Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus

1 Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, 2 Institute for Sensory Research, and 3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York Submitted 26 January 2007; accepted in final form 15 January 2008 Anatomical and physiological studies have...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 2008-03, Vol.99 (3), p.1077-1095
Hauptverfasser: Gai, Yan, Carney, Laurel H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1095
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1077
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 99
creator Gai, Yan
Carney, Laurel H
description 1 Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, 2 Institute for Sensory Research, and 3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York Submitted 26 January 2007; accepted in final form 15 January 2008 Anatomical and physiological studies have shown that anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) neurons receive glycinergic and GABAergic inhibitory inputs. In this study, changes in the temporal responses of AVCN neurons to pure tones and complex sounds after blocking inhibition were analyzed. Blocking inhibition influenced the temporal responses of each type of AVCN neuron. Choppers showed more chopping peaks and shortened chopping cycles after blocking inhibition. Sustained and slowly adapting choppers showed increased regularity throughout the response duration after blocking inhibition, whereas most transient choppers showed increased regularity in the early part of the response. Diverse changes in temporal response patterns were observed in neurons with primary-like and unusual responses, with several neurons showing a large decrease in the first-spike latency after blocking inhibition. This result disagreed with previous findings that onset responses are less affected than sustained responses by manipulating inhibition. Although blocking inhibition had a greater effect on spontaneous activity than that on tone-evoked activity, the change in spontaneous activity was less significant because of larger variability. In addition, for relatively high level masker noises, blocking inhibition had similar effects on responses to noise-alone and noise-plus-tone stimuli, in contrast with previous studies with low-level background noise. In general, inhibition had an enhancing effect on temporal contrast only for responses to amplitude-modulated tones, for which envelope synchrony was enhanced. Results of this study contribute new information about the characteristics, functional roles, and possible sources of inhibitory inputs received by AVCN neurons. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. H. Carney, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Box 603, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642 (E-mail: laurel.carney{at}rochester.edu )
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.00708.2007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2572875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20549472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6af8204c8f500d744ccd668acc78122d0ae965f46889e1ce2fe55343550241793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFvEzEQhS0EoqFw5Ip8gtMG27teey9IVURLpAqkKpwt1zubdeTYi-0t5N_XIVGBA6cZeb5586yH0FtKlpRy9nHnl4QIIpeslGdoUd5YRXknn6MFIaWviRAX6FVKO1IITthLdEEl7TrJ6AL1az-4GbwBHAa89qO9tznEQ2mnOSccPL7TGbD2Pd7YvfXbI3cHaQo-QcLW4zwCvvIZYngAn6N2eBXM6EBH_HU2Dub0Gr0YtEvw5lwv0ffrz5vVl-r22816dXVbGc5lrlo9SEYaIwdOSC-axpi-baU2RkjKWE80dC0fmlbKDqgBNgDndVPz8qmGiq6-RJ9OutN8v4fenOyoKdq9jgcVtFX_Trwd1TY8KMYFk4IXgfdngRh-zJCy2ttkwDntIcxJMcKbrhGsgNUJNDGkFGF4OkKJOuaidl79zkUdcyn8u7-d_aHPQRSgPgGj3Y4_bQQ1jYdkgwvbg7qendvAr1xEu07V5YYQauqHsvXh_1vFwRNdPwLOq6qC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20549472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gai, Yan ; Carney, Laurel H</creator><creatorcontrib>Gai, Yan ; Carney, Laurel H</creatorcontrib><description>1 Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, 2 Institute for Sensory Research, and 3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York Submitted 26 January 2007; accepted in final form 15 January 2008 Anatomical and physiological studies have shown that anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) neurons receive glycinergic and GABAergic inhibitory inputs. In this study, changes in the temporal responses of AVCN neurons to pure tones and complex sounds after blocking inhibition were analyzed. Blocking inhibition influenced the temporal responses of each type of AVCN neuron. Choppers showed more chopping peaks and shortened chopping cycles after blocking inhibition. Sustained and slowly adapting choppers showed increased regularity throughout the response duration after blocking inhibition, whereas most transient choppers showed increased regularity in the early part of the response. Diverse changes in temporal response patterns were observed in neurons with primary-like and unusual responses, with several neurons showing a large decrease in the first-spike latency after blocking inhibition. This result disagreed with previous findings that onset responses are less affected than sustained responses by manipulating inhibition. Although blocking inhibition had a greater effect on spontaneous activity than that on tone-evoked activity, the change in spontaneous activity was less significant because of larger variability. In addition, for relatively high level masker noises, blocking inhibition had similar effects on responses to noise-alone and noise-plus-tone stimuli, in contrast with previous studies with low-level background noise. In general, inhibition had an enhancing effect on temporal contrast only for responses to amplitude-modulated tones, for which envelope synchrony was enhanced. Results of this study contribute new information about the characteristics, functional roles, and possible sources of inhibitory inputs received by AVCN neurons. