Identification of child maltreatment using prospective and self-report methodologies: A comparison of maltreatment incidence and relation to later psychopathology
Abstract Objectives One of the greatest methodological problems in the study of childhood maltreatment is the discrepancy in methods by which cases of child maltreatment are identified. The current study compared incidents of maltreatment identified prospectively, retrospectively, or through a combi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child abuse & neglect 2008-07, Vol.32 (7), p.682-692 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 692 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 682 |
container_title | Child abuse & neglect |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Shaffer, Anne Huston, Lisa Egeland, Byron |
description | Abstract Objectives One of the greatest methodological problems in the study of childhood maltreatment is the discrepancy in methods by which cases of child maltreatment are identified. The current study compared incidents of maltreatment identified prospectively, retrospectively, or through a combination of both methods. Method Within a cohort of 170 participants followed from birth to age 19, incidents of maltreatment which occurred prior to age 17.5 were identified via prospective case review and interviewer ratings of retrospective self-reports. Multi-informant measures of behavior problems were obtained at age 16, and diagnostic assessments of psychopathology were completed at age 17.5. Results While the maximal number of maltreatment cases was identified by using a combination of all available identification methods, the prospective method was the single most comprehensive method for identifying the most cases of childhood physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect. Those who were identified as maltreated by a combination of both prospective and self-report methods experienced the greatest number of incidences of maltreatment (i.e., 49% of this group experienced more than one type of maltreatment) and displayed the most emotional and behavioral problems in late adolescence (i.e., 74% met diagnostic criteria for a clinical disorder). Conclusions This study emphasizes the variability in the incidence rates of maltreatment and the psychological outcomes that result from utilizing different methods of identification. The most severe cases of maltreatment are likely to be identified by both prospective and retrospective methods; however, cases that are identified solely through retrospective self-report may have unique relations to psychopathology in late adolescence. Practice implications Reliance on a single method to identify childhood maltreatment incidents often overlooks many cases. Comparing both prospective case reviews and retrospective self-reports in late adolescence, the most severe cases of multiple incidents of abuse were most likely to be identified by both methodologies. The less severe maltreatment incidents were more likely to be missed, either by prospective methods or, more frequently, by self-report methods. Practitioners must be continually sensitive to possible abuse histories among their clients, seeking out information from multiple sources whenever feasible. Additionally, the potential effects of abuse disclosure on pre-existing o |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.09.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2581900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ802780</ericid><els_id>1_s2_0_S0145213408000963</els_id><sourcerecordid>61407419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-e8f645226d7ee04711f7f970a61394766e98b2029f78e3004d82f5de2039cc593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9Fu0zAUhiMEYmXwBhOKkEDctBzbcWxzgTRNA4YmcQFcW65z0rokcWanlfo6PCkOqTq2C0ZuEul8_uyc8zvLzggsCJDy3WZh184stwsKIBagFkDgUTYjUrC5EFw8zmZACj6nhBUn2bMYN5AeLvjT7ITIksmSlrPs11WF3eBqZ83gfJf7Ok_apspb0wwBzdCmcr6NrlvlffCxRzu4Heamq_KITT0P2Psw5C0Oa1_5xq8cxvf5eW5925vg4uS8Y3OddWlXO1kCNtPWg8_TF4a8j3u79r1JxuTbP8-e1KaJ-OLwPs1-fLz8fvF5fv3109XF-fXcCgrDHGVdFpzSshKIUAhCalErAaYkTBWiLFHJJQWqaiGRARSVpDWvkAJT1nLFTrMPk7ffLlusbDpqMI3ug2tN2GtvnL5b6dxar_xOUy6JAkiCNwdB8DdbjINuXbTYNKZDv426VIxyAvxhMI0UGIiHQSJACPkfRlKAKMj4k2__CRKe-kFB_UFf3UM3fhu6NAJNGRBFuKIJKibIpnDEgPWxXwT0mFO90VNO9ZhTDUqnnKZlL__u9e2iQzAT8PoAmGhNUweTQhOPHAVeSlaMHTqbOAzOHsuXXyRQIeF2ppiCs3MYdLRujF7lQkqyrrx76KD3BbZxXbotzU_cYzx2hOhINehv45UbbxzINEJVMvYbVoEoyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230191592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of child maltreatment using prospective and self-report methodologies: A comparison of maltreatment incidence and relation to later psychopathology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Shaffer, Anne ; Huston, Lisa ; Egeland, Byron</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Anne ; Huston, Lisa ; Egeland, Byron</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives One of the greatest methodological problems in the study of childhood maltreatment is the discrepancy in methods by which cases of child maltreatment are identified. The current study compared incidents of maltreatment identified prospectively, retrospectively, or through a combination of both methods. Method Within a cohort of 170 participants followed from birth to age 19, incidents of maltreatment which occurred prior to age 17.5 were identified via prospective case review and