Utility of the Determine Syphilis TP rapid test in commercial sex venues in Peru
Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the utility of the Determine Syphilis TP test performed in Peruvian commercial sex venues for the detection of active syphilis; and determine the feasibility of integrating rapid syphilis testing for female sex workers (FSW) into existing health outreach ser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexually transmitted infections 2006-12, Vol.82 (suppl 5), p.v22-v25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | v25 |
---|---|
container_issue | suppl 5 |
container_start_page | v22 |
container_title | Sexually transmitted infections |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Campos, P E Buffardi, A L Chiappe, M Buendía, C Garcia, P J Carcamo, C P Garnett, G White, P Holmes, K K |
description | Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the utility of the Determine Syphilis TP test performed in Peruvian commercial sex venues for the detection of active syphilis; and determine the feasibility of integrating rapid syphilis testing for female sex workers (FSW) into existing health outreach services. Methods: We tested 3586 female sex workers for syphilis by Determine in the field using whole blood fingerstick, and by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) in a central laboratory in Lima using sera. Results: 97.4% of the FSW offered rapid syphilis testing participated; and among those who tested positive, 87% visited the local health centre for treatment. More than twice as many specimens were RPR reactive using serum in Lima (5.7%) than tested positive by whole blood Determine in the field (2.8%), and although most were confirmed by TPHA, only a small proportion (0.7%) were RPR reactive at ⩾1:8 dilutions, and likely indicating active syphilis. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the Determine Syphilis TP test in whole blood when compared to serum RPR reactivity at any dilution confirmed by TPHA as the gold standard were 39.3%, 99.2% and 71.4%, respectively. Sensitivity improved to 64.0% when using serum RPR ⩾1:8 confirmed by TPHA. Invalid tests were rare (0.3%). Conclusions: Rapid syphilis testing in sex work venues proved feasible, but Determine using whole blood obtained by fingerstick was substantially less sensitive than reported in previous laboratory-based studies using serum. Although easy to perform in outreach venues, the utility of this rapid syphilis test was relatively low in settings where a large proportion of the targeted population has been previously tested and treated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/sti.2006.023325 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2563917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68295468</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-9b22ef346a52856cb6c902cf65300f6e63f5c47ccb131b5e86883273cd82cab13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1rFDEYxgdRbK2evUlA6EGY7SSZvMlcBF0_oa0LtiJeQib7jpt1PrZJpnT_e7PM0lovPSXk-eV5P54se0mLGaUcTkJ0M1YUMCsY50w8yg5pKVnOGfDH6c5B5WUl-UH2LIR1kUApqqfZAZWUApTsMFtcRte6uCVDQ-IKyQeM6DvXI_m-3aySFMjFgnizcUsSMUTiemKHrkNvnWlJwBtyjf2IYScs0I_PsyeNaQO-2J9H2eWnjxfzL_npt89f5-9O81owHvOqZgwbXoIRTAmwNdiqYLYBwYuiAQTeCFtKa2vKaS1QgVKcSW6XilmTHo-yt5PvZqw7XFrsozet3njXGb_Vg3H6vtK7lf49XGsmgFdUJoPjvYEfrtIAUXcuWGxb0-MwBg2KVaIE9SBIEyal3LX0-j9wPYy-T1vQVCoKkqaVJ-pkoqwfQvDY3PZMC70LVadQ9S5UPYWafrz6d9Q7fp9iAvIJcCHiza1u_B8Nkkuhz3_M9c9f5_IM3p9pnvg3E1936wer_wXbGLlN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781671642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of the Determine Syphilis TP rapid test in commercial sex venues in Peru</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Campos, P E ; Buffardi, A L ; Chiappe, M ; Buendía, C ; Garcia, P J ; Carcamo, C P ; Garnett, G ; White, P ; Holmes, K K</creator><creatorcontrib>Campos, P E ; Buffardi, A L ; Chiappe, M ; Buendía, C ; Garcia, P J ; Carcamo, C P ; Garnett, G ; White, P ; Holmes, K K</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the utility of the Determine Syphilis TP test performed in Peruvian commercial sex venues for the detection of active syphilis; and determine the feasibility of integrating rapid syphilis testing for female sex workers (FSW) into existing health outreach services. Methods: We tested 3586 female sex workers for syphilis by Determine in the field using whole blood fingerstick, and by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) in a central laboratory in Lima using sera. Results: 97.4% of the FSW offered rapid syphilis testing participated; and among those who tested positive, 87% visited the local health centre for treatment. More than twice as many specimens were RPR reactive using serum in Lima (5.7%) than tested positive by whole blood Determine in the field (2.8%), and although most were confirmed by TPHA, only a small proportion (0.7%) were RPR reactive at ⩾1:8 dilutions, and likely indicating active syphilis. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the Determine Syphilis TP test in whole blood when compared to serum RPR reactivity at any dilution confirmed by TPHA as the gold standard were 39.3%, 99.2% and 71.4%, respectively. Sensitivity improved to 64.0% when using serum RPR ⩾1:8 confirmed by TPHA. Invalid tests were rare (0.3%). Conclusions: Rapid syphilis testing in sex work venues proved feasible, but Determine using whole blood obtained by fingerstick was substantially less sensitive than reported in previous laboratory-based studies using serum. Although easy to perform in outreach venues, the utility of this rapid syphilis test was relatively low in settings where a large proportion of the targeted population has been previously tested and treated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/sti.2006.023325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17116642</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>chlamydial infection ; Determine Syphilis TP ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; female sex workers ; FSW ; gonorrhoea ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - methods ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - standards ; Humans ; Infections ; Laboratories ; PCR ; Peru ; Peruvian Ministry of Health HIV/STI Control Program ; Point-of-Care Systems - standards ; polymerase chain reaction ; positive predictive values ; PPV ; PROCETSS ; Rapid Diagnostics ; rapid plasma reagin ; rapid testing ; RPR ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sex industry ; Sex Work ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; sexually transmitted infections ; STD ; STI ; Syphilis ; Syphilis - diagnosis ; Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods ; Syphilis Serodiagnosis - standards ; Teams ; TPHA ; TPPA ; Treponema pallidum ; Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification ; Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay ; Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay ; trichomoniasis ; Vagina ; Workers ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted infections, 2006-12, Vol.82 (suppl 5), p.v22-v25</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Sexually Transmitted Infections</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 Sexually Transmitted Infections</rights><rights>Copyright ©2006 BMJ Publishing Group.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-9b22ef346a52856cb6c902cf65300f6e63f5c47ccb131b5e86883273cd82cab13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://sti.bmj.com/content/82/suppl_5/v22.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://sti.bmj.com/content/82/suppl_5/v22.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,724,777,781,882,3183,23552,27905,27906,53772,53774,77349,77380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17116642$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campos, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffardi, A L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiappe, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buendía, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carcamo, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnett, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, K K</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of the Determine Syphilis TP rapid test in commercial sex venues in Peru</title><title>Sexually transmitted infections</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><description>Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the utility of the Determine Syphilis TP test performed in Peruvian commercial sex venues for the detection of active syphilis; and determine the feasibility of integrating rapid syphilis testing for female sex workers (FSW) into existing health outreach services. Methods: We tested 3586 female sex workers for syphilis by Determine in the field using whole blood fingerstick, and by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) in a central laboratory in Lima using sera. Results: 97.4% of the FSW offered rapid syphilis testing participated; and among those who tested positive, 87% visited the local health centre for treatment. More than twice as many specimens were RPR reactive using serum in Lima (5.7%) than tested positive by whole blood Determine in the field (2.8%), and although most were confirmed by TPHA, only a small proportion (0.7%) were RPR reactive at ⩾1:8 dilutions, and likely indicating active syphilis. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the Determine Syphilis TP test in whole blood when compared to serum RPR reactivity at any dilution confirmed by TPHA as the gold standard were 39.3%, 99.2% and 71.4%, respectively. Sensitivity improved to 64.0% when using serum RPR ⩾1:8 confirmed by TPHA. Invalid tests were rare (0.3%). Conclusions: Rapid syphilis testing in sex work venues proved feasible, but Determine using whole blood obtained by fingerstick was substantially less sensitive than reported in previous laboratory-based studies using serum. Although easy to perform in outreach venues, the utility of this rapid syphilis test was relatively low in settings where a large proportion of the targeted population has been previously tested and treated.</description><subject>chlamydial infection</subject><subject>Determine Syphilis TP</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>female sex workers</subject><subject>FSW</subject><subject>gonorrhoea</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - methods</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>Peru</subject><subject>Peruvian Ministry of Health HIV/STI Control Program</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - standards</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>positive predictive values</subject><subject>PPV</subject><subject>PROCETSS</subject><subject>Rapid Diagnostics</subject><subject>rapid plasma reagin</subject><subject>rapid testing</subject><subject>RPR</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sex industry</subject><subject>Sex Work</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>sexually transmitted infections</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>STI</subject><subject>Syphilis</subject><subject>Syphilis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - standards</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>TPHA</subject><subject>TPPA</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay</subject><subject>trichomoniasis</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1368-4973</issn><issn>1472-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1rFDEYxgdRbK2evUlA6EGY7SSZvMlcBF0_oa0LtiJeQib7jpt1PrZJpnT_e7PM0lovPSXk-eV5P54se0mLGaUcTkJ0M1YUMCsY50w8yg5pKVnOGfDH6c5B5WUl-UH2LIR1kUApqqfZAZWUApTsMFtcRte6uCVDQ-IKyQeM6DvXI_m-3aySFMjFgnizcUsSMUTiemKHrkNvnWlJwBtyjf2IYScs0I_PsyeNaQO-2J9H2eWnjxfzL_npt89f5-9O81owHvOqZgwbXoIRTAmwNdiqYLYBwYuiAQTeCFtKa2vKaS1QgVKcSW6XilmTHo-yt5PvZqw7XFrsozet3njXGb_Vg3H6vtK7lf49XGsmgFdUJoPjvYEfrtIAUXcuWGxb0-MwBg2KVaIE9SBIEyal3LX0-j9wPYy-T1vQVCoKkqaVJ-pkoqwfQvDY3PZMC70LVadQ9S5UPYWafrz6d9Q7fp9iAvIJcCHiza1u_B8Nkkuhz3_M9c9f5_IM3p9pnvg3E1936wer_wXbGLlN</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Campos, P E</creator><creator>Buffardi, A L</creator><creator>Chiappe, M</creator><creator>Buendía, C</creator><creator>Garcia, P J</creator><creator>Carcamo, C P</creator><creator>Garnett, G</creator><creator>White, P</creator><creator>Holmes, K K</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Utility of the Determine Syphilis TP rapid test in commercial sex venues in Peru</title><author>Campos, P E ; Buffardi, A L ; Chiappe, M ; Buendía, C ; Garcia, P J ; Carcamo, C P ; Garnett, G ; White, P ; Holmes, K K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b523t-9b22ef346a52856cb6c902cf65300f6e63f5c47ccb131b5e86883273cd82cab13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>chlamydial infection</topic><topic>Determine Syphilis TP</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>female sex workers</topic><topic>FSW</topic><topic>gonorrhoea</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - methods</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>Peru</topic><topic>Peruvian Ministry of Health HIV/STI Control Program</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - standards</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>positive predictive values</topic><topic>PPV</topic><topic>PROCETSS</topic><topic>Rapid Diagnostics</topic><topic>rapid plasma reagin</topic><topic>rapid testing</topic><topic>RPR</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sex industry</topic><topic>Sex Work</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>sexually transmitted infections</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>STI</topic><topic>Syphilis</topic><topic>Syphilis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Syphilis Serodiagnosis - standards</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>TPHA</topic><topic>TPPA</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay</topic><topic>trichomoniasis</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campos, P E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffardi, A L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiappe, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buendía, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carcamo, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnett, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, K K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campos, P E</au><au>Buffardi, A L</au><au>Chiappe, M</au><au>Buendía, C</au><au>Garcia, P J</au><au>Carcamo, C P</au><au>Garnett, G</au><au>White, P</au><au>Holmes, K K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of the Determine Syphilis TP rapid test in commercial sex venues in Peru</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>suppl 5</issue><spage>v22</spage><epage>v25</epage><pages>v22-v25</pages><issn>1368-4973</issn><eissn>1472-3263</eissn><abstract>Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the utility of the Determine Syphilis TP test performed in Peruvian commercial sex venues for the detection of active syphilis; and determine the feasibility of integrating rapid syphilis testing for female sex workers (FSW) into existing health outreach services. Methods: We tested 3586 female sex workers for syphilis by Determine in the field using whole blood fingerstick, and by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) in a central laboratory in Lima using sera. Results: 97.4% of the FSW offered rapid syphilis testing participated; and among those who tested positive, 87% visited the local health centre for treatment. More than twice as many specimens were RPR reactive using serum in Lima (5.7%) than tested positive by whole blood Determine in the field (2.8%), and although most were confirmed by TPHA, only a small proportion (0.7%) were RPR reactive at ⩾1:8 dilutions, and likely indicating active syphilis. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the Determine Syphilis TP test in whole blood when compared to serum RPR reactivity at any dilution confirmed by TPHA as the gold standard were 39.3%, 99.2% and 71.4%, respectively. Sensitivity improved to 64.0% when using serum RPR ⩾1:8 confirmed by TPHA. Invalid tests were rare (0.3%). Conclusions: Rapid syphilis testing in sex work venues proved feasible, but Determine using whole blood obtained by fingerstick was substantially less sensitive than reported in previous laboratory-based studies using serum. Although easy to perform in outreach venues, the utility of this rapid syphilis test was relatively low in settings where a large proportion of the targeted population has been previously tested and treated.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>17116642</pmid><doi>10.1136/sti.2006.023325</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-4973 |
ispartof | Sexually transmitted infections, 2006-12, Vol.82 (suppl 5), p.v22-v25 |
issn | 1368-4973 1472-3263 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2563917 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | chlamydial infection Determine Syphilis TP Feasibility Studies Female female sex workers FSW gonorrhoea Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - methods Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests - standards Humans Infections Laboratories PCR Peru Peruvian Ministry of Health HIV/STI Control Program Point-of-Care Systems - standards polymerase chain reaction positive predictive values PPV PROCETSS Rapid Diagnostics rapid plasma reagin rapid testing RPR Sensitivity and Specificity Sex industry Sex Work Sexually transmitted diseases sexually transmitted infections STD STI Syphilis Syphilis - diagnosis Syphilis Serodiagnosis - methods Syphilis Serodiagnosis - standards Teams TPHA TPPA Treponema pallidum Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay trichomoniasis Vagina Workers Young adults |
title | Utility of the Determine Syphilis TP rapid test in commercial sex venues in Peru |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20the%20Determine%20Syphilis%20TP%20rapid%20test%20in%20commercial%20sex%20venues%20in%20Peru&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20infections&rft.au=Campos,%20P%20E&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=suppl%205&rft.spage=v22&rft.epage=v25&rft.pages=v22-v25&rft.issn=1368-4973&rft.eissn=1472-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/sti.2006.023325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68295468%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781671642&rft_id=info:pmid/17116642&rfr_iscdi=true |