Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations?
Objective:To assess whether smoking quit rates and satisfaction with the Washington State tobacco quitline (QL) services varied by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, area of residence (that is, urban versus non-urban), or sex of Washington QL callers.Methods:From October 2004 into October 2005, w...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Tobacco control 2007-12, Vol.16 (Suppl 1), p.i65-i70 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | i70 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Suppl 1 |
| container_start_page | i65 |
| container_title | Tobacco control |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Maher, Julie E Rohde, Kristen Dent, Clyde W Stark, Michael J Pizacani, Barbara Boysun, Michael J Dilley, Julia A Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L |
| description | Objective:To assess whether smoking quit rates and satisfaction with the Washington State tobacco quitline (QL) services varied by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, area of residence (that is, urban versus non-urban), or sex of Washington QL callers.Methods:From October 2004 into October 2005, we conducted telephone surveys of Washington QL callers about three months after their initial call to the QL. Analyses compared 7-day quit rates and satisfaction measures by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence and sex (using α = 0.05).Results:We surveyed half (n = 1312) of the 2638 adult smokers we attempted to contact. The 7-day quit rate among survey participants at the 3-month follow-up was 31% (CI: 27.1% to 34.2%), 92% (CI: 89.9% to 94.1%) were somewhat/very satisfied overall with the QL programme, 97% (CI: 95.5% to 98.2%) indicated that they would probably/for sure suggest the QL to others and 95% (CI: 92.9% to 96.4%) were somewhat/very satisfied with the QL specialist. Quit rate did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence or sex. Satisfaction levels were high across subpopulations. Almost all participants (99%) agreed that they were always treated respectfully during interactions with QL staff.Conclusions:The Washington QL appeared effective and well received by callers from the specific populations studied. States choosing to promote their QL more aggressively should feel confident that a tobacco QL can be an effective and well received cessation service for smokers who call from a broad range of communities. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/tc.2006.019786 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2598524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20699245</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20699245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b510t-df4c9edf7fd5539b23974a3e2cbc322b56e78e7f8dd976cdc63158a1cba216653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokNhyw5kqRJSFxn8iF8bUDWiQ9EIugC2luM44CETp7ZT4N_XQ0bDY8PqLs53j869B4CnGC0xpvxltkuCEF8irITk98AC11xWlGJ5HyyQ4nVVM05PwKOUtghhKhh-CE6wRLXklC3A9VWCBqZssvvuWwdzaIy1Ad5MPvd-cNAM0IxjDGP0hYHJxVtvHexChGl01nfewjGMU2-yD0N6_Rg86Eyf3JPDPAWfLt98XL2tNh_WV6uLTdUwjHLVdrVVru1E1zJGVUOoErWhjtjGUkIaxp2QTnSybZXgtrWcYiYNto0hmHNGT8Gr2Xecmp1rrRtyNL0uMXcm_tTBeP23Mviv-ku41YQpyUhdDF4cDGK4mVzKeueTdX1vBhempLkqf6VMFfDsH3AbpjiU4zQWEitEya88y5myMaQUXXeMgpHeV6Wz1fuq9FxVWXj-5wG_8UM3BXg2A9uUQzzqBHGlSL3Xq1n3KbsfR93Eb5qLUrR-_3ml13hzef2OrDUt_PnMN7vt_8LdAR2Steg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781903265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Maher, Julie E ; Rohde, Kristen ; Dent, Clyde W ; Stark, Michael J ; Pizacani, Barbara ; Boysun, Michael J ; Dilley, Julia A ; Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L</creator><creatorcontrib>Maher, Julie E ; Rohde, Kristen ; Dent, Clyde W ; Stark, Michael J ; Pizacani, Barbara ; Boysun, Michael J ; Dilley, Julia A ; Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:To assess whether smoking quit rates and satisfaction with the Washington State tobacco quitline (QL) services varied by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, area of residence (that is, urban versus non-urban), or sex of Washington QL callers.Methods:From October 2004 into October 2005, we conducted telephone surveys of Washington QL callers about three months after their initial call to the QL. Analyses compared 7-day quit rates and satisfaction measures by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence and sex (using α = 0.05).Results:We surveyed half (n = 1312) of the 2638 adult smokers we attempted to contact. The 7-day quit rate among survey participants at the 3-month follow-up was 31% (CI: 27.1% to 34.2%), 92% (CI: 89.9% to 94.1%) were somewhat/very satisfied overall with the QL programme, 97% (CI: 95.5% to 98.2%) indicated that they would probably/for sure suggest the QL to others and 95% (CI: 92.9% to 96.4%) were somewhat/very satisfied with the QL specialist. Quit rate did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence or sex. Satisfaction levels were high across subpopulations. Almost all participants (99%) agreed that they were always treated respectfully during interactions with QL staff.Conclusions:The Washington QL appeared effective and well received by callers from the specific populations studied. States choosing to promote their QL more aggressively should feel confident that a tobacco QL can be an effective and well received cessation service for smokers who call from a broad range of communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tc.2006.019786</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18048635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Application programming interfaces ; Chronic