interviewer ratings of retrospective self-reports. Multi-informant measures of behavior problems were obtained at age 16, and diagnostic assessments of psychopathology were completed at age 17.5. Results While the maximal number of maltreatment cases was identified by using a combination of all available identification methods, the prospective method was the single most comprehensive method for identifying the most cases of childhood physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect. Those who were identified as maltreated by a combination of both prospective and self-report methods experienced the greatest number of incidences of maltreatment (i.e., 49% of this group experienced more than one type of maltreatment) and displayed the most emotional and behavioral problems in late adolescence (i.e., 74% met diagnostic criteria for a clinical disorder). Conclusions This study emphasizes the variability in the incidence rates of maltreatment and the psychological outcomes that result from utilizing different methods of identification. The most severe cases of maltreatment are likely to be identified by both prospective and retrospective methods; however, cases that are identified solely through retrospective self-report may have unique relations to psychopathology in late adolescence. Practice implications Reliance on a single method to identify childhood maltreatment incidents often overlooks many cases. Comparing both prospective case reviews and retrospective self-reports in late adolescence, the most severe cases of multiple incidents of abuse were most likely to be identified by both methodologies. The less severe maltreatment incidents were more likely to be missed, either by prospective methods or, more frequently, by self-report methods. Practitioners must be continually sensitive to possible abuse histories among their clients, seeking out information from multiple sources whenever feasible. Additionally, the potential effects of abuse disclosure on pre-existing or developing psychopathology should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.09.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18638626</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CABND3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescence ; Adolescent ; Affective Symptoms - diagnosis ; Affective Symptoms - epidemiology ; Affective Symptoms - psychology ; Behavior Problems ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child Abuse ; Child abuse & neglect ; Child Abuse - diagnosis ; Child Abuse - psychology ; Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data ; Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis ; Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology ; Child Abuse, Sexual - statistics & numerical data ; Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis ; Child Behavior Disorders - epidemiology ; Child Behavior Disorders - psychology ; Child maltreatment ; Child Neglect ; Child, Preschool ; Cohort Studies ; Comparative studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emotional Problems ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Identification ; Incidence ; Infant ; Late Adolescents ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Maltreatment ; Measurement Techniques ; Medical sciences ; Mental health ; Methodological Problems ; Methods ; Observer Variation ; Pediatrics ; Prospective methods ; Prospective Studies ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology ; Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Self Disclosure ; Self-report ; Selfreport ; Sexual Abuse ; Victimology</subject><ispartof>Child abuse & neglect, 2008-07, Vol.32 (7), p.682-692</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-e8f645226d7ee04711f7f970a61394766e98b2029f78e3004d82f5de2039cc593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-e8f645226d7ee04711f7f970a61394766e98b2029f78e3004d82f5de2039cc593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.09.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,33775,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ802780$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20568347$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18638626$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huston, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egeland, Byron</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of child maltreatment using prospective and self-report methodologies: A comparison of maltreatment incidence and relation to later psychopathology</title><title>Child abuse & neglect</title><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives One of the greatest methodological problems in the study of childhood maltreatment is the discrepancy in methods by which cases of child maltreatment are identified. The current study compared incidents of maltreatment identified prospectively, retrospectively, or through a combination of both methods. Method Within a cohort of 170 participants followed from birth to age 19, incidents of maltreatment which occurred prior to age 17.5 were identified via prospective case review and interviewer ratings of retrospective self-reports. Multi-informant measures of behavior problems were obtained at age 16, and diagnostic assessments of psychopathology were completed at age 17.5. Results While the maximal number of maltreatment cases was identified by using a combination of all available identification