Jyoti</au><au>Horner, Paddy</au><au>Keane, Frances</au><au>Jungmann, Eva</au><au>Sweeney, John</au><au>Kinghorn, George</au><au>Garnett, Geoff G</au><au>Stephenson, Judith M</au><au>Cassell, Jackie A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>400</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>400-405</pages><issn>1368-4973</issn><eissn>1472-3263</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To quantify the contribution of patient delay, provider delay, and diversion between services to delayed access to genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. To describe the factors associated with delay, and their contribution to STI transmission. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 3184 consecutive new patients attending four GUM clinics purposively selected from across England to represent different types of population. Patients completed a short written questionnaire that collected data on sociodemographics, access, and health-seeking behaviour. Questionnaires were then linked to routinely collected individual-level demographic and diagnostic data. Results: Patient delay is a median of 7 days, and does not vary by demographic or social characteristics, or by clinic. However, attendance at a walk-in appointment was associated with a marked reduction in patient delay and provider delay. Among symptomatics, 44.8% of men and 58.0% of women continued to have sex while awaiting treatment, with 7.0% reporting sex with >1 partner; 4.2% of symptomatic patients reported sex without using condoms with new partner(s) since their symptoms had begun. Approximately 25% of all patients had already sought or received care in general practice, and these patients experienced greater provider delay. Conclusions: Walk-in services are associated with a reduction in patient and provider delay, and should be available to all populations. Patients attending primary care require clear care pathways when referred on to GUM clinics. Health promotion should encourage symptomatic patients to seek care quickly, and to avoid sexual contact before treatment.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>17475683</pmid><doi>10.1136/sti.2006.024554</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-4973 |
ispartof | Sexually transmitted infections, 2007-08, Vol.83 (5), p.400-405 |
issn | 1368-4973 1472-3263 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2659040 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Ambulatory Care Behaviour Biological and medical sciences Clinics Cross-Sectional Studies Delivery of Health Care England Epidemiology. Vaccinations Family Practice - statistics & numerical data Female General aspects Gonorrhea Health services Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models Humans Infectious diseases Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Patients Primary care Questionnaires Regression analysis Risk Factors Sexual health Sexually transmitted diseases Sexually Transmitted Diseases - transmission STD Women |
title | How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20much%20do%20delayed%20healthcare%20seeking,%20delayed%20care%20provision,%20and%20diversion%20from%20primary%20care%20contribute%20to%20the%20transmission%20of%20STIs?&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20infections&rft.au=Mercer,%20Catherine%20H&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=400-405&rft.issn=1368-4973&rft.eissn=1472-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/sti.2006.024554&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4026474531%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781671537&rft_id=info:pmid/17475683&rfr_iscdi=true |