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. H. Carney, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Box 603, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642 (E-mail: laurel.carney{at}rochester.edu )</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00708.2007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18199821</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Action Potentials - drug effects ; Action Potentials - physiology ; Animals ; Bicuculline - pharmacology ; Cochlear Nucleus - cytology ; GABA Antagonists - pharmacology ; Gerbillinae ; Glycine Agents - pharmacology ; Iontophoresis - methods ; Neural Inhibition - drug effects ; Neural Inhibition - physiology ; Neurons - drug effects ; Neurons - physiology ; Pyridazines - pharmacology ; Reaction Time - drug effects ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Strychnine - pharmacology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2008-03, Vol.99 (3), p.1077-1095</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6af8204c8f500d744ccd668acc78122d0ae965f46889e1ce2fe55343550241793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6af8204c8f500d744ccd668acc78122d0ae965f46889e1ce2fe55343550241793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3025,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18199821$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gai, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carney, Laurel H</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>1 Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, 2 Institute for Sensory Research, and 3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York Submitted 26 January 2007; accepted in final form 15 January 2008 Anatomical and physiological studies have shown that anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) neurons receive glycinergic and GABAergic inhibitory inputs. In this study, changes in the temporal responses of AVCN neurons to pure tones and complex sounds after blocking inhibition were analyzed. Blocking inhibition influenced the temporal responses of each type of AVCN neuron. Choppers showed more chopping peaks and shortened chopping cycles after blocking inhibition. Sustained and slowly adapting choppers showed increased regularity throughout the response duration after blocking inhibition, whereas most transient choppers showed increased regularity in the early part of the response. Diverse changes in temporal response patterns were observed in neurons with primary-like and unusual responses, with several neurons showing a large decrease in the first-spike latency after blocking inhibition. This result disagreed with previous findings that onset responses are less affected than sustained responses by manipulating inhibition. Although blocking inhibition had a greater effect on spontaneous activity than that on tone-evoked activity, the change in spontaneous activity was less significant because of larger variability. In addition, for relatively high level masker noises, blocking inhibition had similar effects on responses to noise-alone and noise-plus-tone stimuli, in contrast with previous studies with low-level background noise. In general, inhibition had an enhancing effect on temporal contrast only for responses to amplitude-modulated tones, for which envelope synchrony was enhanced. Results of this study contribute new information about the characteristics, functional roles, and possible sources of inhibitory inputs received by AVCN neurons. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. H. Carney, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Box 603, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642 (E-mail: laurel.carney{at}rochester.edu )</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects</subject><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bicuculline - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cochlear Nucleus - cytology</subject><subject>GABA Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Gerbillinae</subject><subject>Glycine Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Iontophoresis - methods</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - drug effects</subject><subject>Neural Inhibition - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons - drug effects</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Pyridazines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - drug effects</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Strychnine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFvEzEQhS0EoqFw5Ip8gtMG27teey9IVURLpAqkKpwt1zubdeTYi-0t5N_XIVGBA6cZeb5586yH0FtKlpRy9nHnl4QIIpeslGdoUd5YRXknn6MFIaWviRAX6FVKO1IITthLdEEl7TrJ6AL1az-4GbwBHAa89qO9tznEQ2mnOSccPL7TGbD2Pd7YvfXbI3cHaQo-QcLW4zwCvvIZYngAn6N2eBXM6EBH_HU2Dub0Gr0YtEvw5lwv0ffrz5vVl-r22816dXVbGc5lrlo9SEYaIwdOSC-axpi-baU2RkjKWE80dC0fmlbKDqgBNgDndVPz8qmGiq6-RJ9OutN8v4fenOyoKdq9jgcVtFX_Trwd1TY8KMYFk4IXgfdngRh-zJCy2ttkwDntIcxJMcKbrhGsgNUJNDGkFGF4OkKJOuaidl79zkUdcyn8u7-d_aHPQRSgPgGj3Y4_bQQ1jYdkgwvbg7qendvAr1xEu07V5YYQauqHsvXh_1vFwRNdPwLOq6qC</recordid><startdate>20080301</startdate><enddate>20080301</enddate><creator>Gai, Yan</creator><creator>Carney, Laurel