diseases ; Cigarette smoking ; Community ; Counseling ; Counseling - methods ; Education ; Educational Status ; ethnic groups ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Hispanics ; hotline ; Hotlines ; Humans ; Interviews ; Low income groups ; Male ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Pacific Islander people ; Patient Satisfaction - ethnology ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Quit rates ; Race ; Rural areas ; rural population ; School surveys ; Sex Factors ; Sexual orientation ; Smoking - ethnology ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - ethnology ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Cessation - statistics & numerical data ; Smoking Prevention ; Social Class ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Studies ; Subpopulations ; Supplement ; Telephones ; Tobacco ; Urban areas ; Urban Health - statistics & numerical data ; Washington - epidemiology ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2007-12, Vol.16 (Suppl 1), p.i65-i70</ispartof><rights>2007 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright: 2007 2007 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright ©2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b510t-df4c9edf7fd5539b23974a3e2cbc322b56e78e7f8dd976cdc63158a1cba216653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b510t-df4c9edf7fd5539b23974a3e2cbc322b56e78e7f8dd976cdc63158a1cba216653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/16/Suppl_1/i65.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/16/Suppl_1/i65.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,727,780,784,803,885,3196,23571,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250,77600,77631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18048635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maher, Julie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, Clyde W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizacani, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysun, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilley, Julia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L</creatorcontrib><title>Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations?</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>Objective:To assess whether smoking quit rates and satisfaction with the Washington State tobacco quitline (QL) services varied by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, area of residence (that is, urban versus non-urban), or sex of Washington QL callers.Methods:From October 2004 into October 2005, we conducted telephone surveys of Washington QL callers about three months after their initial call to the QL. Analyses compared 7-day quit rates and satisfaction measures by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence and sex (using α = 0.05).Results:We surveyed half (n = 1312) of the 2638 adult smokers we attempted to contact. The 7-day quit rate among survey participants at the 3-month follow-up was 31% (CI: 27.1% to 34.2%), 92% (CI: 89.9% to 94.1%) were somewhat/very satisfied overall with the QL programme, 97% (CI: 95.5% to 98.2%) indicated that they would probably/for sure suggest the QL to others and 95% (CI: 92.9% to 96.4%) were somewhat/very satisfied with the QL specialist. Quit rate did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence or sex. Satisfaction levels were high across subpopulations. Almost all participants (99%) agreed that they were always treated respectfully during interactions with QL staff.Conclusions:The Washington QL appeared effective and well received by callers from the specific populations studied. States choosing to promote their QL more aggressively should feel confident that a tobacco QL can be an effective and well received cessation service for smokers who call from a broad range of communities.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Application programming interfaces</subject><subject>Chronic diseases</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Counseling - methods</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>ethnic groups</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hispanics</subject><subject>hotline</subject><subject>Hotlines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Pacific Islander people</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - ethnology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Quit rates</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>rural population</subject><subject>School surveys</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sexual orientation</subject><subject>Smoking - ethnology</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - ethnology</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subpopulations</subject><subject>Supplement</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Washington - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EokNhyw5kqRJSFxn8iF8bUDWiQ9EIugC2luM44CETp7ZT4N_XQ0bDY8PqLs53j869B4CnGC0xpvxltkuCEF8irITk98AC11xWlGJ5HyyQ4nVVM05PwKOUtghhKhh-CE6wRLXklC3A9VWCBqZssvvuWwdzaIy1Ad5MPvd-cNAM0IxjDGP0hYHJxVtvHexChGl01nfewjGMU2-yD0N6_Rg86Eyf3JPDPAWfLt98XL2tNh_WV6uLTdUwjHLVdrVVru1E1zJGVUOoErWhjtjGUkIaxp2QTnSybZXgtrWcYiYNto0hmHNGT8Gr2Xecmp1rrRtyNL0uMXcm_tTBeP23Mviv-ku41YQpyUhdDF4cDGK4mVzKeueTdX1vBhempLkqf6VMFfDsH3AbpjiU4zQWEitEya88y5myMaQUXXeMgpHeV6Wz1fuq9FxVWXj-5wG_8UM3BXg2A9uUQzzqBHGlSL3Xq1n3KbsfR93Eb5qLUrR-_3ml13hzef2OrDUt_PnMN7vt_8LdAR2Steg</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Maher, Julie E</creator><creator>Rohde, Kristen</creator><creator>Dent, Clyde W</creator><creator>Stark, Michael J</creator><creator>Pizacani, Barbara</creator><creator>Boysun, Michael J</creator><creator>Dilley, Julia A</creator><creator>Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations?</title><author>Maher, Julie E ; Rohde, Kristen ; Dent, Clyde W ; Stark, Michael J ; Pizacani, Barbara ; Boysun, Michael J ; Dilley, Julia A ; Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b510t-df4c9edf7fd5539b23974a3e2cbc322b56e78e7f8dd976cdc63158a1cba216653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Application programming interfaces</topic><topic>Chronic diseases</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Counseling - methods</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>ethnic groups</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hispanics</topic><topic>hotline</topic><topic>Hotlines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Pacific Islander people</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - ethnology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Quit rates</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>rural population</topic><topic>School surveys</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sexual orientation</topic><topic>Smoking - ethnology</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - ethnology</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subpopulations</topic><topic>Supplement</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Washington - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maher, Julie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, Clyde W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pizacani, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boysun, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilley, Julia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maher, Julie E</au><au>Rohde, Kristen</au><au>Dent, Clyde W</au><au>Stark, Michael J</au><au>Pizacani, Barbara</au><au>Boysun, Michael J</au><au>Dilley, Julia A</au><au>Yepassis-Zembrou, Patricia L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations?</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>i65</spage><epage>i70</epage><pages>i65-i70</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Objective:To assess whether smoking quit rates and satisfaction with the Washington State tobacco quitline (QL) services varied by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, area of residence (that is, urban versus non-urban), or sex of Washington QL callers.Methods:From October 2004 into October 2005, we conducted telephone surveys of Washington QL callers about three months after their initial call to the QL. Analyses compared 7-day quit rates and satisfaction measures by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence and sex (using α = 0.05).Results:We surveyed half (n = 1312) of the 2638 adult smokers we attempted to contact. The 7-day quit rate among survey participants at the 3-month follow-up was 31% (CI: 27.1% to 34.2%), 92% (CI: 89.9% to 94.1%) were somewhat/very satisfied overall with the QL programme, 97% (CI: 95.5% to 98.2%) indicated that they would probably/for sure suggest the QL to others and 95% (CI: 92.9% to 96.4%) were somewhat/very satisfied with the QL specialist. Quit rate did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity, education level, area of residence or sex. Satisfaction levels were high across subpopulations. Almost all participants (99%) agreed that they were always treated respectfully during interactions with QL staff.Conclusions:The Washington QL appeared effective and well received by callers from the specific populations studied. States choosing to promote their QL more aggressively should feel confident that a tobacco QL can be an effective and well received cessation service for smokers who call from a broad range of communities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>18048635</pmid><doi>10.1136/tc.2006.019786</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0964-4563 |
| ispartof | Tobacco control, 2007-12, Vol.16 (Suppl 1), p.i65-i70 |
| issn | 0964-4563 1468-3318 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2598524 |
| source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Application programming interfaces Chronic diseases Cigarette smoking Community Counseling Counseling - methods Education Educational Status ethnic groups Ethnicity Female Hispanics hotline Hotlines Humans Interviews Low income groups Male Minority & ethnic groups Pacific Islander people Patient Satisfaction - ethnology Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Professional-Patient Relations Quit rates Race Rural areas rural population School surveys Sex Factors Sexual orientation Smoking - ethnology Smoking cessation Smoking Cessation - ethnology Smoking Cessation - methods Smoking Cessation - statistics & numerical data Smoking Prevention Social Class Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomics Studies Subpopulations Supplement Telephones Tobacco Urban areas Urban Health - statistics & numerical data Washington - epidemiology Young adults |
| title | Is a statewide tobacco quitline an appropriate service for specific populations? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A09%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20a%20statewide%20tobacco%20quitline%20an%20appropriate%20service%20for%20specific%20populations?&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Maher,%20Julie%20E&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=i65&rft.epage=i70&rft.pages=i65-i70&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tc.2006.019786&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20699245%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781903265&rft_id=info:pmid/18048635&rft_jstor_id=20699245&rfr_iscdi=true |