Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions
Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry vi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tobacco control 2006-08, Vol.15 (4), p.323-332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 332 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Tobacco control |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Lopipero, Peggy Bero, Lisa A |
description | Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/tc.2006.016451 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2563596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20748014</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20748014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-4844ca45c1287245aef40928e9ade08cf23ab48fa7a7a5d63fac7353824b58403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1v1DAQtRAVXQpXbiBLnDhk8cfYcTggoeWjSKtyKe3Rchxn6-0mbm0Hsf8er9IuIEsz0rynNx9-CL2iZEkpl--zXTJC5JJQCYI-QQsKUlWcU_UULUgjoQIh-Sl6ntKWEMprQZ-hUyqVEkKxBUqXoTXWBuzH7KJLOeEQcb5x-G5qd94e6x8wI3jvTCyEvlS7KeW4xyWY7DbeJZwDnsbOxcGPDhsfd4echnDrxw0-SERvsw9jeoFOerNL7uVDPkM_v365XJ1X6x_fvq8-rasWmMwVKABrQFjKVM1AGNcDaZhyjekcUbZn3LSgelOXJzrJe2NrLrhi0AoFhJ-hj7NuWWVwnXVjGXan76IfTNzrYLz-Hxn9jd6EX5qVk4lGFoG3DwIx3E9lA70NUxzLzJrWiqqGKF4X1pt_2xz1H49cCK9nwjblEI84IzUoQqHg1Yz7lN3vI27irZZ1-TF9cbXSa2AX_Fp-1ueF_27mt8P2bzeiD4bQ2eqDIfRsCP4H0FmmUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781890837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lopipero, Peggy ; Bero, Lisa A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopipero, Peggy ; Bero, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tc.2006.016451</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16885582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Aeronautics ; Aerospace Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence ; Air Line Pilots Association ; Air quality ; Air Transport Association ; Air transportation industry ; Air travel ; Aircraft ; Airlines ; ALPA ; ATA ; Aviation ; Bans ; CAB ; Cigar smoking ; Cigars ; Civil Aeronautics Board ; Civil aviation ; Commercial aircraft ; Department of Transportation ; DOT ; environmental tobacco smoke ; ETS ; Humans ; Libraries ; Lobbying ; Longitudinal Studies ; Nader, Ralph ; NAS ; National Academy of Science ; Outdoor air quality ; Passengers ; Petitions ; Pipe smoking ; Propaganda ; Public concern ; Public Health ; Public hearings ; Public opinion ; Public Relations ; Research Paper ; Restrictions ; Secondhand smoke ; SHS ; Smokers’ Rights Alliance ; Smoking ; Smoking Prevention ; SRA ; TAN ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Action Network ; tobacco control ; Tobacco Industry ; Tobacco Institute ; Tobacco smoke ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control ; Tobacco smoking ; United States ; Ventilation ; Vice-President</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2006-08, Vol.15 (4), p.323-332</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Tobacco Control</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 Tobacco Control</rights><rights>Copyright ©2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/15/4/323.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/15/4/323.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,727,780,784,803,885,23570,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249,77371,77402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16885582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopipero, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bero, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><title>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Aeronautics</subject><subject>Aerospace Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Air Line Pilots Association</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Air Transport Association</subject><subject>Air transportation industry</subject><subject>Air travel</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>ALPA</subject><subject>ATA</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>CAB</subject><subject>Cigar smoking</subject><subject>Cigars</subject><subject>Civil Aeronautics Board</subject><subject>Civil aviation</subject><subject>Commercial aircraft</subject><subject>Department of Transportation</subject><subject>DOT</subject><subject>environmental tobacco smoke</subject><subject>ETS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Nader, Ralph</subject><subject>NAS</subject><subject>National Academy of Science</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Passengers</subject><subject>Petitions</subject><subject>Pipe smoking</subject><subject>Propaganda</subject><subject>Public concern</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public hearings</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public Relations</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Secondhand smoke</subject><subject>SHS</subject><subject>Smokers’ Rights