Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla

Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla

The efficacy of controlling Meloidogyne hapla on potato with water incorporation of ethoprop was compared to physical incorporation before planting. The standard practice of aldicarb application for insect control was also evaluated for M. hapla suppression with and without ethoprop. Physical incorp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nematology 1991-10, Vol.23 (4S), p.686-692
Hauptverfasser: Ingham, R E, Morris, M, Newcomb, G B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 692
container_issue 4S
container_start_page 686
container_title Journal of nematology
container_volume 23
creator Ingham, R E
Morris, M
Newcomb, G B
description The efficacy of controlling Meloidogyne hapla on potato with water incorporation of ethoprop was compared to physical incorporation before planting. The standard practice of aldicarb application for insect control was also evaluated for M. hapla suppression with and without ethoprop. Physical incorporation before planting by rototilling or discing reduced (P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2619214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733320980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-6fbdc7d50e1728812a405f47c563e9fdf3ea0d126fea3be09191b7080089a4823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhbNQbK3-BcnO1UAe80g2QilVC4ouKrgb7kySNjKdjElG6L831Sq6uo9z-A6cEzQlhLGME_I6QechvBHCZUnLMzShkglORTlFYWmMbmPAzuBV3zo_OA_Ruh4_6rh16vBfpmXwbsDQKzxXyn7pSZh3yrbgG5zOZxchOrweG-0T6QA9uJp9AnXOKrfZ9xpvYejgAp0a6IK-PM4Zerldrhf32cPT3Woxf8gGKouYlaZRbaUKomnFhKAMclKYvGqLkmtplOEaiKKsNBp4o4mkkjYVEYQICblgfIZuvrnD2Oy0anUfPXT14O0O_L52YOv_Sm-39cZ91KxMBdE8Aa6PAO_eRx1ivbOh1V0HvXZjqCvOOSNSkOS8-hv1m_FTNP8E5Kp7NA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733320980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ingham, R E ; Morris, M ; Newcomb, G B</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingham, R E ; Morris, M ; Newcomb, G B</creatorcontrib><description>The efficacy of controlling Meloidogyne hapla on potato with water incorporation of ethoprop was compared to physical incorporation before planting. The standard practice of aldicarb application for insect control was also evaluated for M. hapla suppression with and without ethoprop. Physical incorporation before planting by rototilling or discing reduced (P &lt;/= 0.05) tuber infection. Postplant water incorporation of ethoprop was not as effective as physical incorporation of ethoprop or postplant water incorporation of aldicarb and did not reduce (P &lt;/= 0.05) tuber infection at harvest. Ethoprop did not affect yield, whereas aldicarb increased yield in one experiment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-300X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19283186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nematologists</publisher><ispartof>Journal of nematology, 1991-10, Vol.23 (4S), p.686-692</ispartof><rights>The Society of Nematologists 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2619214/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2619214/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19283186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingham, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcomb, G B</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla</title><title>Journal of nematology</title><addtitle>J Nematol</addtitle><description>The efficacy of controlling Meloidogyne hapla on potato with water incorporation of ethoprop was compared to physical incorporation before planting. The standard practice of aldicarb application for insect control was also evaluated for M. hapla suppression with and without ethoprop. Physical incorporation before planting by rototilling or discing reduced (P &lt;/= 0.05) tuber infection. Postplant water incorporation of ethoprop was not as effective as physical incorporation of ethoprop or postplant water incorporation of aldicarb and did not reduce (P &lt;/= 0.05) tuber infection at harvest. Ethoprop did not affect yield, whereas aldicarb increased yield in one experiment.</description><issn>0022-300X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhbNQbK3-BcnO1UAe80g2QilVC4ouKrgb7kySNjKdjElG6L831Sq6uo9z-A6cEzQlhLGME_I6QechvBHCZUnLMzShkglORTlFYWmMbmPAzuBV3zo_OA_Ruh4_6rh16vBfpmXwbsDQKzxXyn7pSZh3yrbgG5zOZxchOrweG-0T6QA9uJp9AnXOKrfZ9xpvYejgAp0a6IK-PM4Zerldrhf32cPT3Woxf8gGKouYlaZRbaUKomnFhKAMclKYvGqLkmtplOEaiKKsNBp4o4mkkjYVEYQICblgfIZuvrnD2Oy0anUfPXT14O0O_L52YOv_Sm-39cZ91KxMBdE8Aa6PAO_eRx1ivbOh1V0HvXZjqCvOOSNSkOS8-hv1m_FTNP8E5Kp7NA</recordid><startdate>199110</startdate><enddate>199110</enddate><creator>Ingham, R E</creator><creator>Morris, M</creator><creator>Newcomb, G B</creator><general>Society of Nematologists</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199110</creationdate><title>Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla</title><author>Ingham, R E ; Morris, M ; Newcomb, G B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p195t-6fbdc7d50e1728812a405f47c563e9fdf3ea0d126fea3be09191b7080089a4823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingham, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcomb, G B</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of nematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingham, R E</au><au>Morris, M</au><au>Newcomb, G B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nematology</jtitle><addtitle>J Nematol</addtitle><date>1991-10</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4S</issue><spage>686</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>686-692</pages><issn>0022-300X</issn><abstract>The efficacy of controlling Meloidogyne hapla on potato with water incorporation of ethoprop was compared to physical incorporation before planting. The standard practice of aldicarb application for insect control was also evaluated for M. hapla suppression with and without ethoprop. Physical incorporation before planting by rototilling or discing reduced (P &lt;/= 0.05) tuber infection. Postplant water incorporation of ethoprop was not as effective as physical incorporation of ethoprop or postplant water incorporation of aldicarb and did not reduce (P &lt;/= 0.05) tuber infection at harvest. Ethoprop did not affect yield, whereas aldicarb increased yield in one experiment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nematologists</pub><pmid>19283186</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-300X
ispartof Journal of nematology, 1991-10, Vol.23 (4S), p.686-692
issn 0022-300X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2619214
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T13%3A13%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Incorporation%20Method%20of%20Ethoprop%20and%20Addition%20of%20Aldicarb%20on%20Potato%20Tuber%20Infection%20by%20Meloidogyne%20hapla&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nematology&rft.au=Ingham,%20R%20E&rft.date=1991-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4S&rft.spage=686&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=686-692&rft.issn=0022-300X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E733320980%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733320980&rft_id=info:pmid/19283186&rfr_iscdi=true