H</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080301</creationdate><title>Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus</title><author>Gai, Yan ; Carney, Laurel H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-6af8204c8f500d744ccd668acc78122d0ae965f46889e1ce2fe55343550241793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Action Potentials - drug effects</topic><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bicuculline - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cochlear Nucleus - cytology</topic><topic>GABA Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Gerbillinae</topic><topic>Glycine Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Iontophoresis - methods</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - drug effects</topic><topic>Neural Inhibition - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons - drug effects</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Pyridazines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - drug effects</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Strychnine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gai, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carney, Laurel H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gai, Yan</au><au>Carney, Laurel H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2008-03-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1077</spage><epage>1095</epage><pages>1077-1095</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>1 Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, 2 Institute for Sensory Research, and 3 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York Submitted 26 January 2007; accepted in final form 15 January 2008 Anatomical and physiological studies have shown that anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) neurons receive glycinergic and GABAergic inhibitory inputs. In this study, changes in the temporal responses of AVCN neurons to pure tones and complex sounds after blocking inhibition were analyzed. Blocking inhibition influenced the temporal responses of each type of AVCN neuron. Choppers showed more chopping peaks and shortened chopping cycles after blocking inhibition. Sustained and slowly adapting choppers showed increased regularity throughout the response duration after blocking inhibition, whereas most transient choppers showed increased regularity in the early part of the response. Diverse changes in temporal response patterns were observed in neurons with primary-like and unusual responses, with several neurons showing a large decrease in the first-spike latency after blocking inhibition. This result disagreed with previous findings that onset responses are less affected than sustained responses by manipulating inhibition. Although blocking inhibition had a greater effect on spontaneous activity than that on tone-evoked activity, the change in spontaneous activity was less significant because of larger variability. In addition, for relatively high level masker noises, blocking inhibition had similar effects on responses to noise-alone and noise-plus-tone stimuli, in contrast with previous studies with low-level background noise. In general, inhibition had an enhancing effect on temporal contrast only for responses to amplitude-modulated tones, for which envelope synchrony was enhanced. Results of this study contribute new information about the characteristics, functional roles, and possible sources of inhibitory inputs received by AVCN neurons. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. H. Carney, Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Rochester, Box 603, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642 (E-mail: laurel.carney{at}rochester.edu )</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>18199821</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00708.2007</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2008-03, Vol.99 (3), p.1077-1095
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2572875
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Action Potentials - drug effects
Action Potentials - physiology
Animals
Bicuculline - pharmacology
Cochlear Nucleus - cytology
GABA Antagonists - pharmacology
Gerbillinae
Glycine Agents - pharmacology
Iontophoresis - methods
Neural Inhibition - drug effects
Neural Inhibition - physiology
Neurons - drug effects
Neurons - physiology
Pyridazines - pharmacology
Reaction Time - drug effects
Reaction Time - physiology
Strychnine - pharmacology
Time Factors
title Influence of Inhibitory Inputs on Rate and Timing of Responses in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Inhibitory%20Inputs%20on%20Rate%20and%20Timing%20of%20Responses%20in%20the%20Anteroventral%20Cochlear%20Nucleus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Gai,%20Yan&rft.date=2008-03-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1077&rft.epage=1095&rft.pages=1077-1095&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00708.2007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E20549472%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20549472&rft_id=info:pmid/18199821&rfr_iscdi=true