Alliance</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>SRA</subject><subject>TAN</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Action Network</subject><subject>tobacco control</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry</subject><subject>Tobacco Institute</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Vice-President</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUk1v1DAQtRAVXQpXbiBLnDhk8cfYcTggoeWjSKtyKe3Rchxn6-0mbm0Hsf8er9IuIEsz0rynNx9-CL2iZEkpl--zXTJC5JJQCYI-QQsKUlWcU_UULUgjoQIh-Sl6ntKWEMprQZ-hUyqVEkKxBUqXoTXWBuzH7KJLOeEQcb5x-G5qd94e6x8wI3jvTCyEvlS7KeW4xyWY7DbeJZwDnsbOxcGPDhsfd4echnDrxw0-SERvsw9jeoFOerNL7uVDPkM_v365XJ1X6x_fvq8-rasWmMwVKABrQFjKVM1AGNcDaZhyjekcUbZn3LSgelOXJzrJe2NrLrhi0AoFhJ-hj7NuWWVwnXVjGXan76IfTNzrYLz-Hxn9jd6EX5qVk4lGFoG3DwIx3E9lA70NUxzLzJrWiqqGKF4X1pt_2xz1H49cCK9nwjblEI84IzUoQqHg1Yz7lN3vI27irZZ1-TF9cbXSa2AX_Fp-1ueF_27mt8P2bzeiD4bQ2eqDIfRsCP4H0FmmUw</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>Lopipero, Peggy</creator><creator>Bero, Lisa A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</title><author>Lopipero, Peggy ; Bero, Lisa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-4844ca45c1287245aef40928e9ade08cf23ab48fa7a7a5d63fac7353824b58403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Aeronautics</topic><topic>Aerospace Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Air Line Pilots Association</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Air Transport Association</topic><topic>Air transportation industry</topic><topic>Air travel</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>ALPA</topic><topic>ATA</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>CAB</topic><topic>Cigar smoking</topic><topic>Cigars</topic><topic>Civil Aeronautics Board</topic><topic>Civil aviation</topic><topic>Commercial aircraft</topic><topic>Department of Transportation</topic><topic>DOT</topic><topic>environmental tobacco smoke</topic><topic>ETS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Nader, Ralph</topic><topic>NAS</topic><topic>National Academy of Science</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Passengers</topic><topic>Petitions</topic><topic>Pipe smoking</topic><topic>Propaganda</topic><topic>Public concern</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public hearings</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public Relations</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Secondhand smoke</topic><topic>SHS</topic><topic>Smokers’ Rights Alliance</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>SRA</topic><topic>TAN</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Action Network</topic><topic>tobacco control</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry</topic><topic>Tobacco Institute</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Vice-President</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopipero, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bero, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopipero, Peggy</au><au>Bero, Lisa A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>323-332</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>16885582</pmid><doi>10.1136/tc.2006.016451</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4563 |
ispartof | Tobacco control, 2006-08, Vol.15 (4), p.323-332 |
issn | 0964-4563 1468-3318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2563596 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Advocacy Aeronautics Aerospace Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence Air Line Pilots Association Air quality Air Transport Association Air transportation industry Air travel Aircraft Airlines ALPA ATA Aviation Bans CAB Cigar smoking Cigars Civil Aeronautics Board Civil aviation Commercial aircraft Department of Transportation DOT environmental tobacco smoke ETS Humans Libraries Lobbying Longitudinal Studies Nader, Ralph NAS National Academy of Science Outdoor air quality Passengers Petitions Pipe smoking Propaganda Public concern Public Health Public hearings Public opinion Public Relations Research Paper Restrictions Secondhand smoke SHS Smokers’ Rights Alliance Smoking Smoking Prevention SRA TAN Tobacco Tobacco Action Network tobacco control Tobacco Industry Tobacco Institute Tobacco smoke Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control Tobacco smoking United States Ventilation Vice-President |
title | Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A11%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tobacco%20interests%20or%20the%20public%20interest:%2020%20years%20of%20industry%20strategies%20to%20undermine%20airline%20smoking%20restrictions&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Lopipero,%20Peggy&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=323-332&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tc.2006.016451&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20748014%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781890837&rft_id=info:pmid/16885582&rft_jstor_id=20748014&rfr_iscdi=true |