methods, the prospective method was the single most comprehensive method for identifying the most cases of childhood physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect. Those who were identified as maltreated by a combination of both prospective and self-report methods experienced the greatest number of incidences of maltreatment (i.e., 49% of this group experienced more than one type of maltreatment) and displayed the most emotional and behavioral problems in late adolescence (i.e., 74% met diagnostic criteria for a clinical disorder). Conclusions This study emphasizes the variability in the incidence rates of maltreatment and the psychological outcomes that result from utilizing different methods of identification. The most severe cases of maltreatment are likely to be identified by both prospective and retrospective methods; however, cases that are identified solely through retrospective self-report may have unique relations to psychopathology in late adolescence. Practice implications Reliance on a single method to identify childhood maltreatment incidents often overlooks many cases. Comparing both prospective case reviews and retrospective self-reports in late adolescence, the most severe cases of multiple incidents of abuse were most likely to be identified by both methodologies. The less severe maltreatment incidents were more likely to be missed, either by prospective methods or, more frequently, by self-report methods. Practitioners must be continually sensitive to possible abuse histories among their clients, seeking out information from multiple sources whenever feasible. Additionally, the potential effects of abuse disclosure on pre-existing or developing psychopathology should be considered.</description><subject>Adolescence</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Affective Symptoms - psychology</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child abuse & neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child Behavior Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Child Behavior Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Child maltreatment</subject><subject>Child Neglect</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Emotional Problems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Late Adolescents</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maltreatment</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prospective methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Self Disclosure</subject><subject>Self-report</subject><subject>Selfreport</subject><subject>Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Victimology</subject><issn>0145-2134</issn><issn>1873-7757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9Fu0zAUhiMEYmXwBhOKkEDctBzbcWxzgTRNA4YmcQFcW65z0rokcWanlfo6PCkOqTq2C0ZuEul8_uyc8zvLzggsCJDy3WZh184stwsKIBagFkDgUTYjUrC5EFw8zmZACj6nhBUn2bMYN5AeLvjT7ITIksmSlrPs11WF3eBqZ83gfJf7Ok_apspb0wwBzdCmcr6NrlvlffCxRzu4Heamq_KITT0P2Psw5C0Oa1_5xq8cxvf5eW5925vg4uS8Y3OddWlXO1kCNtPWg8_TF4a8j3u79r1JxuTbP8-e1KaJ-OLwPs1-fLz8fvF5fv3109XF-fXcCgrDHGVdFpzSshKIUAhCalErAaYkTBWiLFHJJQWqaiGRARSVpDWvkAJT1nLFTrMPk7ffLlusbDpqMI3ug2tN2GtvnL5b6dxar_xOUy6JAkiCNwdB8DdbjINuXbTYNKZDv426VIxyAvxhMI0UGIiHQSJACPkfRlKAKMj4k2__CRKe-kFB_UFf3UM3fhu6NAJNGRBFuKIJKibIpnDEgPWxXwT0mFO90VNO9ZhTDUqnnKZlL__u9e2iQzAT8PoAmGhNUweTQhOPHAVeSlaMHTqbOAzOHsuXXyRQIeF2ppiCs3MYdLRujF7lQkqyrrx76KD3BbZxXbotzU_cYzx2hOhINehv45UbbxzINEJVMvYbVoEoyg</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Shaffer, Anne</creator><creator>Huston, Lisa</creator><creator>Egeland, Byron</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Identification of child maltreatment using prospective and self-report methodologies: A comparison of maltreatment incidence and relation to later psychopathology</title><author>Shaffer, Anne ; Huston, Lisa ; Egeland, Byron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c720t-e8f645226d7ee04711f7f970a61394766e98b2029f78e3004d82f5de2039cc593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescence</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Affective Symptoms - psychology</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child abuse & neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child Behavior Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Child Behavior Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Child maltreatment</topic><topic>Child Neglect</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Emotional Problems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Late Adolescents</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maltreatment</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prospective methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Self Disclosure</topic><topic>Self-report</topic><topic>Selfreport</topic><topic>Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Victimology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huston, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egeland, Byron</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaffer, Anne</au><au>Huston, Lisa</au><au>Egeland, Byron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ802780</ericid><atitle>Identification of child maltreatment using prospective and self-report methodologies: A comparison of maltreatment incidence and relation to later psychopathology</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse & neglect</jtitle><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>682</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>682-692</pages><issn>0145-2134</issn><eissn>1873-7757</eissn><coden>CABND3</coden><abstract>Abstract Objectives One of the greatest methodological problems in the study of childhood maltreatment is the discrepancy in methods by which cases of child maltreatment are identified. The current study compared incidents of maltreatment identified prospectively, retrospectively, or through a combination of both methods. Method Within a cohort of 170 participants followed from birth to age 19, incidents of maltreatment which occurred prior to age 17.5 were identified via prospective case review and interviewer ratings of retrospective self-reports. Multi-informant measures of behavior problems were obtained at age 16, and diagnostic assessments of psychopathology were completed at age 17.5. Results While the maximal number of maltreatment cases was identified by using a combination of all available identification methods, the prospective method was the single most comprehensive method for identifying the most cases of childhood physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect. Those who were identified as maltreated by a combination of both prospective and self-report methods experienced the greatest number of incidences of maltreatment (i.e., 49% of this group experienced more than one type of maltreatment) and displayed the most emotional and behavioral problems in late adolescence (i.e., 74% met diagnostic criteria for a clinical disorder). Conclusions This study emphasizes the variability in the incidence rates of maltreatment and the psychological outcomes that result from utilizing different methods of identification. The most severe cases of maltreatment are likely to be identified by both prospective and retrospective methods; however, cases that are identified solely through retrospective self-report may have unique relations to psychopathology in late adolescence. Practice implications Reliance on a single method to identify childhood maltreatment incidents often overlooks many cases. Comparing both prospective case reviews and retrospective self-reports in late adolescence, the most severe cases of multiple incidents of abuse were most likely to be identified by both methodologies. The less severe maltreatment incidents were more likely to be missed, either by prospective methods or, more frequently, by self-report methods. Practitioners must be continually sensitive to possible abuse histories among their clients, seeking out information from multiple sources whenever feasible. Additionally, the potential effects of abuse disclosure on pre-existing or developing psychopathology should be considered.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18638626</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.09.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-2134 |
ispartof | Child abuse & neglect, 2008-07, Vol.32 (7), p.682-692 |
issn | 0145-2134 1873-7757 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2581900 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescence Adolescent Affective Symptoms - diagnosis Affective Symptoms - epidemiology Affective Symptoms - psychology Behavior Problems Biological and medical sciences Child Child Abuse Child abuse & neglect Child Abuse - diagnosis Child Abuse - psychology Child Abuse - statistics & numerical data Child Abuse, Sexual - diagnosis Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology Child Abuse, Sexual - statistics & numerical data Child Behavior Disorders - diagnosis Child Behavior Disorders - epidemiology Child Behavior Disorders - psychology Child maltreatment Child Neglect Child, Preschool Cohort Studies Comparative studies Cross-Sectional Studies Emotional Problems Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Identification Incidence Infant Late Adolescents Longitudinal Studies Male Maltreatment Measurement Techniques Medical sciences Mental health Methodological Problems Methods Observer Variation Pediatrics Prospective methods Prospective Studies Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reactive Attachment Disorder - diagnosis Reactive Attachment Disorder - epidemiology Reactive Attachment Disorder - psychology Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Self Disclosure Self-report Selfreport Sexual Abuse Victimology |
title | Identification of child maltreatment using prospective and self-report methodologies: A comparison of maltreatment incidence and relation to later psychopathology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A43%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20child%20maltreatment%20using%20prospective%20and%20self-report%20methodologies:%20A%20comparison%20of%20maltreatment%20incidence%20and%20relation%20to%20later%20psychopathology&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20&%20neglect&rft.au=Shaffer,%20Anne&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=682&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=682-692&rft.issn=0145-2134&rft.eissn=1873-7757&rft.coden=CABND3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.09.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E61407419%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230191592&rft_id=info:pmid/18638626&rft_ericid=EJ802780&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0145213408000963&rfr_iscdi=true |