Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions

Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry vi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tobacco control 2006-08, Vol.15 (4), p.323-332
Hauptverfasser: Lopipero, Peggy, Bero, Lisa A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332
container_issue 4
container_start_page 323
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 15
creator Lopipero, Peggy
Bero, Lisa A
description Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tc.2006.016451
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2563596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20748014</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20748014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-4844ca45c1287245aef40928e9ade08cf23ab48fa7a7a5d63fac7353824b58403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1v1DAQtRAVXQpXbiBLnDhk8cfYcTggoeWjSKtyKe3Rchxn6-0mbm0Hsf8er9IuIEsz0rynNx9-CL2iZEkpl--zXTJC5JJQCYI-QQsKUlWcU_UULUgjoQIh-Sl6ntKWEMprQZ-hUyqVEkKxBUqXoTXWBuzH7KJLOeEQcb5x-G5qd94e6x8wI3jvTCyEvlS7KeW4xyWY7DbeJZwDnsbOxcGPDhsfd4echnDrxw0-SERvsw9jeoFOerNL7uVDPkM_v365XJ1X6x_fvq8-rasWmMwVKABrQFjKVM1AGNcDaZhyjekcUbZn3LSgelOXJzrJe2NrLrhi0AoFhJ-hj7NuWWVwnXVjGXan76IfTNzrYLz-Hxn9jd6EX5qVk4lGFoG3DwIx3E9lA70NUxzLzJrWiqqGKF4X1pt_2xz1H49cCK9nwjblEI84IzUoQqHg1Yz7lN3vI27irZZ1-TF9cbXSa2AX_Fp-1ueF_27mt8P2bzeiD4bQ2eqDIfRsCP4H0FmmUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781890837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lopipero, Peggy ; Bero, Lisa A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopipero, Peggy ; Bero, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tc.2006.016451</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16885582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Aeronautics ; Aerospace Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Air Line Pilots Association ; Air quality ; Air Transport Association ; Air transportation industry ; Air travel ; Aircraft ; Airlines ; ALPA ; ATA ; Aviation ; Bans ; CAB ; Cigar smoking ; Cigars ; Civil Aeronautics Board ; Civil aviation ; Commercial aircraft ; Department of Transportation ; DOT ; environmental tobacco smoke ; ETS ; Humans ; Libraries ; Lobbying ; Longitudinal Studies ; Nader, Ralph ; NAS ; National Academy of Science ; Outdoor air quality ; Passengers ; Petitions ; Pipe smoking ; Propaganda ; Public concern ; Public Health ; Public hearings ; Public opinion ; Public Relations ; Research Paper ; Restrictions ; Secondhand smoke ; SHS ; Smokers’ Rights Alliance ; Smoking ; Smoking Prevention ; SRA ; TAN ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Action Network ; tobacco control ; Tobacco Industry ; Tobacco Institute ; Tobacco smoke ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention &amp; control ; Tobacco smoking ; United States ; Ventilation ; Vice-President</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2006-08, Vol.15 (4), p.323-332</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Tobacco Control</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 Copyright 2006 Tobacco Control</rights><rights>Copyright ©2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/15/4/323.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/15/4/323.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,230,314,727,780,784,803,885,23570,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249,77371,77402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16885582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopipero, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bero, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><title>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Aeronautics</subject><subject>Aerospace Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Air Line Pilots Association</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Air Transport Association</subject><subject>Air transportation industry</subject><subject>Air travel</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Airlines</subject><subject>ALPA</subject><subject>ATA</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>CAB</subject><subject>Cigar smoking</subject><subject>Cigars</subject><subject>Civil Aeronautics Board</subject><subject>Civil aviation</subject><subject>Commercial aircraft</subject><subject>Department of Transportation</subject><subject>DOT</subject><subject>environmental tobacco smoke</subject><subject>ETS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Nader, Ralph</subject><subject>NAS</subject><subject>National Academy of Science</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Passengers</subject><subject>Petitions</subject><subject>Pipe smoking</subject><subject>Propaganda</subject><subject>Public concern</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public hearings</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public Relations</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Secondhand smoke</subject><subject>SHS</subject><subject>Smokers’ Rights Alliance</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Prevention</subject><subject>SRA</subject><subject>TAN</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Action Network</subject><subject>tobacco control</subject><subject>Tobacco Industry</subject><subject>Tobacco Institute</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Tobacco smoking</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Vice-President</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUk1v1DAQtRAVXQpXbiBLnDhk8cfYcTggoeWjSKtyKe3Rchxn6-0mbm0Hsf8er9IuIEsz0rynNx9-CL2iZEkpl--zXTJC5JJQCYI-QQsKUlWcU_UULUgjoQIh-Sl6ntKWEMprQZ-hUyqVEkKxBUqXoTXWBuzH7KJLOeEQcb5x-G5qd94e6x8wI3jvTCyEvlS7KeW4xyWY7DbeJZwDnsbOxcGPDhsfd4echnDrxw0-SERvsw9jeoFOerNL7uVDPkM_v365XJ1X6x_fvq8-rasWmMwVKABrQFjKVM1AGNcDaZhyjekcUbZn3LSgelOXJzrJe2NrLrhi0AoFhJ-hj7NuWWVwnXVjGXan76IfTNzrYLz-Hxn9jd6EX5qVk4lGFoG3DwIx3E9lA70NUxzLzJrWiqqGKF4X1pt_2xz1H49cCK9nwjblEI84IzUoQqHg1Yz7lN3vI27irZZ1-TF9cbXSa2AX_Fp-1ueF_27mt8P2bzeiD4bQ2eqDIfRsCP4H0FmmUw</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>Lopipero, Peggy</creator><creator>Bero, Lisa A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</title><author>Lopipero, Peggy ; Bero, Lisa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b426t-4844ca45c1287245aef40928e9ade08cf23ab48fa7a7a5d63fac7353824b58403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Aeronautics</topic><topic>Aerospace Medicine - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Air Line Pilots Association</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Air Transport Association</topic><topic>Air transportation industry</topic><topic>Air travel</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Airlines</topic><topic>ALPA</topic><topic>ATA</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>CAB</topic><topic>Cigar smoking</topic><topic>Cigars</topic><topic>Civil Aeronautics Board</topic><topic>Civil aviation</topic><topic>Commercial aircraft</topic><topic>Department of Transportation</topic><topic>DOT</topic><topic>environmental tobacco smoke</topic><topic>ETS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Nader, Ralph</topic><topic>NAS</topic><topic>National Academy of Science</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Passengers</topic><topic>Petitions</topic><topic>Pipe smoking</topic><topic>Propaganda</topic><topic>Public concern</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public hearings</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public Relations</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Secondhand smoke</topic><topic>SHS</topic><topic>Smokers’ Rights Alliance</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Prevention</topic><topic>SRA</topic><topic>TAN</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Action Network</topic><topic>tobacco control</topic><topic>Tobacco Industry</topic><topic>Tobacco Institute</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Tobacco smoking</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Vice-President</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopipero, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bero, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopipero, Peggy</au><au>Bero, Lisa A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>323-332</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To understand the evolution of 20 years of tobacco industry strategies to undermine federal restrictions of smoking on aircraft in the United States. Design: We searched and analysed internal tobacco industry records, public documents, and other related research. Results: The industry viewed these restrictions as a serious threat to the social acceptability of smoking. Its initial efforts included covert letter-writing campaigns and lobbying of the airline industry, but with the emergence of proposals to ban smoking, the tobacco companies engaged in ever increasing efforts to forestall further restrictions. Tactics to dominate the public record became especially rigorous. The industry launched an aggressive public relations campaign that began with the promotion of industry sponsored petition drives and public opinion surveys. Results from polling research that produced findings contrary to the industry’s position were suppressed. In order to demonstrate smoker outrage against a ban, later efforts included the sponsorship of smokers’ rights and other front groups. Congressional allies and industry consultants sought to discredit the science underlying proposals to ban smoking and individual tobacco companies conducted their own cabin air quality research. Faced with the potential of a ban on all domestic flights, the industry sought to intimidate an air carrier and a prominent policymaker. Despite the intensification of tactics over time, including mobilisation of an army of lobbyists and Congressional allies, the tobacco industry was ultimately defeated. Conclusions: Our longitudinal analysis provides insights into how and when the industry changed its plans and provides public health advocates with potential counterstrategies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>16885582</pmid><doi>10.1136/tc.2006.016451</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 2006-08, Vol.15 (4), p.323-332
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2563596
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Advocacy
Aeronautics
Aerospace Medicine - legislation & jurisprudence
Air Line Pilots Association
Air quality
Air Transport Association
Air transportation industry
Air travel
Aircraft
Airlines
ALPA
ATA
Aviation
Bans
CAB
Cigar smoking
Cigars
Civil Aeronautics Board
Civil aviation
Commercial aircraft
Department of Transportation
DOT
environmental tobacco smoke
ETS
Humans
Libraries
Lobbying
Longitudinal Studies
Nader, Ralph
NAS
National Academy of Science
Outdoor air quality
Passengers
Petitions
Pipe smoking
Propaganda
Public concern
Public Health
Public hearings
Public opinion
Public Relations
Research Paper
Restrictions
Secondhand smoke
SHS
Smokers’ Rights Alliance
Smoking
Smoking Prevention
SRA
TAN
Tobacco
Tobacco Action Network
tobacco control
Tobacco Industry
Tobacco Institute
Tobacco smoke
Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence
Tobacco Smoke Pollution - prevention & control
Tobacco smoking
United States
Ventilation
Vice-President
title Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A11%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tobacco%20interests%20or%20the%20public%20interest:%2020%20years%20of%20industry%20strategies%20to%20undermine%20airline%20smoking%20restrictions&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Lopipero,%20Peggy&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=323-332&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tc.2006.016451&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20748014%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781890837&rft_id=info:pmid/16885582&rft_jstor_id=20748014&rfr_iscdi=true